Is Meghan Markle the most beautiful royal ever?

First topic message reminder :

She is lovely ,imo more beautiful than Kate, who is attractive rather than beautiful, and probably her facial features are more aligned than Princess Diana's.....but is she the most beautiful Royal ever?


"Meghan Markle is more beautiful than Kate Middleton, according to a scientific study of Britain's A-list princesses.
A mathematical method once used by ancient Greeks reveals the 36-year old American has a face even more perfect than Kate’s, and any other British royal of her generation.
Prince Harry's fiance was found to be 87.4 per cent accurate to the Golden Ratio of Beauty Phi.
Her eyes, eyebrows, nose, lips, chin, jaw and facial shape were measured and came closest to the Greeks' idea of physical "perfection."



https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/927912/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-new-latest-most-beautiful

magica wrote:

eddie wrote:

magica wrote:I said she was mixed race then went onto say something else. I didn't mean she's not good because of her colour.
I shouldn't have had it in the same sentence.
What I should've done was started a new sentence.
I don't care if she's blue with pink spots

Fair enough then. I always think truly racist people have no qualms about saying they’re racist - they’re usually vocally proud of the fact.

And, that is why Ben, myself and Jules merely said it sounded racist.

Jules knows me years and knows I'm not a racist, her and Syl have been friends many years on forums.

I wrote it wrong Ed and sorry it came out the way it did. Certainly wasn't my intention.

Mags, don’t worry. I’ve said tons of shite on forums. And I always will because I have flaws.
I don’t think you’re racist, for what it’s worth.

eddie wrote:

magica wrote:

Jules knows me years and knows I'm not a racist, her and Syl have been friends many years on forums.

I wrote it wrong Ed and sorry it came out the way it did. Certainly wasn't my intention.

Mags, don’t worry. I’ve said tons of shite on forums. And I always will because I have flaws.
I don’t think you’re racist, for what it’s worth.

This is what i mean when women stick together

Someone says something poor and again, I do not think deliberately and actually subcionsiously, and yet people defend them not based off what they said, but on how they like them.

This proves my point from the very beginning on how poorly some women are

They will over look something poorly said and where if I had said something poor, you Eddie, would have busted my balls, being a man

I rest my case.

Vintage wrote:

gelico wrote:

I don't know how you do it but you have the amazing ability to bore me rigid after just a few posts when  you get on your righteous high horse about something, I just tend to roll my eyes and sort of zone right out

Precisely, its no longer a discussion thread it becomes a pompous lecture, which is why I'm signing off for now, shame it was an interesting thread, until now.

Iagree Vin

I explained myself, not enough for dodge now he's having a go at Syl.

I'm sure he's a racist on the quiet, sticks out to me.

Syl ignore him

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Mags, don’t worry. I’ve said tons of shite on forums. And I always will because I have flaws.
I don’t think you’re racist, for what it’s worth.

This is what i mean when women stick together

Someone says something poor and again, I do not think deliberately or subcionsiously, and yet people defend them not based off what they said, but on how they like them.

This proves my point from the very beginning on how poorly some women are

They will over look something poorly said and where if I had said something poor, you Eddie, would have busted my balls, being a man

I rest my case.

TFFT.

Just to get back to looks again...

Can anyone else see a resemblance between Meghan and Kates sister Pippa?

See now, its the avoid the actual facts and talk between themselves women brigade, to get out of this hole she dug herself

How much more proof do people need?

eddie wrote:

magica wrote:

Jules knows me years and knows I'm not a racist, her and Syl have been friends many years on forums.

I wrote it wrong Ed and sorry it came out the way it did. Certainly wasn't my intention.

Mags, don’t worry. I’ve said tons of shite on forums. And I always will because I have flaws.
I don’t think you’re racist, for what it’s worth.

Thanks ed, the only one banging on about it is Didge. Makes me wonder tbh.

Syl wrote:Just to get back to looks again...

Can anyone else see a resemblance between Meghan and Kates sister Pippa?

Yes - I've said that before.

magica wrote:

Vintage wrote:


Precisely, its no longer a discussion thread it becomes a pompous lecture, which is why I'm signing off for now, shame it was an interesting thread, until now.

