Chilling picture shows female Isil fighter holding child moments before detonating suicide vest

Raggamuffin wrote:Didge, you dedicate your entire life to trying to offend people on a forum, and when you finally succeed, you blame them for actually being offended. Grow up! Get used to me telling you what a bigoted bore you are.

If that is what you believe about me, Rags you are entitled to think so, of which i disagree of course, as that is not my intent

I am happy for you to call me anything you like rags

Its just words, which are meaningless.

So knock yourself out doing so

Enjoy, as I will now wait for others if they want to continue the actual debate

Cheers

Thorin wrote:

eddie wrote:People can always ignore posters and poster's opinions.
How are we supposed to moderate how much someone can talk about something?
Zack posts sporadically anyway and probably doesn't much care if he's banned or not. There are other places he can post where people will be happy to keep him happy because it makes them feel good.

This is a debate forum. If poster's can't control their words - and lets face it, we have the option of pressing 'send' - then they shouldn't be on debate forums.

Simply put, if a poster goes on and on at me, like didge has in the past, I don't read the thread anymore. I choose to not read or reply.
It's really fucking simple.

Best to leave it now, Rags is on a mission to make this all my fault and stamp her feet on this, so let her.

Not bothered

Just going to ignore her now on this, as she is now also calling you a bigot because you disagree, which seems to be the bog standard reply by some when they do not like replies from people.

You are a bigot. Others have seen through you as well.

it's all a bit confusing

clearly anyone who has a religion they follow does so because they have CHOSEN to do so. black/gay/transexual or whatever is how you are born FFS!

i've never trusted the bible since the beginning there was nothing then god came along and separated light and darkness. it wasn't till day 4 that he made the sun and moon and there was never any mention of a magic torch to help him through day 2 and 3 till he had the bright idea of making such things.

any religion must be able to stand up to mockery and critisism. i would like to think i would treat all religions the same

jesus was a modern day libtard the sort that would get on my tits very quickly and easily. really preachy and irritating, liked calling people fools, proper up his own arse, prone to hissy fits, all in all though he was a good bloke who did many many good deeds. (not sure that chumming up with a tax collector was the best idea, always thought that might be a bit dodgy)

buddha was a fat git who, if he wanted to set a good example should have gone on a sodding diet maybe. all he ever did was sit there with his legs crossed and a big fat gut.....oh wait, that might be the virgin mary i'm thinking of,,,,,


sikhs seem peaceful enough, good at ceremonial dancing and stuff ''i don't smoke pot, i don't drink bourbon, all i want to do is shake my turban''

mohammed though, was proper full blown psycho and no mistake

besides who would ever want to follow a faith which has an apostacy law, without which it would collapse

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:People can always ignore posters and poster's opinions.
How are we supposed to moderate how much someone can talk about something?
Zack posts sporadically anyway and probably doesn't much care if he's banned or not. There are other places he can post where people will be happy to keep him happy because it makes them feel good.

This is a debate forum. If poster's can't control their words - and lets face it, we have the option of pressing 'send' - then they shouldn't be on debate forums.

Simply put, if a poster goes on and on at me, like didge has in the past, I don't read the thread anymore. I choose to not read or reply.
It's really fucking simple.

It's not surprising he doesn't post much is it? Didge is constantly banging on about Muslims and telling everyone how they feel and what they think. Didge doesn't seem to be able to control himself.

Quite frankly, I think you're not understanding the situation at all, and you're being a bit of a bigot too.

Any way the wind blows with you rags. Another time and place and you'd be on the other side of the fence.

You can call me all the names you like, but if this was a street corner and Didge was simply stating his opnions and a man came along and was verbally abusive - who do you think would be arrested?  

Perhaps you're more upset with didge than Zack because it's about religion. I don't know and frankly I don't care.
Zack broke a rule. You know he's in the wrong otherwise how about because you have been going on all night about this, I start abusing your dead relatives?

You're being stupidly stubborn and you know it.

Raggamuffin wrote:Re Zack, did he just snap because he's sick and tired of seeing Muslims and Islam bashed on here every five minutes? Perhaps you could change the record sometimes Didge?

