Political Matchmaker

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:11 am

https://www.crowdpac.co.uk/political-matchmaker

Link here to find out how left/right and how pro-liberty/authority you are.

I scored 81% Left, 59% Liberty

Tom Watson was the potential leader closest to my score.

What results do you guys get?

NOTE: the leaders are only British but the score is interesting eitherway Wink

by Guest Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:15 am

SNP
Nicola Sturgeon
69% Liberty
83% Left

Tom Watson? Jeez Les lol

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:47 am

sassy wrote:SNP
Nicola Sturgeon
69% Liberty
83% Left

Tom Watson? Jeez Les lol

To be fair you aren't far off either lol

Honestly, none of the current leaders are much cop imo. I'm more interested in where people fall politically Razz

by Syl Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:58 am

Moderate centre.
Labour.
Tony Blair.
58% Liberty
51% Right.

Leave.

by Guest Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:05 pm

Syl wrote:Moderate centre.
Labour.
Tony Blair.
58% Liberty
51% Right.

Leave.

Tony Blair = 51+ right wing Twisted Evil

by Guest Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:07 pm

Eilzel wrote:
sassy wrote:SNP
Nicola Sturgeon
69% Liberty
83% Left

Tom Watson? Jeez Les lol

To be fair you aren't far off either lol

Honestly, none of the current leaders are much cop imo. I'm more interested in where people fall politically

I'm amazed it only gave me 83% left. Would imagine you have to put 'strongly' for or against anything for that, a couple I put the next one along.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:08 pm

sassy wrote:
Syl wrote:Moderate centre.
Labour.
Tony Blair.
58% Liberty
51% Right.

Leave.

Tony Blair = 51+ right wing

Did anyone ever think he was LW?

On social issues he was alright, on economics he was basically a Thatcherite Twisted Evil

by Syl Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:10 pm

I never liked Blair, I thought he was an offspring of Thatcher.

I did vote LEAVE though....so I must have done something right in that quiz. Cool

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:12 pm

Syl wrote:I never liked Blair, I thought he was an offspring of Thatcher.

I did vote LEAVE though....so I must have done something right in that quiz.

Well, tbf, it asks that question pretty directly, so much so I don't know why they included it in the answer lol

Presumably when it asked 'Was leaving the EU a good thing?' you said, yes Smile

by Syl Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:15 pm

Eilzel wrote:
Syl wrote:I never liked Blair, I thought he was an offspring of Thatcher.

I did vote LEAVE though....so I must have done something right in that quiz.

Well, tbf, it asks that question pretty directly, so much so I don't know why they included it in the answer lol

Presumably when it asked 'Was leaving the EU a good thing?' you said, yes

I did...I voted out and I answered the questions honestly....as I'm sure everyone will. Laughing

by scrat Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:17 pm

Dear scrat,

Thanks for taking Crowdpac’s Political Matchmaker test! According to your answers, you are 83% Liberty and 95% Left.

Jeremy Corbyn!

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:18 pm

scrat wrote:Dear scrat,

Thanks for taking Crowdpac’s Political Matchmaker test! According to your answers, you are 83% Liberty and 95% Left.

Jeremy Corbyn!

I suppose my 81% Leftism does look moderate compared to that Laughing

by Guest Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:19 pm

scrat wrote:Dear scrat,

Thanks for taking Crowdpac’s Political Matchmaker test! According to your answers, you are 83% Liberty and 95% Left.

Jeremy Corbyn!

I hadn't used the important arrows at the side, tried to take it again with them but it wouldnt let me!!!

by scrat Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:22 pm

sassy wrote:
scrat wrote:Dear scrat,

Thanks for taking Crowdpac’cs Political Matchmaker test! According to your answers, you are 83% Liberty and 95% Left.

Jeremy Corbyn!

I hadn't used the important arrows at the side, tried to take it again with them but it wouldnt let me!!!

I even voted leave the EU and was neutral on immigration, I didn't play with the arrows.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:25 pm

I only used some of the arrows, they probably only make a difference if it is close tbh

by Guest Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:25 pm

scrat wrote:
sassy wrote:

I hadn't used the important arrows at the side, tried to take it again with them but it wouldnt let me!!!
I even voted leave the EU and was neutral on immigration, I didn't play with the arrows.

In that case, I'm really puzzled.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:27 pm

sassy wrote:
scrat wrote:
I even voted leave the EU and was neutral on immigration, I didn't play with the arrows.

In that case, I'm really puzzled.

You are surprised that you 'only' got 83% Left? That's pretty high compared to what most would get haha

by scrat Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:29 pm

Syl wrote:Moderate centre.
Labour.
Tony Blair.
58% Liberty
51% Right.

Leave.

