Gay is genetic

Puriel wrote:

Catman wrote:

Yes you have you fucking liar, and i don't have a criminal record either.

I'm sure others on sky will confirm you did say you had a criminal record and that you could not work with children. why did you say that and now say it was a lie.

Catman wrote:

Puriel wrote:


I'm sure others on sky will confirm you did say you had a criminal record and that you could not work with children. why did you say that and now say it was a lie.

You really are a nasty piece of filth, i don't have any kind of criminal record.

Puriel wrote:i'll stand up for gay rights , but not paedophiles rights , here endeth the lesson.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Puriel wrote:


the topic being that a gene may mean that gays are a sex on their own and should be recognised as such , they will then be just like everyone else. any other point is that Catty is not representative of all gay men.

point being that Catty is a piece of shit , this does not mean all gay men should be treated as such.

You could have left the second part out. Your hatred of Catman isn't interesting.

Puriel wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Puriel wrote:


the topic being that a gene may mean that gays are a sex on their own and should be recognised as such , they will then be just like everyone else. any other point is that Catty is not representative of all gay men.

point being that Catty is a piece of shit , this does not mean all gay men should be treated as such.

You could have left the second part out. Your hatred of Catman isn't interesting.

posted by Catman.

Yea...You always used to love to try to equate homosexuality to paedophelia, didn't you Bloggshit, you piece of shit.



Now you could have said the same of the above post , but you only seem to react to others retaliating against Candyman.

Puriel wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

You could have left the second part out. Your hatred of Catman isn't interesting.

posted by Catman.

Yea...You always used to love to try to equate homosexuality to paedophelia, didn't you Bloggshit, you piece of shit.



Now you could have said the same of the above post , but you only seem to react to others retaliating against Candyman.

victorismyhero wrote:bloggs the oxygen thief
bloggs the walking proof that god DOESN'T exist....

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Puriel wrote:



posted by Catman.

Yea...You always used to love to try to equate homosexuality to paedophelia, didn't you Bloggshit, you piece of shit.



Now you could have said the same of the above post , but you only seem to react to others retaliating against Candyman.

You started all this bullshit. I hate it when people try to pull that -- if you hadn't jumped into this thread with your personal hate of Catman, he'd wouldn't have typed the above.

Eilzel wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:bloggs the oxygen thief
bloggs the walking proof that god DOESN'T exist....

What is truly tragic is how he has disappeared of late only to return when he finds everybody posting in a new forum, having been banned elsewhere and roundly ignored on Flap- must have been a boring few months lurking in the shadows   

victorismyhero wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

What is truly tragic is how he has disappeared of late only to return when he finds everybody posting in a new forum, having been banned elsewhere and roundly ignored on Flap- must have been a boring few months lurking in the shadows   

Well Eil, you know well enough that i will not jump to phils defence when he is getting clobbered for HIS nasty turns, BUT I'll not stand by and let bloggs kind of shit go uncommented on.
bloggs has the intellect of a festering boil on the arse of a syphyllitic moose.

victorismyhero wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

What is truly tragic is how he has disappeared of late only to return when he finds everybody posting in a new forum, having been banned elsewhere and roundly ignored on Flap- must have been a boring few months lurking in the shadows   

Well Eil, you know well enough that i will not jump to phils defence when he is getting clobbered for HIS nasty turns, BUT I'll not stand by and let bloggs kind of shit go uncommented on.
bloggs has the intellect of a festering boil on the arse of a syphyllitic moose.

victorismyhero wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

What is truly tragic is how he has disappeared of late only to return when he finds everybody posting in a new forum, having been banned elsewhere and roundly ignored on Flap- must have been a boring few months lurking in the shadows   

Well Eil, you know well enough that i will not jump to phils defence when he is getting clobbered for HIS nasty turns, BUT I'll not stand by and let bloggs kind of shit go uncommented on.
bloggs has the intellect of a festering boil on the arse of a syphyllitic moose.

Puriel wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:

Well Eil, you know well enough that i will not jump to phils defence when he is getting clobbered for HIS nasty turns, BUT I'll not stand by and let bloggs kind of shit go uncommented on.
bloggs has the intellect of a festering boil on the arse of a syphyllitic moose.

ive never been on Candymans arse.   

victorismyhero wrote:

Puriel wrote:


ive never been on Candymans arse.   

I notice you are not denying you lack of intellectual capacity then...

Puriel wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:


I notice you are not denying you lack of intellectual capacity then...

i certainly wouldn't brag it was on par with yours.  

Code:

Sassy wrote:PURILE PURIEL, kinda goes don't you think?

victorismyhero wrote:what I dont understand is WHY...do people feel they are entitled to an "opinion" (usually negative, those most likely to give an opinion are generally the "haters") on gays???
surely its non of YOUR business?? Even issue like marriage rights are not actually YOUR business (since whether or not gay folk can marry in the same way as a straight couple HAS NO EFFECT ON YOU...it takes nothing away from you). I guess its the "nosey granny syndrome" a sort of "curtain twitching " response....

I often wonder if gays/coloured/otherwise different/disabled/unemployed people dissapeared over night...what would the "haters" on here do...who would they have to hate....doubless we would end up like cambodia...they would likely turn on the educated and the educators, the "geeks" as the like to see them.

I wonder if these folks were the type to bully kids who just wanted to learn, you know the stuff...rip up their home work...call them losers for studying.....these are the people who think it "great to be "fick""

Catman wrote:

Sassy wrote:PURILE PURIEL, kinda goes don't you think?

He always used to have George Michael as his avatar, and his new one is very telling!  

