Isis scum ---WARNING - HIGHLY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING IMAGES---

First topic message reminder :

WARNING - HIGHLY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING IMAGES


New ISIS Video Shows Child Soldiers Executing & Beheading 5 ‘Kurdish Fighters’


In a new video purportedly released by the Islamic State titled “The Nations Will Gather Against You,” 5 Kurds allegedly with the YPG are executed by boy soldiers. The video was released on August 26 on ISIS terrorist channels from “Wilayat ar-Raqqa, or “State of Raqqa,” an ISIS-occupied region of Syria. Raqqa acts as the “capital” of the so-called Islamic State. According to the Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium, “Raqqa has been the seat of Islamic State control in Syria since IS moved its operations there from the environs of Aleppo in the summer of 2014. It had previously been a rebel-held center of operation.”

The executions in the new ISIS video include the beheading of 4 alleged Kurdish fighters by ISIS militants. One of the men is forced to watch his countrymen die.

Later, 5 young children born of foreign ISIS fighters execute 5 Kurdish YPG.

Lastly, 5 elderly men are shown executing 5 YPG fighters, too.


http://heavy.com/news/2016/08/new-isis-islamic-state-amaq-news-pictures-videos-kurdish-ypg-peshmerga-execution-beheading-by-boy-child-foreign-soldiers-raqqa-syria-telegram-full-uncensored-youtube-mp4-download/



This is a link to another article that has a video included...

Think the link is pretty self explanatory...

https://www.zerocensorship.com/uncensored/isis/shotgun-face-slow-motion-beheading-executions-men-iraq-video-308355

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

And sassy has run away...

I'd say she's gone with good reason, tommy.  Have you got anything else to say that isn't about your hatred for Muslims.  Damn, it's boring.

Watch the videos...

Miffs2 wrote:Perhaps miscreant is used differently overseas? Miscreant is not an appropriate word for Isis. To me it's a bit like calling them naughty. But,as Tommy highlighted it, all that ensued was a bit of twattery, another bloody c&p and bit of bandwagon jumping.

Miscreant is a word normally used to describe a younger and relatively insignificant minor criminal, normally a teenager who has gone off the rails a little bit etc...


But primarily meaning someone who is breaking the law... ISIS are enforcers of Islamic law...

Tommy Monk wrote:

Miffs2 wrote:Perhaps miscreant is used differently overseas? Miscreant is not an appropriate word for Isis. To me it's a bit like calling them naughty. But,as Tommy highlighted it, all that ensued was a bit of twattery, another bloody c&p and bit of bandwagon jumping.

Miscreant is a word normally used to describe a younger and relatively insignificant minor criminal, normally a teenager who has gone off the rails a little bit etc...


But primarily meaning someone who is breaking the law... ISIS are enforcers of Islamic law...

You are right. But as its you saying it ...

Have a green!

Tommy Monk wrote:


Have a green!

Thanks Tommy 

I was looking for a word that meant "evil person" and that's what I came up with. Come up with better hobbies, you two.

Ben Reilly wrote:I was looking for a word that meant "evil person" and that's what I came up with. Come up with better hobbies, you two.

Kindly remember young man, it's the Queen's English, don't fuck with it

Miffs2 wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:I was looking for a word that meant "evil person" and that's what I came up with. Come up with better hobbies, you two.

Kindly remember young man, it's the Queen's English, don't fuck with it

I speak Texan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texan_English

Ben Reilly wrote:

Miffs2 wrote:
Kindly remember young man, it's the Queen's English, don't fuck with it

I speak Texan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texan_English

Tommy Monk wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:You want to play the percentages game again sassy...?


You do realise that 99% of population over there are Muslims...!!!???


But up to 18% of victims are not Muslims!!!


What does that tell you...!!!???


Also... if isis were only a small number and had little support then they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily by the vast majority!!!


So it must be that isis and supporters are the majority!!!


They are doing islam by the book over there and enforcing Islamic law with the inevitable barbaric evil happening as a result of this!!!


If you watch the 2nd video I posted in op... you will see how these Islamic law enforcers deal with 3 young men who dared to spray paint a bit of graffiti on some walls... and while these and other 'miscreants' are dealt with, islamic style, the crowds in the background (who vastly outnumber the Islamic enforcers) do nothing against it...