Only 51% right, I think 99% Britain first would be closer to the Mark.

by Syl Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:38 pm

scrat wrote:
Syl wrote:Moderate centre.
Labour.
Tony Blair.
58% Liberty
51% Right.

Leave.
Only 51% right, I think 99% Britain first would be closer to the Mark.

Political Matchmaker Norwegian-troll-isolated-white-background-41309530

by scrat Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:44 pm

Syl wrote:
scrat wrote:
Only 51% right, I think 99% Britain first would be closer to the Mark.

IMO anyone who constantly follows private piles around in snivelling servitude is extreme far right, after all he's a Britain first clone and their followers murder innocent mothers!

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:46 pm

You
60% LIBERTY
71% LEFT
LEAVE

LABOUR
Sadiq Khan
67% LIBERTY
72% LEFT
REMAIN

I don't use the arrows.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:47 pm

scrat wrote:
Syl wrote:
IMO anyone who constantly follows private piles around in snivelling servitude is extreme far right, after all he's a Britain first clone and their followers murder innocent mothers!

Let's be fair here Scrat.

You are 95% Leftist.
I am 81% and you say I'm moderate.
It's small wonder a 51% Rightie is Far-Right in your eyes.

It's all about perspective Neutral

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:48 pm

eddie wrote:

You
60% LIBERTY
71% LEFT
LEAVE

LABOUR
Sadiq Khan
67% LIBERTY
72% LEFT
REMAIN

Sadiq Khan, he's alright Smile

Seems most of us are leaning leftward so far.

by scrat Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:52 pm

Eilzel wrote:
scrat wrote:
IMO anyone who constantly follows private piles around in snivelling servitude is extreme far right, after all he's a Britain first clone and their followers murder innocent mothers!

Let's be fair here Scrat.

You are 95% Leftist.
I am 81% and you say I'm moderate.
It's small wonder a 51% Rightie is Far-Right in your eyes.

It's all about perspective

Hey, I've already stated there's only three groups, Syl supports private piles, she went down into the basement and offered him comfort, a moderate would have ignored him, especially after demanding that homosexuals should be hung, but then I guess I'm a lot less tolerant of far right extremists than others.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:53 pm

scrat wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Let's be fair here Scrat.

You are 95% Leftist.
I am 81% and you say I'm moderate.
It's small wonder a 51% Rightie is Far-Right in your eyes.

It's all about perspective
Hey, I've already stated there's only three groups, Syl supports private piles, she went down into the basement and offered him comfort, a moderate would have ignored him, especially after demanding that homosexuals should be hung, but then I guess I'm a lot less tolerant of far right extremists than others.

OK, two questions- who is Piles? And when did anyone demand gay people be hung?

Obviously I would not have ignored that.

by 'Wolfie Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:55 pm

scrat wrote:
Syl wrote:Moderate centre.
Labour.
Tony Blair.
58% Liberty
51% Right.

Leave.
Only 51% right, I think 99% Britain first would be closer to the Mark.

Yay !!!

And Attilla the Hun as her closest leader match...

by 'Wolfie Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:58 pm

scrat wrote:
Syl wrote:
IMO anyone who constantly follows private piles around in snivelling servitude is extreme far right, after all he's a Britain first clone and their followers murder innocent mothers!

Looky there !!!

Syl's put a pic' of herself up !!!

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:01 pm

Eilzel wrote:
eddie wrote:

You
60% LIBERTY
71% LEFT
LEAVE

LABOUR
Sadiq Khan
67% LIBERTY
72% LEFT
REMAIN

Sadiq Khan, he's alright

Seems most of us are leaning leftward so far.

I'm surprised I got Labour - I've never voted labour. The closest I ever got to feeling okay about labour was the year Blair was elected. How wrong was I, as it turns out!

by 'Wolfie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:06 pm

Eilzel wrote:
scrat wrote:
Hey, I've already stated there's only three groups, Syl supports private piles, she went down into the basement and offered him comfort, a moderate would have ignored him, especially after demanding that homosexuals should be hung, but then I guess I'm a lot less tolerant of far right extremists than others.

OK, two questions- who is Piles? And when did anyone demand gay people be hung?

Obviously I would not have ignored that.

1. Stormee == Major Pain == Private Piles

2. A few days ago, Major wrote "All poofs should be hung..", so Victor basemented him..

And yes, lez, Syl is one of Majors leading supporters on here, often supporting his racist/xenophobic outbursts, and cheering him on..

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:06 pm

eddie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

Sadiq Khan, he's alright

Seems most of us are leaning leftward so far.

I'm surprised I got Labour - I've never voted labour. The closest I ever got to feeling okay about labour was the year Blair was elected. How wrong was I, as it turns out!