If a person can't control themselves on forums and resort to saying vile things about other people's dead relatives, then they're no better than that piece of shit, Edna. God knows she was fucking psycho. We can all lose our tempers, but really....was that necessary?

gelico wrote:
it's all a bit confusing

clearly anyone who has a religion they follow does so because they have CHOSEN to do so.  black/gay/transexual or whatever is how you are born FFS!

i've never trusted the bible since the beginning there was nothing then god came along and separated light and darkness.  it wasn't till day 4 that he made the sun and moon and there was never any mention of a magic torch to help him through day 2 and 3 till he had the bright idea of making such things.

any religion must be able to stand up to mockery and critisism.  i would like to think i would treat all religions the same

jesus was a modern day libtard the sort that would get on my tits very quickly and easily.  really preachy and irritating, liked calling people fools, proper up his own arse, prone to hissy fits, all in all though he was a good bloke who did many many good deeds.  (not sure that chumming up with a tax collector was the best idea, always thought that might be a bit dodgy)

buddha was a fat git who, if he wanted to set a good example should have gone on a sodding diet maybe.   all he ever did was sit there with his legs crossed and a big fat gut.....oh wait, that might be the virgin mary i'm thinking of,,,,,


sikhs seem peaceful enough,  good at ceremonial dancing and stuff  ''i don't smoke pot, i don't drink bourbon, all i want to do is shake my turban''

mohammed though, was proper full blown psycho and no mistake

besides who would ever want to follow a faith which has an apostacy law, without which it would collapse

Exactly Gelico.

Its engineered to form a tight hold and control on believers. Especially when the country is governed my that belief system.
You have blasphemy, which criminalised any criticism and challenges to the beliefs. Then apostasy that stops people from leaving, when the punishment is death. Used to have the same issue with Christianity for centuries. Until people spoke out and we had enlightenment, secularism and science.

The part highlight is very important. I mean imagine people acted like this based on their belief one type of food was tastier than another. That they got angry and over sensitive over? Most people would not do so, as they would know they could be wrong on this, as its down to personal taste. When people might be wrong on a religious belief. Then they are afraid that they might be, hence the over the top reaction.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Re Zack, did he just snap because he's sick and tired of seeing Muslims and Islam bashed on here every five minutes? Perhaps you could change the record sometimes Didge?

If a person can't control themselves on forums and resort to saying vile things about other people's dead relatives, then they're no better than that piece of shit, Edna.   God knows she was fucking psycho.  We can all lose our tempers, but really....was that necessary?

No, it wasn't, and it was clearly designed to piss Didge off, but it was in response to the constant barrage of stuff he posts about Muslims and Islam.

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's not surprising he doesn't post much is it? Didge is constantly banging on about Muslims and telling everyone how they feel and what they think. Didge doesn't seem to be able to control himself.

Quite frankly, I think you're not understanding the situation at all, and you're being a bit of a bigot too.

Any way the wind blows with you rags. Another time and place and you'd be on the other side of the fence.

You can call me all the names you like, but if this was a street corner and Didge was simply stating his opnions and a man came along and was verbally abusive - who do you think would be arrested?  

Perhaps you're more upset with didge than Zack because it's about religion. I don't know and frankly I don't care.
Zack broke a rule. You know he's in the wrong otherwise how about because you have been going on all night about this, I start abusing your dead relatives?

You're being stupidly stubborn and you know it.

I think you're being stubborn actually. You obviously don't see the relentless threads about this subject. They're all the same, and they all feature Didge sounding off about how he knows better than anyone else.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Re Zack, did he just snap because he's sick and tired of seeing Muslims and Islam bashed on here every five minutes? Perhaps you could change the record sometimes Didge?

If a person can't control themselves on forums and resort to saying vile things about other people's dead relatives, then they're no better than that piece of shit, Edna.   God knows she was fucking psycho.  We can all lose our tempers, but really....was that necessary?

She is very much alive Horatio thank goodness.
Though she has been poorly of late

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:

eddie wrote:People can always ignore posters and poster's opinions.
How are we supposed to moderate how much someone can talk about something?
Zack posts sporadically anyway and probably doesn't much care if he's banned or not. There are other places he can post where people will be happy to keep him happy because it makes them feel good.

