Nice attacker had 'little interest in religion,' no known links to terrorists

by Ben Reilly Sat Jul 16, 2016 4:30 am

The man responsible for Thursday’s murderous attack in Nice was a violent petty criminal unknown to the French security services, who was born in Tunisia but had been living and working in the coastal city, prosecutors have said.

Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, a 31-year-old delivery driver and father, was shot dead by police after killing 84 people, including 10 children and teenagers, and injuring scores more in a deadly Bastille Day rampage.

Despite a criminal record dating from his first conviction in March this year, Lahouaiej-Bouhlel was not known by French or Tunisian officials to have links to terrorist organisations and was said by neighbours to have had little apparent interest in religion.

Echoing the remarks of French officials, security sources in Tunisia said he was not known by the Tunisian authorities to hold radical or Islamist views.

At a packed press conference, the Paris prosecutor François Molins said Lahouaiej-Bouhlel had been “completely unknown to both France’s domestic and foreign intelligence officials”. But he added: “Although yesterday’s attack has not been claimed, this sort of thing fits in perfectly with calls for murder from such terrorist organisations.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/15/bastille-day-truck-driver-was-known-to-police-reports-say

by Tommy Monk Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:23 pm

We have already heard the bullshit claims from some about how he was a French man and a French home grown terrorist and not a foreign immigrant to France...

When the truth is that he was a Tunisian born Tunisian Muslim
immigrant to France...

And now we hear the same people giving out the waffle about how he had 'little apparent interest in religion'...

So... of course it was nothing to do with islam...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:14 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
We have already heard the bullshit claims from some about how he was a French man and a French home grown terrorist and not a foreign immigrant to France...

When the truth is that he was a Tunisian born Tunisian Muslim
immigrant to France...

And now we hear the same people giving out the waffle about how he had 'little apparent interest in religion'...

So... of course it was nothing to do with islam...

To you a Muslim can't hail a taxi without it being all about Islam Nice attacker had 'little interest in religion,' no known links to terrorists 2984306523

Nice attacker had 'little interest in religion,' no known links to terrorists 2984306523

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:18 pm

And to you... a Muslim carrying out a targeted terrorist attack and telling police how it is all about islam (like the recent shoot up in the gay bar) is nothing to do with islam...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:29 pm

I don't dispute that to the attackers, it's about Islam.

I just think that the peaceful majority should get the final say in whether that’s what Islam is all about.

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:33 pm

You really have no idea...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:36 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

You really have no idea...

Best you can do there, Tommy? Smile

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:49 pm

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:03 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:I don't dispute that to the attackers, it's about Islam.

I just think that the peaceful majority should get the final say in whether that’s what Islam is all about.

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:14 pm

The koran has the only say...

And 1400 years of history show what it's all about...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:17 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:The koran has the only say...

A book which is interpreted differently by everyone who's ever read it Smile

Just like every book ever written.

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:25 pm

A book that's supposed to be perfect in every way but so open to different interpretations or misinterpretation...!?

lol!

And 1400 years of history show what it's all about...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:31 pm

Well, it's no more real than the other books, Tommy.

And what about the past 1400 years of European history? Not exactly peaceful.

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:37 pm

Is deflection the best you can do...?

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:52 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Is deflection the best you can do...?

It's not deflection, it's called context. Look up the Papal decrees authorizing the conquest, enslavement and slaughter of non-Christian peoples and you'll see that to single Islam out as violent is hypocrisy

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 4:23 pm

Was that after hundreds of years of Muslim aggression and in response to it... or before...?

And for you to deny 1400 years of Muslim aggression is just being plain disingenuous...

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 4:34 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Was that after hundreds of years of Muslim aggression and in response to it... or before...?

And for you to deny 1400 years of Muslim aggression is just being plain disingenuous...

I'm not saying that Muslims haven't been violent, I'm saying European countries' colonial expansion was equally violent and far more widespread. And also justified with religion.

by Miffs2 Sun Jul 17, 2016 6:30 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:Was that after hundreds of years of Muslim aggression and in response to it... or before...?

