Katie Hopkins - one sick bitch

First topic message reminder :

Has lost yet another libel case.
Before Christmas she cost the Mail over £150,000 in damages.
This time it's as result of her own fucking loose gob and stupidity.
£24,000 damages and£125,000 in costs.
Fuck me she is one dull cnut.
Proving once again the alt right just are not right in most departments.
Pity they didn't fuck her brain up even more during her epilepsy operation.
A drooling  cabbage would talk more sense .

Katie Hopkins faces £120,000 court bill after LOSING libel tweets case

http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/things-worse-katie-hopkins-faces-10004074#ICID=Android_TMNewsApp_AppShare

Hey M Lord how are you? Good to 'see' you x

Thorin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:


What long post?

The one on this page where I countered in red.
Its on the previous page as well as well as others that excuses were offered up.
Anything else or is your input on this going to be yet more about sexist comments where you class men as girls on periods?
Well its about the limit of your mentality I guess

Oh that.   Too pedantic to even notice.

I was referring to your monthly lunar madness, actually.   Not menstruation.   But seeing as that's how you interpret it....

HoratioTarr wrote:

Thorin wrote:

The one on this page where I countered in red.
Its on the previous page as well as well as others that excuses were offered up.
Anything else or is your input on this going to be yet more about sexist comments where you class men as girls on periods?
Well its about the limit of your mentality I guess

Oh that.   Too pedantic to even notice.

I was referring to your monthly lunar madness, actually.   Not menstruation.   But seeing as that's how you interpret it....

So more quackery about the moon, just like the job you do.

Quackery

SEXY MAMA wrote:Hey M Lord how are you? Good to 'see' you x

Hello SM. Absolutely fine except for the exigencies of old age. Daughter (She Who Must Be Obeyed Mk 2) has banned me from doing things like felling trees and teetering on top of ladders while repairing barn roofs (though I do conceal, er, certain other activities from her!) but otherwise enjoying life. Busy morning in prospect, but I'll send you a PM later in the day.

Syl wrote:

Jules wrote:


The bit that I did not care about is you thinking that having your photo in your avvy makes you something very special, cos you are always ramming the issue down people's throats. Give it a rest.--?.

I don't go on about showing my own image....I merely respond to YOU who tends to go on about it a lot.....odd woman.

-------------

I have only just spotted this post, I don't know how I missed it earlier. I'm glad I returned to read this thread or I'd have missed it altogether.

Yes you do go on and on about the fact that you use your own photo and your own real name on public forums.
You bring up the subject in most forums and you do it quite spontaneously. I don't mind that bit, you can keep saying it nonstop, all day long, for all I care.

The bit I do mind is when you start criticising  and calling others,  for not doing the same as you.
And please don't lie, I never bring the subject up, never in a million years. So don't lie that you're only ''responding'' to me.
It's  YOU who always bring the subject up, just like you did in this very thread. Plus you mention it and make posts about it, in most forums.


"Odd woman" ???  I'll be as odd as I jolly well like. None of your business!
Have a candy and a pat on the back for being an identikit 'cookie-cutter', congrats.

I know I'll get the blame now, for replying. I don't care. It's always me who is deemed to be in the wrong. If you come to a thread and start attacking people, of course they will respond.

People are supposed to be relaxed and chilled after a holiday, not jump straight into rows. You should demand a refund from the travel firm!

Jules wrote:

Syl wrote:

I don't go on about showing my own image....I merely respond to YOU who tends to go on about it a lot.....odd woman.

-------------

I have only just spotted this post, I don't know how I missed it earlier. I'm glad I returned to read this thread or I'd have missed it altogether.

Yes you do go on and on about the fact that you use your own photo and your own real name on public forums.
You do it in most forums and you do it quite spontaneously. I don't mind that bit, you can keep saying it nonstop, all day long, for all I care.

The bit I do mind is when you start criticising  and calling others,  for not doing the same as you.
And please don't lie, I never bring the subject up, never in a million years. So don't lie that you're only ''responding'' to me.
It's  YOU who always bring the subject up, just like you did in this very thread. Plus you mention it and make posts about it, in most forums.

"Odd woman" ???  I'll be as odd as I jolly well like. None of your business!
Have a candy and a pat on the back for being an identikit 'cookie-cutter', congrats.

What a lying piece of shit that silly old bag Sly is  !!!

SHE'S the one who introduced the issue of avatars, personal images and identity into these threads this week..

And Sly's certainly the last person on here who should be calling anyone else "odd".  They don't get any weirder on here than that silly old troll Sly..        

Can't you post anything but insults? nearly every post you make is having a go at some one. You must have a shit life.

