Jennifer Lawrence is trying to open up closed, rigid, old fashioned minds, about FEMINISM

First topic message reminder :

This stunning lady is a self proclaimed feminist. So she was given a lot of stick for showing 'too much flesh' recently.


WTF????     Do people still have the outdated idea that as a feminist she must not attempt to look feminine in any way? Should she have turned up in a nasty grey boiler suit, with cropped hair?


It's cringeworthy the way some misguided women treat the term as a dirty word and explain  "I am not a feminist" in their debates, like it's beneath them... I mean, God forbid, shock, horror,  that anyone should think they are feminists.  




----------------------------------------------------------

Some old fashioned myths about feminism:-
They are all political activists
They are all placard waving militants
They go on demonstrations.
They are lesbians
I (jules) am a feminist and none of the above applies to me.    Feminism is a state of mind where you believe in parity  and equality between men & women, that's all. It's just a philosophy your head. Hence why some male politicians proudly call themselves feminists.  

Syl wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:If a women dresses in a "sexy" manner in public, is she  trying to attract a man then? There must surely be better ways of meeting a nice guy.

No doubt some women dress to attract men, whether they go for sexy or subtle, but not all.
Did you?
I have always dressed to please myself no one else.

Yes women do dress for themselves but I also think most women, young ones in particular, also get a kick out of being attractive to the opposite sex, that's an inherent need and part of the mating game. You'll never change that. Some women don't have to try hard and some do. Should either be criticised? I don't think so.

Syl wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:Same girl, different look, which is showing her true inner sexiness?

Sexiness, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
Some men thought Margaret Thatcher oozed sexuality, many men love the obvious Barbie doll look of huge boobs (even false ones) and a kilo of blonde hair extensions.

Exactly my point. Does it matter? Nearly everyone can be sexy to someone.

eddie wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Syl wrote:

If you are answering Veya best not quote me then.....you were nasty for no reason.

You leapt into the interlocutor role as veya turned in.

Syl wrote:I gave Wetwipe ONE red.....and told him about it.

You always have something hostile to say to Wolf.  I am only suggesting that you assumed the same attitude with me, as I responded to your post...and that's where the hostility came in.  You asked; that's my answer.

....................
.....................

Sly has always been a nasty, nasty old harridan on this site...

Not just her inbred sexism and racism,  but her constant "defending the indefensible" in relation to her good chum, the well known racist, white supremacist and xenophobic neo-nazi mini-minor Stormee, and other trolling InaFlop rejects..

Not to mention those regular attacks against "immigrants", refugees, "Asian" gangs, the unemployed, the disabled and single mothers from her clucky little hens circle, blaming those scary blacks, asians and welfare recipoents for ev3rything that goes awry in her nasty little world.

As for those stupid and dishonest personal insults that regularly eminate from the likes of Sly and her mad mates on here,  it certainly puts the lie to their claims of being nice and "honest" ladies, being unfairly put upon by we wicked foreigners..

As long as they keep on spouting their lying bullshit against me on here, I will keep on returning it threefold --  except that I never have to lie about those disgusting old crones in turn, as they provide me with more ammo every time they abuse me...

FIND THE POSTS
FIND THEM.

IF YOU DON’T OR CANT I’LL BE ASKING THE OTHER ADMIN THEIR ADVICE ON YOUR CONTINUAL SPREAD OF LIES AGAINST ANOTHER POSTER


ILL BE BACK

So it’s not going to be missed.

eddie wrote:

Maddog wrote:

It's sorta why I have gone into troll/clown mode.  I refuse to take people who constantly insult me, seriously.  

I know that.

Those vile comments to Syl were just unnecessary. All that 'vile old hag' stuff he keeps churning out. If Wetwipe is a youngster then what the fuck kind of life has he that he sits on a forum all week insulting older women? Perhaps he's still on the tit and is a bit bitter about it.

eddie wrote:I’m incredibly fucking weary. I’ve had the same done to me by a few posters past and present.