This is a debate forum. If poster's can't control their words - and lets face it, we have the option of pressing 'send' - then they shouldn't be on debate forums.

Simply put, if a poster goes on and on at me, like didge has in the past, I don't read the thread anymore. I choose to not read or reply.
It's really fucking simple.

Best to leave it now, Rags is on a mission to make this all my fault and stamp her feet on this, so let her.

Not bothered

Just going to ignore her now on this, as she is now also calling you a bigot because you disagree, which seems to be the bog standard reply by some when they do not like replies from people.

You are a bigot. Others have seen through you as well.

Yet you are able to state your opinion, even in anger, without talking about fucking his dead mum. See where I'm going with this?

I'll leave you to it. I get totally bored when I have to repeat myself.

gelico wrote:
it's all a bit confusing

clearly anyone who has a religion they follow does so because they have CHOSEN to do so.  black/gay/transexual or whatever is how you are born FFS!

i've never trusted the bible since the beginning there was nothing then god came along and separated light and darkness.  it wasn't till day 4 that he made the sun and moon and there was never any mention of a magic torch to help him through day 2 and 3 till he had the bright idea of making such things.

any religion must be able to stand up to mockery and critisism.  i would like to think i would treat all religions the same

jesus was a modern day libtard the sort that would get on my tits very quickly and easily.  really preachy and irritating, liked calling people fools, proper up his own arse, prone to hissy fits, all in all though he was a good bloke who did many many good deeds.  (not sure that chumming up with a tax collector was the best idea, always thought that might be a bit dodgy)

buddha was a fat git who, if he wanted to set a good example should have gone on a sodding diet maybe.   all he ever did was sit there with his legs crossed and a big fat gut.....oh wait, that might be the virgin mary i'm thinking of,,,,,


sikhs seem peaceful enough,  good at ceremonial dancing and stuff  ''i don't smoke pot, i don't drink bourbon, all i want to do is shake my turban''

mohammed though, was proper full blown psycho and no mistake

besides who would ever want to follow a faith which has an apostacy law, without which it would collapse

You clearly know nothing about the nature of religious faith either. You don't switch it on and off like a tap.

Raggamuffin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

If a person can't control themselves on forums and resort to saying vile things about other people's dead relatives, then they're no better than that piece of shit, Edna.   God knows she was fucking psycho.  We can all lose our tempers, but really....was that necessary?

No, it wasn't, and it was clearly designed to piss Didge off, but it was in response to the constant barrage of stuff he posts about Muslims and Islam.

how would you know what it was about?

Anyone with a problem regarding the banning of Zack is welcome to PM any admin of their choice or go directly to the forum owner.

Let's get back to the topic please.

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You are a bigot. Others have seen through you as well.

Yet you are able to state your opinion, even in anger, without talking about fucking his dead mum. See where I'm going with this?

I'll leave you to it. I get totally bored when I have to repeat myself.

He's not sitting there going on and on and on about Christians is he? He has done in the past, and he generally drags them into it sooner or later though. I'm not a Muslim, and yet I have more understanding of them than he does obviously. Zack probably has more reason to criticise Christianity than Didge does, and yet he never has.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, it wasn't, and it was clearly designed to piss Didge off, but it was in response to the constant barrage of stuff he posts about Muslims and Islam.

how would you know what it was about?

It's kind of obvious.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:


Any way the wind blows with you rags. Another time and place and you'd be on the other side of the fence.

You can call me all the names you like, but if this was a street corner and Didge was simply stating his opnions and a man came along and was verbally abusive - who do you think would be arrested?  

Perhaps you're more upset with didge than Zack because it's about religion. I don't know and frankly I don't care.
Zack broke a rule. You know he's in the wrong otherwise how about because you have been going on all night about this, I start abusing your dead relatives?

You're being stupidly stubborn and you know it.

I think you're being stubborn actually. You obviously don't see the relentless threads about this subject. They're all the same, and they all feature Didge sounding off about how he knows better than anyone else.

but if you dont like didge sounding off and the constant talk of islam then you are allowed to ignore it.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think you're being stubborn actually. You obviously don't see the relentless threads about this subject. They're all the same, and they all feature Didge sounding off about how he knows better than anyone else.

but if you dont like didge sounding off and the constant talk of islam then you are allowed to ignore it.

