A MESSAGE FROM YOUR BODY

magica wrote:Wow, brilliant Thor. That really hit the spot, brought it home to me.

Raggamuffin wrote:So people should stop being fat gits and lose some weight. What's new?

Raggamuffin wrote:You posted a video of some fat people stuffing themselves, so ...

Everyone knows if they're too fat - it's obvious.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:You posted a video of some fat people stuffing themselves, so ...

Everyone knows if they're too fat - it's obvious.

Everyone knows if you are ugly and negative inside, its a heart risk.

Its obvious Rags

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Everyone knows if you are ugly and negative inside, its a heart risk.

Its obvious Rags

What are you talking about? The video is about bodies. Did you even watch it?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

What are you talking about? The video is about bodies. Did you even watch it?

Persistant negative emotions are believed to increase the risk for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease by raising the levels of inflammatory causing chemicals in the body. In future studies, the researchers at University of Pittsburgh hope to identify the specific neural circuitry underlying this process.


https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-athletes-way/201405/negative-emotions-can-increase-the-risk-heart-disease

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:





Persistant negative emotions are believed to increase the risk for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease by raising the levels of inflammatory causing chemicals in the body. In future studies, the researchers at University of Pittsburgh hope to identify the specific neural circuitry underlying this process.


https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-athletes-way/201405/negative-emotions-can-increase-the-risk-heart-disease

So what's negative about saying people should stop being fat gits? It's a positive thing actually.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

So what's negative about saying people should stop being fat gits? It's a positive thing actually.

Well being a fat git is clearly subjective.

So you would need to define what that is Rags

So what do you class as dangerously over weight and thus fat gits?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Well being a fat git is clearly subjective.

So you would need to define what that is Rags

So what do you class as dangerously over weight and thus fat gits?

You disagree with the video then?

Look at someone and you will see if they're a fat git or not. You don't need to know what they weigh or their BMI.

Remember this?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You disagree with the video then?

Look at someone and you will see if they're a fat git or not. You don't need to know what they weigh or their BMI.

Remember this?

I am asking what you perceive medically rags

AS they BMI is not a good indicater.

I am shown underweight for example and yet I am lean

So again what do you class as a fat git?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I am asking what you perceive medically rags

AS they BMI is not a good indicater.

I am shown underweight for example and yet I am lean

So again what do you class as a fat git?

Someone who looks like a fat git. BMI is OK - pretty reliable IMO. However, you don't need know your BMI - you know if you're too fat or too thin.

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Someone who looks like a fat git. BMI is OK - pretty reliable IMO. However, you don't need know your BMI - you know if you're too fat or too thin.

Stick to retail Rags, if that is how you base someone subjectively as a fat git

BMI is a poor indicator.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:




Stick to retail Rags, if that is how you base someone subjectively as a fat git

BMI is a poor indicator.

You can generally tell by the size of their stomach. BMI is not a poor indicator, but as I keep saying, you don't need to know it. Do you think you're a fat git or not?

Thorin wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You can generally tell by the size of their stomach. BMI is not a poor indicator, but as I keep saying, you don't need to know it. Do you think you're a fat git or not?

How does that view work with people generally broader and thus larger all over?

Do you see how you are talking babble?

I weigh 12 stone Rags and am 6ft

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


How does that view work with people generally broader and thus larger all over?

Do you see how you are talking babble?

I weigh 12 stone Rags and am 6ft

Well that's why the BMI ranges are very generous. You just have to be sensible about it. For example, for my height I should be between 7st 13 and 10st 11. At 7st 13 I would be too thin, and at 10st 11 I would be too fat.

Raggamuffin wrote:Meh. You're not even interested in the video - you just want an argument. I simply can't stand your shite any longer. I can see if someone's a fat git, and if you can't, that's your problem.

Raggamuffin wrote:Bye Didge. I just see no benefit in discussing anything more with you on any subject. You just want an argument the whole time.

Thorin wrote:

magica wrote:Wow, brilliant Thor. That really hit the spot, brought it home to me.

You are welcome Magica and you are the epitome of being positive

Your last point reminded me of a Sam Cooke song  

So enjoy