It’s time to stop the bullshit and lies and if I don’t get the backing of anyone else I’ll do it a-fucking-lone.

So glad you've spoken out over this, Wolfe calls Syl bloody despicable names, as I said there was no need for it. It's bloody nasty and spiteful.

eddie wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:


Sly has always been a nasty, nasty old harridan on this site...

Not just her inbred sexism and racism,  but her constant "defending the indefensible" in relation to her good chum, the well known racist, white supremacist and xenophobic neo-nazi mini-minor Stormee, and other trolling InaFlop rejects..

Not to mention those regular attacks against "immigrants", refugees, "Asian" gangs, the unemployed, the disabled and single mothers from her clucky little hens circle, blaming those scary blacks, asians and welfare recipoents for ev3rything that goes awry in her nasty little world.

As for those stupid and dishonest personal insults that regularly eminate from the likes of Sly and her mad mates on here,  it certainly puts the lie to their claims of being nice and "honest" ladies, being unfairly put upon by we wicked foreigners..

As long as they keep on spouting their lying bullshit against me on here, I will keep on returning it threefold --  except that I never have to lie about those disgusting old crones in turn, as they provide me with more ammo every time they abuse me...

FIND THE POSTS
FIND THEM.

IF YOU DON’T OR CANT I’LL BE ASKING THE OTHER ADMIN THEIR ADVICE ON YOUR CONTINUAL SPREAD OF LIES AGAINST ANOTHER POSTER


ILL BE BACK

Nice work eddie and thank you

I read his post with disgust but chose to ignore it. On reflection I should have reported it for the downright lies and abuse it is towards syl. I dont know whether anyone else reported him or whether you just happened to see it by chance but in future if I see something like that I will report it. It's so vindictive and totally untrue

I’m not going to turn this into “bash Wolf” thread when I’m asking him not to bash someone else.

I want him to find these posts. He must know where they are - the claim is that it’s constant - so he’ll lay his hands on at least ten.

Syl wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

So why does a woman want to dress "sexy" to please herself? It's because she thinks it attracts men or makes other women envious, right? It's a substitute for conversation or having to actually be an interesting person.

Did you wear mini dresses? I certainly did first time round, they were  great in summer with tanned legs, and freeing.....some considered them sexy, I bet most women wore them because they were fashionable not sexy.
Most women want to look nice, if they think they look nice in a low frock or a short one, thats probably why they wear it.

The oscars and such events are a showcase for clothes as well as talent.....I doubt Jennifer Lawrence would wear that style of dress at most places.....its an attention grabber, and it certainly worked in her favour.

Syl makes a lot of good points so it causes some one like Wolfie to become nervous and spout rubbish - sign of the times and an under developed character, he shouldn't be allowed to do this. if you disagree fine but calling someone names is something else. Personally I don't give a stuff about what he said about my post. Even if someone may be old, maybe rigid in their ideas it doesn't mean they are wrong, they have lived a good few years and experienced a lot of life, I think they may well be the best placed to make a judgement, throughout history elders have advised with experience. These days they are more of a joke, doesn't make them wrong though.   I do realise that some can be intransigent but really wise folk won't stand in the way of progress that is good for the whole. In any case she has as much right to express her opinion as anyone without being called names.

Anyway back to the subject:
Mini skirt - only once some plastic leather skirt mid thigh, revealing skinny rib roll neck sleeveless jumper (can't quite work that out ) persuaded by friends. I have to say I didn't enjoy the attention or many of the lavicious comments so I went back to my usual jeans with bells on literally, crazy multi colour wide leg pants or maxi skirst/dresses. I'm more for the romatic flowing look or purely practical, I don't feel the need to bare flesh.

I loved minis, hot pants, bell bottom jeans, platform soles, all glitzy tops, alternating with midi and maxi skirts. Just because I could

eddie wrote:I’m not going to turn this into “bash Wolf” thread when I’m asking him not to bash someone else.

I want him to find these posts. He must know where they are - the claim is that it’s constant - so he’ll lay his hands on at least ten.