You've been here five minutes and you're already "advising" me. When you've been here a couple of years, I might take some notice.

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:
it's all a bit confusing

clearly anyone who has a religion they follow does so because they have CHOSEN to do so.  black/gay/transexual or whatever is how you are born FFS!

i've never trusted the bible since the beginning there was nothing then god came along and separated light and darkness.  it wasn't till day 4 that he made the sun and moon and there was never any mention of a magic torch to help him through day 2 and 3 till he had the bright idea of making such things.

any religion must be able to stand up to mockery and critisism.  i would like to think i would treat all religions the same

jesus was a modern day libtard the sort that would get on my tits very quickly and easily.  really preachy and irritating, liked calling people fools, proper up his own arse, prone to hissy fits, all in all though he was a good bloke who did many many good deeds.  (not sure that chumming up with a tax collector was the best idea, always thought that might be a bit dodgy)

buddha was a fat git who, if he wanted to set a good example should have gone on a sodding diet maybe.   all he ever did was sit there with his legs crossed and a big fat gut.....oh wait, that might be the virgin mary i'm thinking of,,,,,


sikhs seem peaceful enough,  good at ceremonial dancing and stuff  ''i don't smoke pot, i don't drink bourbon, all i want to do is shake my turban''

mohammed though, was proper full blown psycho and no mistake

besides who would ever want to follow a faith which has an apostacy law, without which it would collapse

You clearly know nothing about the nature of religious faith either. You don't switch it on and off like a tap.

oh, but I do

and nowhere in my post did I suggest people switch it on and off like a tap. Not sure where that's come from,,,,

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, it wasn't, and it was clearly designed to piss Didge off, but it was in response to the constant barrage of stuff he posts about Muslims and Islam.

how would you know what it was about?

Odd as i was just told about claiming to know what people think..

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:

but if you dont like didge sounding off and the constant talk of islam then you are allowed to ignore it.

You've been here five minutes and you're already "advising" me. When you've been here a couple of years, I might take some notice.

I am not advising you at all, merely pointing out that instead of moaning about didge's posts you could try ignoring him instead is all

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:
it's all a bit confusing

clearly anyone who has a religion they follow does so because they have CHOSEN to do so.  black/gay/transexual or whatever is how you are born FFS!

i've never trusted the bible since the beginning there was nothing then god came along and separated light and darkness.  it wasn't till day 4 that he made the sun and moon and there was never any mention of a magic torch to help him through day 2 and 3 till he had the bright idea of making such things.

any religion must be able to stand up to mockery and critisism.  i would like to think i would treat all religions the same

jesus was a modern day libtard the sort that would get on my tits very quickly and easily.  really preachy and irritating, liked calling people fools, proper up his own arse, prone to hissy fits, all in all though he was a good bloke who did many many good deeds.  (not sure that chumming up with a tax collector was the best idea, always thought that might be a bit dodgy)

buddha was a fat git who, if he wanted to set a good example should have gone on a sodding diet maybe.   all he ever did was sit there with his legs crossed and a big fat gut.....oh wait, that might be the virgin mary i'm thinking of,,,,,


sikhs seem peaceful enough,  good at ceremonial dancing and stuff  ''i don't smoke pot, i don't drink bourbon, all i want to do is shake my turban''

mohammed though, was proper full blown psycho and no mistake

besides who would ever want to follow a faith which has an apostacy law, without which it would collapse

Exactly Gelico.

Its engineered to form a tight hold and control on believers. Especially when the country is governed my that belief system.
You have blasphemy, which criminalised any criticism and challenges to the beliefs. Then apostasy that stops people from leaving, when the punishment is death. Used to have the same issue with Christianity for centuries. Until people spoke out and we had enlightenment, secularism and science.

The part highlight is very important. I mean imagine people acted like this based on their belief one type of food was tastier than another. That they got angry and over sensitive over? Most people would not do so, as they would know they could be wrong on this, as its down to personal taste. When people might be wrong on a religious belief. Then they are afraid that they might be, hence the over the top reaction.

To get back on topic

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:

how would you know what it was about?

