More evidence that nazism was left wing

by Tommy Monk Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:25 am

First topic message reminder :

"...Lenin is the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is very slight..."

Joseph Goebbels

lol!

by Guest Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:47 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Didge... I don't understand why you are getting your knickers in such a twist here... there are plenty of people out there with bigger brains than you who are of the opinion that fascism/Nazism is a form of far left ideology!!!

It stands to reason, as left is big state and big state control on people and businesses, far left is even bigger state and even bigger authoritarian state control... whereas right is small state and small state control... therefore far right will be tiny state and tiny state control...!

It only stands to reason that you constantly ignore facts and your only reason here to claim as you do, is to disassociate Nazism from Right wing politics.

Frankly Tommy, you have made this same lame argument countless times and it will never be true.

You just further prove why I will never count you as somebody worthy of decent debate.

by Tommy Monk Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:50 pm

I keep making the point with different examples/evidence to back it up!

It is the left who wish to disassociate from the left wing aspects of fascism/Nazism... and of course to tarnish the image of right wing politics!

by Guest Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:54 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:I keep making the point with different examples/evidence to back it up!

It is the left who wish to disassociate from the left wing aspects of fascism/Nazism... and of course to tarnish the image of right wing politics!

Do you?

All you do is source people who are motivated with agenda's to disassociated Nazism from Right wing politics.

Worst of all you constantly ignore countless facts that debunk you claims

Now, I am not going to entertain your idiocy further.

by Tommy Monk Sun Apr 23, 2017 9:04 pm

You completely ignore the fact that all the so called 'far right nazis/fascists' had long established and well known political backgrounds as left wing socialists!!!

by Andy Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:12 pm

Is the reason Tommy keeps banging on with endless Nazis are Lefties threads because he IS a nazi but doesnt want to associate himself with anything left of Ghengis Khan

by Tommy Monk Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:46 pm

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:56 am

Angry Andy wrote:Is the reason Tommy keeps banging on with endless Nazis are Lefties threads because he IS a nazi but doesnt want to associate himself with anything left of Ghengis Khan

Seriously, the idiot is starved of attention, you need to stop giving him what he craves Andy

The man is a right fuckwit and no amount of factual evidence will convince the idiot

So let him flap around looking like the twat that he is

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:36 am

Tommy Monk wrote:

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

RW does not equal mininal interference in people's lives, or favouring individual freedoms. Examples- Republican and Tory policies present and past regarding abortion, gay rights, civil rights etc.

RW does not always equal small govt. It means hands off the economy, but everything else is game.

LW does not equal interference in peoples' lives. It involves supporting those who need help.

LW politics pushed for equal rights for women, ethnic minorities and LGBT people long before the Right did (conservatives in many places still actively work against those things). So the idea RW favours individual liberties and freedoms is utter utter nonsense.

RW favours freedom for big businesses to do what they want and pay as little in taxes as possible. The Right served the rich and powerful. Hitler supported them too! He just made sure they served his nationalist interests.

And you can spout isolated evidence of the Nazis being LW all you like. But it is understood by most that Nazism was a nationalist (RW) pro-big business (RW) in practice anti-socialist (RW) anti-union (RW) ideology and most definitely NOT liberal (LW) or socialist (LW) in its actions.

Again- Nazism was a socialist and the DEMORATIC Republic of Korea is democratic.

The evidence you have posted is a couple of isolated accounts that run contrary to every serious account in works on history.

by 'Wolfie Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:05 am

AS SHOWN in his previous looney-toon diatribes on climate change denial, the evils of immigration, and his claimed innate superiority of the white Englische "race", Tommy Monk couldn't give a damn about the actual truth or otherwise of his demented fantasising...

