NewsFix
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

+12
Andy
'Wolfie
Tommy Monk
Ben Reilly
Syl
Fred Moletrousers
Vintage
magica
Original Quill
nicko
veya_victaous
eddie
16 posters

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by eddie Sun Jul 08, 2018 4:27 am

First topic message reminder :

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 79e60c10


LONDON — A week before Cheeto-Faced Ferret-Wearing Shit Gibbon’s working visit to Britain, the mayor of London has allowed an additional participant in the city’s welcome reception: a giant orange balloon of the president depicted as a baby in a diaper.

The balloon was approved amid “Stop Trump” protests planned for the visit starting on July 12. Activist groups and trade unions organized an online petition calling on the mayor to allow the effigy to be flown over Parliament. It drew over 10,000 signatories.

Mr. Trump’s visit to Britain was originally scheduled to coincide with the opening of the new United States Embassy in January, but it was abruptly canceled with a message on Twitter from the president saying he did not want to inaugurate the building because the Obama administration had paid too much for it.

British and American officials speculated that the real reason Mr. Trump had pulled out of the trip was because of the risk of large-scale protests.

At the time, the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan — who has had a long-running feud with Mr. Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr. — said the American president “got the message” from Londoners who “love and admire America and Americans” but find his policies and actions “the polar opposite of our city’s values of inclusion, diversity and tolerance.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/06/world/europe/uk-trump-baby-blimp.html

eddie
eddie
King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!

Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 25
Location : England

Back to top Go down


‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:31 pm

Again where is the evidence of rigging the electoral roll?

That is about the influence they played on the election

Did you not read it yourself?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Original Quill Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:32 pm

13 Russian nationals indicted for interfering in US elections
Alex Pappas By Alex Pappas, Judson Berger | Fox News

Special counsel indicts Russian nationals for meddling
13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies have been charged in an elaborate plot to use social media and the internet to damage the American political system; chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge reports from the Justice Department.

A federal grand jury on Friday indicted 13 Russians and three Russian companies for allegedly interfering in the 2016 presidential election, in a case brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller that detailed a sophisticated plot to wage “information warfare” against the U.S.

The Russian nationals are accused of setting a “strategic goal to sow discord in the U.S. political system, including the 2016 presidential election.”

The indictment – the first filed against Russian nationals as part of Mueller’s probe – effectively returns focus to the meddling activities out of Russia in the run-up to the 2016 election, following a string of charges relating to the actions of Trump associates.

Former Department of Justice official Robert Driscoll comments on the indictment of 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies for attempting to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Further, the DOJ made clear that the indictment does not allege that any of the interference changed the outcome of the presidential race.

“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election,” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel probe, said at a Friday press conference.

Cheeto-Faced Ferret-Wearing Shit Gibbon reacted to the indictments by seizing on Rosenstein's comment that the election results were not impacted by the Russians' activity.

"Russia started their anti-US campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for President," Trump tweeted. "The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong - no collusion!"

Russia started their anti-US campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for President. The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong - no collusion!

The 37-page indictment, signed by Mueller, said the actions detailed by prosecutors date back to 2014.

The defendants are accused of spreading derogatory information about Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, denigrating Republican candidates Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio -- and ultimately supporting Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders and then-Republican candidate Donald Trump.

"There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

- Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein

It says the defendants spread derogatory information about various candidates throughout the 2016 campaign and by “early to mid-2016” were supporting Trump’s presidential campaign.

Rosenstein, though, said that after the election, the group worked both to stage rallies in favor of President-elect Trump and in opposition to his election.

Rosenstein on Friday described a sophisticated operation by Russian organization Internet Research Agency. He said the scheme involved setting up hundreds of social media accounts using stolen or fictitious identities to make it appear like the accounts were controlled by individuals in the U.S. He said the defendants posed as politically active Americans and recruited “real Americans” to stage rallies and engage in political activities.

