why are certain religious rights observed while others are ignored??

Eilzel wrote:The Christian B&B owners were discriminating against a gay couple.

Women wearing the veil in certain buildings pose a security and identity problem.

Totally different cases.

heavenly father wrote:

Eilzel wrote:The Christian B&B owners were discriminating against a gay couple.

Women wearing the veil in certain buildings pose a security and identity problem.

Totally different cases.

they were not allowing any none married couples.. funny how gay only hotels exist though..

again not when you consider anyone walking in to a bank or post office wearing a balaclava or helmet would be asked to remove it.

heavenly father wrote:oddly enough i was planning on booking a double room for my wife and i and seeing what happened when we arrive, perhaps the gay community need to see militant heterosexuality at work.

my issue was with the unbalance of so called religious rights actually.

PhilDidge wrote:

heavenly father wrote:oddly enough i was planning on booking a double room for my wife and i and seeing what happened when we arrive, perhaps the gay community need to see militant heterosexuality at work.

my issue was with the unbalance of so called religious rights actually.

Well as I say Dean did book stating clearly he was hextrosexual, your beef is because you are a christian on the B&B owners

PhilDidge wrote:

heavenly father wrote:oddly enough i was planning on booking a double room for my wife and i and seeing what happened when we arrive, perhaps the gay community need to see militant heterosexuality at work.

my issue was with the unbalance of so called religious rights actually.

Well as I say Dean did book stating clearly he was hextrosexual, your beef is because you are a christian on the B&B owners

heavenly father wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

Well as I say Dean did book stating clearly he was hextrosexual, your beef is because you are a christian on the B&B owners

Thank you oh mind reading one, would you like to post my next topic for me save me the typing..

i want to know why certain religions seem to be treat differently...

PhilDidge wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

Thank you oh mind reading one, would you like to post my next topic for me save me the typing..

i want to know why certain religions seem to be treat differently...

What religious rights are you being denied that is different to other faiths?

Do you wish to wear a veil?

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

What religious rights are you being denied that is different to other faiths?

Do you wish to wear a veil?

But DIDIEPOOS it is NOT a Religious requirement to wear a veil.

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:


But DIDIEPOOS it is NOT a Religious requirement to wear a veil.

I agree it isn't Pakistanley.

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:


I agree it isn't Pakistanley.

Then your previous comment was MOOT , was it not PAKIDIDGE.

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:


Then your previous comment was MOOT , was it not PAKIDIDGE.

Was it, never claimed it was, I stated quite clearly what religious rights was he being denied, then asked if he wanted to wear a veil, so no moot point at all Pakistanley

heavenly father wrote:oddly enough i was planning on booking a double room for my wife and i and seeing what happened when we arrive, perhaps the gay community need to see militant heterosexuality at work.

my issue was with the unbalance of so called religious rights actually.

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

Was it, never claimed it was, I stated quite clearly what religious rights was he being denied, then asked if he wanted to wear a veil, so no moot point at all Pakistanley

Does your wife wear the veil PakiDidge ?

Eilzel wrote:

heavenly father wrote:oddly enough i was planning on booking a double room for my wife and i and seeing what happened when we arrive, perhaps the gay community need to see militant heterosexuality at work.

my issue was with the unbalance of so called religious rights actually.

Well you brought up gay hotels- and the only one anyone has ever been able to find in the UK since 2010 actually does allow heterosexuals. So it may be nothing to do with religious rights, but since YOU brought it up then didge is right to prove you wrong   

Now back to religious rights. Anybody going in to certain buildings would be asked to remove a balaclava or helmet yes; and they SHOULD be asked to remove a veil as well.

Religious rights should go as far as the point where they contravene sense and decency. In the case on the Christian B&B owners; and women wearing veils in certain public buildings- they have  contravened both those things.

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:



Does your wife wear the veil PakiDidge ?

Oh my someone has their dummies out of place ha ha, you want to get personal now because you are upset?

 :D 

Do you understand the meaning of Atheism?

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:

Oh my someone has their dummies out of place ha ha, you want to get personal now because you are upset?

 :D 

Do you understand the meaning of Atheism?

A simple question PakiDidge  , a full veil or just the headscarf ??????????

heavenly father wrote:actually there are many gay only hotels, i'll have to let you know how we get on as a couple.

so is it law to remove a crash helmet in a bank or post office, if so why not the veil.

PhilDidge wrote:

heavenly father wrote:actually there are many gay only hotels, i'll have to let you know how we get on as a couple.

so is it law to remove a crash helmet in a bank or post office, if so why not the veil.

It should be law that it is removed and also for teaching, being communication is 80% body language, with the face movements very much part of this, but again what religious rights are you being denied?