Odd as i was just told about claiming to know what people think..

Read his post again. You always claim you're an "expert" in psychology - it's not difficult, but it's clearly beyond you.

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:
it's all a bit confusing

clearly anyone who has a religion they follow does so because they have CHOSEN to do so.  black/gay/transexual or whatever is how you are born FFS!

i've never trusted the bible since the beginning there was nothing then god came along and separated light and darkness.  it wasn't till day 4 that he made the sun and moon and there was never any mention of a magic torch to help him through day 2 and 3 till he had the bright idea of making such things.

any religion must be able to stand up to mockery and critisism.  i would like to think i would treat all religions the same

jesus was a modern day libtard the sort that would get on my tits very quickly and easily.  really preachy and irritating, liked calling people fools, proper up his own arse, prone to hissy fits, all in all though he was a good bloke who did many many good deeds.  (not sure that chumming up with a tax collector was the best idea, always thought that might be a bit dodgy)

buddha was a fat git who, if he wanted to set a good example should have gone on a sodding diet maybe.   all he ever did was sit there with his legs crossed and a big fat gut.....oh wait, that might be the virgin mary i'm thinking of,,,,,


sikhs seem peaceful enough,  good at ceremonial dancing and stuff  ''i don't smoke pot, i don't drink bourbon, all i want to do is shake my turban''

mohammed though, was proper full blown psycho and no mistake

besides who would ever want to follow a faith which has an apostacy law, without which it would collapse

Exactly Gelico.

Its engineered to form a tight hold and control on believers. Especially when the country is governed my that belief system.
You have blasphemy, which criminalised any criticism and challenges to the beliefs. Then apostasy that stops people from leaving, when the punishment is death. Used to have the same issue with Christianity for centuries. Until people spoke out and we had enlightenment, secularism and science.

The part highlight is very important. I mean imagine people acted like this based on their belief one type of food was tastier than another. That they got angry and over sensitive over? Most people would not do so, as they would know they could be wrong on this, as its down to personal taste. When people might be wrong on a religious belief. Then they are afraid that they might be, hence the over the top reaction.

To get back on topic

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:

how would you know what it was about?

It's kind of obvious.  

is it?

if you are correct then it shows that if people can react like that and post nothing but filth and anger in return for criticism then what sort of a religion is it. why the need to do that? surely any criticism can be met with debate rather than disgrace himself in that fashion,,,,no?

I am a christian now

Thorin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


Exactly Gelico.

Its engineered to form a tight hold and control on believers. Especially when the country is governed my that belief system.
You have blasphemy, which criminalised any criticism and challenges to the beliefs. Then apostasy that stops people from leaving, when the punishment is death. Used to have the same issue with Christianity for centuries. Until people spoke out and we had enlightenment, secularism and science.

The part highlight is very important. I mean imagine people acted like this based on their belief one type of food was tastier than another. That they got angry and over sensitive over? Most people would not do so, as they would know they could be wrong on this, as its down to personal taste. When people might be wrong on a religious belief. Then they are afraid that they might be, hence the over the top reaction.

To get back on topic

It's not on topic, it's just slagging off religious people. The topic is about a suicide bomber.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's kind of obvious.  

is it?

if you are correct then it shows that if people can react like that and post nothing but filth and anger in return for criticism then what sort of a religion is it.  why the need to do that?  surely any criticism can be met with debate rather than disgrace himself in that fashion,,,,no?

I am a christian now

Yes, it is obvious.

It's not criticism, it's baiting and spamming. We've had endless debates about religion here, which you would know if you have been here longer than five minutes, and Didge never ever listens, he just keeps on spouting off about the same old thing.

Oh, and for that idiot across the way who thinks I'm you, he can think again.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's kind of obvious.  

is it?

if you are correct then it shows that if people can react like that and post nothing but filth and anger in return for criticism then what sort of a religion is it.  why the need to do that?  surely any criticism can be met with debate rather than disgrace himself in that fashion,,,,no?

I am a christian now

I think Rags fails to know I have known you on forums for years

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:

is it?

if you are correct then it shows that if people can react like that and post nothing but filth and anger in return for criticism then what sort of a religion is it.  why the need to do that?  surely any criticism can be met with debate rather than disgrace himself in that fashion,,,,no?