But Rosenstein said those Americans did not know they were communicating with Russians.

Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein says the defendants posed as politically and socially active Americans to engage in informational warfare during presidential election and the early days of the Trump administration; no allegation in indictment that any American had knowledge of Russian activities.
“We have known that Russians meddled in the election, but these indictments detail the extent of the subterfuge,” House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said. “These Russians engaged in a sinister and systematic attack on our political system. It was a conspiracy to subvert the process, and take aim at democracy itself.”

Democrats on Capitol Hill, though, reacted by continuing to suggest that people associated with Trump or his campaign could have been involved in Russia's meddling.

“It is imperative that the Special Counsel investigation be allowed to continue to follow the facts on the Trump-Russia scandal, unhindered by the White House or Republicans in Congress,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said. “The American people deserve to know the full extent of Russia’s interference in our election and the involvement of Trump officials.”

The president ignored shouted questions from reporters as he departed the White House for Florida on Friday afternoon.

But in a statement released by the White House, Trump said “We cannot allow those seeking to sow confusion, discord, and rancor to be successful."

"It’s time we stop the outlandish partisan attacks, wild and false allegations, and far-fetched theories, which only serve to further the agendas of bad actors, like Russia, and do nothing to protect the principles of our institutions," he said. "We must unite as Americans to protect the integrity of our democracy and our elections.”

James Trusty says there's no indication that the U.S. government will pursue extradition for Russian nationals indicted for attempting to interfere in the presidential election.Video
Former DOJ official: 13 Russian nationals won't face justice
READ THE INDICTMENT OF RUSSIAN NATIONALS

According to the special counsel, the indictment charges the defendants with conspiracy to defraud the United States, three defendants with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud and five defendants with aggravated identity theft.

The three entities charged in the indictment are Internet Research Agency LLC, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering.

The 13 Russians charged are: Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin; Mikhail Ivanovich Bystrov; Mikhail Leonidovich Burchik; Aleksandra Yuryevna Krylova; Anna Vladislavovna Bogacheva; Sergey Pavlovich Polozov; Maria Anatolyrvna Bovda; Robert Sergetevich Bovda; Dzheykhun Nasimi Ogly; Vadim Vladimirovich Podkopaev; Gleb Igorevich Vasilchenko; Irina Viktorovna Kaverzina and Vladimir Venkov.

The indictment says Internet Research Agency registered with the Russian government as a corporate entity in 2013. It employed hundreds of individuals for its online operations and had an annual budget equaling millions of U.S. dollars, the filing said.

Prosecutors accuse the Russians of communicating with a real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots organization. They learned from that person to focus their activities on “purple states like Colorado, Virginia and Florida," the indictment says.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announces indictment of 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies for U.S. election meddling.Video
Russian nationals, entities indicted for election meddling
It also says the group’s employees – referred to as “specialists” – created social media accounts to look like they were operated by Americans. They created group pages on Facebook and Instagram with names like “Secured Borders,” “Blacktivist” (to promote the Black Lives Matter movement), “United Muslims of America,” “Army of Jesus,” “South United” and “Heart of Texas.”

They also created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts, like one named “Tennessee GOP” under the @TEN_GOP handle that attracted more than 100,000 followers.

According to the indictment, the specialists were instructed to post content online that criticized “Hillary and the rest (except Sanders and Trump – we support them)."

It said they used pro-Trump, anti-Clinton hashtags online like “#Trump2016,” “#TrumpTrain,” “#MAGA,” “#IWontProtectHillary,” and “Hillary4Prison.”

It says the defendants, around the latter half of 2016, encouraged minority groups in the United States not to vote in the election or vote for a third party candidate. An Instagram account they controlled called “Woke Blacks” posted a message on Oct. 16, 2016 that read: “We cannot resort to the lesser of two devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

The special counsel’s office also said Friday that an American, Richard Pinedo, 28, of Santa Paula, Calif., pleaded guilty Feb. 12 to identity fraud as part of its investigation. A filing from prosecutors said Pinedo sold bank account numbers over the internet.