Iagree Vin

I explained myself, not enough for dodge now he's having a go at Syl.

I'm sure he's a racist on the quiet, sticks out to me.

Syl ignore him

I am giving you the option to explain yourself Magica

I do not think you are actually racist, but subconciously racist

As why else claim she cannot be a Royal through marriage, based on your claim of mixed race?

I am asking you to explain that, when the Royal family is mixed ethnically

Long dark hair seems to be the in-thing with the "royals" these days.

Syl wrote:Just to get back to looks again...

Can anyone else see a resemblance between Meghan and Kates sister Pippa?

Yes I always have Syl.

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Mags, don’t worry. I’ve said tons of shite on forums. And I always will because I have flaws.
I don’t think you’re racist, for what it’s worth.

"This is what i mean when women stick together"

Someone says something poor and again, I do not think deliberately and actually subcionsiously, and yet people defend them not based off what they said, but on how they like them.

This proves my point from the very beginning on how poorly some women are

They will over look something poorly said and where if I had said something poor, you Eddie, would have busted my balls, being a man

I rest my case.

Make your mind up, we were all back stabbing bitches 5 minutes ago.

Off for the night...take care. x

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

magica wrote:

Jules knows me years and knows I'm not a racist, her and Syl have been friends many years on forums.

I wrote it wrong Ed and sorry it came out the way it did. Certainly wasn't my intention.

Mags, don’t worry. I’ve said tons of shite on forums. And I always will because I have flaws.
I don’t think you’re racist, for what it’s worth.

This is what i mean when women stick together

Someone says something poor and again, I do not think deliberately and actually subcionsiously, and yet people defend them not based off what they said, but on how they like them.

This proves my point from the very beginning on how poorly some women are

They will over look something poorly said and where if I had said something poor, you Eddie, would have busted my balls, being a man

I rest my case.

Didge I am really not like that. I wouldve thought you’d know that already.
For the record I’d not let’s anyone call,you racist either, because I don’t think you are.

I don’t stick to anyone if I think they’re wrong. I’m going by mags’ past history and I don’t see her as being racist.

Syl wrote:

Didge wrote:


"This is what i mean when women stick together"

Someone says something poor and again, I do not think deliberately and actually subcionsiously, and yet people defend them not based off what they said, but on how they like them.

This proves my point from the very beginning on how poorly some women are

They will over look something poorly said and where if I had said something poor, you Eddie, would have busted my balls, being a man

I rest my case.

Make your mind up, we were all back stabbing bitches 5 minutes ago.

Off for the night...take care. x

As seen they still are, look how they look to each other when they cannot take on views they do not like

Its all women defending each other and the same women that slag off other women on an article thread they do not like

The thought Police and now, when I do this to them, look how very defensive they get

Point proven and again shows how shallow they are



Have a good evening Syl

x

Didge wrote:

magica wrote:

Iagree Vin

I explained myself, not enough for dodge now he's having a go at Syl.

I'm sure he's a racist on the quiet, sticks out to me.

Syl ignore him

I am giving you the option to explain yourself Magica

I do not think you are actually racist, but subconciously racist

As why else claim she cannot be a Royal through marriage, based on your claim of mixed race?

I am asking you to explain that, when the Royal family is mixed ethnically

Ok one more time. I said she was mixed race because she is, and those I know love being it. They are the only ones to have tight curly hair too and can be lighter or darker, they are proud as is meghan.

I didn't mean because of this she couldn't be in the royalist, it came out the wrong way and I should've made another sentence. I'm not struck on her but its nothing to do with her skin.

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


This is what i mean when women stick together

Someone says something poor and again, I do not think deliberately and actually subcionsiously, and yet people defend them not based off what they said, but on how they like them.

This proves my point from the very beginning on how poorly some women are

They will over look something poorly said and where if I had said something poor, you Eddie, would have busted my balls, being a man

I rest my case.

Didge I am really not like that. I wouldve thought you’d know that already.
For the record I’d not let’s anyone call,you racist either, because I don’t think you are.

I don’t stick to anyone if I think they’re wrong. I’m going by mags’ past history and I don’t see her as being racist.