I am a christian now

I think Rags fails to know I have known you on forums for years

That's obvious as well. It's not relevant - she doesn't know me and she's already telling me what to do.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


To get back on topic

It's not on topic, it's just slagging off religious people. The topic is about a suicide bomber.

what shall we say about the suicide bomber. she was religious (Islamic) so best not slag her off at all.
can't have all these relentless threads about islam......or shall we pretend she was a jehovah's witness.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I think Rags fails to know I have known you on forums for years

That's obvious as well. It's not relevant - she doesn't know me and she's already telling me what to do.

no,,,I'm not

why do you whine so, my child?

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That's obvious as well. It's not relevant - she doesn't know me and she's already telling me what to do.

no,,,I'm not

why do you whine so, my child?

Yes you are - you're telling me I should ignore Didge's posts if I don't like them. Don't patronise me - newbie.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's not on topic, it's just slagging off religious people. The topic is about a suicide bomber.

what shall we say about the suicide bomber.  she was religious (Islamic) so best not slag her off at all.
can't have all these relentless threads about islam......or shall we pretend she was a jehovah's witness.  

I know that you like to slag off Muslims too, so you're a bit biased. It was one person who doesn't represent Islam.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's not on topic, it's just slagging off religious people. The topic is about a suicide bomber.

what shall we say about the suicide bomber.  she was religious (Islamic) so best not slag her off at all.
can't have all these relentless threads about islam......or shall we pretend she was a jehovah's witness.  

Seems its me being told what I can or cannot post about

Clearly its taboo to talk about all these terrorist events around the world and where people are being oppressed.

Hey ho, catch you a bit later Gelico, when this has calmed down

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:

no,,,I'm not

why do you whine so, my child?

Yes you are - you're telling me I should ignore Didge's posts if I don't like them. Don't patronise me - newbie.

No, I'm not - read it again. I did not tell you what you should do at all, I merely suggested what you could do.

you seem to whine a lot over something which is nothing to do with you anyway
(Please note the above is not 'telling you what to do''. t'is only an observation

yes it was patronising of me. How very clever of you to have picked up on it. Well done, you!

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:

what shall we say about the suicide bomber.  she was religious (Islamic) so best not slag her off at all.
can't have all these relentless threads about islam......or shall we pretend she was a jehovah's witness.  

Seems its me being told what I can or cannot post about

Clearly its taboo to talk about all these terrorist events around the world and where people are being oppressed.

Hey ho, catch you a bit later Gelico, when this has calmed down

You're not talking about terrorist events, you're slagging off Muslims.

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Yes you are - you're telling me I should ignore Didge's posts if I don't like them. Don't patronise me - newbie.

No, I'm not - read it again.  I did not tell you what you should do at all, I merely suggested what you could do.

you seem to whine a lot over something which is nothing to do with you anyway
(Please note the above is not 'telling you what to do''.  t'is only an observation

yes it was patronising of me.  How very clever of you to have picked up on it.  Well done, you!

You speak as if you know me. You don't know me - you've spoken to me once in this thread as if my posts are anything to do with you. I have a good reason to "whine". At least, I'm not barking mad.

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:

what shall we say about the suicide bomber.  she was religious (Islamic) so best not slag her off at all.
can't have all these relentless threads about islam......or shall we pretend she was a jehovah's witness.  

I know that you like to slag off Muslims too, so you're a bit biased. It was one person who doesn't represent Islam.

I most certainly do not slag off Muslims.  where did you get that from?  find me anything i've said slagging off Muslims,,,,

newbie though I am, it seems clear that you know an awful lot of jackshit

gelico wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I know that you like to slag off Muslims too, so you're a bit biased. It was one person who doesn't represent Islam.

I most certainly do  not slag off Muslims.  where did you get that from?  find me anything i've said slagging off Muslims,,,,

newbie though I am, it seems clear that you know an awful lot of jackshit

I know more than the bullshit you're coming out with.

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:

No, I'm not - read it again.  I did not tell you what you should do at all, I merely suggested what you could do.

you seem to whine a lot over something which is nothing to do with you anyway
(Please note the above is not 'telling you what to do''.  t'is only an observation

yes it was patronising of me.  How very clever of you to have picked up on it.  Well done, you!