I will answer, because its been brought up again.
I saw the post, and like most of his posts I ignored it.

If he wants to imagine I and other females on here are nasty old harridans...so what?
The lies he spreads are never backed up by any proof.....because lies cant be proved.

His opinion is less than worthless, he is just a troll, and a piss poor one at that.

eddie wrote:I’m not going to turn this into “bash Wolf” thread when I’m asking him not to bash someone else.

I want him to find these posts. He must know where they are - the claim is that it’s constant - so he’ll lay his hands on at least ten.

That's a fair point. You really should back that up, Wolf, and if you're saying that just because she's been on Flap, that's pretty shitty.

I’m logged on, ain’t I? wrote:

eddie wrote:I’m not going to turn this into “bash Wolf” thread when I’m asking him not to bash someone else.

I want him to find these posts. He must know where they are - the claim is that it’s constant - so he’ll lay his hands on at least ten.

That's a fair point. You really should back that up, Wolf, and if you're saying that just because she's been on Flap, that's pretty shitty.

Um...one was in my post, to which ed's post was a rejoinder:

Syl wrote:I gave Wetwipe ONE red.....and told him about it.

So...right under your nose, as they say.

Originally this discussion string began between veya, wolf and me, as quite a friendly discussion of the subject (veya and I are rarely argumentative). Veya and Wolf retired (OZ time being close of the day), and I left a post for veya when he would return. Then, suddenly, Syl is red-stripping all of Wolf's posts and responding for veya. I was trying to return to a calm debate with veya in my response, when all this hell broke out.

We know the Conservative Woman's Caucus of this site likes to gang up on Wolf (as you reference, eds). This whole thing could be avoided if someone didn't peel off and start red-stripping and interjecting nonsensical barbs at him. We DID have a reasonable discussion on-going.

Now, what was it about Jennifer's dress, veya?

You’re not listening are you?

Wolf is making unfounded claims that he can’t back up and that’s not going to be tolerated. He does it all the time and we are all a bit tired of it.

Your reply to Ben was nothing to do with what two admin have asked him to do.

Thank you for your input. Useless though it was.

eddie wrote:You’re not listening are you?

Wolf is making unfounded claims that he can’t back up and that’s not going to be tolerated. He does it all the time and we are all a bit tired of it.

Your reply to Ben was nothing to do with what two admin have asked him to do.

Thank you for your input. Useless though it was.

AND i JUST GAVE YOU THE EVIDENCE YOU ASKED FOR!! Also the context in which the hostility arose.

If the Conservative Woman's Caucus were not out to get Wolf, then normal, calm discussions would be possible. This is just another incident in which this kind of disruption happens.

So Quill excuses Wolf's disgusting  post to Syl, because he was given a red, boo fucking hoo!

Original Quill wrote:

eddie wrote:You’re not listening are you?

Wolf is making unfounded claims that he can’t back up and that’s not going to be tolerated. He does it all the time and we are all a bit tired of it.

Your reply to Ben was nothing to do with what two admin have asked him to do.

Thank you for your input. Useless though it was.

AND i JUST GAVE YOU THE EVIDENCE YOU ASKED FOR!!  Also the context in which the hostility arose.

If the Conservative Woman's Caucus were not out to get Wolf, then normal, calm discussions would be possible.  This is just another incident in which this kind of disruption happens.

Quill, please, do me a favour and read the posts properly.

I am not discussing this with you any further because you’re simply not understanding it whereas every single other poster and admin, does.

I have no idea what you are failing to understand but I’m not wasting my time when the whole point I made, is clear.

eddie wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

AND i JUST GAVE YOU THE EVIDENCE YOU ASKED FOR!!  Also the context in which the hostility arose.

If the Conservative Woman's Caucus were not out to get Wolf, then normal, calm discussions would be possible.  This is just another incident in which this kind of disruption happens.

Quill, please, do me a favour and read the posts properly.

I am not discussing this with you any further because you’re simply not understanding it whereas every single other poster and admin, does.  