And for you to deny 1400 years of Muslim aggression is just being plain disingenuous...

I'm not saying that Muslims haven't been violent, I'm saying European countries' colonial expansion was equally violent and far more widespread. And also justified with religion.

But, in the hear and now, not back in history, who is murdering in the name of their God and viewing anyone not of the sane faith as not worthy to live?

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 6:41 pm

Miffs2 wrote:
Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:Was that after hundreds of years of Muslim aggression and in response to it... or before...?

And for you to deny 1400 years of Muslim aggression is just being plain disingenuous...

I'm not saying that Muslims haven't been violent, I'm saying European countries' colonial expansion was equally violent and far more widespread. And also justified with religion.
But, in the hear and now, not back in history, who is murdering in the name of their God and viewing anyone not of the sane faith as not worthy to live?

Pretty much all of them. Muslims are killing, Christians are killing, Hindus are killing, Buddhists are even killing Muslims and Christians. http://www.pewforum.org/2014/01/14/religious-hostilities-reach-six-year-high/

by Victorismyhero Sun Jul 17, 2016 6:49 pm

you will however notice that the druids and wiccans are not.......

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 6:57 pm

Lord Foul wrote:you will however notice that the druids and wiccans are not.......

A triple homicide in Florida is suspected to be a "Wiccan ritual killing" related to the "blue" moon, police said Tuesday.

The three victims, all from the same family, were found after a welfare check on Friday, July 31, said Escambia County Sheriff's Office spokesman Sgt. Andrew Hobbes.

"It appears that this might be connected to some type of Wiccan ritual killing and possibly tied to the blue moon," Hobbes told NBC News.

A "blue" moon is what it's called when there are two full moons in the same calendar month.

Voncile Smith, 77, and her two sons, Richard, 49, and John, 47, were discovered when one of the son's employers realized he hadn't shown up for work.

Voncile and John both died of blunt force trauma and had their throats cut, police said. Richard was shot in the ear, "as he came into the house," and had his throat cut, Hobbes said. Police believe a claw hammer was used to commit the murders, Hobbes said.

No evidence of a forcible entry was found and, while police have spoken with a person of interest in the case, no arrests have been made, Hobbes said.

When asked how the evidence suggests these are ritualistic or Wiccan killings Sgt. Hobbes said, "The injuries to the victims, the positions of the bodies and also the person of interest right now is also a practitioner."

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/police-wiccan-ritual-killing-leaves-three-dead-pensacola-n404256

by Victorismyhero Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:06 pm

yeah of course...just like the highland and island ritual abuse scandle.....

and ..its in florida....where you can legaly be sacked for being a wiccan

and ...most of all.......not one of your law enforcement types would know "wicca" if it slapped him in the face with a wet fish....and certainly would know the difference between the practicioners of wicca and those of the dark satanists

and...you have a statistical sample of ...erm..........one.....

as evidence i submit that HAD these been ritualistic killings there would have been 3 causes of death
not 2 as described.....

satanistic ritual calls for the "triple death" usually a blow to the head, stabbing and strangulation
but also blow to the head, throat cut and drowned is not unknown......

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:17 pm

Lord Foul wrote:yeah of course...just like the highland and island ritual abuse scandle.....

and ..its in florida....where you can legaly be sacked for being a wiccan

and ...most of all.......not one of your law enforcement types would know "wicca" if it slapped him in the face with a wet fish....and certainly would know the difference between the practicioners of wicca and those of the dark satanists

and...you have a statistical sample of ...erm..........one.....

as evidence i submit that HAD these been ritualistic killings there would have been 3 causes of death
not 2 as described.....

satanistic ritual calls for the "triple death" usually a blow to the head, stabbing and strangulation
but also blow to the head, throat cut and drowned is not unknown......

So you're saying they don't represent true Wicca, right? Laughing

by Miffs2 Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:28 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Miffs2 wrote:
But, in the hear and now, not back in history, who is murdering in the name of their God and viewing anyone not of the sane faith as not worthy to live?