Its not about whether you would defend me when someone classed me as racist

You would be very hard pressed to show that I was on things I have said

I would though stand my courner and explain what I had said that would have people perceive me as racist and believe me, I have had posters on here call me racist and a Nazi. Where not once did I see you defend me from this from Veya, Quill ect

That is not even the point, they had no evidence.

We have something poorly said, which is very racial, would you agree?

She stipulated, that mixed race, would nulify her from marrying into the Royal family

Yet the Royal family is mixed ethnically (I mean for goodness sake, they are German ethnically and not English).

Yet Magica has no issue with that

So why stated mixed race as an issue againt her marrying Harry?

Its not for you to answer, but magica

I again do not think she is conciously racist

Let me make that clear

Didge , you can have any view you want but don't put it over with the pompous, arrogant lecturer mode you tend to favour, its not how people DISCUSS things, its boring.

The best bit of this evening is while following the thread, I have been watching a programme on the nazis's building of a super race,it turns out the poster baby picked out by leading Nazis for the Lebensborn scheme was actually Jewish!

I've replied to you,took above your post

magica wrote:

Didge wrote:


I am giving you the option to explain yourself Magica

I do not think you are actually racist, but subconciously racist

As why else claim she cannot be a Royal through marriage, based on your claim of mixed race?

I am asking you to explain that, when the Royal family is mixed ethnically

Ok one more time. I said she was mixed race because she is, and those I know love being it. They are the only ones to have tight curly hair too and can be lighter or darker, they are proud as is meghan.

I didn't mean because of this she couldn't be in the royalist, it came out the wrong way and I should've made another sentence. I'm not struck on her but its nothing to do with her skin.

She is not mixed race.

She is mixed ethnically

There is only one race biologically Magica

The human race

The Royal family is mixed ethnically

So you are claiming because she loves being something taught wrong, said labels, when you use said labels. Are you thus both not wrong?

Have you accused her on using labels, when you have used those said labels, as an excuse to deny her?

So explain to me, why you stated, she can not be a Royal (a concept) because she is mixed race (another concept and label).?

Vintage wrote:Didge , you can have any view you want but don't put it over with the pompous, arrogant lecturer mode you tend to favour, its not how people DISCUSS things, its boring.

The best bit of this evening is while following the thread, I have been watching a programme on the nazis's building of a super race,it turns out the poster baby picked out by leading Nazis for the Lebensborn scheme was actually Jewish!

So again the thought police

How about actually taking on my points Vintage?

I mean if its so boring, how is it, that my views, have generated more debate on one thread, that all other threads the whole day

Stop giving me bollocks and excuses, as you are talking utter crap and being utterly pathetic, when i do respect you.

I dont care if you think I am boring, if you do, then why then reply to me in debates?

It says to me, you are drawn to them

Go figure

Didge wrote:

magica wrote:

Ok one more time. I said she was mixed race because she is, and those I know love being it. They are the only ones to have tight curly hair too and can be lighter or darker, they are proud as is meghan.

I didn't mean because of this she couldn't be in the royalist, it came out the wrong way and I should've made another sentence. I'm not struck on her but its nothing to do with her skin.

She is not mixed race.

She is mixed ethnically

There is only one race biologically Magica

The Royal family is mixed ethnically

So you are claiming because she loves being something taught wrong, said labels, when you use said labels. Are you thus both not wrong?

Have you excused her on using labels, when you have used those said labels, as an excuse to deny her?

So explain to me, why you stated, she can not be a Royal (a concept) because she is mixed race (another concept and label).?

I never said she can't be a royal because shes mixed race, I've explained it, that it was in the sentence but shouldnt have been. It should've been separate sentence.

I don't make the labels, and tbh I'm not explaining myself over and over again

magica wrote:

Didge wrote:


She is not mixed race.

She is mixed ethnically

There is only one race biologically Magica

The Royal family is mixed ethnically

So you are claiming because she loves being something taught wrong, said labels, when you use said labels. Are you thus both not wrong?

Have you excused her on using labels, when you have used those said labels, as an excuse to deny her?

