Practical Philosophy and Benjamin Franklin
Page 1 of 1
Practical Philosophy and Benjamin Franklin
Long before he helped to draft the Declaration of Independence, Franklin was a printer, an inventor and a philosopher.
Benjamin Franklin was a practical man. When short of type as a young printer, he spurned the idea of waiting for duplicates from England and manufactured his own. In later life, after noting the musical potential of glass bowls, he invented a new musical instrument in the glass armonica, which found favour with Mozart and Beethoven. All of a piece with this practicality was his Experiments and Observations on Electricity, the work that won him the Copley Medal, the 18th-century equivalent of the Nobel Prize.
However, to describe Franklin as ‘practical’ is not to dismiss an exceptional intellectual capacity, a wide and deep reading and an ability to comprehend the intricate philosophical concepts of others. He used the latter to create US institutions, not least the American Philosophical Society, with the works of Locke and Defoe providing intellectual inspiration.
As to what Franklin himself regarded as his guiding principles, one is well advised to look at his time in London as a young printer and the consequential Plan of Conduct, which he wrote for himself on the voyage back to Philadelphia. When considering it decades later, Franklin declared it ‘the more remarkable, as being form’d when I was so young, and yet being pretty faithfully adhered to quite thro’ to old Age’. It is a plan for a practical life, for the joint benefit of Franklin himself and of a wider public – there being no inherent logical contradiction between the two in the 18th century, so long as an individual possessed both the self-knowledge to understand the need for balance and the discipline to ensure it. Kevin Slack believes that Franklin did just that.
Slack makes clear that there is a major difference between practicality and pragmatism. The former allows people to alter their stated position to accommodate differences with others without compromising fundamental principles. He argues powerfully that Franklin’s principles were forged by 1760. This might seem strange, as in that year he was a loyal British subject who lobbied for a great British empire of North America, whereas by 1776 he was one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Yet one can argue that the foundations of Franklin’s argument remained unchanged, being based on an extraordinarily accurate estimate of America’s growth potential. What did change was Franklin’s view of the necessary political superstructure: it would still be an empire of North America, but no longer British. Slack addresses this, though for the most brilliant exposition one should turn to Carla Mulford’s Benjamin Franklin and the Ends of Empire (2015). Slack is more focused on identifying the one key influence on Franklin’s personal philosophy. This is a well-trodden and rather muddied path, not made any easier by Franklin’s own aphorism: ‘Let all Men know thee, but no man know thee thoroughly.’ Many different ‘philosophical Franklins’ have been proffered and the book is valuable in addressing them. Slack himself goes for the 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury, himself tutored by Locke, but more useful is Slack’s general definition of Franklin’s understanding of Natural Rights in Chapter Eight. There is, though, one surprise here: in his argument he glosses over Franklin’s greatest practical application of philosophy. By suggesting to Thomas Jefferson that the key line in the Declaration of Independence – ‘We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable’ – should be changed to ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident’, Franklin neatly took God out of the equation, substituted Natural Rights and changed the moral basis for political power in the western world.
Benjamin Franklin: Natural Right and the Art of Virtue
Kevin Slack
University of Rochester Press and Boydell and Brewer 328pp £75
George Goodwin is author of Benjamin Franklin in London (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2016).
http://www.historytoday.com/reviews/practical-philosophy-and-benjamin-franklin
Benjamin Franklin was a practical man. When short of type as a young printer, he spurned the idea of waiting for duplicates from England and manufactured his own. In later life, after noting the musical potential of glass bowls, he invented a new musical instrument in the glass armonica, which found favour with Mozart and Beethoven. All of a piece with this practicality was his Experiments and Observations on Electricity, the work that won him the Copley Medal, the 18th-century equivalent of the Nobel Prize.
However, to describe Franklin as ‘practical’ is not to dismiss an exceptional intellectual capacity, a wide and deep reading and an ability to comprehend the intricate philosophical concepts of others. He used the latter to create US institutions, not least the American Philosophical Society, with the works of Locke and Defoe providing intellectual inspiration.
As to what Franklin himself regarded as his guiding principles, one is well advised to look at his time in London as a young printer and the consequential Plan of Conduct, which he wrote for himself on the voyage back to Philadelphia. When considering it decades later, Franklin declared it ‘the more remarkable, as being form’d when I was so young, and yet being pretty faithfully adhered to quite thro’ to old Age’. It is a plan for a practical life, for the joint benefit of Franklin himself and of a wider public – there being no inherent logical contradiction between the two in the 18th century, so long as an individual possessed both the self-knowledge to understand the need for balance and the discipline to ensure it. Kevin Slack believes that Franklin did just that.
Slack makes clear that there is a major difference between practicality and pragmatism. The former allows people to alter their stated position to accommodate differences with others without compromising fundamental principles. He argues powerfully that Franklin’s principles were forged by 1760. This might seem strange, as in that year he was a loyal British subject who lobbied for a great British empire of North America, whereas by 1776 he was one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Yet one can argue that the foundations of Franklin’s argument remained unchanged, being based on an extraordinarily accurate estimate of America’s growth potential. What did change was Franklin’s view of the necessary political superstructure: it would still be an empire of North America, but no longer British. Slack addresses this, though for the most brilliant exposition one should turn to Carla Mulford’s Benjamin Franklin and the Ends of Empire (2015). Slack is more focused on identifying the one key influence on Franklin’s personal philosophy. This is a well-trodden and rather muddied path, not made any easier by Franklin’s own aphorism: ‘Let all Men know thee, but no man know thee thoroughly.’ Many different ‘philosophical Franklins’ have been proffered and the book is valuable in addressing them. Slack himself goes for the 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury, himself tutored by Locke, but more useful is Slack’s general definition of Franklin’s understanding of Natural Rights in Chapter Eight. There is, though, one surprise here: in his argument he glosses over Franklin’s greatest practical application of philosophy. By suggesting to Thomas Jefferson that the key line in the Declaration of Independence – ‘We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable’ – should be changed to ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident’, Franklin neatly took God out of the equation, substituted Natural Rights and changed the moral basis for political power in the western world.
Benjamin Franklin: Natural Right and the Art of Virtue
Kevin Slack
University of Rochester Press and Boydell and Brewer 328pp £75
George Goodwin is author of Benjamin Franklin in London (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2016).
http://www.historytoday.com/reviews/practical-philosophy-and-benjamin-franklin
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» A chilling quote about Tory philosophy
» Russian man arrested under anti-terror law after talking about philosophy of yoga
» Aretha Franklin, 'Queen of Soul', dies aged 76
» An American Translation of Benjamin Netanyahu's own words
» An Open Letter to Rev. Franklin Graham from a “Small Church” Pastor
» Russian man arrested under anti-terror law after talking about philosophy of yoga
» Aretha Franklin, 'Queen of Soul', dies aged 76
» An American Translation of Benjamin Netanyahu's own words
» An Open Letter to Rev. Franklin Graham from a “Small Church” Pastor
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill