Isis scum ---WARNING - HIGHLY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING IMAGES---

WARNING - HIGHLY GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING IMAGES


New ISIS Video Shows Child Soldiers Executing & Beheading 5 ‘Kurdish Fighters’


In a new video purportedly released by the Islamic State titled “The Nations Will Gather Against You,” 5 Kurds allegedly with the YPG are executed by boy soldiers. The video was released on August 26 on ISIS terrorist channels from “Wilayat ar-Raqqa, or “State of Raqqa,” an ISIS-occupied region of Syria. Raqqa acts as the “capital” of the so-called Islamic State. According to the Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium, “Raqqa has been the seat of Islamic State control in Syria since IS moved its operations there from the environs of Aleppo in the summer of 2014. It had previously been a rebel-held center of operation.”

The executions in the new ISIS video include the beheading of 4 alleged Kurdish fighters by ISIS militants. One of the men is forced to watch his countrymen die.

Later, 5 young children born of foreign ISIS fighters execute 5 Kurdish YPG.

Lastly, 5 elderly men are shown executing 5 YPG fighters, too.


http://heavy.com/news/2016/08/new-isis-islamic-state-amaq-news-pictures-videos-kurdish-ypg-peshmerga-execution-beheading-by-boy-child-foreign-soldiers-raqqa-syria-telegram-full-uncensored-youtube-mp4-download/



This is a link to another article that has a video included...

Think the link is pretty self explanatory...

https://www.zerocensorship.com/uncensored/isis/shotgun-face-slow-motion-beheading-executions-men-iraq-video-308355

Tommy at least some of the article please...?

I wont look at the pics...once seen they cant be unseen.

Syl wrote:I wont look at the pics...once seen they cant be unseen.

Me neither. My imagination is enough.

Thanks Tommy

With respect guys... your imaginations are nothing compared to the pure evil that these Islamist devils are doing...


You really need to see for your own eyes what they are doing to begin to see the evil that is their driving force...

I don't need to see, I have a vivid imagination and that's enough.

Again... with respect... the worst your imagination can dream up doesn't even close to the reality of what is going on ... and also as imagination is the conscious minds attempt to create a dream type fantasy visualisation etc, it is never really considered by the mind as being so real, so will never have the impact on the mind as something that is actually seen and witnessed as a real event!


People need to see the reality rather than conjure up their own soft focus dream like visualisations that are then easily dismissed as imaginary...!!!

Nope...it took me ages to get that mans leg (the kickboxer) out of my mind.

And I also think sometimes the imagination can conjure up even worse images than the actual footage of certain horrors, but I'm not taking the chance.

No doubt others will though, so your thread wont go unnoticed.

Tommy Monk wrote:Again... with respect... the worst your imagination can dream up doesn't even close to the reality of what is going on ... and also as imagination is the conscious minds attempt to create a dream type fantasy visualisation etc, it is never really considered by the mind as being so real, so will never have the impact on the mind as something that is actually seen and witnessed as a real event!


People need to see the reality rather than conjure up their own soft focus dream like visualisations that are then easily dismissed as imaginary...!!!

Yet you seem so angry that decent people are fleeing the lands these miscreants are occupying!

Tommy Monk wrote:

With respect guys... your imaginations are nothing compared to the pure evil that these Islamist devils are doing...


You really need to see for your own eyes what they are doing to begin to see the evil that is their driving force...

I can't look, sorry. I can't get pictures like that out of my head.

Thank you though Tommy, for taking into account the feelings of others and posting this sort of material sensitively and properly.

Saw that kind of stuff lots of times, after a time you get used to it,

that's why these savages think nothing of it, it comes second nature to them.

I never forget it.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Again... with respect... the worst your imagination can dream up doesn't even close to the reality of what is going on ... and also as imagination is the conscious minds attempt to create a dream type fantasy visualisation etc, it is never really considered by the mind as being so real, so will never have the impact on the mind as something that is actually seen and witnessed as a real event!


People need to see the reality rather than conjure up their own soft focus dream like visualisations that are then easily dismissed as imaginary...!!!