And sassy has run away...

Still nothing to say on this sassy...!?

I see you posted your original message that I was supposed to have run away from at gone 6 this morning, when I have signed off from the forum at about midnight last night and only came on again this evening.   So lets put to bed the crap about me running away shall we.

Now, yet again, you seem to have misunderstood the statistics, you seem to misunderstand any statistics.

They are talking about people who have been killed by Muslim extremist WORLD WIDE not in the Middle East.

And I wouldn't watch a video you posted if I was paid, I value my brain and I don't put crap in it.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/431425/genocide-middle-eastern-christians-know-it-state-department-wont-say-it



Watch the videos... they were made by the followers and enforcers of Islam by the book....

Tommy Monk wrote:You want to play the percentages game again sassy...?


You do realise that 99% of population over there are Muslims...!!!???


But up to 18% of victims are not Muslims!!!


What does that tell you...!!!???


Also... if isis were only a small number and had little support then they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily by the vast majority!!!


So it must be that isis and supporters are the majority!!!


They are doing islam by the book over there and enforcing Islamic law with the inevitable barbaric evil happening as a result of this!!!


If you watch the 2nd video I posted in op... you will see how these Islamic law enforcers deal with 3 young men who dared to spray paint a bit of graffiti on some walls... and while these and other 'miscreants' are dealt with, islamic style, the crowds in the background (who vastly outnumber the Islamic enforcers) do nothing against it...

Tommy, have you got a link to a reputable poll or any academic research papers that supports what you have said in the part I have highlighted and disputes the poll carried out by the Pew research centre?

This poll...

In nations with significant Muslim populations, much disdain for ISIS

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/17/in-nations-with-significant-Muslim-populations-much-disdain-for-isis/

Don't see a majority of support in any of the figures quoted. Perhaps you have other data from elsewhere that you can share?

In areas where isis are they must be a majority with support or they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily...


Some crappy poll is irrelevant...

Tommy Monk wrote:In areas where isis are they must be a majority with support or they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily...


Some crappy poll is irrelevant...

It's all irrelevant. That's what I've been saying. Who started this thread, anyway?

Tommy Monk wrote:In areas where isis are they must be a majority with support or they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily...


Some crappy poll is irrelevant...

It's only from the Pew Research Center which is a highly respected polling organisation. But if you know better than them then what are you basing it on?

I asked a hundred people...


Then I 'extrapolated' the data...

Tommy Monk wrote:I asked a hundred people...


Then I 'extrapolated' the data...

Friends of yours were they?

A completely random selection of completely random members of public who are unconnected in any way to anything...


And who's identities must remain completely unknown for data protection reasons...



But... it's all highly scientific... you know... and... most amusing...!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

A completely random selection of completely random members of public who are unconnected in any way to anything...


And who's identities must remain completely unknown for data protection reasons...



But... it's all highly scientific... you know... and... most amusing...!!!

How many were Muslims and what percentage of the world Muslim population is it? An estimate will do.

I said that in the places where isis are... they must be large enough in number and have large enough local support to exist and continue to exist...!!!


Therefore they and their supporters must be the majority in places where they exist!!!


Because... if they were 'only a few'... and didn't have majority support of locals... then they would be turned over/driven out relatively quickly and easily!!!


Therefore... ISIS militants are the majority in numbers in the areas where isis are... or ISIS militants are not so large in number but have majority of locals support...


Either way... majority of people in areas where isis are, must be pro isis... or they would be turned over by the majority of people against them!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

I said that in the places where isis are... they must be large enough in number and have large enough local support to exist and continue to exist...!!!


Therefore they and their supporters must be the majority in places where they exist!!!


Because... if they were 'only a few'... and didn't have majority support of locals... then they would be turned over/driven out relatively quickly and easily!!!


Therefore... ISIS militants are the majority in numbers in the areas where isis are... or ISIS militants are not so large in number but have majority of locals support...


Either way... majority of people in areas where isis are, must be pro isis... or they would be turned over by the majority of people against them!!!

