Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat

by Guest Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:20 am

[*]The DNC sued Donald Trump's campaign, WikiLeaks, a host of campaign aides, and the Russian government and its intelligence services on Friday
[*]Democrats argue that a vast and sinister conspiracy to take down Hillary Clinton was behind the 2016 election result
[*]Trump has now announced that he plans to counter-sue 'for the DNC Server that they refused to give to the FBI, the Wendy Wasserman Schultz Servers and Documents held by the Pakistani mystery man and Clinton Emails'
[*]Contours of the lawsuit resemble a mafia 'RICO' conspiracy case
[*]DNC's central claim: 'Russian government notified the Trump campaign in advance' that it had stolen DNC emails and planned to weaponize them
[*]Trump campaign fires back and says the DNC is nearly insolvent and is suing for publicity to raise money
[*]Campaign threatens to use legal discovery process to dig into the Democratic Party's vulnerabilities

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5639369/Democratic-Party-SUES-Trump-campaign-WikiLeaks-Russia-election-interference.html#ixzz5DGmK5W30
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

by Original Quill Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:04 am

If Trump counter-sues, then his motion to dismiss is useless. He will be subject to discovery just the same. That's the one thing he can't let happen.

by Guest Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:08 am

Original Quill wrote:If Trump counter-sues, then his motion to dismiss is useless. He will be subject to discovery just the same. That's the one thing he can't let happen.

On this I agree.

Can you imagine him thus losing such a lawsuit?

It is though going to be hard to prove any complicity with Trump mind

by Original Quill Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:01 pm

Didge wrote:
Original Quill wrote:If Trump counter-sues, then his motion to dismiss is useless. He will be subject to discovery just the same. That's the one thing he can't let happen.

On this I agree.

Can you imagine him thus losing such a lawsuit?

It is though going to be hard to prove any complicity with Trump mind

Trump has no counter-suit because he has had no injury. He won the election despite, even, the fact that he lost the popular vote by 3-million votes. It's a vacuous, mirror-image argument, put forth for political reasons.

The DNC lawsuit is not aimed to win. It is filed to keep alive the issue(s) in the event that Special Prosecutor Mueller is fired. Not that the DNC won't win--indeed, the DNC won the same case in the Watergate era--but that winning a mere monetary award is inconsequential. The victory is in keeping the public informed. Discovery serves that purpose in case Trump manages to shut down the special prosecutor investigation.

by Sponsored content

Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat

Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat

Re: Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat

Re: Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat

Re: Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat

Re: Trump vows to counter-sue the Democrats after the party files a suit against his campaign, Wikileaks and Russia - but he gets Debbie Wasserman Schulz's name wrong while issuing threat