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

Jules wrote:

I have only just spotted this post, I don't know how I missed it earlier. I'm glad I returned to read this thread or I'd have missed it altogether.

Yes you do go on and on about the fact that you use your own photo and your own real name on public forums.
You do it in most forums and you do it quite spontaneously. I don't mind that bit, you can keep saying it nonstop, all day long, for all I care.

The bit I do mind is when you start criticising  and calling others,  for not doing the same as you.
And please don't lie, I never bring the subject up, never in a million years. So don't lie that you're only ''responding'' to me.
It's  YOU who always bring the subject up, just like you did in this very thread. Plus you mention it and make posts about it, in most forums.

"Odd woman" ???  I'll be as odd as I jolly well like. None of your business!
Have a candy and a pat on the back for being an identikit 'cookie-cutter', congrats.

What a lying piece of shit that silly old bag Sly is  !!!

SHE'S the one who introduced the issue of avatars, personal images and identity into these threads this week..

And Sly's certainly the last person on here who should be calling anyone else "odd".  They don't get any weirder on here than that silly old troll Sly..        

I nearly fell over when she said she was only responding to me. Who brought the subject up? Who always brings the subject up?
Warped vision, warped values, warped logic.  

Look on the bright side Syl, your mates will soon descend on the thread and blame me for everything, and cover you with kisses & greenies.

Lurrverrly!  

Jules wrote:

Syl wrote:

I don't go on about showing my own image....I merely respond to YOU who tends to go on about it a lot.....odd woman.

-------------

I have only just spotted this post, I don't know how I missed it earlier. I'm glad I returned to read this thread or I'd have missed it altogether.

Yes you do go on and on about the fact that you use your own photo and your own real name on public forums.
You bring up the subject in most forums and you do it quite spontaneously. I don't mind that bit, you can keep saying it nonstop, all day long, for all I care.

The bit I do mind is when you start criticising  and calling others,  for not doing the same as you.
And please don't lie, I never bring the subject up, never in a million years. So don't lie that you're only ''responding'' to me.
It's  YOU who always bring the subject up, just like you did in this very thread. Plus you mention it and make posts about it, in most forums.


"Odd woman" ???  I'll be as odd as I jolly well like. None of your business!
Have a candy and a pat on the back for being an identikit 'cookie-cutter', congrats.

You are determined to look for a row aren't you?

I made ONE post after I had returned from holiday, answering another poster, nothing to do with you.

You zoomed in and picked out my one post and answered in a nasty fashion, not once but TWICE....amusingly pointing out in big bold letters that NOBODY cared about my pic....which only you were going on about .....I only mentioned my name and avi in reply to Thor (in context of what we were talking about) long after you had wittered on about it.

Now do yourself a favour, stop obsessing over me, my holiday, my posts, my opinions.... try to either ignore me (which would be my preferred option) or post civilly if you can (knowing you of old not likely) just stop trying to cause trouble over nothing.

Thank you...over and out.

To try and keep this thread on topic, after all of the constant trolling from nicko, Sly, Freddy M' and Ragg's...

Has Katie Hopkins always been so dog's_arse ugly  ?

Or is that simply a result of all that hatred that she makes her miserable living from..

Hopkins has always been ugly.
Remember when she was shagged from.behind over a farmers gate?
Her lover thought he was shagging a cow!
(He wasn't far wrong)

Still pictures on Google!

I see Wilf the tag teamer has rushed over to help Canny...probably got the order on her own forum to aid and abet in her latest agenda to try to get someone else banned from here.

I will leave you both to it.

Syl wrote:

Jules wrote:

I have only just spotted this post, I don't know how I missed it earlier. I'm glad I returned to read this thread or I'd have missed it altogether.

Yes you do go on and on about the fact that you use your own photo and your own real name on public forums.
You bring up the subject in most forums and you do it quite spontaneously. I don't mind that bit, you can keep saying it nonstop, all day long, for all I care.

The bit I do mind is when you start criticising  and calling others,  for not doing the same as you.
And please don't lie, I never bring the subject up, never in a million years. So don't lie that you're only ''responding'' to me.
It's  YOU who always bring the subject up, just like you did in this very thread. Plus you mention it and make posts about it, in most forums.


"Odd woman" ???  I'll be as odd as I jolly well like. None of your business!
Have a candy and a pat on the back for being an identikit 'cookie-cutter', congrats.

You are determined to look for a row aren't you?

I made ONE post after I had returned from holiday, answering another poster, nothing to do with you.

You zoomed in and picked out my one post and answered in a nasty fashion, not once but TWICE....amusingly pointing out in big bold letters that NOBODY cared about my pic....which only you were going on about   .....I only mentioned my name and avi  in reply to Thor (in context of what we were talking about)  long after you had wittered on about it.