Yet you seem so angry that decent people are fleeing the lands these miscreants are occupying!

'Miscreants'...?


That is an interesting choice of words...


Would you care to elaborate on your definition of the word and justify it's use in this context please...!?

Look it up, Tommy.

I already knew what the word meant... then I looked up the definition too and confirmed what I already thought...


That's why I said it was an interesting choice of words by you... and why i asked YOU to clarify YOUR UNDERSTANDING of the definition of the word... and how YOU THINK that it applies within the context used...?

Tommy Monk wrote:
I already knew what the word meant... then I looked up the definition too and confirmed what I already thought...


That's why I said it was an interesting choice of words by you... and why i asked YOU to clarify YOUR UNDERSTANDING of the definition of the word... and how YOU THINK that it applies within the context used...?

Why do you find it interesting?

Why don't you just clarify your meaning in your post for the purpose of clear understanding and benefit of debate...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Why don't you just clarify your meaning in your post for the purpose of clear understanding and benefit of debate...?

I was clear and can't see what part you could possibly not understand.

I don't understand what you mean by 'miscreants'... please elaborate for clarity...?

Tommy Monk wrote:I don't understand what you mean by 'miscreants'... please elaborate for clarity...?

You said you looked it up.

Tommy Monk wrote:I don't understand what you mean by 'miscreants'... please elaborate for clarity...?

Stop being 'disingenuous'....

What the fuck? Why are you asking why someone used a word? Am I missing the entrance to a trap you're laying, tommy?

eddie wrote:What the fuck? Why are you asking why someone used a word? Am I missing the entrance to a trap you're laying, tommy?

If I had to guess, I'm thinking he eventually wants to take me to task for using a word he feels is too mild to describe ISIS members ... it's not, and I didn't mean it to be mild, but that won't stop him from trying to make me out as "soft on ISIS."

Not being disingenuous... I know what it means... That's why.i don't understand bens interesting use (misuse) of the word...


Ben... I'm asking you to clarify what you mean by the use of the word...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Not being disingenuous... I know what it means... That's why.i don't understand bens interesting use (misuse) of the word...


Ben... I'm asking you to clarify what you mean by the use of the word...?

We love that word though, don't we?

Yet you seem so angry that decent people are fleeing the lands these

mis·cre·ant
ˈmiskrēənt/
noun
plural noun: miscreants
a person who behaves badly or in a way that breaks the law.
synonyms: criminal, culprit, wrongdoer, malefactor, offender, villain, lawbreaker, evildoer, delinquent, hoodlum, reprobate; malfeasant
"the South Street playground has been taken over by a pack of drug-dealing miscreants"

are occupying!

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:What the fuck? Why are you asking why someone used a word? Am I missing the entrance to a trap you're laying, tommy?

If I had to guess, I'm thinking he eventually wants to take me to task for using a word he feels is too mild to describe ISIS members ... it's not, and I didn't mean it to be mild, but that won't stop him from trying to make me out as "soft on ISIS."

Yeah I think maybe, perhaps, you were being led a merry old dance up his garden path.

eddie wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:What the fuck? Why are you asking why someone used a word? Am I missing the entrance to a trap you're laying, tommy?

If I had to guess, I'm thinking he eventually wants to take me to task for using a word he feels is too mild to describe ISIS members ... it's not, and I didn't mean it to be mild, but that won't stop him from trying to make me out as "soft on ISIS."

Yeah I think maybe, perhaps, you were being led a merry old dance up his garden path.

Or at least what he thought would be a trip up his garden path, in his miscreant brain

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:What the fuck? Why are you asking why someone used a word? Am I missing the entrance to a trap you're laying, tommy?

If I had to guess, I'm thinking he eventually wants to take me to task for using a word he feels is too mild to describe ISIS members ... it's not, and I didn't mean it to be mild, but that won't stop him from trying to make me out as "soft on ISIS."

Yeah I think maybe, perhaps, you were being led a merry old dance up his garden path.

Or at least what he thought would be a trip up his garden path, in his miscreant brain

You're in trouble now

HoratioTarr wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Not being disingenuous... I know what it means... That's why.i don't understand bens interesting use (misuse) of the word...