To be fair I ignored the association with Labour. They are all lame. Labour were good in their traditional form but not for a while now. Political parties today are all over the spectrum.

by Victorismyhero Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:08 pm

shut it wolfie...troll
shut it scrat...troll
"* You are expected to participate in a manner that promotes debate, not fighting. That doesn't mean that we expect there to be no fighting. But members who routinely turn a majority of the threads in which they're participating into slinging matches will be considered a nuisance and subjected to temporary bans, over and over again if necessary, until they figure out how to stop doing that, or a permanent ban."

by Victorismyhero Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:10 pm

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:
scrat wrote:
Hey, I've already stated there's only three groups, Syl supports private piles, she went down into the basement and offered him comfort, a moderate would have ignored him, especially after demanding that homosexuals should be hung, but then I guess I'm a lot less tolerant of far right extremists than others.

OK, two questions- who is Piles? And when did anyone demand gay people be hung?

Obviously I would not have ignored that.

1. Stormee == Major Pain == Private Piles

2. A few days ago, Major wrote "All poofs should be hung..", so Victor basemented him..

not "strictly true"............. however........

And yes, lez, Syl is one of Majors leading supporters on here, often supporting his racist/xenophobic outbursts, and cheering him on..

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:11 pm

Major did not write "All poofs should be hung"

That is not factually correct.
Wolf you need to stop lying.

by 'Wolfie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:16 pm

I just gave that quiz a go...

I scored :

88% Left
59% Liberty

and it gives British Labour's Tom Watson as the closest Political match over there..

by 'Wolfie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:19 pm

eddie wrote:Major did not write "All poofs should be hung"

That is not factually correct.
Wolf you need to stop lying.

I'M NOT lying, you fallacious pig.. You need to stop falsely labelling me, so often..

He wrote " p**fs"

What the fuck do you think he meant, you useless piece of shit..

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:19 pm

OK, let's forget that, I can find out another time, and get back to the main thread- vic, wolfie, did you do the test?

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:20 pm

wolfie, stop being horrible, chill out Cool

by 'Wolfie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:22 pm

Eilzel wrote:OK, let's forget that, I can find out another time, and get back to the main thread- vic, wolfie, did you do the test?

I scored 88% Left...

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:24 pm

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:OK, let's forget that, I can find out another time, and get back to the main thread- vic, wolfie, did you do the test?

I scored 88% Left...

That makes you our 2nd most Leftist poster so far- Sass will be dis-made (sp?) Laughing

by scrat Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:26 pm

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
eddie wrote:Major did not write "All poofs should be hung"

That is not factually correct.
Wolf you need to stop lying.

I'M NOT lying, you fallacious pig.. You need to stop falsely labelling me, so often..

He wrote " p**fs"

What the fuck do you think he meant, you useless piece of shit..

Green given, they're now denying why it was basemented because it posted more during its stay in chokey than it normally does, and it wasn't only Syl who crept downstairs to offer it some comfort!

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:29 pm

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
eddie wrote:Major did not write "All poofs should be hung"

That is not factually correct.
Wolf you need to stop lying.

I'M NOT lying, you fallacious pig.. You need to stop falsely labelling me, so often..

He wrote " p**fs"

What the fuck do you think he meant, you useless piece of shit..

I suggest you read the thread and his post again.
You misquoted him and even though I agree with you about what I think he meant - you still quoted him falsely.
You lied.

Would you like to go and look?

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:31 pm

scrat wrote:
WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
eddie wrote:Major did not write "All poofs should be hung"

That is not factually correct.
Wolf you need to stop lying.

I'M NOT lying, you fallacious pig.. You need to stop falsely labelling me, so often..

He wrote " p**fs"

What the fuck do you think he meant, you useless piece of shit..
Green given, they're now denying why it was basemented because it posted more during its stay in chokey than it normally does, and it wasn't only Syl who crept downstairs to offer it some comfort!

Would you like me to respeat to you too?

I agreed with the fact that I think major meant what he posted but wolf still misquoted him. That's a fact isn't it not?

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:32 pm

Eilzel wrote:OK, let's forget that, I can find out another time, and get back to the main thread- vic, wolfie, did you do the test?

Eric Bristow thread
I'd like you to read it then you can come back and tell me what you know.

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:35 pm

Here is what major actually said:

The only sense Bristow made was the "SORTING THAT P**F OUT" bit.

Hangem high.

Now I know that he deserved basmenting but the fact is, he did not say what Wolf claimed, wolf is a stickler for facts and I am sure he wouldn't want to be misquoted.

Major of course, says he meant hang all paedos.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:36 pm

eddie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:OK, let's forget that, I can find out another time, and get back to the main thread- vic, wolfie, did you do the test?

Eric Bristow thread
I'd like you to read it then you can come back and tell me what you know.

I just read it.

The argument is pedantic. He as good as said what they quoted him saying imo. He may not have been so direct, but it is obvious. While I don't think any mod condones him or finds it acceptable (he is on a final warning as far as I can tell), I don't think we need to be having a go at scrat or wolfie (in this case) because they simplified what he said in other words.

Major is a five star geranium- and I hope he does slip again before long.

EDIT: Of course major says that- he doesn't want to be banned. But he at the very least wanted people to suspect- and that is BS enough to give him the boot imo.

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:44 pm

Eilzel wrote:
eddie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:OK, let's forget that, I can find out another time, and get back to the main thread- vic, wolfie, did you do the test?

Eric Bristow thread
I'd like you to read it then you can come back and tell me what you know.

I just read it.

The argument is pedantic. He as good as said what they quoted him saying imo. He may not have been so direct, but it is obvious. While I don't think any mod condones him or finds it acceptable (he is on a final warning as far as I can tell), I don't think we need to be having a go at scrat or wolfie (in this case) because they simplified what he said in other words.

Major is a five star geranium- and I hope he does slip again before long.

EDIT: Of course major says that- he doesn't want to be banned. But he at the very least wanted people to suspect- and that is BS enough to give him the boot imo.

I don't believe Major meant it any other way either and I fairly gave him a chance to explain as is my way.

I merely pointed out that he had been misquoted and I don't no think that's a bad thing.

But okay. I do apologise to wolf for calling him a liar, that was perhaps the wrong word.
Sorry wolf but I try to be fair. Independent thoughts called you a troll the other day and I didn't let that slide either.

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:56 pm

eddie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

I just read it.

The argument is pedantic. He as good as said what they quoted him saying imo. He may not have been so direct, but it is obvious. While I don't think any mod condones him or finds it acceptable (he is on a final warning as far as I can tell), I don't think we need to be having a go at scrat or wolfie (in this case) because they simplified what he said in other words.

Major is a five star geranium- and I hope he does slip again before long.

EDIT: Of course major says that- he doesn't want to be banned. But he at the very least wanted people to suspect- and that is BS enough to give him the boot imo.

I don't believe Major meant it any other way either and I fairly gave him a chance to explain as is my way.

I merely pointed out that he had been misquoted and I don't no think that's a bad thing.

But okay. I do apologise to wolf for calling him a liar, that was perhaps the wrong word.
Sorry wolf but I try to be fair. Independent thoughts called you a troll the other day and I didn't let that slide either.

Can't say fairer than that sunny

by Victorismyhero Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:10 pm

tis "test" is garbage....

talk about tailoring the questions the questions to suit

take the first one....

should human rights be sacrificed for national security

there is no black and white/yes/no to this

surely it depends on
a) the seriousness of the HR breach
b) the severity of the threat to national security

the best answer I could give to that kind of leading question is

as a general principle NO
however i realise that at rare times, situations may occur whereby such action may be NECESSARY for the safety of the nations citizens

by Eilzel Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:12 pm

Lord Foul wrote:tis "test" is garbage....

talk about tailoring the questions the questions to suit

take the first one....

should human rights be sacrificed for national security

there is no black and white/yes/no to this

surely it depends on
a) the seriousness of the HR breach
b) the severity of the threat to national security

the best answer I could give to that kind of leading question is

as a general principle NO
however i realise that at rare times, situations may occur whereby such action may be NECESSARY for the safety of the nations citizens

You could just go with neutral then Rolling Eyes

Did you actually finish the test?

by eddie Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:13 pm

Eilzel wrote:
eddie wrote:
Eilzel wrote:

I just read it.

The argument is pedantic. He as good as said what they quoted him saying imo. He may not have been so direct, but it is obvious. While I don't think any mod condones him or finds it acceptable (he is on a final warning as far as I can tell), I don't think we need to be having a go at scrat or wolfie (in this case) because they simplified what he said in other words.

Major is a five star geranium- and I hope he does slip again before long.

EDIT: Of course major says that- he doesn't want to be banned. But he at the very least wanted people to suspect- and that is BS enough to give him the boot imo.

I don't believe Major meant it any other way either and I fairly gave him a chance to explain as is my way.

I merely pointed out that he had been misquoted and I don't no think that's a bad thing.

But okay. I do apologise to wolf for calling him a liar, that was perhaps the wrong word.
Sorry wolf but I try to be fair. Independent thoughts called you a troll the other day and I didn't let that slide either.

Can't say fairer than that

That's becasue you're a fair person. Others, not so. Laughing

by Sponsored content