Trump reverses ban on hunting endangered elephants

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


Not at all, because you have only now said because i exposed you as a racist retard

Thanks though for admitting you were being racist and the mods are afraid to act with you

Not that I want you moderated, its more about the PC of the mods themselves.

Its like they seem to think they will lose if they do moderate you.

Idiots

There isn't anything TO moderate.

If you were a mod, what would you do??

What is it you think the mods should be doing to me, and for what reasons??

Didge wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


Not at all, because you have only now said because i exposed you as a racist retard

Thanks though for admitting you were being racist and the mods are afraid to act with you

Not that I want you moderated, its more about the PC of the mods themselves.

Its like they seem to think they will lose if they do moderate you.

Idiots

There isn't anything TO moderate.

If you were a mod, what would you do??

What is it you think the mods should be doing to me, and for what reasons??

I think they should start being honest

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


I think they should start being honest

Anyone want to tell me what the mod team failed to moderate?
Because none of us got an abuse report.  

Hey ho. New moon in the sky tonight, lots of intense feelings about.

Didge wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

There isn't anything TO moderate.

If you were a mod, what would you do??

What is it you think the mods should be doing to me, and for what reasons??

I think they should start being honest

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


I think they should start being honest

What kind of answer is that??

I asked YOU what YOU would do as a mod

Didge wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

What kind of answer is that??

I asked YOU what YOU would do as a mod

What would I do?

Allow free speech

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


What would I do?

Allow free speech

So what are you fucking whinging for??

Am I to assume that you as a lod would be happy that calling mugabe a black dog is free Speech??

Didge wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

So what are you fucking whinging for??

Am I to assume that you as a lod would be happy that calling mugabe a black dog is free Speech??

You fail to see the point dummy

This is not even about you, but as seen clearly your crave my attention

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


You fail to see the point dummy

This is not even about you, but as seen clearly your crave my attention

Not about me??

So some other smelly-bandit then

Lord Foul wrote:Anotherone that doesnt "get it"

didge...where have I infringed your "freedom of speech". afterall I allow you endless inane ramblings with little if any interference beyond the odd challenge (which is debate isnt it )

What I will NOT allow in excess is unwarranted personal attacks, which seek to disrupt things rather than facilitate debate and which are in fact an admission of failure by the abuser... you complain about receiving abuse..and doubless you do...but its almost invariably retaliatory.
You are a long way away from being the most unpleasant poster we've had on here but you are certainly extremely abrasive at times........

SOME back and forth school playground antics is to be expected....I only stick my beak in if I consider someone is starting to get too excited or is agressive beyond a certain limit, OR i percieve the person is deliberately provoking an OTT response
TBH I'd sooner jump in a bit early and nip a potential situation in the bud than allow it to blossom into the fuckwittery we have seen before on here....

if some dont like that ...well tough.....
lets face it what do you want me to do...ban smelly??
well if not then what else?

it seems to me I (as in me) dont need to do owt about smelly's racism...there are plenty of "volunteers" here only too willing to jump on him for anything he says, even making mountains out of molehills to do so....

freedom of speech does include unpopular opinion, It does not permit personal abuse, even though we as mods DO allow a certain level of childish behaviour....

Didge wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:Anotherone that doesnt "get it"

didge...where have I infringed your "freedom of speech". afterall I allow you endless inane ramblings with little if any interference beyond the odd challenge (which is debate isnt it )

What I will NOT allow in excess is unwarranted personal attacks, which seek to disrupt things rather than facilitate debate and which are in fact an admission of failure by the abuser... you complain about receiving abuse..and doubless you do...but its almost invariably retaliatory.
You are a long way away from being the most unpleasant poster we've had on here but you are certainly extremely abrasive at times........

SOME back and forth school playground antics is to be expected....I only stick my beak in if I consider someone is starting to get too excited or is agressive beyond a certain limit, OR i percieve the person is deliberately provoking an OTT response
TBH I'd sooner jump in a bit early and nip a potential situation in the bud than allow it to blossom into the fuckwittery we have seen before on here....

if some dont like that ...well tough.....
lets face it what do you want me to do...ban smelly??
well if not then what else?

it seems to me I (as in me) dont need to do owt about smelly's racism...there are plenty of "volunteers" here only too willing to jump on him for anything he says, even making mountains out of molehills to do so....

freedom of speech does include unpopular opinion, It does not permit personal abuse, even though we as mods DO allow a certain level of childish behaviour....