Ben... I'm asking you to clarify what you mean by the use of the word...?

We love that word though, don't we?

Maybe i like it a little bit more than you...





Although one of my other favourite words springs to mind... 'superfluous'...!!!







And Ben... seriously...?

Tommy Monk wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Not being disingenuous... I know what it means... That's why.i don't understand bens interesting use (misuse) of the word...


Ben... I'm asking you to clarify what you mean by the use of the word...?

We love that word though, don't we?

Maybe i like it a little bit more than you...





Although one of my other favourite words springs to mind... 'superfluous'...!!!







And Ben... seriously...?

Seriously what?

He wants you to look up the word "seriously".

Tell us how those in the videos who are behaving in the koranic way and enforcing Islamic law are 'miscreants'...?


When the definition of the word is...


mis·cre·ant
ˈmiskrēənt/
noun
plural noun: miscreants
a person who behaves badly or in a way that breaks the law.

Tommy Monk wrote:Tell us how those in the videos who are behaving in the koranic way and enforcing Islamic law are 'miscreants'...?

When the definition of the word is...

mis·cre·ant
ˈmiskrēənt/
noun
plural noun: miscreants
a person who behaves badly or in a way that breaks the law.

Well, apparently they are behaving badly.  They can't be breaking the law, because the law is theirs.  The government did a lot of the same things in Burma.  We've also seen a lot of the same thing in Africa.

Wisely, we in America have kept out of it.  It's none of our business. There is a 1,600-year old civil war going on in Islam, and they will eventually have to settle it among themselves. Nothing we can do will help them.

They did shitty things and Tommy wants to make it out like I don't think that because he's a shitty little boy. I won't call him a man because he thinks and speaks as a child, so to me, he's a boy.

I think Tommy wants to raise a hue and cry about it.  But, to what end?  I believe we've learned that going into conflicts that are none of our business, and in which we can serve no productive purpose, only results in more babies being killed.  After all, we don't go in with chicklets and chocolates, do we?

All conflicts must be resolved internally, inclusively, and integratively.  As the middle east is not our conflict, there's nothing we can do except, perhaps, lend an sympathetic ear and encourage worldwide mediation.

Saying 'a few miscreants' is an understatement of epic proportions... and you also forget that vast numbers of the people there actually support the evil islamic barbarism!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Saying 'a few miscreants' is an understatement of epic proportions... and you also forget that vast numbers of the people there actually support the evil islamic barbarism!!!

Now the little boy has resorted to lying about what I said!

Ben Reilly wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Saying 'a few miscreants' is an understatement of epic proportions... and you also forget that vast numbers of the people there actually support the evil islamic barbarism!!!

Now the little boy has resorted to lying about what I said!

As well as lying about "vast numbers of the people there actually support the evil islamic barbarism!!!" as it is the vast number of people there that they are actually killing.   What a toss pot.

My mistake ben... you didn't say 'few''... but to describe them as 'miscreants' is still an epic understatement.


And sassy... the isis scum are both the militants and the vast number of people there who support them...


If they didn't have support then they could and would be turned over relatively quickly and easily.

You are not only stupid and ignorant, but just about as hateful as it is possible to be.

Muslims Are the VICTIMS of “Between 82 and 97% of Terrorism-Related Fatalities”: US Government

The Little-Known Secret to Destroying ISIS Propaganda

ISIS and Al Qaeda terrorist attacks on Westerners is evil.

And as a white American from a Judeo-Christian background, I am repulsed by the fact that ISIS is targeting Christians in Syria and Iraq with brutal murder … including crucifixion. [And these crimes are invariably not reported by the Western media.]

But most victims of ISIS, Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorism are themselves Muslim.

The U.S. National Counterterrorism Center – the United States government organization responsible for national and international counterterrorism efforts – reported in 2011 (page 14):

In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97% of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years.

The State Department commented:

NCTC [i.e. the National Counterterrorism Center] maintains its statistical information on the U.S. government’s authoritative and unclassified database on terrorist acts, the Worldwide Incidents Tracking System (WITS).
***
Muslims continued to bear the brunt of terrorism ….