Fox News' Jake Gibson contributed to this report.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/13-russian-nationals-indicted-for-interfering-in-us-elections.html

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:33 pm

So more evidence of the same of interference

Where is the evidence, you claim of rigging the electoral roll?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Original Quill Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:35 pm

It's all there. More coming...naming the US part in the conspiracy. They're saving the best for the last.

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:37 pm

Original Quill wrote:It's all there.  More coming...naming the US part in the conspiracy.  They're saving the best for the last.

Is it?

I see nothing about rigging electoral rolls

Still waiting

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Original Quill Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:38 pm

It's there.

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Original Quill Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:42 pm

The New York Times provides their synopsis:

New York Times wrote:12 Russians Charged: Major Highlights of the Indictment and Rod Rosenstein’s Statement

Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, announced indictments against 12 Russians for hacking during the 2016 presidential elections.CreditT.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times
By The New York Times
July 13, 2018

Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, on Friday announced new charges against 12 Russian military intelligence officers accused of hacking the Democratic National Committee, the Clinton presidential campaign and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

[Read our main story on the latest indictments in the Russia investigation. ]

The following are some of the key highlights of the indictment of the Russian agents and what Mr. Rosenstein said at the announcement on Friday.

Key portions of the indictment, annotated.
Analysis by David E. Sanger and Matthew Rosenberg
“4. By in or around April 2016, the conspirators also hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (“D.C.C.C.”) and the Democratic National Committee (“D.N.C.”). The conspirators covertly monitored the computers of dozens of D.C.C.C. and D.N.C. employees, implanted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code (“malware”), and stole emails and other documents from the D.C.C.C. and D.N.C. 5. By in or around April 2016, the conspirators began to plan the release of materials stolen from the Clinton campaign, D.C.C.C. and D.N.C.”

The indictment makes no reference to the previous hack of the D.N.C. by another Russian intelligence agency. That agency appeared to just be spying — it did not publish the committee’s documents, or go into the Clinton campaign itself. Mr. Mueller focused only on efforts to influence the election, not to spy.

“7. The conspirators also used the Guccifer 2.0 persona to release additional stolen documents through a website maintained by an organization (“Organization 1”), that had previously posted documents stolen from U.S. persons, entities and the U.S. government. The conspirators continued their U.S. election-interference operations through in or around November 2016.”

“Organization 1” appears to be WikiLeaks. It is not clear why the indictment does not name the organization. And it does not answer the mystery of whether WikiLeaks got the documents directly or through a cutout — a critical question for those examining whether there was any link to the Trump campaign.

“8. To hide their connections to Russia and the Russian government, the conspirators used false identities and made false statements about their identities. To further avoid detection, the conspirators used a network of computers located across the world, including in the United States, and paid for this infrastructure using cryptocurrency.”

We know that Russian hackers had posed as American citizens, but we did not know until now that they used cryptocurrency to hide their identities. That is a relatively new addition to traditional means of falsifying identities.

“22. The conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton campaign throughout the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a third-party provider and used by Clinton’s personal office. At or around the same time, they also targeted 76 email addresses at the domain for the Clinton campaign.”

The Russia hack was announced by CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm, in mid-June 2016. This suggests that the revelation did not slow the officers from the G.R.U., Russia’s military intelligence agency; they continued their hacking even though they had been exposed. This is consistent with the group’s activities when caught inside the White House computer systems, where it fought an National Security Agency operation to oust them.

“25. On or about April 19, 2016, KOZACHEK, YERSHOV, and their co-conspirators remotely configured an overseas computer to relay communications between X-Agent malware and the AMS panel and then tested X-Agent’s ability to connect to this computer. The conspirators referred to this computer as a ‘middle server.’ The middle server acted as a proxy to obscure the connection between malware at the D.C.C.C. and the conspirators’ AMS panel.”

