Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

by Guest Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:23 am

Police have shot dead a suspect in an anti-terror operation in the Canadian province of Ontario, media reports say.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) would only say that "action has been taken" against a lone suspect.
Canadian media said police had raided a property in Strathroy, about 225km (140 miles) south-west of Toronto.
They named the suspect as Aaron Driver, 24, who was arrested last year for openly supporting so-called Islamic State on social media.

'Potential threat'

A senior police official told the Canadian Press news agency that the suspect allegedly planned to use a bomb to carry out a suicide bombing mission in a public area.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37042260

Potential threat neutralized

Job done

by Ben Reilly Thu Aug 11, 2016 5:23 pm

See, things like this are going on all the time, yet people will still insist that governments are "doing nothing" to prevent and combat terrorism.

by nicko Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:38 pm

We rarely hear about terrorists being "taken down" here.

by Guest Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Except like Jean Charles Menezes, slaughtered on a London tube train and innocent.

by Guest Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:39 pm

nicko wrote:We rarely hear about terrorists being "taken down" here.

One reason, look back to the absurd hype when 3 IRA operatives were rightly taken down in Gilbraltar
It does not matter that they were planning to that day to explode a bomb outside Governors residency, people seem to think that the SAS can take risks by looking at a situation in hindsight.
There were known terrorists who had been involved in many incidents and yet you can guess as to who thought this was wrong.
I was glad the SAS took them out, job done

by Guest Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:47 pm

A Canadian terror suspect detonated a bomb in the back seat of a taxi as police closed in on Wednesday, authorities say.
Aaron Driver wounded himself and the cab driver, before police opened fire in Strathroy, Ontario, said officials.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police told a news conference that Driver, who died, was in the final stages of a homemade bomb plot.
Deputy Commissioner Mike Cabana said the FBI had supplied them with credible information, including a "martyrdom" video.

http://news.sky.com/story/aaron-driver-detonated-bomb-in-taxi-as-canada-cops-swooped-10532301

by nicko Fri Aug 12, 2016 6:49 am

Having a bash at our Police now sassy?

by Guest Fri Aug 12, 2016 10:44 am

At the police who murdered Jean Charles and got away scot free - yes. Who covered up and pretended he had jumped a barrier and were proved to be lying, who said he had a backpack and were proved to be lying, who said he had a thick jacket and were proved to be lying, who dragged him onto the floor, knew he was unarmed and shot his brains out multiple times and splattered them over the train in front of multiple witnesses and got away with it I most certainly am.

by Original Quill Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:07 pm

nicko wrote:Having a bash at our Police now sassy?

No more than that you are justifying murder of innocent people, nicko. The poor bastard was just trying to get on a train, and got blown away for having "Mongolian eyes". Rich...real rich.

by Guest Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:12 pm

Original Quill wrote:
nicko wrote:Having a bash at our Police now sassy?

No more than that you are justifying murder of innocent people, nicko. The poor bastard was just trying to get on a train, and got blown away for having "Mongolian eyes". Rich...real rich.

I see both sassy and yourself both fail to understand british law in regards to murder.
This was mistaken identity.
It was not because as you claim he has mongolian eyes, which he does not

Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation' 2Q==

Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation' 2Q==

by Original Quill Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:37 pm

Didge wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

No more than that you are justifying murder of innocent people, nicko. The poor bastard was just trying to get on a train, and got blown away for having "Mongolian eyes". Rich...real rich.

I see both sassy and yourself both fail to understand british law in regards to murder.
This was mistaken identity.
It was not because as you claim he has mongolian eyes, which he does not

"Mongolian eyes" was the description in the police report.

Wiki wrote:They later stated that they were satisfied that they had the correct man, noting that he 'had Mongolian eyes'.

I'll leave it up to them to justify.

However, it's not surprising how easily you justify it...given all the babies you want to kill if you get your war in the Middle East.

by Guest Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:41 pm

So you agree with the police on the eyes

I do not

How wierd

Please show where I justified it?

I never did and as per usual the regressive invent lies

You both stated murder which its not murder

Both incorrect as per usual

I never said the action was justified in fact it was wrong, but mistakes do happen.