Pretty much all of them. Muslims are killing, Christians are killing, Hindus are killing, Buddhists are even killing Muslims and Christians. http://www.pewforum.org/2014/01/14/religious-hostilities-reach-six-year-high/

Anything more recent? Anything on international terrorists who shout God is great before blowing themselves and who ever is near to pieces or do we all agree Islam has that distinction?

by Ben Reilly Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:31 pm

Miffs2 wrote:
Ben Reilly wrote:
Miffs2 wrote:
But, in the hear and now, not back in history, who is murdering in the name of their God and viewing anyone not of the sane faith as not worthy to live?

Pretty much all of them. Muslims are killing, Christians are killing, Hindus are killing, Buddhists are even killing Muslims and Christians. http://www.pewforum.org/2014/01/14/religious-hostilities-reach-six-year-high/
Anything more recent? Anything on international terrorists who shout God is great before blowing themselves and who ever is near to pieces or do we all agree Islam has that distinction?

Are we going to quibble about the details of the killings? Is it better to be killed by someone who's a Christian and doesn't shout "Allahu akbar" before he kills you?

by Miffs2 Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:37 pm

T

Ben Reilly wrote:
Miffs2 wrote:
Anything more recent? Anything on international terrorists who shout God is great before blowing themselves and who ever is near to pieces or do we all agree Islam has that distinction?

Are we going to quibble about the details of the killings? Is it better to be killed by someone who's a Christian and doesn't shout "Allahu akbar" before he kills you?

I think it would be better not to be killed. Is there any reason that you struggle to admit any wrong doing by Muslims? You do realise that your mealy mouthed attempts to justify/minimise/ explain away their blood lust only serve to facilitate their violence?

by Victorismyhero Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:52 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Lord Foul wrote:yeah of course...just like the highland and island ritual abuse scandle.....

and ..its in florida....where you can legaly be sacked for being a wiccan

and ...most of all.......not one of your law enforcement types would know "wicca" if it slapped him in the face with a wet fish....and certainly would know the difference between the practicioners of wicca and those of the dark satanists

and...you have a statistical sample of ...erm..........one.....

as evidence i submit that HAD these been ritualistic killings there would have been 3 causes of death
not 2 as described.....

satanistic ritual calls for the "triple death" usually a blow to the head, stabbing and strangulation
but also blow to the head, throat cut and drowned is not unknown......

So you're saying they don't represent true Wicca, right?

no I'm saying that your law enforcement is making false statements........falsely attributing the killings to a religious aspect.......

Razz

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:59 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:Was that after hundreds of years of Muslim aggression and in response to it... or before...?

And for you to deny 1400 years of Muslim aggression is just being plain disingenuous...

I'm not saying that Muslims haven't been violent, I'm saying European countries' colonial expansion was equally violent and far more widespread. And also justified with religion.

Funny how we see you so desperately flip flop around with your arguments here...

Especially as you tried to accuse me of doing this earlier on another thread...

Ben Reilly wrote:I also think it's funny that after we knock down one of Tommy's claims, he doesn't even acknowledge it, he just moves straight to the next claim that's been debunked a thousand times

Not how debate works ...

You have gone from trying to claim that it is only up to some Muslims to decide what 'proper' islam is about...

The violent Muslims are not proper koran/islam following Muslims etc...

Its not for the koran to say what's what...

Even though the koran is the same throughout, deemed to be perfect in every way and the clear and concise rule book for all Muslims to follow etc...

You then say that the koran is ambiguous and that it is interpreted/misinterpreted differently by everyone who reads it...

And you say it is just like every other book ever written...

And then you say the koran is no more real than any other book...

You then start to deflect from historical evidence of Muslim aggression by trying to claim that the well overdue response against it was in some way justification for the centuries of earlier Muslim aggression that provoked this said response...

Then you switch to a half hearted admission of the existence of some historical Muslim aggression, and an admission that Muslims were actually violent in the past... but you then try to downplay the extent/enormity of the first 1000 years of history of Muslim aggression against others, by your trying to compare it with being just the same as the last 300 years in history when some people from some European countries started to travel about and explore/settle/colonise some other parts of the world.

And you seem to then actually admit that historically Muslims were very violent and this behaviour was justified by their religion!!!