Maine coon lover wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:what I dont understand is WHY...do people feel they are entitled to an "opinion" (usually negative, those most likely to give an opinion are generally the "haters") on gays???
surely its non of YOUR business?? Even issue like marriage rights are not actually YOUR business (since whether or not gay folk can marry in the same way as a straight couple HAS NO EFFECT ON YOU...it takes nothing away from you). I guess its the "nosey granny syndrome" a sort of "curtain twitching " response....

I often wonder if gays/coloured/otherwise different/disabled/unemployed people dissapeared over night...what would the "haters" on here do...who would they have to hate....doubless we would end up like cambodia...they would likely turn on the educated and the educators, the "geeks" as the like to see them.

I wonder if these folks were the type to bully kids who just wanted to learn, you know the stuff...rip up their home work...call them losers for studying.....these are the people who think it "great to be "fick""

why are people who have no faith in God always attacking those who do and deliberatley trying to disprove the existence of God ?

Puriel wrote:

faeces goes down the toilet , it is not meant to be prodded with a penis .

heavenly father wrote:

Joy Division wrote:

It's just experiment Favva, and some are getting hysterical over it.  

that's very true, i suppose the good thing if it were a genetic thing it can be mended...that's promising..

heavenly father wrote:

eddie wrote:
I know I'll sound like a muppet, but I don't put a lot of store by "scientist findings"

Next month they'll be saying that if mums ate flora margarine in their 7th month of pregnancy then they're sons will have blonde hair and dance like Beyoncé.

that's science for you, the answer could change on a daily basis, how can that be fact..

PhilDidge wrote:

Puriel wrote:

faeces goes down the toilet , it is not meant to be prodded with a penis .

Is the mouth meant to have a penis in it, or a tongue up a vagina?

How about tongues in each others mouth?

heavenly father wrote:

eddie wrote:

Yep I agree.

I also dislike all these bloody injections they keep insisting our children have! They're saying two year olds need flu injections!!!! WTF!!!!

in the height of the swine flu they were prepared to use untested injections, how on earth did that get passed as a good idea..

heavenly father wrote:

eddie wrote:

Well my little girl isn't having it. No way.
Trouble is, they target mums and play in their love and guilt....mums feel bad if they don't do the bets by their kids so they believe the GP's.
I won't be fooled.

at their ages they should fight anything off any way, injections for kids that young just seems wrong.

heavenly father wrote:

Shady wrote:
Good afternoon Folks.

I'm wracking my brains trying to think where I read an article about human evolution which explains in detail how homosexuals are a breakaway mutant species of the homonids.

AHOY THERE HEAVENLY FATHER....Now then HF,I know that you believe in the creation theory & I respect your beliefs but this theory as described above may explain a few things.

Because the use of the word 'mutant'indicates a fuck up in the evolution process.

What do you think?

its an interesting idea but how would homosexuals keep going if they were their own branch of a species as they cannot breed..

the idea of them being a mutation is weird and could explain somethings, again if the mutation could be removed perhaps they could become normal..

Puriel wrote:
faeces goes down the toilet , it is not meant to be prodded with a penis .

Puriel wrote:
Gays have been saying for some time that it is not a choice , that they are born Gay.

heavenly father wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:
Homosexuality is caused by problems in the homosexual person - everybody knows that.

Extreme ugliness in girls, problems with the opposite sex, women being used and abused by men.

Abusive past, childhood...

Etc etc.

I tend to agree... :D 

Beekeeper wrote:

Puriel wrote:
faeces goes down the toilet , it is not meant to be prodded with a penis .

  

SOME women like anal too, you know Puriel...

Puriel wrote:

eddie wrote:
And the devil doles out ignorance.

are you saying Catman was gifted by both ?

Puriel wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

As fascinating as your personal problem with Catman is, could we try to keep this thread on the very interesting topic it was started about? Or at least talk about what Cass is planning for dinner?

the topic being that a gene may mean that gays are a sex on their own and should be recognised as such , they will then be just like everyone else. any other point is that Catty is not representative of all gay men....

Beekeeper wrote:

Puriel wrote:

are you saying Catman was gifted by both ?

  

EDDIE just called you an ignoramus there,  Oh Putrid_one !

Sassy wrote:

Puriel wrote:

I'm sure others on sky will confirm you did say you had a criminal record and that you could not work with children. why did you say that and now say it was a lie.

He most definitely did not say that, he said he'd had a driving violation I think, but how dare you suggest such a thing.   You really are the mud at the bottom of the pond.   In this weather, you need dredging and disposing of.

Puriel wrote:
i'll stand up for gay rights , but not paedophiles rights....

Beekeeper wrote:

Puriel wrote:
i'll stand up for gay rights , but not paedophiles rights....

  

YOU DO realise that you are the "pervert" that keeps on mixing up those two quite separate topics on here,  don't you Putrid_  ?   Of course you do !

OH, and I see where Eddie insulted you again yesterday ~ you must have conveniently missed that one..

BLIND as well as stupid, aren't you Bogroll !!!      ::drnkpst:: 

Puriel wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

Is the mouth meant to have a penis in it, or a tongue up a vagina?

How about tongues in each others mouth?

..... if humans were flexible enough would you accept that they clean their own arses with their tongues like animals.

Beekeeper wrote:

Puriel wrote:

..... if humans were flexible enough would you accept that they clean their own arses with their tongues like animals.

 

AS YOU most obviously seem to go about your putrid little Troll's life with your head stuck up your own arse most of the time, Bloggsy ~ then why don't you answer your own question for the rest of the forum !