Nor does he worry about actual definitions, or the meaning of "evidence", "proof" or "examples", totally ignoring the actual facts of the matter -- and instead usually relying on blogs, opinions and "alternative news" from equally deranged like-minded 'alt.right'/neo-nazi scum.. Rolling Eyes

by veya_victaous Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:49 am

Tommy Monk wrote:

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

well no wonder you're so wrong since it doesn't mean that at all

Traditional meaning
Left wing 'State control the means of production'
Right wing 'Privately owned means of production'

Modern meaning
Left wing 'equality, social freedoms, well funded public resources'
Right wing 'Billionaire's rights, racism, sexism and homophobia'

by Raggamuffin Mon Apr 24, 2017 6:34 am

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

AS SHOWN in his previous looney-toon diatribes on climate change denial, the evils of immigration, and his claimed innate superiority of the white Englische "race", Tommy Monk couldn't give a damn about the actual truth or otherwise of his demented fantasising...

Nor does he worry about actual definitions, or the meaning of "evidence", "proof" or "examples", totally ignoring the actual facts of the matter -- and instead usually relying on blogs, opinions and "alternative news" from equally deranged like-minded 'alt.right'/neo-nazi scum..

He has given a definition, and so have others now. That's why the debate might actually get somewhere. Of course it won't if you keep dropping in to hurl abuse around.

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:00 am

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

RW does not equal mininal interference in people's lives, or favouring individual freedoms. Examples- Republican and Tory policies present and past regarding abortion, gay rights, civil rights etc.

RW does not always equal small govt. It means hands off the economy, but everything else is game.

LW does not equal interference in peoples' lives. It involves supporting those who need help.

LW politics pushed for equal rights for women, ethnic minorities and LGBT people long before the Right did (conservatives in many places still actively work against those things). So the idea RW favours individual liberties and freedoms is utter utter nonsense.

RW favours freedom for big businesses to do what they want and pay as little in taxes as possible. The Right served the rich and powerful. Hitler supported them too! He just made sure they served his nationalist interests.

And you can spout isolated evidence of the Nazis being LW all you like. But it is understood by most that Nazism was a nationalist (RW) pro-big business (RW) in practice anti-socialist (RW) anti-union (RW) ideology and most definitely NOT liberal (LW) or socialist (LW) in its actions.

Again- Nazism was a socialist and the DEMORATIC Republic of Korea is democratic.

The evidence you have posted is a couple of isolated accounts that run contrary to every serious account in works on history.

Well said Eilzel, but the above will be lost on the imbecile.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:33 pm

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

RW does not equal mininal interference in people's lives, or favouring individual freedoms. Examples- Republican and Tory policies present and past regarding abortion, gay rights, civil rights etc.

RW does not always equal small govt. It means hands off the economy, but everything else is game.

LW does not equal interference in peoples' lives. It involves supporting those who need help.

LW politics pushed for equal rights for women, ethnic minorities and LGBT people long before the Right did (conservatives in many places still actively work against those things). So the idea RW favours individual liberties and freedoms is utter utter nonsense.

RW favours freedom for big businesses to do what they want and pay as little in taxes as possible. The Right served the rich and powerful. Hitler supported them too! He just made sure they served his nationalist interests.

And you can spout isolated evidence of the Nazis being LW all you like. But it is understood by most that Nazism was a nationalist (RW) pro-big business (RW) in practice anti-socialist (RW) anti-union (RW) ideology and most definitely NOT liberal (LW) or socialist (LW) in its actions.

Again- Nazism was a socialist and the DEMORATIC Republic of Korea is democratic.

The evidence you have posted is a couple of isolated accounts that run contrary to every serious account in works on history.

Left do favour high tax big state/govt, and right do favour low tax small state/govt!

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:37 pm

veya_victaous wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

well no wonder you're so wrong since it doesn't mean that at all

Traditional meaning
Left wing 'State control the means of production'
Right wing 'Privately owned means of production'

Modern meaning
Left wing 'equality, social freedoms, well funded public resources'
Right wing 'Billionaire's rights, racism, sexism and homophobia'

You are correct in your traditional meaning definition... which is one of the reasons why I have argued that nazism/fascism was left wing... because the nazi/fascist states completely controlled the means of production.

And you're 'modern meaning' is why you are such an idiot!!!

Left = nice and right = nasty is just left wing bullshit!!!

And only correct in the mind of a simpleton!!!

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:12 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Right wing = small state, small government, low taxes, minimal interference in people's lives... favouring individuals freedoms and liberties...!