So what

Give yourself a pat on the head

I do not want anyone banned, showing you fail to grasp the point

Didge wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:Anotherone that doesnt "get it"

didge...where have I infringed your "freedom of speech". afterall I allow you endless inane ramblings with little if any interference beyond the odd challenge (which is debate isnt it )

What I will NOT allow in excess is unwarranted personal attacks, which seek to disrupt things rather than facilitate debate and which are in fact an admission of failure by the abuser... you complain about receiving abuse..and doubless you do...but its almost invariably retaliatory.
You are a long way away from being the most unpleasant poster we've had on here but you are certainly extremely abrasive at times........

SOME back and forth school playground antics is to be expected....I only stick my beak in if I consider someone is starting to get too excited or is agressive beyond a certain limit, OR i percieve the person is deliberately provoking an OTT response
TBH I'd sooner jump in a bit early and nip a potential situation in the bud than allow it to blossom into the fuckwittery we have seen before on here....

if some dont like that ...well tough.....
lets face it what do you want me to do...ban smelly??
well if not then what else?

it seems to me I (as in me) dont need to do owt about smelly's racism...there are plenty of "volunteers" here only too willing to jump on him for anything he says, even making mountains out of molehills to do so....

freedom of speech does include unpopular opinion, It does not permit personal abuse, even though we as mods DO allow a certain level of childish behaviour....

So what

Give yourself a pat on the head

I do not want anyone banned, showing you fail to grasp the point

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


So what

Give yourself a pat on the head

I do not want anyone banned, showing you fail to grasp the point

What exactly is the point??

You seem to be the only person privy to the point you're trying to make.
.

smelly-bandit wrote:You saying I'm racist is just your opinion didge.

Its not a fact.

You consider me racist

I don't consider myself racist

Why does your opinion hold more weight than mine??

Is it because you think simply calling me a racist is a good way to avoid dealing with me??

You think racist is a magic word that you can just wave around whenever you're outsmarted??

You seem to live in a fantasy world where you think your word is law and then are outraged and shocked that in the real world people don't agree with you.

Its like you simply can't comprehend the idea that people have different opinions to you and then throw a Hissyfit when your declarations and accusations of racism are ignored.

Maddog wrote:

Didge wrote:


bravo

You think that is a plus?

I think protecting all species is a plus. I like living in an area with an abundance of wildlife. But I'm a weirdo.  

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Maddog wrote:

I think protecting all species is a plus. I like living in an area with an abundance of wildlife. But I'm a weirdo.  

Not all, perhaps, Maddog.  Two species eligible for trapping to extinction in the UK that spring immediately to my mind are coypu and wild mink, both, admittedly, originally species imported by the fur trade.

I'm not sure how the giant rodent coypu (South American, I believe) began to establish itself mainly in East Anglia, but they were doing massive damage to the river and dike banks in that region, some of which is below sea level, so the the risk of catastrophic flooding was obvious.

Trapping and shooting started in the sixties and coypu are now, so far as I know, extinct. I saw several of them when I had a boat on the Great Ouse and I can testify to their size - bloody big!

Wild mink, which were doing a tremendous amount of damage to indigenous wildlife, got into the wild decades ago when they escaped from now banned fur farms, and some were illegally released from farms by animal rights activists.

Didge wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:You saying I'm racist is just your opinion didge.

Its not a fact.

You consider me racist

I don't consider myself racist

Why does your opinion hold more weight than mine??

Is it because you think simply calling me a racist is a good way to avoid dealing with me??

You think racist is a magic word that you can just wave around whenever you're outsmarted??

You seem to live in a fantasy world where you think your word is law and then are outraged and shocked that in the real world people don't agree with you.

Its like you simply can't comprehend the idea that people have different opinions to you and then throw a Hissyfit when your declarations and accusations of racism are ignored.

Still craving my attention I see

smelly-bandit wrote:

Didge wrote:


Still craving my attention I see

Poor baby

HoratioTarr wrote:

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

Not all, perhaps, Maddog.  Two species eligible for trapping to extinction in the UK that spring immediately to my mind are coypu and wild mink, both, admittedly, originally species imported by the fur trade.

I'm not sure how the giant rodent coypu (South American, I believe) began to establish itself mainly in East Anglia, but they were doing massive damage to the river and dike banks in that region, some of which is below sea level, so the the risk of catastrophic flooding was obvious.

Trapping and shooting started in the sixties and coypu are now, so far as I know, extinct. I saw several of them when I had a boat on the Great Ouse and I can testify to their size - bloody big!

Wild mink, which were doing a tremendous amount of damage to indigenous wildlife, got into the wild decades ago when they escaped from now banned fur farms, and some were illegally released from farms by animal rights activists.

Vicious killers are mink.  Do you know they pack in times of famine?