I have no idea what you are failing to understand but I’m not wasting my time when the whole point I made, is clear.  

I was in this discussion long before you can along.  I am more familiar than you, with it.

And quit bringing up that old saw about reading-before-posting.  Quite obviously, it's a rhetorical device.

I have fully explained the last 24-hours on this threat to you.  If you want to stop picking on Wolf, then stop taking your cues from the Conservative Woman's Caucus.

Cheap shots at me, are wasted on me, (and rather childish) and you’re obviously saying that to Ben too, are you not, seeing as he saw what happened and thought that wolf was out of order for calling Syl a racist?
Think about that and reply, if you can.


Okay so let’s go real slow......what is it, that I am asking wolf for? In one sentence, then I can walk you through what’s going on.

eddie wrote:Cheap shots at me, are wasted on me, (and rather childish) and you’re obviously saying that to Ben too, are you not, seeing as he saw what happened and thought that wolf was out of order for calling Syl a racist?
Think about that and reply, if you can.


Okay so let’s go real slow......what is it, that I am asking wolf for? In one sentence, then I can walk you through what’s going on.

No, I'm speaking directly to you, and not Ben.  Syl is simply a member of the Conservative Women's Caucus on this site.  The CWC has been at war with Wolf for over a year, now.  If you don't know that, honestly, then open your eyes.

You keep asking for Wolf to identify salvos in that war.  I showed you one shot, and two red-strips, in evidence thereof.  If you are truly looking for evidence, then go back and see the many, many times Wolf is called wetwipe, and other disparaging, meaningless names.

C'mon eds...this has been going on for at least a year. It's not any one salvo--although I gave you a perfectly clear example--but on-going treatment.

FAO Quill:

Here’s a helpful screenshot and a little tip: the part of Wolf’s post that is made in bold, by me, is the part I am responding to. That part that I am responding to, is what we are asking him to provide and the reason he is pissing us off. Do you see? I hope that my explanation, along with a screenshot, will walk you through what’s happening.
Nobody is concerned about red stripes and previous posts before this post, this claim, by the poster Wolf to the poster Syl.

Great. Glad you can now comprehend what’s happening.

I’m logged on, ain’t I? wrote:

eddie wrote:I’m not going to turn this into “bash Wolf” thread when I’m asking him not to bash someone else.

I want him to find these posts. He must know where they are - the claim is that it’s constant - so he’ll lay his hands on at least ten.

That's a fair point. You really should back that up, Wolf, and if you're saying that just because she's been on Flap, that's pretty shitty.

This post above, is made by the admin Ben, quoting the admin eddie, in regards to the poster Wolf.

If you are accusing me of being part of a gang you must therefore be accusing Ben, who agrees with me, as being part of that gang too.
Do you see?


I know he’s LW but don’t feel like you always have to avoid disagreeing with him.
He won’t mind!

Hope that clears that matter up.

In any case, the poster Wolf seems to be avoiding this thread and letting you, Quill,  sort it all out, so if you could pass on the message that continually calling a poster racist wont be tolerated, we’d very much appreciate it.
Because you know, when a poster on here kept saying you wasn’t a lawyer you reported it many times and got quite cross, remember? And rightly so!

So do you see now? I thought you would.

Thanks for your help in passing the message along correctly.

Original Quill wrote:

eddie wrote:You’re not listening are you?

Wolf is making unfounded claims that he can’t back up and that’s not going to be tolerated. He does it all the time and we are all a bit tired of it.

Your reply to Ben was nothing to do with what two admin have asked him to do.

Thank you for your input. Useless though it was.

AND i JUST GAVE YOU THE EVIDENCE YOU ASKED FOR!!  Also the context in which the hostility arose.

If the Conservative Woman's Caucus were not out to get Wolf, then normal, calm discussions would be possible.  This is just another incident in which this kind of disruption happens.

Syl gave Wolfboy a red for this horrible post he made to Vintage.

Really can't help being an obnoxious old conservative fuckwit, can you...