Left wing = big state, big government big state control of and taxation of business, big control and interference in people's lives...

RW does not equal mininal interference in people's lives, or favouring individual freedoms. Examples- Republican and Tory policies present and past regarding abortion, gay rights, civil rights etc.

RW does not always equal small govt. It means hands off the economy, but everything else is game.

LW does not equal interference in peoples' lives. It involves supporting those who need help.

LW politics pushed for equal rights for women, ethnic minorities and LGBT people long before the Right did (conservatives in many places still actively work against those things). So the idea RW favours individual liberties and freedoms is utter utter nonsense.

RW favours freedom for big businesses to do what they want and pay as little in taxes as possible. The Right served the rich and powerful. Hitler supported them too! He just made sure they served his nationalist interests.

And you can spout isolated evidence of the Nazis being LW all you like. But it is understood by most that Nazism was a nationalist (RW) pro-big business (RW) in practice anti-socialist (RW) anti-union (RW) ideology and most definitely NOT liberal (LW) or socialist (LW) in its actions.

Again- Nazism was a socialist and the DEMORATIC Republic of Korea is democratic.

The evidence you have posted is a couple of isolated accounts that run contrary to every serious account in works on history.

Left do favour high tax big state/govt, and right do favour low tax small state/govt!

Tell me what part of my post in bold are incorrect Rolling Eyes

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:17 pm

Most of it...

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:26 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Most of it...

So tommy thinks most of this is true then...

1) Republicans and Conservatives have always respected the freedoms of women, ethnic minorities and LGBT people...
2) RWers have always respected the freedoms of women's reproductive rights and for people to marry whoever they want.
3) LWers have no interest in helping those in need.
4) The Right have always been ahead of the Left in helping people from minority groups.
5) Nowhere in the world do conservatives work against the rights of gay people or women.
6) RW governments do not favour freedom for big business to do most of what they want.
7) RW governments want to heavily tax big business.
8 ) Hitler did not support big business.
9) Hitler did not ensure big business worked toward a nationalist agenda.
10) Nazism was not nationalist.
11) Nazism was not pro-big business (ie: Volkswagen).
12) Nazism did not suppress socialists.
13) Nazism did not oppose trade unions.
14) Nazism was liberal.
15) North Korea is really democratic.

...and wonders why people think he doesn't know WTF he is talking about most of the time... Rolling Eyes

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:33 pm

The democrats started the kkk...

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:44 pm

The Democratic party and Republican party pretty much switched positions in the early to mid 20th centuries Tommy, pretty well documented, especially the Southern Strategy of the GOP. The Democratic party did not use to be the liberal/LW/progressive force it is today. The Republicans of Lincoln very much were. So that point is irrelevant.

And the rest of the points? SO you agree with most of those points in my last post?

Or shall we just acknowledge you're a troll and leave it there?

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:53 pm

Really...!?

Is that why so many democrats were opposed to the civil rights act 1964...!?

And why so many had previously voiced their commitment to continued segregation.. !?

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420321/whitewashing-democratic-partys-history-mona-charen

Oh dear...!!!

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:01 pm

Most supported it, and that was right on the middle of the Republican switch to appealing to more racist voters. The Democrats and Republicans today are very different to how they were then in terms of social politics, and more so the further back you go.

But again, massive diversion and avoiding all other points you are so utterly wrong on.

Seriously, you think the DRK is democratic, by your definition of how things work. Not smart.

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:06 pm

You know what. Waste of time. Don't answer.

Your entire tactic is this- "Look at these 1 or 2 articles I found by people way smarter than me who say I'm right. I don't actually want to discuss this really. I just want to say this person who wrote hundreds of words sounds REAAAAALLLLY clever and I agree with him so he must be right."

Pathetic.

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:08 pm

Eilzel wrote:You know what. Waste of time. Don't answer.

Your entire tactic is this- "Look at these 1 or 2 articles I found by people way smarter than me who say I'm right. I don't actually want to discuss this really. I just want to say this person who wrote hundreds of words sounds REAAAAALLLLY clever and I agree with him so he must be right."