So explain to me, why you stated, she can not be a Royal (a concept) because she is mixed race (another concept and label).?

I never said she can't be a royal because shes mixed race, I've explained it, that it was in the sentence but shouldnt have been. It should've been separate sentence.

I don't make the labels, and tbh I'm not explaining myself over and over again

This is what you said Magica

magica wrote:

I don't think she's right for royally she's of mixed race, ex actor, divorced lady who is now going to have the world on a plate.

That is saying she is not right, at the very least to be a Royal is it not?

I mean the whole 3 views you made were based on what exactly to deny a man and woman in love marrying?

Can you imagine, hypothetically of course. You being denied, just like many women are today around the world. Being married to the man they love? Based on such superficial reasons? Where most of them are forced to marry men they do not love?

Do you now see why I see and show your views in contempt?

As they are nothing more in a long line of pathetic reasons that have attempted to deny people marrying when they are in love.

I grew up with this bullshit, when my my second eldest bro Pete married a Prodestant, when my family was Catholic. How my Mum was against this, trying to deny love and gave as many bullshit reasons as you have given now.

I dont think you are racist, but you made a good job, of being like one here. When you used the same poor reasoning as my mom. As both were based on beliefs. Now a daughter of that union, who is 26 has leukemia and under going chemo.

Let people in love, be in love

Didge sometimes people just phrase things clumsily. I’ve done it, you’ve done it.

eddie wrote:Didge sometimes people just phrase things clumsily. I’ve done it, you’ve done it.

Then why make poor excuses?

When i got angry at you and wrongly lashed out at you and attacked your relationship, what happened?

I was rightly punished.

I was out of order.

You know I did not mean it, but Ben was right to act

I am not asking the same here, but how can you attack one wrong and defend another?

It makes you a hypocrite Eddie, just like me,.

We are all human, but at least I always say when i am in the wrong

All i am saying is allow people to be in love

To attack that, shows utter envy

Okay well we are all human and she’s already said what she meant and admitted she worded it poorly.
Not much more to be said.

Thanx Ed, my bad and I've apologised, I really didn't mean how I said it.

eddie wrote:Okay well we are all human and she’s already said what she meant and admitted she worded it poorly.
Not much more to be said.

How is there not more to be said?

I would think, that would be a point to start to why people have views, whether negativelly or postive, would you not?

Why do people try to shut down debate, when its not to their liking? By saying not much more to be said?

Didge wrote:

magica wrote:

Didge wrote:


I am giving you the option to explain yourself Magica

I do not think you are actually racist, but subconciously racist

As why else claim she cannot be a Royal through marriage, based on your claim of mixed race?

I am asking you to explain that, when the Royal family is mixed ethnically

Ok one more time. I said she was mixed race because she is, and those I know love being it. They are the only ones to have tight curly hair too and can be lighter or darker, they are proud as is meghan.

I didn't mean because of this she couldn't be in the royalist, it came out the wrong way and I should've made another sentence. I'm not struck on her but its nothing to do with her skin.

She is not mixed race.

She is mixed ethnically

There is only one race biologically Magica

The human race

The Royal family is mixed ethnically

So you are claiming because she loves being something taught wrong, said labels, when you use said labels. Are you thus both not wrong?

Have you accused her on using labels, when you have used those said labels, as an excuse to deny her?

So explain to me, why you stated, she can not be a Royal (a concept) because she is mixed race (another concept and label).?

Just let it go, man! You're just kicking her while she's down, when you should just accept that she didn't word it the way she meant it. Christ!

Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:


She is not mixed race.

She is mixed ethnically

There is only one race biologically Magica

The human race

The Royal family is mixed ethnically

So you are claiming because she loves being something taught wrong, said labels, when you use said labels. Are you thus both not wrong?

Have you accused her on using labels, when you have used those said labels, as an excuse to deny her?

So explain to me, why you stated, she can not be a Royal (a concept) because she is mixed race (another concept and label).?

Just let it go, man! You're just kicking her while she's down, when you should just accept that she didn't word it the way she meant it. Christ!

Wow

Do you know we are actually in private PM on this?

No

How about you are jumping in after doing as i once did, now retracting on your claim?