Now do yourself a favour, stop obsessing over me, my holiday, my posts, my opinions.... try to either ignore me (which would be my preferred option) or post civilly if you can (knowing you of old not likely) just stop trying to cause trouble over nothing.

Thank you...over and out.

Calling people 'frauds, fakes and cowards' when they have done absolutely nowt wrong, is ludricrous. We are all here to post, that's the point of forums. Posting does not make anyone a keyboard warrior. Allow people to post in peace without calling them names, even if they choose not to share their personal details, they don't deserve to be called. Over & out.

Jules wrote:

Syl wrote:

You are determined to look for a row aren't you?

I made ONE post after I had returned from holiday, answering another poster, nothing to do with you.

You zoomed in and picked out my one post and answered in a nasty fashion, not once but TWICE....amusingly pointing out in big bold letters that NOBODY cared about my pic....which only you were going on about   .....I only mentioned my name and avi  in reply to Thor (in context of what we were talking about)  long after you had wittered on about it.

Now do yourself a favour, stop obsessing over me, my holiday, my posts, my opinions.... try to either ignore me (which would be my preferred option) or post civilly if you can (knowing you of old not likely) just stop trying to cause trouble over nothing.

Thank you...over and out.

Calling people 'frauds, fakes and cowards' when they have done absolutely nowt wrong,  is ludricrous. We are all here to post, that's the point of forums. Posting does not make anyone a keyboard warrior. Allow people to post in peace without calling them names, even if they choose not to share their personal details, they don't deserve to be called. Over & out.

Who is talking of people who post? I am talking of people who scream abuse, lies, and generally only want to cause upset on a forum, hidden behind their keyboards in the safety of their own homes. Of course they are cowards....look at your latest enabler Wolf, classic example of a lying coward.
The problem with you is you twist what has been said, go along with lies, encourage bad feeling....to be frank you often start the bad feeling.
Get over yourself.

nicko wrote:Can't you post anything but insults?  nearly every post you make is having a go at some one.   You must have a shit life.

Its very obvious who has shit lives on forums isn't it.....maybe we should be more understanding.

Anyway...back on topic.

FFS Canny, when you start tag-teaming with Wolfman, it's obvious you've lost the plot and must be absolutely desperate.

Raggamuffin wrote:FFS Canny, when you start tag-teaming with Wolfman, it's obvious you've lost the plot and must be absolutely desperate.

I call you Raggamuffin on here, not Fenella / Dove / Eric or whatever. Perhaps you might afford me the same courtesy??
I replied to just ONE post he made and this is exactly what YOU do when someone backs you up. So put your accusing finger away.

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

To try and keep this thread on topic, after all of the constant trolling from nicko, Sly, Freddy M' and Ragg's...

Has Katie Hopkins always been so dog's_arse ugly  ?

Or is that simply a result of all that hatred that she makes her miserable living from..

Actually, you're off topic - this thread is about a libel case. If you want to hurl silly, juvenile insults around, you should start another thread. In any case, she's probably a lot better looking than you if you're going on "hatred" - you're full of it.

Jules wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:FFS Canny, when you start tag-teaming with Wolfman, it's obvious you've lost the plot and must be absolutely desperate.

I call you Raggamuffin on here, not Fenella / Dove / Eric or whatever. Perhaps you might afford me the same courtesy??
I replied to just ONE post he made and this is exactly what YOU do when someone backs you up. So put your accusing finger away.

Why would you call me Eric? Are you completely bonkers? You joined in with him slagging Syl off - that's tag-teaming. It was nothing to do with you anyway - Syl was talking to Didge.

Jules wrote:

Is that what you model yourself on?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Jules wrote:

I call you Raggamuffin on here, not Fenella / Dove / Eric or whatever. Perhaps you might afford me the same courtesy??
I replied to just ONE post he made and this is exactly what YOU do when someone backs you up. So put your accusing finger away.

Why would you call me Eric? Are you completely bonkers? You joined in with him slagging Syl off - that's tag-teaming. It was nothing to do with you anyway - Syl was talking to Didge.

Correct on both counts Rags....that wont stop her though.

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

To try and keep this thread on topic, after all of the constant trolling from nicko, Sly, Freddy M' and Ragg's...

Has Katie Hopkins always been so dog's_arse ugly  ?

Or is that simply a result of all that hatred that she makes her miserable living from..

I don't think there's any doubt about who is the real troll here, WhoseYourMousie...a silly little Aussie tosspot who can always be counted on to crawl out from under his rock with some infantile comment or another whenever his peanut sized brain senses that a debate has become too adult for him and needs lowering to his own pre-school playgroup level.