Pathetic.

Hence my point, you are wasting your time with someone who has the intellect of a 2 year old.

It certainly proves that he has in fact a low IQ, that is for sure.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:09 pm

The communist DRK calling itself democratic is an example of the lies and spin of the left...!

This thread is about fascism/Nazism bring a form of left wing politics/ideology... not about how you would like the left to be viewed as...

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:12 pm

Eilzel wrote:You know what. Waste of time. Don't answer.

Your entire tactic is this- "Look at these 1 or 2 articles I found by people way smarter than me who say I'm right. I don't actually want to discuss this really. I just want to say this person who wrote hundreds of words sounds REAAAAALLLLY clever and I agree with him so he must be right."

Pathetic.

Ohhhhh!

A tantrum!!!

lol!

Most amusing!!!

This rhyme of mine from the limerick thread is very apt here now...

The hate comes from those who just can't face
Inconvenient truth conclusively fact based
Overwhelming evidence is there
Enraged lefties pull out their hair
While I sit back and laugh and rest my case!!!

Laughing

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:12 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:The communist DRK calling itself democratic is an example of the lies and spin of the left...!

This thread is about fascism/Nazism bring a form of left wing politics/ideology... not about how you would like the left to be viewed as...

More evidence that nazism was left wing - Page 5 Double-facepalm

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:19 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Eilzel wrote:You know what. Waste of time. Don't answer.

Your entire tactic is this- "Look at these 1 or 2 articles I found by people way smarter than me who say I'm right. I don't actually want to discuss this really. I just want to say this person who wrote hundreds of words sounds REAAAAALLLLY clever and I agree with him so he must be right."

Pathetic.

Ohhhhh!

A tantrum!!!

Most amusing!!!

This rhyme of mine from the limerick thread is very apt here now...

The hate comes from those who just can't face
Inconvenient truth conclusively fact based
Overwhelming evidence is there
Enraged lefties pull out their hair
While I sit back and laugh and rest my case!!!

Yes, I'm having a tantrum. Because a potential interesting subject is going no where because of an imbecilic troll.

You have addressed nothing. Because you can't. Go find an essay by someone smarter than you. It's a wide range, but you can probably start from the work of 13 year olds.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:38 pm

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Ohhhhh!

A tantrum!!!

Most amusing!!!

This rhyme of mine from the limerick thread is very apt here now...

The hate comes from those who just can't face
Inconvenient truth conclusively fact based
Overwhelming evidence is there
Enraged lefties pull out their hair
While I sit back and laugh and rest my case!!!

Yes, I'm having a tantrum. Because a potential interesting subject is going no where because of an imbecilic troll.

You have addressed nothing. Because you can't. Go find an essay by someone smarter than you. It's a wide range, but you can probably start from the work of 13 year olds.

It's not 'going nowhere'... it's just not going the way you want it to...!

It would help if you actually knew what you were talking about instead of spouting nonsense and waffle...!

Laughing

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:46 pm

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Ohhhhh!

A tantrum!!!

Most amusing!!!

This rhyme of mine from the limerick thread is very apt here now...

The hate comes from those who just can't face
Inconvenient truth conclusively fact based
Overwhelming evidence is there
Enraged lefties pull out their hair
While I sit back and laugh and rest my case!!!

Yes, I'm having a tantrum. Because a potential interesting subject is going no where because of an imbecilic troll.

You have addressed nothing. Because you can't. Go find an essay by someone smarter than you. It's a wide range, but you can probably start from the work of 13 year olds.

Hence my point, its impossible to debate the child.

He just refuses to accept anything that counters his misconceptions

Hence he makes the debate impossible.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:51 pm

When someone makes a big long list of things I never said, but claim that they are all things that I believe... then it is them who has behaved in a childish fashion...!

And when they then have a tantrum after being shown up on the 'dark side' of the democrats political history, and because they are not getting it all their own way... it confirms who is the child here...!!!

lol!

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:59 pm

Best thing to do Eilzel, is place the imbecile on ignore

He has zero interest in debate, but to spam things he never came up with himself, but plagiarized off others.

You are thus having debate links and not Tommy, hence the futility of the debate

The twat is just on a continuous wind up and as seen is about as thick as they come

Best to just starve him of the attention seeking he so badly craves.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:02 pm

Thorin wrote:Best thing to do Eilzel, is place the imbecile on ignore

He has zero interest in debate, but to spam things he never came up with himself, but plagiarized off others.

You are thus having debate links and not Tommy, hence the futility of the debate

The twat is just on a continuous wind up and as seen is about as thick as they come

Best to just starve him of the attention seeking he so badly craves.

Says the chief attention seeker and spammer of big long copy&pastes...

lol!

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:06 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Thorin wrote:Best thing to do Eilzel, is place the imbecile on ignore

He has zero interest in debate, but to spam things he never came up with himself, but plagiarized off others.

You are thus having debate links and not Tommy, hence the futility of the debate

The twat is just on a continuous wind up and as seen is about as thick as they come

Best to just starve him of the attention seeking he so badly craves.

Says the chief spammer of big long copy&pastes...

Look, you have been exposed here as nothing more than a child, who fails to even understand what you are posting from others on this argument

The more people ignore you and exhaust you of the attention you crave the better it will be for the forum.

You may then grow up

I at least understand what I debate about, all you do is play off what others you read.

Like you 9/11 conspiracies
Moon landing conspiracies
Your denial of Global warning.

So this is my last post to you and no doubt others will follow suit until you grow up.

As seen you are nothing but a petulant brat

So enjoy Coventry, you have brought this on yourself

by Eilzel Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:12 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:When someone makes a big long list of things I never said, but claim that they are all things that I believe... then it is them who has behaved in a childish fashion...!

And when they then have a tantrum after being shown up on the 'dark side' of the democrats political history, and because they are not getting it all their own way... it confirms who is the child here...!!!

I made the list after the initial list of questions I put to you were ignored as you tried to evade the points.

Pathetic as I said.

Didge is right, waste of time.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:14 pm

Thorin wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Says the chief spammer of big long copy&pastes...

Look, you have been exposed here as nothing more than a child, who fails to even understand what you are posting from others on this argument

The more people ignore you and exhaust you of the attention you crave the better it will be for the forum.

You may then grow up

I at least understand what I debate about, all you do is play off what others you read.

Like you 9/11 conspiracies
Moon landing conspiracies
Your denial of Global warning.

So this is my last post to you and no doubt others will follow suit until you grow up.

As seen you are nothing but a petulant brat

So enjoy Coventry, you have brought this on yourself

A bit of peace and quiet... free from your constant fuckwittery...!?

relieved

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:16 pm

Eilzel wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:When someone makes a big long list of things I never said, but claim that they are all things that I believe... then it is them who has behaved in a childish fashion...!

And when they then have a tantrum after being shown up on the 'dark side' of the democrats political history, and because they are not getting it all their own way... it confirms who is the child here...!!!

I made the list after the initial list of questions I put to you were ignored as you tried to evade the points.

Pathetic as I said.

Didge is right, waste of time.

He will be like a little boy who thinks his nose has been stolen, all lost and confused if people end up ignoring him and he will fail to see how he brought this on himself

He is a waste of time and is nothing more than an ignorant wally

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:18 pm

Please debate the topic or get off my thread!!!

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:25 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

Please debate the topic or get off my thread!!!

Fuck off you pathetic brat

by Original Quill Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:37 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

Please debate the topic or get off my thread!!!

So, you not only want to post your message, but put the words in someone else's mouth too? Why don't you just leave the computer out of it and go sit in a corner and talk to yourself? Eliminate the middle-man. Cool

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:43 pm

I said the exact opposite of that Quill... two posters here want to just comment about me, instead of about the topic of thread... which is against the rules...!

And given that one is a mod... you would think he would know better...!?

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:46 pm

Original Quill wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

Please debate the topic or get off my thread!!!

So, you not only want to post your message, but put the words in someone else's mouth too? Why don't you just leave the computer out of it and go sit in a corner and talk to yourself? Eliminate the middle-man.