So the hundred of your sample were in areas where ISIS exists then?

Well that doesn't quite fit the bill where I saw people coming out onto the streets when Iraqi soldiers moved into a town in Northern Iraq after ISIS had been driven out.

Did you see it on the telly this evening?

Got to go Tommy. Can you pinpoint on a map where ISIS have a majority of support for their violence and the way they treat people and I'll have a look at it tomorrow.

Night

81% of Muslims surveyed support Islamic State slaughters – Al Jazeera Arabic Poll
FEATURED
by Jordan Schachtel, Breitbart
25 May 2015, Washington, D.C.

In a recent survey conducted by AlJazeera.net, the website for the Al Jazeera Arabic television channel, respondents overwhelmingly support the Islamic State terrorist group, with 81% voting “YES” on whether they approved of ISIS’s conquests in the region.

The poll, which asked in Arabic, “Do you support the organizing victories of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)?” has generated over 38,000 responses thus far, with only 19% of respondents voting “NO” to supporting ISIS.

Al Jazeera Arabic’s television audience is largely made up of Sunni Muslims living in the Arab world. Its biggest viewership numbers come from Egypt and Saudi Arabia, along with a large amount of satellite television viewers in the United States, according to research estimates. AlJazeera.net is most popular in Saudi Arabia, the United States, Egypt, Morocco, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to the Alexa webpage analytics site. Al Jazeera claims that it has over 40 million viewers in the Arab world.

The news that an overwhelming majority of respondents to the Al Jazeera Arabic poll strongly support ISIS may not surprise long-time trackers of the controversial network. The news outfit, which is run by Qatar’s ruling family and headquartered in Doha, has a track record rife with allegations that the organization supports the narratives of Sunni terrorist groups.

Following the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States, the Al Jazeera headquarters in Doha proudly displayed silhouettes revering Osama bin Laden as a prophet-like figure, according to a New York Times investigation. In an Al Jazeera survey taken on September 11, 2006, 50% of respondents said they supported Osama bin Laden.

https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/10/15/poll-81-of-Muslims-around-the-world-support-islamic-state-al-jazeera-arabic-poll/

I wonder if Irn Bru has seen this yet...?

http://metrocosm.com/support-isis-Muslim-world-perceptions-vs-reality/

Tommy Monk wrote:I wonder if Irn Bru has seen this yet...?

The article is meant to refer to victories in Iraq and Syria. Irn was speaking to violence not associated with geographic conquest.

Otherwise, the Muslims are no different than us. After all, we do more than our share of baby-killing, rape, and even institutionalized torture (I believe we call it "enhanced interrogation"...how antiseptic).

It is a survey of what Muslims think of isis...


The result is clear...

Tommy Monk wrote:
It is a survey of what Muslims think of isis...


The result is clear...

My link has the facts; yours has the right-wing lies.

No... my article was a survey done by AlJazeera of Muslims in the Muslim countries... yours is the left wing lies!

Quill, you seem to be obsessed with the phase "baby killing"

nicko wrote:Quill, you seem to be obsessed with the phase "baby killing"

Face it nicko.  That's what these military adventures from the west are all about.  They call themselves "peacemakers", yet do they go in with the tools of peace: say, a box of candies, a warm puppy, a baseball mitt or a cricket bat?  No, they show up with killing instruments.  The result is baby-killing.

If I invited someone to a party at my house and he showed up with an AR-15, I would invite him to leave.  We all know damn well the difference.  These are not peacemakers, they are war mongers.  And don't tell me that the coalition forces went into Iraq to take out a despot; they went in for revenge.  Really it's the same argument I make with the NRA...the people who have weapons don't get hurt; only the innocent get hurt.

Hence, baby-killers.

Have you seen the massive increase in arms sales that have happened under your nice fluffy Obama president...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Have you seen the massive increase in arms sales that have happened under your nice fluffy Obama president...?

...and a totally Republican Congress, I should add.  Obama cannot even get domestic legislation over gun control, despite his valiant attempts.  Can you imagine what would happen if he tried it over the international market!