I would imagine that most of your fellow countrymen would curl up in sheer embarrassment if they knew that you were their chief representative in an international discussion group.

Okay let's stop now.

If there's nothing more to say on Hopkins then there's nothing more to say.

Syl wrote:

Jules wrote:

I knew that as soon as you replied some godawful creep would give you a greenie.

The bit that I did not care about is you thinking that having your photo in your avvy makes you something very special, cos you are always ramming the issue down people's throats. Give it a rest. Sassy's avvy looks lovely but she does not go on and on about it, like you do, regarding avvi photos.


The other post was nothing to do with avvies, it's about you grumbling about rows on forums and then immersing yourself in them, you are always in the middle of a row. so why pretend that forum rows are beneath you?.

I don't go on about showing my own image....I merely respond to YOU who tends to go on about it a lot.....odd woman.

Not sure its very polite to call someone a "godawful creep" because they may agree with something I have said either....don't be so judgmental.

At least you've got the balls to post your own image.  Most don't.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Syl wrote:

I don't go on about showing my own image....I merely respond to YOU who tends to go on about it a lot.....odd woman.

Not sure its very polite to call someone a "godawful creep" because they may agree with something I have said either....don't be so judgmental.

At least you've got the balls to post your own image.  Most don't.

My original point was that the people who hide and spew hatred always do it concealing who they are. Katie Hopkins at least shows herself.
I don't expect people on forums to post pics and use their own names...that's personal choice, but its 100% true that keyboard warriors are cowardly creeps who would crap themselves if anyone found out who they were.

I'm not sure why some idiot chose to twist what I was saying.....that's forums for you.

eddie wrote:Okay let's stop now.

If there's nothing more to say on Hopkins then there's nothing more to say.

OK, Eddie - mea culpa (in part at least ), but just remind yourself which poster waited until the debate had wound up in a perfectly amicable way and then popped up from nowhere to post the following:

AND, most of those five pages feels like it was largely three or four pages of DYKface, Raggamuffin and Fred M' trying in vain to 'defend the indefensible..'.

Yes... the very fool who is now accusing others (whom he regards as Right Wing, naturally) of being trolls!

Wolfman is a troll. He occasionally pretends not to be by chucking out some on-topic stuff, but the majority of his posts contain baiting and abuse of other members.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

To try and keep this thread on topic, after all of the constant trolling from nicko, Sly, Freddy M' and Ragg's...

Has Katie Hopkins always been so dog's_arse ugly  ?

Or is that simply a result of all that hatred that she makes her miserable living from..

I don't think there's any doubt about who is the real troll here, WhoseYourMousie...a silly little Aussie tosspot who can always be counted on to crawl out from under his rock with some infantile comment or another whenever his peanut sized brain senses that a debate has become too adult for him and needs lowering to his own pre-school playgroup level.

I would imagine that most of your fellow countrymen would curl up in sheer embarrassment if they knew that you were their chief representative in an international discussion group.

Contradiction and double standard.
I thought you were above infantile abuse?
You are not the standard to base intelligence, knowledge or whether someone is liked by their fellow countryman. Why not for once rise above instead of being comparable

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

To try and keep this thread on topic, after all of the constant trolling from nicko, Sly, Freddy M' and Ragg's...

Has Katie Hopkins always been so dog's_arse ugly  ?

Or is that simply a result of all that hatred that she makes her miserable living from..

Stop attacking posters wolf and tackle the points instead

Sorry Eddie but I must say, this thread is disgusting. The attack on Syl and tag teaming is horrible to read. I have no problem with Jules and I get that she and Syl don't get on but Wolfe had no right butting in, this was between those two. I've sat back and said nothing before as this is between Syl and Jules, they both give as good as they get. Wolfe had no right jumping in with horrible insults. It's makes bloody nasty reading.

magica wrote:Sorry Eddie but I must say, this thread is disgusting. The attack on Syl and tag teaming is horrible to read. I have no problem with Jules and I get that she and Syl don't get on but Wolfe had no right butting in, this was between those two. I've sat back and said nothing before as this is between Syl and Jules, they both give as good as they get. Wolfe  had no right jumping in with horrible insults. It's makes bloody nasty reading.

Pointing out just one person when multiple people are attacking is also poor.
Nobody is in the right here, when many join in for a free for all on abuse.
Either all are wrong who do so or none are wrong.
You cannot condemn one without condemning others.
Its seems you are just trying to get someone in trouble and I hope now Eddie locks the thread as you are fueling the fire Magica.

You're right. That is why free speech is a great thing. People can say what they think and they get judged by what they say and how they behave.

The proof is always in the posting.