(As shown in the bit I highlighted in your quoted post above!)

And as told to them in their guide book...

Which is what I was saying in the first place!!!

lol!

by Ben Reilly Mon Jul 18, 2016 3:50 pm

Miffs2 wrote:T
Ben Reilly wrote:
Miffs2 wrote:
Anything more recent? Anything on international terrorists who shout God is great before blowing themselves and who ever is near to pieces or do we all agree Islam has that distinction?

Are we going to quibble about the details of the killings? Is it better to be killed by someone who's a Christian and doesn't shout "Allahu akbar" before he kills you?

I think it would be better not to be killed. Is there any reason that you struggle to admit any wrong doing by Muslims? You do realise that your mealy mouthed attempts to justify/minimise/ explain away their blood lust only serve to facilitate their violence?

Ben Reilly wrote:I'm not saying that Muslims haven't been violent, I'm saying European countries' colonial expansion was equally violent and far more widespread. And also justified with religion.

Are you intentionally dishonest or just negligent?

by nicko Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:41 pm

Why do you, and others, continually bring up what Europe did 150 yrs or more? We are referring to what's happening NOW!!

by Ben Reilly Mon Jul 18, 2016 5:00 pm

nicko wrote:Why do you, and others, continually bring up what Europe did 150 yrs or more? We are referring to what's happening NOW!!

If you'd care to pay attention, Tommy brought up the past 1,400 years of history, so aside from the fact that I'll talk about whatever I want to talk about, my observations were relevant to the discussion.

by Guest Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:03 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:
Is deflection the best you can do...?

It's not deflection, it's called context. Look up the Papal decrees authorizing the conquest, enslavement and slaughter of non-Christian peoples and you'll see that to single Islam out as violent is hypocrisy

Oh so what you are saying is that then religion is the cause and rightfully so, whether it be the Abrahamic faiths, but you shy away when blaming Islam?
I mean you would not dare say Christianity had nothing to do with the Crusades would you?
You go off though european colonialism, which is odd Ben, as this proves further there is something then only wrong with Islam, if this is your excuse as to why we see Islamic violence and terrorism? We should see comparability from non Muslim majority countries within these continents?
I mean based on colonialism expansion by European nations, why is it then we do not see countless African, Asian and South American terrorism and violence based off colonialism against the west?
Is it then not something inexplicable then the root cause Islam then based on transgression and Jihad that is the root cause problem, which is able to convince many Muslims to commit to violence.
Also I think shouting allah Akbar, which was heard by many witnesses before he murder countless people, gave away the root cause being Islam and naratives of hate again.

by veya_victaous Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:08 am

nicko wrote:Why do you, and others, continually bring up what Europe did 150 yrs or more? We are referring to what's happening NOW!!

cause why do you think what is happening now is happening?

Are you so dumb to think that the rest of the world is not going to want their stuff back?
do you think you can stop the game while your winning? and everyone esle will just say OK?

You're like a moron who built on Sand going 'i dont know why my house is falling down' and when someone points out 'cause your using foundations of sand' You start going on with defenise bullshit "why are you talking about what i built my house on? in the past I am talking about it falling down now."

And you wonder why the new world thinks you're a bunch of hill shepherd dickheads Rolling Eyes

by nicko Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:00 am

And you wonder why most Brit posters on here think your full of SHIT, with your constant repeating of your favourite put down,"Hill Shepherds"

Just why do you think your better than every one else? Your not, just a poster who's head is full of ME ME ME.

Shut your mouth and give your arse a chance!!

by veya_victaous Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:37 am

nicko wrote:And you wonder why most Brit posters on here think your full of SHIT, with your constant repeating of your favourite put down,"Hill Shepherds"

Just why do you think your better than every one else? Your not, just a poster who's head is full of ME ME ME.

