PM sacks deputy over porn

Damian Green sacked after 'misleading statements' on porn claims

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-politics-42434802


Good.

Cass wrote:Damian Green sacked after 'misleading statements' on porn claims

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-politics-42434802


Good.

I don't have an issue with him watching porn. Now the harassment of a woman is different.

Maddog wrote:

Cass wrote:Damian Green sacked after 'misleading statements' on porn claims

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-politics-42434802


Good.

I don't have an issue with him watching porn.  Now the harassment of a woman is different.  

I do if it’s on the taxpayers’ time, devices and money. He can watch it at home if he needs too.

And he lied about it.

Cass wrote:

Maddog wrote:

I don't have an issue with him watching porn.  Now the harassment of a woman is different.  

I do if it’s on the taxpayers’ time, devices and money. He can watch it at home if he needs too.

And he lied about it.

Well, there is the whole wasting time and money I guess.

Would anyone care if he was browsing on Amazon a few minutes every day? A few hours, yes.

Maddog wrote:

Cass wrote:

I do if it’s on the taxpayers’ time, devices and money. He can watch it at home if he needs too.

And he lied about it.

Well, there is the whole wasting time and money I guess.

Would anyone care if he was browsing on Amazon a few minutes every day?  A few hours, yes.    

Shouldn’t be doing anything personal. I don’t. Not even on breaks or lunch. All of my computer action and email is open to a FOI request if a patron suddenly decided to stalk me or file a grievance against me or just get it into their head to go after me, so that, combined with it being against our county’s acceptable use policy which we have to sign every year..it’s just following my employment rules and protecting my ass.

Allowing legal porn on his official computer, even though he was a backbencher at the time, was utterly stupid and a lapse of judgement and standards which itself throws into question his suitability for high office. Lying to his party leader and PM, his colleagues, electors, public and media left May with no alternative but to sack him.

But the role and actions of the police must now come under serious scrutiny. For a former very senior Metropolitan police officer to make public, via the social media, highly confidential and privileged information that was made available to him in respect of official inquiries into a matter which did not result is a prosecution or even a police warning could, in itself, be a serious criminal offence rating a prison sentence if proven in a court of law.

Labour will be tempted to exploit this matter to the full, but there is now going to be some serious consideration over whether individual police officers will in future be regarded as "politicians' narks" - passing on information and tip-offs based on official police inquiries and files with the aim of damaging one party by giving political advantage to another.

Gestapo? NKVD? Do you think that it couldn't happen here?

Fred Moletrousers wrote:Allowing legal porn on his official computer, even though he was a backbencher at the time, was utterly stupid and a lapse of judgement and standards which itself throws into question his suitability for high office. Lying to his party leader and PM, his colleagues, electors, public and media  left May with no alternative but to sack him.

But the role and actions of the police must now come under serious scrutiny. For a former very senior Metropolitan police officer to make public, via the social media, highly confidential and privileged information that was made available to him in respect of official inquiries into a matter which did not result is a prosecution or even a police warning could, in itself, be a serious criminal offence rating a prison sentence if proven in a court of law.

Labour will be tempted to exploit this matter to the full, but there is now going to be some serious consideration over whether individual police officers will in future be regarded as "politicians' narks" - passing on information and tip-offs based on official police inquiries and files with the aim of damaging one party  by giving political advantage to another.

Gestapo? NKVD? Do you think that it couldn't happen here?

The cop was probably DISGUSTED that Damian got off so lightly, with not even a warning.  Why should decent officers be forced to keep the dirty little secrets of people in high places? 


I shed no tears for a grubby sleazebag in high office who's got HARD porn on his works PC.  

It's not a political issue - labour has not escaped criticism, they are equally involved in the sleaze scandals and two devastated labour politicians were recently driven to suicide after sexual  accusations.

We have a Labour MP by the name of Keith Vaz, he was caught with Rent boys sniffing Cocain, he is still in office. WHY ?