• In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97 percent of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years.
  
• Muslim majority countries bore the greatest number of attacks involving 10 or more deaths ….
  

According to a 2009 report published by the Counter Terrorism Center at the United States Military Academy at West Point, Al-Qaeda kills over seven times more Muslims than non-Muslims.
The UN reported last year that Muslims are the largest victims of ISIS in Iraq.
In 2013, the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism’s Global Terrorism Database –  joint government-university program on terrorism, hosted at the University of Maryland noted that between 2004 and 2013, about half of all terrorist attacks, and 60% of fatalities due to terrorist attacks, took place in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan – all of which have a mostly Muslim population:

While she doubts that 95% of terrorism victims are Muslim, she thinks the truth might not be far off.
“It’s not out of the realm of possibility, given the extreme concentration of attacks in majority-Muslim countries,” Miller says.

In other words, the vast majority of Muslims not only condemn ISIS … but they are actually bearing the brunt of ISIS’ cruelty.
One American Muslim writes at Daily Beast:

We Muslims despise these crazy people more than anyone else does.
Denounce ISIS? Muslims despise ISIS. (At least those who aren’t pathological.)
True, ISIS is compromised of people who claim to be Muslims. But the number one victim of this barbaric terror group is Muslims. That’s undisputed. ISIS has killed thousands of Muslims across the Middle East, including beheading Sunni Muslims in Iraq for failing to pledge loyalty to them, executing Imams for not submitting to them, and even killing an Imam in Iraq for simply denouncing them.

(Muslims are also being slaughtered by ISIS for standing up and publicly opposing the terrorist group’s persecution of Christians. And as a sidenote, a 2013 study by Duke University showed that Muslim Americans helped catch more terrorism suspects and perpetrators than the United States government itself.)
Indeed, if we want to stop ISIS, one of the most important things we can do is publicize the fact that ISIS is killing more “fellow” Muslims than any other victims. This will destroy ISIS propaganda that they are focused on a jihad or “holy war” against Christian and Jewish “occupiers”.
As Daily Beast pointed out in 2014:

The group’s killing of Westerners gets attention. But ISIS has killed far more Muslims, and publicizing that fact would harm it more.
Last Thursday, the United Nations released a report that could provide us with one of the keys to defeating ISIS. Unfortunately, it received almost zero media attention.What makes this 26-page report (PDF) so powerful is that it describes to us the gruesome circumstances in which ISIS has killed fellow Muslims. We are talking beheadings, killing of women for objecting to ISIS’ policies, and executing Sunni Muslim clerics for refusing to swear allegiance to ISIS.
Why is this important? This information can hopefully help dissuade other Muslims from joining or financially supporting ISIS. And it may even persuade other Muslim countries to join or increase their efforts in fighting ISIS. The reason being that slaughtering fellow Muslims is seen as universally wrong across the Muslim world and as a violation of Islamic values. In fact, Al Qaeda has even publicly criticized ISIS for this very conduct.
***
The leaders of ISIS are very aware that the killing of fellow Muslims—especially Sunnis- could hurt their cause in attracting support from the Sunni Muslim world. In fact, ISIS is so concerned about the possible backlash that the group’s leaders addressed this subject (PDF) in the latest issue of its online magazine.
***
I wish the media would give more coverage to ISIS’ crimes against Muslims. The publicity would hurt the group’s cause tremendously, and it could also make the case to my fellow Americas that this fight is not Islam versus the West. Rather, it’s everyone who doesn’t want to live under ISIS’ brutal dictatorship versus ISIS.
And those Muslims who gave their lives fighting against or refusing to give into ISIS in our common struggle should be recognized in the media for their bravery. It would be very powerful to see images in our media of the Muslims killed by ISIS, not just Westerners.

How to Stop ISIS

Unfortunately, Western governments are increasing the threat from terrorism (all of the countries we’ve “regime changed” have descended into brutal chaos, allowing ISIS and other terrorists to spread) … instead of doing the things which will stop terrorism.
One of those things is to publicize the fact that most of ISIS’ victims are Muslim, as it will destroy ISIS propaganda.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/Muslims-are-the-victims-of-between-82-and-97-of-terrorism-related-fatalities-us-government/5516565

Tommy Monk wrote:My mistake ben... you didn't say 'few''... but to describe them as 'miscreants' is still an epic understatement.