Shut your mouth and give your arse a chance!!

yeah i was only using hillshepherd to try not to include all Brits
but Fuck it

Since only les and Sassy are left (off the top of my head) as 'Brits with a brain'

YES I AM BETTER
NO QUESTION
WHY? CAUSE YOU ARE COWARDS SCARED OF THE FUTURE

I have no problem telling you, yes.
IF that is your opinon than, I am better than you
And the fact you are so pathetic when it comes to accepting the Uks faults, NO wonder people like YOU have sent it down the toilet!!
Cant face reality so cant address any issues.
Pathetic, Stick your fingers in your ears and Just pretend your still even 'good'. cause claims of the Best are Fucking Laughable.

So YES I am many times Better, than obsolete Rubbish like you or Any Moron that Voted Brexit.
that is just a fact.

I mean YOU asked a Question and GOT THE ANSWER but to soft and weak to accept it.
WHY do we talk about what you did 150 years ago? Cause THAT IS WHAT HAS CAUSED WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW!!!

by eddie Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:09 am

I don't care if you think you're better than me, your opnion isn't really on my radar.

Your opinion is like that of a child; sweeping, emotional and based on nothing but what you've viewed from afar.

(Or possibly a pissed-up thirty-something who's never got out of his desert and has nothing to talk to but sand, a dilapidated caravan and a three-legged dingo...but hey, I don't want to sterotype Wink

)

by nicko Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:22 am

Well, veya just proved it, he's a big headed prat so far up his own arse he can lick his teeth, get back to your little shack in the desert and stop drinking all that 4x it's rotting your sad little Aussie brain. Bye the way, if brains were dynamite, you wouldn't have enough to blow your hat off!!!

by HoratioTarr Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:35 am

veya_victaous wrote:
nicko wrote:And you wonder why most Brit posters on here think your full of SHIT, with your constant repeating of your favourite put down,"Hill Shepherds"

Just why do you think your better than every one else? Your not, just a poster who's head is full of ME ME ME.

Shut your mouth and give your arse a chance!!

yeah i was only using hillshepherd to try not to include all Brits
but Fuck it

Since only les and Sassy are left (off the top of my head) as 'Brits with a brain'

YES I AM BETTER
NO QUESTION
WHY? CAUSE YOU ARE COWARDS SCARED OF THE FUTURE

I have no problem telling you, yes.
IF that is your opinon than, I am better than you
And the fact you are so pathetic when it comes to accepting the Uks faults, NO wonder people like YOU have sent it down the toilet!!
Cant face reality so cant address any issues.
Pathetic, Stick your fingers in your ears and Just pretend your still even 'good'. cause claims of the Best are Fucking Laughable.

So YES I am many times Better, than obsolete Rubbish like you or Any Moron that Voted Brexit.
that is just a fact.

I mean YOU asked a Question and GOT THE ANSWER but to soft and weak to accept it.
WHY do we talk about what you did 150 years ago? Cause THAT IS WHAT HAS CAUSED WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW!!!

So by that yardstick, I guess the White Australia Policy is why Oz now has tough asylum policies?

by Raggamuffin Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:42 am

veya_victaous wrote:
nicko wrote:And you wonder why most Brit posters on here think your full of SHIT, with your constant repeating of your favourite put down,"Hill Shepherds"

Just why do you think your better than every one else? Your not, just a poster who's head is full of ME ME ME.

Shut your mouth and give your arse a chance!!

yeah i was only using hillshepherd to try not to include all Brits
but Fuck it

Since only les and Sassy are left (off the top of my head) as 'Brits with a brain'

YES I AM BETTER
NO QUESTION
WHY? CAUSE YOU ARE COWARDS SCARED OF THE FUTURE

I have no problem telling you, yes.
IF that is your opinon than, I am better than you
And the fact you are so pathetic when it comes to accepting the Uks faults, NO wonder people like YOU have sent it down the toilet!!
Cant face reality so cant address any issues.
Pathetic, Stick your fingers in your ears and Just pretend your still even 'good'. cause claims of the Best are Fucking Laughable.

So YES I am many times Better, than obsolete Rubbish like you or Any Moron that Voted Brexit.
that is just a fact.

I mean YOU asked a Question and GOT THE ANSWER but to soft and weak to accept it.
WHY do we talk about what you did 150 years ago? Cause THAT IS WHAT HAS CAUSED WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW!!!