Sadly at the cost of this mans life

by Original Quill Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:54 pm

Didge wrote:So you agree with the police on the eyes

I do not

How wierd

Please show where I justified it?

Amazing...even the smallest post and you fail to fully read it. I said, I'll leave it to them to justify.

didge wrote:I never did and as per usual the regressive invent lies

You both stated murder which its not murder

Both incorrect as per usual

I never said the action was justified in fact it was wrong, but mistakes do happen.

Sadly at the cost of this mans life

You don't recognize a semantic argument when you make it, do you? Murder is a homicide. 'Mistake' is an excuse to the charge of murder, as is 'self-defense' or other exceptions. Excuses call into question chaos and derangement, which the police on that day exhibited.

I know you like to think you are clever, didge. But most often you are just being ignorant.

by Guest Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:58 pm

Original Quill wrote:

Amazing...even the smallest post and you fail to fully read it. I said, I'll leave it to them to justify.You don't recognize a semantic argument when you make it, do you? Murder is a homicide. Mistake is an excuse to the charge of murder, as is self-defense or other exceptions. Excuses call into question chaos and derangement, which the police on that day exhibited.

I know you like to think you are clever, didge. But most often you are just being ignorant.

Did not fail to miss anything, you claimed also the same on the eyes, which makes you complicit to the mistakje

This is not murder which again shows you fail to understand our laws

You keep wrongly going off the US, which is why you are clueless on any other law, espcially international law

So its no god going off your out of date laws or failing to understand laws around the Police as well.

by Guest Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:00 pm

Anyway, why not read up on the case before continuing to make errors quill, like a good little boy, as I have now better things to do, than argue with someone who clearly needs a tissue to dry his eyes

Laughing

Laters

On Friday, 12 December 2008 the inquest into Jean Charles' death returned an open verdict.[94] Their answers to the specific questions and contributory facts were as follows. In the latter portion, the answers 'yes', 'no', and 'can't decide' were determined by the jury while answering the broader question 'which of these other factors, if any, contributed to the death. In November 2009, the Metropolitan Police reached a compensation deal with the family of Jean Charles de Menezes. This marked the end of litigation between the parties. The amount of compensation was not disclosed.

Too easy for me

by Guest Fri Aug 12, 2016 7:13 pm

They would not have paid compensation is they thought they were right.

by 'Wolfie Sat Aug 13, 2016 3:55 am

Didge wrote:So you agree with the police on the eyes

I do not

How wierd

Please show where I justified it?

I never did and as per usual the regressive invent lies

You both stated murder which its not murder

Both incorrect as per usual

I never said the action was justified in fact it was wrong, but mistakes do happen.

Sadly at the cost of this mans life

The police forces of the world are famous for murdering "suspects" and total innocents, Didge -- and often getting away with it..

Doesn't matter where they are..
Britain; the Americas; Australia; Across Europe; no real differences..

What is much more disgusting than people criticising shonky, incompetent or amateurish-acting police forces, is blanket apologies claiming "Bad luck !"; "Mistakes happen..". Suspect

by Guest Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:49 am

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Didge wrote:So you agree with the police on the eyes

I do not

How wierd

Please show where I justified it?

I never did and as per usual the regressive invent lies

You both stated murder which its not murder

Both incorrect as per usual

I never said the action was justified in fact it was wrong, but mistakes do happen.

Sadly at the cost of this mans life

The police forces of the world are famous for murdering "suspects" and total innocents, Didge -- and often getting away with it..

Doesn't matter where they are..
Britain; the Americas; Australia; Across Europe; no real differences..

What is much more disgusting than people criticising shonky, incompetent or amateurish-acting police forces, is blanket apologies claiming "Bad luck !"; "Mistakes happen..".

All irrelevant wolf

This was not murder.
There was no intent, it was mistaken identity
This would only come under Manslaughter, through negligence

by nicko Sat Aug 13, 2016 7:17 am

Quill, just to let you know, i'v not killed any babies today.

But tomorrow is another day, i'l let you know how I get on!

by Sponsored content

Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

'Potential threat'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'

Re: Canada police 'kill suspect in anti-terror operation'