You speak as if you know me. You don't know me - you've spoken to me once in this thread as if my posts are anything to do with you. I have a good reason to "whine". At least, I'm not barking mad.

I do not speak as I I know you
I don't know you
You're posts are nothing to do with me (except that it's a public forum for anyone to comment)
What are your good reasons for whining?, pray tell, do!
Being barking mad is mostly hilarious, I thoroughly recommend it,,
Fair play to you though, each to their own and all
On reflection, I would rather be barking mad and be able to say ''At least I'm not a whiney, miserable windbag who's constantly looking for stuff to be offended about''
like i said each to their own,,,

Raggamuffin wrote:

gelico wrote:


I most certainly do  not slag off Muslims.  where did you get that from?  find me anything i've said slagging off Muslims,,,,

newbie though I am, it seems clear that you know an awful lot of jackshit

I know more than the bullshit you're coming out with.

go on then, being as how you know so much, please tell me how and where i've ever slagged off any Muslims?

Raggamuffin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

If a person can't control themselves on forums and resort to saying vile things about other people's dead relatives, then they're no better than that piece of shit, Edna.   God knows she was fucking psycho.  We can all lose our tempers, but really....was that necessary?

No, it wasn't, and it was clearly designed to piss Didge off, but it was in response to the constant barrage of stuff he posts about Muslims and Islam.

I agree that there's a bit too much about Islam on here but it's also in the news all the time, so it's hardly surprising.

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:

what shall we say about the suicide bomber.  she was religious (Islamic) so best not slag her off at all.
can't have all these relentless threads about islam......or shall we pretend she was a jehovah's witness.  

Seems its me being told what I can or cannot post about

Clearly its taboo to talk about all these terrorist events around the world and where people are being oppressed.

Hey ho, catch you a bit later Gelico, when this has calmed down

i missed this post

calmed down? what sort of place is this where a thread like this is considered in need of calming down. apart from zack, no one has said anything over the line in any way

it's only me and raggamuffin on here. anyhoos, i'm bored now, no one else is posting

catch you later

Thorin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

If a person can't control themselves on forums and resort to saying vile things about other people's dead relatives, then they're no better than that piece of shit, Edna.   God knows she was fucking psycho.  We can all lose our tempers, but really....was that necessary?

She is very much alive Horatio thank goodness.
Though she has been poorly of late

Oh, sorry. But it was bad either way.

I think it's best if gelico and I ignore each other. She's clearly a nasty piece of work.

Raggamuffin wrote:I think it's best if gelico and I ignore each other. She's clearly a nasty piece of work.

oh come off it, don't try that,,,,I know you love me really,,,,and so you should for I am luvverly, so I am.

don't run away and avoid me. I am sure there is much banter to be had and many things on which we might agree.

we could end up as BFFs and have jolly farting competitions and everything

don't give up so soon

lots of love and kindest regards

HoratioTarr wrote:

Thorin wrote:


She is very much alive Horatio thank goodness.
Though she has been poorly of late

Oh, sorry.  But it was bad either way.  

No worries, you were not to know. I agree its still as bad.

@Gelico, I mean when this had got to being a debate again, as to being calm.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's not surprising he doesn't post much is it? Didge is constantly banging on about Muslims and telling everyone how they feel and what they think. Didge doesn't seem to be able to control himself.

Quite frankly, I think you're not understanding the situation at all, and you're being a bit of a bigot too.

Any way the wind blows with you rags. Another time and place and you'd be on the other side of the fence.

You can call me all the names you like, but if this was a street corner and Didge was simply stating his opnions and a man came along and was verbally abusive - who do you think would be arrested?  

Perhaps you're more upset with didge than Zack because it's about religion. I don't know and frankly I don't care.
Zack broke a rule. You know he's in the wrong otherwise how about because you have been going on all night about this, I start abusing your dead relatives?

You're being stupidly stubborn and you know it.

I think you're being stubborn actually. You obviously don't see the relentless threads about this subject. They're all the same, and they all feature Didge sounding off about how he knows better than anyone else.

+1000000