This level of detail clearly indicates that intelligence agencies were inside Russian computers. That might be the N.S.A. — but it could also be the Dutch or the British, who were monitoring Russian activity and providing information secretly to the United States. It raises questions about why the United States did not act more quickly.

“33. In response to Company 1’s efforts, the conspirators took countermeasures to maintain access to the D.C.C.C. and D.N.C. networks.
a. On or about May 31, 2016, YERMAKOV searched for open-source information about Company 1 and its reporting on X-Agent and X-Tunnel. On or about June 1, 2016, the conspirators attempted to delete traces of their presence on the D.C.C.C. network using the computer program CCleaner.”

Company 1 is CrowdStrike. The countermeasures are similar to the G.R.U.’s action when caught in the White House system. It also shows an effort to cover the group’s tracks.

“35. More than a month before the release of any documents, the conspirators constructed the online persona DCLeaks to release and publicize stolen election-related documents. On or about April 19, 2016, after attempting to register the domain electionleaks.com, the conspirators registered the domain dcleaks.com through a service that anonymized the registrant.”

This says what has long been suspected: that the G.R.U. officers directly created DCLeaks.

“41. On or about June 15, 2016, the conspirators logged into a Moscow-based server used and managed by Unit 74455 and, between 4:19 PM and 4:56 PM Moscow Standard Time, searched for certain words and phrases.”

This was a day after the public revelation of the hack. It shows that the United States or one of its allies eventually got into the Russian servers to gather the evidence, or monitored the traffic from those servers.

“58. Although the conspirators caused transactions to be conducted in a variety of currencies, including U.S. dollars, they principally used Bitcoin when purchasing servers, registering domains and otherwise making payments in furtherance of hacking activity. Many of these payments were 21 processed by companies located in the United States that provided payment processing services to hosting companies, domain registrars and other vendors both international and domestic. The use of Bitcoin allowed the conspirators to avoid direct relationships with traditional financial institutions, allowing them to evade greater scrutiny of their identities and sources of funds.”

The indictment’s details about the Russians’ use of Bitcoin showed how cryptocurrencies — and the anonymity they provide — have become both a tool and a challenge for intelligence agencies in the battles between nation states. The Bitcoin network allows anyone to move millions of dollars across the world without any in-person meetings, and without requiring the approval of any financial institutions. For spies, that means gone are the days of covertly exchanging suitcases full of cash.

“The conspirators funded the purchase of computer infrastructure for their hacking activity in part by “mining” Bitcoin. Individuals and entities can mine Bitcoin by allowing their computing power to be used to verify and record payments on the Bitcoin public ledger, a service for which they are rewarded with freshly minted Bitcoin. The pool of Bitcoin generated from the G.R.U.’s mining activity was used, for example, to pay a Romanian company to register the domain dcleaks.com through a payment processing company located in the United States.”

Spies need to get their money somewhere, and Russia’s intelligence services are not nearly as well bankrolled as their American counterparts. So, in 2016, the Russians came up with a new way to secure money — they created it by mining their own Bitcoins.

ADVERTISEMENT


[Read the full indictment, here.]
Excerpts: Mr. Rosenstein’s Announcement
Video

DONALD TRUMP By The Associated Press 1:46
Justice Dept. Announces Charges In Russian Hacking Case
Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein announced indictments against 12 Russian military officers who are accused of conspiring to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.Published OnJuly 13, 2018CreditImage by T.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times
Laying out the charges.
“Today a grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment presented by the special counsel’s office. The indictment charges 12 Russian military officers by name for conspiring to interfere with the 2016 presidential election. Eleven of the defendants are charged with conspiring to hack into computers, steal documents and release those documents with the intent to interfere in the election.