That makes you loook to me, like someone controlled

Buck, buck

There was no problem here and you allowed Eddie to control you

That'd Didge I'm afraid, single minded if nothing else. Dog and bone come to mind.

You know what, that would have really pissed me off but it's just you, Didge, it's how you are, so I will let it go.

Vintage wrote:That'd Didge I'm afraid, single minded if nothing else. Dog and bone come to mind.

No problem

I accept your surrender, when no battle was offered.

Happy that instead of the bullshit, you actually take on my points

Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:You know what, that would have really pissed me off but it's just you, Didge, it's how you are, so I will let it go.

Oh I am so honoured

How about, you actually take on my points and stop being a suck up?

Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:You know what, that would have really pissed me off but it's just you, Didge, it's how you are, so I will let it go.

But you know it’s true...we do have to swap genders and pass the control stick on occasion because that’s the kind of ting that’s 18 Biz. And don’t forget we often need to untie ourselves and unplug the love drug.

Would you like the control stick back?

eddie wrote:

Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:You know what, that would have really pissed me off but it's just you, Didge, it's how you are, so I will let it go.

But you know it’s true...we do have to swap genders and pass the control stick on occasion because that’s the kind of ting that’s 18 Biz. And don’t forget we often need to untie ourselves and unplug the love drug.

Would you like the control stick back?

Its how i am here right?

Eddie

What did I say, that was so wrong?

Well what can i say for people being sheep

Ben originally viewed something was racist

Then bowed out, I wonder why

I questioned this and now am threatened by Ben on what he also made a claim also

WTF

Even though I am simple questioning views

Even more so when Magica and I are cool

So again what did I do wrong Ben?

I have asked you twice now or is this what Eddie thinks?

So what interests me here is that Ben is fine with women bitching about women and their looks, but me challenging someone on their views is to him worse.

What a world we now live in with today

What is the point of a debate forum it seems

What I know is this

On this forum, its not really about what someone says, but who actually says it in how or why people will condemn something

To me, it infinately shows how many people are fake today.

Just to say and back Didge here, we sorted this out last night via pm. We're both good now.

I don't think I would have bothered Mags.

Lol Rags, I'm glad were sorted though.

magica wrote:Lol Rags, I'm glad were sorted though.

Why does it matter to you what Didge thinks you meant?

It mattered because well, it did and I wrote it all wrong. Anyway there's an end to it now.

Btw I looked up that Lady Windsor, what a very attractive girl she is.

There are a number of 'lesser' royals who are considered very attractive, there is at least one daughter of a duke who is a model plus a few Lady/Honourables as well.
Having your hair and make up done and having help with what you wear can make a difference of course, even I might pass muster with a bit of help!

Aww bet you would Vin. Yes having beauty, hairdresser, clothes on tap, would probably make us all look like lovely.

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:You know what, that would have really pissed me off but it's just you, Didge, it's how you are, so I will let it go.

But you know it’s true...we do have to swap genders and pass the control stick on occasion because that’s the kind of ting that’s 18 Biz. And don’t forget we often need to untie ourselves and unplug the love drug.

Would you like the control stick back?

Its how i am here right?

Eddie

What did I say, that was so wrong?

Dude, you're such a drama queen.

Amazing how such an innocent thread could cause so much drama.

Didge wrote:I thought men were supposed to be fixated on looks????

Seems to me more so, that women are....

Why is that?

Envy?

Jealousy?

When the views are negative?

Serious questions and find this more interesting, than the actual bitching posted about these Royal or potential Royal women.

Do any of those who posted negative views consider how they would view people looking at them the same way. Based on their husbands/partners choices to be with them?

How would they view anyone speaking this way of their own union with their partners?

Actually, the point being missed, is why many women seem to constantly bitch about other women and their looks all the time.

@Ben, Drama Queen?

This from a snowflake

lol

Not sure I get the points didge... Can you reiterate them all for me again please...?

Tommy Monk wrote:


Not sure I get the points didge... Can you reiterate them all for me again please...?

Sure, go back to page 2 and read through

Ok... I'm sure it will be riveting stuff... can't wait...