You can't be better - you're not British. Cool

by 'Wolfie Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:16 am

nicko wrote:
Why do you, and others, continually bring up what Europe did 150 yrs or more? We are referring to what's happening NOW!!

THE BRITISH MUSEUM is still hoarding dozens of Aboriginal skeletons and remains, as well as sacred objects, that were stolen from families and communities back in the late 18th through to early 20th century...

ALL SO some so called political hack faux-anthropologists could do fake "research" to bolster the 18th century Admiralty claim that Australia was Terra nullus -- an 'uninhabited' continent..

This fake ""research" is STILL going on, FGS !
Nice attacker had 'little interest in religion,' no known links to terrorists 2686688521

Nice attacker had 'little interest in religion,' no known links to terrorists 2686688521

(Just like that Japanese fake whale research is continuing, over in Japan..).

AND the British Museum is equally guilty of ongoing grave robbing crimes in respect to remains from Egypt, the Americas, New Zealand, India, South Africa, and other former Brit' territories...

JUST BECAUSE various European crimes in other countries may have happened 50, 150 or 250 years ago, it doesn't mean that the results aren't still going on ! afro

by nicko Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:45 pm

I'd report it to the Police if it worries you that much.

by eddie Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:34 pm

nicko wrote:I'd report it to the Police if it worries you that much.

You think? Sleep

by Tommy Monk Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:39 pm

veya_victaous wrote:
nicko wrote:And you wonder why most Brit posters on here think your full of SHIT, with your constant repeating of your favourite put down,"Hill Shepherds"

Just why do you think your better than every one else? Your not, just a poster who's head is full of ME ME ME.

Shut your mouth and give your arse a chance!!

yeah i was only using hillshepherd to try not to include all Brits
but Fuck it

Since only les and Sassy are left (off the top of my head) as 'Brits with a brain'

YES I AM BETTER
NO QUESTION
WHY? CAUSE YOU ARE COWARDS SCARED OF THE FUTURE

I have no problem telling you, yes.
IF that is your opinon than, I am better than you
And the fact you are so pathetic when it comes to accepting the Uks faults, NO wonder people like YOU have sent it down the toilet!!
Cant face reality so cant address any issues.
Pathetic, Stick your fingers in your ears and Just pretend your still even 'good'. cause claims of the Best are Fucking Laughable.

So YES I am many times Better, than obsolete Rubbish like you or Any Moron that Voted Brexit.
that is just a fact.

I mean YOU asked a Question and GOT THE ANSWER but to soft and weak to accept it.
WHY do we talk about what you did 150 years ago? Cause THAT IS WHAT HAS CAUSED WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW!!!

We are not scared of the future... we are trying to determine our own future... one that we want for ourselves!!!

by Ben Reilly Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:45 pm

I think you're being unrealistic about how much you can affect your future.

by Tommy Monk Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:53 pm

Whys that?

by Ben Reilly Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:56 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Whys that?

You want things that are unrealistic -- i.e., a nice booming economy with little to no immigration.

by Tommy Monk Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:02 pm

No... I don't like booming economy... it's not nice... it is a sign that the economy isn't running well and is heading for a bust...

And mass immigration certainly isn't good for us either...

by Ben Reilly Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:03 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:No... I don't like booming economy... it's not nice... it is a sign that the economy isn't running well and is heading for a bust...

And mass immigration certainly isn't good for us either...

You know what I mean. You want a healthy economy without immigration, and the way the world is set up now, that's not feasible.

by eddie Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:05 pm

Just out of interest, what would happen to a nice "booming", (and I mean "booming" in that everything is running smoothly and food and water isn't scarce), African village if immigrant White, black and Asian man, were to arrive and want to live among them?

The thought occurred to me as I read through this thread: would it be better, or worse and better or worse, for whom?

by Tommy Monk Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:06 pm

Ben Reilly wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:No... I don't like booming economy... it's not nice... it is a sign that the economy isn't running well and is heading for a bust...

And mass immigration certainly isn't good for us either...

You know what I mean. You want a healthy economy without immigration, and the way the world is set up now, that's not feasible.

Waffle...

by Sponsored content