Anyway, the Republican Congress will not even declare war against ISIL.  And they are the war mongers, fcs!  How the hell do you think Obama will succeed with gun control internationally? It was pure genius when he maneuvered the Republicans into a cul de sac to keep us out of war. Thank your lucky stars for that much.

And there's me thinking the American president was in control of usa policy...


At least that's what you lefties say when you are blaming other non leftie presidents for everything...

Tommy Monk wrote:And there's me thinking the American president was in control of usa policy...

At least that's what you lefties say when you are blaming other non leftie presidents for everything...

It never sinks in, does it?  A president is in charge of enforcement, not policy making.  If a president is lucky enough to have a Congress of it's own party, then as leader of the party the president has complete responsibility, or blame, for what happens on his watch.

We blame Bush and Cheney because they had such complete control--executive power and Congress--when they brought about the Iraq War disaster.

You really don't understand American politics, do you?  It's not as if these are difficult concepts, you know.  You were so keen on the meaning of majority-rule during the Brexit referendum; why do you have such a difficult time with majority-rule when it comes to the President not having a majority in Congress during most of the Obama tenure?

LET'S ALL not forget here, that Tommy's understanding and comprehension of all things political is so lacking and warped, that he still clings to the self-imposed nonsense that the Nazi's in the 1930s were a "far left" socialist party, with Hitler as a lefty despot  !!!

So it should surprise no-one that Tommy refuses to accept the differences between different sectors of governments, or chooses not to understand the limited "powers" and influence among presidents and prime ministers..        

Tommy Monk wrote:

With respect guys... your imaginations are nothing compared to the pure evil that these Islamist devils are doing...


You really need to see for your own eyes what they are doing to begin to see the evil that is their driving force...

I wont look either TM, the images shown on TV are bad enough but photographic Journalists will show
every graffic detail and nobody wants to see them

If you don't see it then you simply don't know what these scum cnuts are like.

Tommy Monk wrote:If you don't see it then you simply don't know what these scum cnuts are like.

You dont need to see things to realise how horrific they must be.
I watched the video of Saddam hanging because I knew he was a monster and deserved it but no I dont like
watching cruelty of any kind to man or beast

Trust me... you need to see some of this shit to believe it...

Tommy Monk wrote:

Trust me... you need to see some of this shit to believe it...

No we dont in my opinion as your imagination can and does create it's own pictures.
You can read any book and if you get into it you can kind of visualise the scenario even if fiction

Wheres the book saying what is happening in the videos...?

Tommy Monk wrote:

Wheres the book saying what is happening in the videos...?

There are none but why would anyone ever choose to watch the things you want us to comment on?
I'd ban showing pictures/photographs of cruelty as they aren't wanted or needed

I'm not saying watch it for pleasure... all I said was that you need to see to believe the level of evil these Muslims are doing.

Tommy Monk wrote:

I'm not saying watch it for pleasure... all I said was that you need to see to believe the level of evil these Muslims are doing.

You have the right attitude and intentions TM but that cant be the way to teach idiots not to join terrorist, racist or any other types of anti social groups as that just wont work IMO!

If more people were aware of the reality... the terrorists would not have such an easy time if it...

Ben Reilly wrote:They did shitty things and Tommy wants to make it out like I don't think that because he's a shitty little boy. I won't call him a man because he thinks and speaks as a child, so to me, he's a boy.

You are so rude and antagonistic towards Tommy Ben and it spoils his topics regularly, you and your mods would be jumping over any of us who kept doing such..

Discuss the topic, NOT Tommy.

His topics largely are world wide issues which have a wide devastating affect.

I cannot understand WHY you are not flat out out AGAINST Isis/Muslim threat and their wickedness/ carnage.

In actual fact It is difficult to really believe you are, no one could be if you come from a civilised part of this world.

Isis/Muslims are a WORLD THREAT, Ben. REMEMBER 911.

Spot on!!!

Sorry if I upset anyone,but pictures like this should be shown. You can read a description and think it's terrible these things happening, 10 mins after you'v forgotten about it. There are people around who would do this to YOU if they could. I have fought in Wars in several places in the World, and these atrocities happen all over. I have seen worse involving children, it made me and my mates so sick we killed the savages responsible on the spot! Only real pictures can bring the truth home.