One of those defendants, and a 12th Russian military officer, are charged with conspiring to infiltrate computers of organizations involved in administering the elections, including state boards of election, secretaries of state, and companies that supply software used to administer elections.”

On the hackers’ strategy.
“According to the allegations in the indictment, the defendants worked for two units of the main intelligence directorate of the Russian general staff known as the G.R.U. The units engaged in active cyber operations to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

EDITORS’ PICKS

You Can’t Hurt Lindsay Lohan Now

The Artist Is Not Present

China Got a 99-Year Lease for a Port Near India. Here’s How, and Why.
ADVERTISEMENT


There was one unit that engaged in active cyber operations by stealing information, and a different unit that was responsible for disseminating the stolen information. The defendants used two techniques to steal information. First, they used a scheme known as spearfishing which involves sending misleading email messages and tricking the users into disclosing their passwords and security information.

Secondly, the defendants hacked into computer networks and installed malicious software that allowed them to spy on users and capture keystrokes, take screenshots, and exfiltrate or remove data from those computers.”

The Russians used cryptocurrencies to conceal their efforts.
“In addition to releasing documents directly to the public, the defendants transferred stolen documents to another organization that is not identified by name in the indictment and they used that organization as a pass-through to release the documents. They discussed the timing of the release in an attempt to enhance the impact on the election. In an effort to conceal their connections to Russia, the defendants used a network of computers around the world and they paid for it using cryptocurrencies.”

No Americans were charged in the indictment.
“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result. The special counsel’s investigation is ongoing and there will be no comments on the special counsel at this time.”

Rosenstein subtly jabbed Congress weeks after testifying on Capitol Hill.
“We do not try cases on television or in congressional hearings. Most anonymous leaks are not from the government officials who are actually conducting these investigations. We follow the rule of law, which means that we follow procedures. And we reserve judgment. We complete our investigations and we evaluate all of the relevant evidence before we reach any conclusion.”

Rosenstein stressed focusing on holding criminals accountable, not partisan bickering.
“A partisan warfare fueled by modern technology does not fairly reflect the grace, dignity, and unity of the American people. The blame for election interference belongs to the criminals who committed election interference. We need to work together to hold the perpetrators accountable. And we need to keep moving forward to preserve our values, protect against future interference, and defend America.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/us/politics/mueller-russian-indictment-transcript.html

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:46 pm

So still no evidence of rigging, just similar articles of the same thing

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Original Quill Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:50 pm

I'll give you time to read and digest.

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:51 pm

Original Quill wrote:I'll give you time to read and digest.

How about you show me the evidence of electoral roll rigging?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:52 pm

I mean even in your own link

"There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result. The special counsel’s investigation is ongoing and there will be no comments on the special counsel at this time.”

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Tommy Monk Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:47 pm

"...There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election,” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel probe, said at a Friday press conference..."


From Quills earlier post...




lol!


Tommy Monk
Tommy Monk
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 26319
Join date : 2014-02-12

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Original Quill Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:57 am

Tommy Monk wrote:"...There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election,” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel probe, said at a Friday press conference..."

From Quills earlier post...

lol!

I'm glad you brought that up, tommy. The operative phrasing is no American in "the indictment"... meaning this particular indictment. As you've seen, there are multiple Indictments, with no about 32 defendants, and 4 convictions. There's lots of pickin's on the table, and more to come.

Note that this Indictment alleges "conspiracy." Hmmm... In order to show conspiracy, one must show two sides to an agreement. The Russian army officers didn't sit in Moscow and conspire with themselves--the crime isn't masturbation. This leaves us waiting for the other shoe to drop...who is to be named in the next Indictment? Who rounds out the conspiracy?

To say there are two sides, and mention only one, is to say there is another Indictment coming.

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Guest Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:26 am

Its very clear in the article, there was no rigging of the elections

Just infuence

Sop let me know when you have some evidence to your claims

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes - Page 4 Empty Re: ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon for President’s Trip to U.K.? London Mayor Says Yes

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum