Donald Trump, pampered child who doesn't understand how the world works

http://www.salon.com/2016/09/28/a-world-of-worry-hillarys-apologies-arent-enough-to-stop-trump-terror-from-striking-our-allies/

I’d wager a month’s salary that Trump has never even uttered the phrase “mutual defense treaties,” and that he has no understanding that such documents exist or that they’re binding. It makes sense, really, given that Trump has abandoned thousands of subcontractors without payment despite agreements to the contrary. But amid all of his otherwise career-ending gaffes and blurts (under normal rules, that is), Clinton had no choice but to interject with an apology so as to maintain solid relations with our partners on the international stage, all because Trump thinks honoring our treaties is a matter of personal whimsy.

In fact, Clinton wasn’t just apologizing to world for Trump. By proxy, Clinton was also apologizing for 45 percent of American voters who think this smirking Twitter troll is presidential material, and that it’s okay if we renege on our defense obligations. Now, just imagine how Trump will actually comport himself when and if he’s elected. Imagine the unnecessary conflicts in which we’d become entangled with otherwise friendly nations because Trump and his gaggle of cheerleaders don’t realize what’s going on. This is far worse than the bungling antics of George W. Bush. Trump would make enemies out of friendlies, and launch shooting wars with unfriendlies. And the irony is the white non-college educated men who compose Trump’s legion of fanboys would be stationed on the front lines as designated bullet blockers in those wars.

From the article:

Clinton said: "Well, let me — let me start by saying, words matter. Words matter when you run for president. And they really matter when you are president. And I want to reassure our allies in Japan and South Korea and elsewhere that we have mutual defense treaties and we will honor them.”

That is the sort of sound bite I like.

Ben Reilly wrote:http://www.salon.com/2016/09/28/a-world-of-worry-hillarys-apologies-arent-enough-to-stop-trump-terror-from-striking-our-allies/

I’d wager a month’s salary that Trump has never even uttered the phrase “mutual defense treaties,” and that he has no understanding that such documents exist or that they’re binding. It makes sense, really, given that Trump has abandoned thousands of subcontractors without payment despite agreements to the contrary. But amid all of his otherwise career-ending gaffes and blurts (under normal rules, that is), Clinton had no choice but to interject with an apology so as to maintain solid relations with our partners on the international stage, all because Trump thinks honoring our treaties is a matter of personal whimsy.

In fact, Clinton wasn’t just apologizing to world for Trump. By proxy, Clinton was also apologizing for 45 percent of American voters who think this smirking Twitter troll is presidential material, and that it’s okay if we renege on our defense obligations. Now, just imagine how Trump will actually comport himself when and if he’s elected. Imagine the unnecessary conflicts in which we’d become entangled with otherwise friendly nations because Trump and his gaggle of cheerleaders don’t realize what’s going on. This is far worse than the bungling antics of George W. Bush. Trump would make enemies out of friendlies, and launch shooting wars with unfriendlies. And the irony is the white non-college educated men who compose Trump’s legion of fanboys would be stationed on the front lines as designated bullet blockers in those wars.

He's punching above his weight. Tosser!

It’s not a matter of whether a Trump presidency would destabilize the world economy and our relations with international alliances; it’s how apocalyptic the destruction would be.

like I said Trump is the Apocalyptic vote

For all his bluster, we now know that his staff (including his own children) consider his performance a "disaster" and are already running to the press to place blame, which is pretty unprecedented for a campaign that is still over 40 days from the election: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/us/politics/donald-trump-debate.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/

Ben Reilly wrote:For all his bluster, we now know that his staff (including his own children) consider his performance a "disaster" and are already running to the press to place blame, which is pretty unprecedented for a campaign that is still over 40 days from the election: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/us/politics/donald-trump-debate.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/

When the staff has to use the press to get to their boss, you know the problem is with the candidate.