Spot on. Countless rebuttals have been made only for Tommy to ignore and regurgitate the same drivel

Hence you are right, he would be better off arguing with himself, as seen people are fed up of his ignorance here

by eddie Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:52 pm

So can I take it that all this agreeing means you're all sleeping together just as HA suggested the other day?
Didn't someone call it "arse-licking" if you agreed with someone else? See how nonsensical all that was now?

Come on. Stop making it too easy. Cool

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:54 pm

eddie wrote:So can I take it that all this agreeing means you're all sleeping together just as HA suggested the other day?
Didn't someone call it "arse-licking" if you agreed with someone else? See how nonsensical all that was now?

Come on. Stop making it too easy.

Well it makes posters wonder how you constantly fail to comment on tommy's irrational views here.

Nuff said

by Original Quill Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:11 pm

eddie wrote:So can I take it that all this agreeing means you're all sleeping together just as HA suggested the other day?
Didn't someone call it "arse-licking" if you agreed with someone else? See how nonsensical all that was now?

Come on. Stop making it too easy.

I don't know who is agreeing, eds. Tommy is trying to eliminate the competition by rule rather than meeting in the field. That hardly seems anti-competitive...seems more like cheating, which is standard operating procedure for conservatives. I have an immediate aversion for that kind of approach, regardless who is on the other side.

That said, carry on...

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:33 pm

Thorin wrote:
eddie wrote:So can I take it that all this agreeing means you're all sleeping together just as HA suggested the other day?
Didn't someone call it "arse-licking" if you agreed with someone else? See how nonsensical all that was now?

Come on. Stop making it too easy.

Well it makes posters wonder how you constantly fail to comment on tommy's irrational views here.

Nuff said

So in other words... you want eddie to shut me up because you don't agree with my opinion...!?

How very 'progressive'...!

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:36 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Thorin wrote:

Well it makes posters wonder how you constantly fail to comment on tommy's irrational views here.

Nuff said

So in other words... you want eddie to shut me up because you don't agree with my opinion...!?

How very 'progressive'...!

How is rightly being critical of someone shutting them up?

Wow Tommy promoting Islamic beliefs around censorship of criticism of religious beliefs

You cannot make it up

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:36 pm

Original Quill wrote:
eddie wrote:So can I take it that all this agreeing means you're all sleeping together just as HA suggested the other day?
Didn't someone call it "arse-licking" if you agreed with someone else? See how nonsensical all that was now?

Come on. Stop making it too easy.

I don't know who is agreeing, eds. Tommy is trying to eliminate the competition by rule rather than meeting in the field. That hardly seems anti-competitive...seems more like cheating, which is standard operating procedure for conservatives. I have an immediate aversion for that kind of approach, regardless who is on the other side.

That said, carry on...

No... I requested that people stopped posting about me... that they post on topic on this thread...!

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:38 pm

People stayed on topic

Tommy ignored damning evidence refuting his poor plagiarized claims

People got bored with his ignorance

Nuff said

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:44 pm

Thorin wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

So in other words... you want eddie to shut me up because you don't agree with my opinion...!?

How very 'progressive'...!

How is rightly being critical of someone shutting them up?

Wow Tommy promoting Islamic beliefs around censorship of criticism of religious beliefs

You cannot make it up

You have repeatedly complained to eddie that she should be taking some sort of action against me for voicing my opinion and for arguing my case...!

And I think it is you who just made that bit up!!!

by Guest Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:46 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Thorin wrote:

How is rightly being critical of someone shutting them up?

Wow Tommy promoting Islamic beliefs around censorship of criticism of religious beliefs

You cannot make it up

You have repeatedly complained to eddie that she should be taking some sort of action against me for voicing my opinion and for arguing my case...!

And I think it is you who just made that bit up!!!

Really?

Show me where I said she should moderate you?

Never did

What I spoke about is that she never had or ever condemn you for you hateful views and deliberate disruption

See how you even lie about things not said

The facts are this, you started this thread as nothing more than a piss take, because you are nothing more than an immature brat

by Sponsored content