Jealousy really is a curse with some of you anti-feminist snowflakes..

Vintage did nothing to deserve that, but of course you'll disagree.

You're being myopic in this. I don't know, perhaps intentionally. Nobody cares about red-stripes??? Seriously??? You only want to count the evidence that serves you.

What you have in front of you is not a screen-shot. This is a whole year, day after day, week after week, when you want a nice, neat screen-shot package. Now you want to clip and trim whole year of what is going on, to create a screen-shot package.

Now, you're either willing to review all the evidence, or you're not. In either case, its useless to continue to put words into this effort. You're either willing to listen, or you are not.

Original Quill wrote:You're being myopic in this.  I don't know, perhaps intentionally.  Nobody cares about red-stripes???  Seriously???  You only want to count the evidence that serves you.

What you have in front of you is not a screen-shot.  This is a whole year, day after day, week after week, when you want a nice, neat screen-shot package.  Now you want to clip and trim whole year of what is going on, to create a screen-shot package.

Now, you're either willing to review all the evidence, or you're not.  In either case, its useless to continue to put words into this effort.  You're either willing to listen, or you are not.

Please read my above posts that you may have missed due to cross posting.
They’re just above this one.

Thanks.

I think the matter has been resolved now and just so you know, we aren’t blind and we see who starts the abuse.

On and PS! You can get arrested for calling continually calling someone racist but I don’t think red stripes and the word “wetwipe” are quite the same, are they?
Do you see?

Anyway, glad that’s sorted. I’m sure once Wolf is polite to others he will see the same treatment back! Don’t forget, he’s been basemented twice for the same thing - with all admins’ consent.

Original Quill wrote:You're being myopic in this.  I don't know, perhaps intentionally.  Nobody cares about red-stripes???  Seriously???  You only want to count the evidence that serves you.

What you have in front of you is not a screen-shot.  This is a whole year, day after day, week after week, when you want a nice, neat screen-shot package.  Now you want to clip and trim whole year of what is going on, to create a screen-shot package.

Now, you're either willing to review all the evidence, or you're not.  In either case, its useless to continue to put words into this effort.  You're either willing to listen, or you are not.

no comments about your crossness at others questioning your abilities in the legal field?

did you go cry to eddy then?? REPORT REPORT!

awwww!! Bless

eddie wrote:In any case, the poster Wolf seems to be avoiding this thread and letting you, Quill, sort it all out, so if you could pass on the message that continually calling a poster racist wont be tolerated, we’d very much appreciate it.

Wolf and I rarely PM. However, if you wish to retain me to convey a message to any poster, not just Wolf, I will require a $50,000 retainer, to be held in my trust account, and charged against at a rate of $750/hour, plus any expenses.

eddie wrote:

I’m logged on, ain’t I? wrote:

eddie wrote:I’m not going to turn this into “bash Wolf” thread when I’m asking him not to bash someone else.

I want him to find these posts. He must know where they are - the claim is that it’s constant - so he’ll lay his hands on at least ten.

That's a fair point. You really should back that up, Wolf, and if you're saying that just because she's been on Flap, that's pretty shitty.

This post above, is made by the admin Ben, quoting the admin eddie, in regards to the poster Wolf.

If you are accusing me of being part of a gang you must therefore be accusing Ben, who agrees with me, as being part of that gang too.
Do you see?


I know he’s LW but don’t feel like you always have to avoid disagreeing with him.
He won’t mind!

Hope that clears that matter up.

Just in case you missed it, because it holds a very important message.

Original Quill wrote:

I’m logged on, ain’t I? wrote:

That's a fair point. You really should back that up, Wolf, and if you're saying that just because she's been on Flap, that's pretty shitty.

Um...one was in my post, to which ed's post was a rejoinder:

Syl wrote:I gave Wetwipe ONE red.....and told him about it.

So...right under your nose, as they say.