And sassy... the isis scum are both the militants and the vast number of people there who support them...


If they didn't have support then they could and would be turned over relatively quickly and easily.

How about this -- they're evil, twisted, sick, murderous scum.

Try twisting those terms into something I didn't intend.

You want to play the percentages game again sassy...?


You do realise that 99% of population over there are Muslims...!!!???


But up to 18% of victims are not Muslims!!!


What does that tell you...!!!???


Also... if isis were only a small number and had little support then they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily by the vast majority!!!


So it must be that isis and supporters are the majority!!!


They are doing islam by the book over there and enforcing Islamic law with the inevitable barbaric evil happening as a result of this!!!


If you watch the 2nd video I posted in op... you will see how these Islamic law enforcers deal with 3 young men who dared to spray paint a bit of graffiti on some walls... and while these and other 'miscreants' are dealt with, islamic style, the crowds in the background (who vastly outnumber the Islamic enforcers) do nothing against it...

Double posted.

Tommy Monk wrote:My mistake ben... you didn't say 'few''... but to describe them as 'miscreants' is still an epic understatement.

Understatement? That's a value. You mean you are all over Ben like a cheap suit for stating a value claim?

Waste much time, tommy?

Some people harp on about the same thing for days. My guess is that they have little else.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:My mistake ben... you didn't say 'few''... but to describe them as 'miscreants' is still an epic understatement.


And sassy... the isis scum are both the militants and the vast number of people there who support them...


If they didn't have support then they could and would be turned over relatively quickly and easily.

How about this -- they're evil, twisted, sick, murderous scum.

Try twisting those terms into something I didn't intend.

Those words have clear meanings...


I haven't 'twisted' what you said before... the words you used already had clear meaning too... which is why i asked you to clarify what you meant...


Either you meant what you said, or you didn't say what you meant...!?


Surely as a journalist you are well aware of the meanings of words and the importance of correct usage...?

Tommy Monk wrote:You want to play the percentages game again sassy...?


You do realise that 99% of population over there are Muslims...!!!???


But up to 18% of victims are not Muslims!!!


What does that tell you...!!!???


Also... if isis were only a small number and had little support then they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily by the vast majority!!!


So it must be that isis and supporters are the majority!!!


They are doing islam by the book over there and enforcing Islamic law with the inevitable barbaric evil happening as a result of this!!!


If you watch the 2nd video I posted in op... you will see how these Islamic law enforcers deal with 3 young men who dared to spray paint a bit of graffiti on some walls... and while these and other 'miscreants' are dealt with, islamic style, the crowds in the background (who vastly outnumber the Islamic enforcers) do nothing against it...

And sassy has run away...

Tommy Monk wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:You want to play the percentages game again sassy...?

You do realise that 99% of population over there are Muslims...!!!???

But up to 18% of victims are not Muslims!!!

What does that tell you...!!!???

Also... if isis were only a small number and had little support then they would be turned over relatively quickly and easily by the vast majority!!!

So it must be that isis and supporters are the majority!!!

They are doing islam by the book over there and enforcing Islamic law with the inevitable barbaric evil happening as a result of this!!!

If you watch the 2nd video I posted in op... you will see how these Islamic law enforcers deal with 3 young men who dared to spray paint a bit of graffiti on some walls... and while these and other 'miscreants' are dealt with, islamic style, the crowds in the background (who vastly outnumber the Islamic enforcers) do nothing against it...

And sassy has run away...

I'd say she's gone with good reason, tommy. Have you got anything else to say that isn't about your hatred for Muslims. Damn, it's boring.

Perhaps miscreant is used differently overseas? Miscreant is not an appropriate word for Isis. To me it's a bit like calling them naughty. But,as Tommy highlighted it, all that ensued was a bit of twattery, another bloody c&p and bit of bandwagon jumping.