Originally this discussion string began between veya, wolf and me, as quite a friendly discussion of the subject (veya and I are rarely argumentative).  Veya and Wolf retired (OZ time being close of the day), and I left a post for veya when he would return.   Then, suddenly, Syl is red-stripping all of Wolf's posts and responding for veya.  I was trying to return to a calm debate with veya in my response, when all this hell broke out.

We know the Conservative Woman's Caucus of this site likes to gang up on Wolf (as you reference, eds).  This whole thing could be avoided if someone didn't peel off and start red-stripping and interjecting nonsensical barbs at him.  We DID have a reasonable discussion on-going.

Now, what was it about Jennifer's dress, veya?

Quill, the first nasty post in this entire thread was posted by Wolf.
He answered Vintage's civil post with this...

"Really can't help being an obnoxious old conservative fuckwit, can you...

Jealousy really is a curse with some of you anti-feminist snowflakes.."

I gave him ONE red and told him about it.

I then pleasantly answered one of your posts, if you had wanted a private conversation with Veya you should have pm'd ....as it is this is a forum and anyone can add their 2 cents worth on a public thread.
You misunderstood my post, and because your friend had been told off, you were annoyed and  you also started with the insults.



Now Eddie is asking for posts to show, as your  friend accused me of, some of the racist, sexist posts he is always accusing me of posting. Also where I defend white supremacist neo Nazi's, not to mention my regular attacks on immigrants, refugees, Asian gangs, anyone who is scarily black, and the disabled.

He follows this by crying that I and others insult him, then goes on to call us mad, liars, disgusting old crones....and more.

If you don't see the way he continuously verbally abuses and insults quite a few of us on here "right under your nose, as they say"....I suggest you go to Specsavers.

Original Quill wrote:

eddie wrote:In any case, the poster Wolf seems to be avoiding this thread and letting you, Quill, sort it all out, so if you could pass on the message that continually calling a poster racist wont be tolerated, we’d very much appreciate it.

Wolf and I rarely PM.  However, if you wish to retain me to convey a message to any poster, not just Wolf, I will require a $50,000 retainer, to be held in my trust account, and charged against at a rate of $750/hour, plus any expenses.  

Hmmmmm. I think I’ll pass. I’m pretty good at being understood and understandimg others. I shoulda been a lawyer doncha think?

magica wrote:So Veya excuses Wolf's disgusting  post to Syl, because he was given a red, boo fucking hoo!

Quill not Veya Mags.

eddie wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Wolf and I rarely PM.  However, if you wish to retain me to convey a message to any poster, not just Wolf, I will require a $50,000 retainer, to be held in my trust account, and charged against at a rate of $750/hour, plus any expenses.  

Hmmmmm. I think I’ll pass. I’m pretty good at being understood and understandimg others.  I shoulda been a lawyer doncha think?

Highly advisable. You start retaining attorneys to carry messages, it gets expensive. Yet, that's what they do, if you ask.

eddie wrote:In any case, the poster Wolf seems to be avoiding this thread and letting you, Quill,  sort it all out, so if you could pass on the message that continually calling a poster racist wont be tolerated, we’d very much appreciate it.
Because you know, when a poster on here kept saying you wasn’t a lawyer you reported it many times and got quite cross, remember? And rightly so!

So do you see now? I thought you would.  

Thanks for your help in passing the message along correctly.

His avoidance speaks volumes.

I don't think Quill was ever a lawyer, and I find it hilarious that he reported someone saying as much.

BTW, feel free to announce it anytime I report anyone.

I have never reported anyone, I think its a bit whingy expecting a mod to act when most people are very capable of handling dickheads themselves.

I’ve never understood the whole “ignore” button...though admin don’t get that option anyway.

Original Quill wrote:You're being myopic in this.  I don't know, perhaps intentionally.  Nobody cares about red-stripes???  Seriously???  You only want to count the evidence that serves you.

What you have in front of you is not a screen-shot.  This is a whole year, day after day, week after week, when you want a nice, neat screen-shot package.  Now you want to clip and trim whole year of what is going on, to create a screen-shot package.

Now, you're either willing to review all the evidence, or you're not.  In either case, its useless to continue to put words into this effort.  You're either willing to listen, or you are not.

You're a dickwad fucktard.

Syl wrote:

magica wrote:So Veya excuses Wolf's disgusting  post to Syl, because he was given a red, boo fucking hoo!

Quill not Veya Mags.

Yes I've changed the name before I saw your post Syl.

magica wrote:

Syl wrote:

Quill not Veya Mags.

Yes I've changed the name before I saw your post Syl.

You are both fork-tongued, lying xenophobic and lying bitches...

You rancid old crones have been insulting me and others on here with yoir hatemongering and sexist lies for many months now..

You can both go and fuck yourselves, and take Horatio with you.

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

magica wrote:

Syl wrote:

Quill not Veya Mags.

Yes I've changed the name before I saw your post Syl.

You are both fork-tongued, lying xenophobic and lying bitches...

You rancid old crones have been insulting me and others on here with yoir hatemongering and sexist lies for many  months now..

You can both go and fuck yourselves, and take Horatio with you.

Again, where is th proof for this? You started the insults Wolf - in fact, I have NEVER seen anyone, not one poster, insult you FiRST.

Any name you get called - and surely “wetwipe” doesn’t hurt your feelings - is a retaliation against YOU, starting the name-calling.

EVERY SINGLE POSTER on this forum knows it’s you who starts with the name-calling because it has made up a good 90% of your posts.


I’m locking this thread and I am seeking further advice.


Do you understand that you can’t keep calling people racist and making up lies about them?
And do you also understand that your credibitly with pretty much the left and right, has sunk lower than it was because you make these big bold statements and you can’t back them up?

You returned to a thread, after hiding for two days, that everyone is watching, and you flopped on your face, couldn’t own what you said, made uo more hissy fit lies and sneaked away again.


I think it’s safe to say you’re a bit of a joke.

Ben Mothafuckin' Reilly wrote:

Original Quill wrote:You're being myopic in this.  I don't know, perhaps intentionally.  Nobody cares about red-stripes???  Seriously???  You only want to count the evidence that serves you.

What you have in front of you is not a screen-shot.  This is a whole year, day after day, week after week, when you want a nice, neat screen-shot package.  Now you want to clip and trim whole year of what is going on, to create a screen-shot package.

Now, you're either willing to review all the evidence, or you're not.  In either case, its useless to continue to put words into this effort.  You're either willing to listen, or you are not.

You're a dickwad fucktard.

And look, someone gave you a red and had no balls to say why.

Spineless. Proven spineless.

Attention Wolf:
After having spoken to the other admin it has been suggested that if this happens again then a two day ban will follow.  

Attention all:
Posters must refrain from making repeated false accusations against another poster.

Admin


The thread is now unlocked.

Anyway....I like Jennifer Lawrence.

Actors - how can you be sure that they aren't playing a character even when not on stage or filmimg. Do you ever see the real person.

Vintage wrote:Actors - how can you be sure that they aren't playing a character even when not on stage or filmimg. Do you ever see the real person.

Who knows...even on chat shows they are giving a performance, but I suppose many people do that anyway, actor or not.

You're right, when are any of us truly ourselves, I suppose some more than others. If you are comfortable with yourself I suppose its second nature to be yourself. I think to an extent many people try to be whatever someone else expectations of them are, even in everyday situations.

There’s nothing more attractive than someone who is simply being themself.
And laughing, everyone looks good when they laugh...how can they not?

eddie wrote:Attention Wolf:
After having spoken to the other admin it has been suggested that if this happens again then a two day ban will follow.  

Attention all:
Posters must refrain from making repeated false accusations against another poster.

Admin


The thread is now unlocked.

The ad hominem and strawman tend to be a common tactic around here.

Care to expand on that thought?

eddie wrote:Care to expand on that thought?

People attack posters, instead of their position, or they expect them to defend positions they have never taken.

Maybe it's an Aussie thing?