Black 12-year-old girl dragged by a rope around her neck by white classmates, schools says it was ‘accident’

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

eddie wrote:
The floor is a word that's used in the UK - we say that more often than ground, in some areas.

Floor and ground mean pretty much the same thing.
Talk about nit-picking.

Seriously, get a life.

WHAT a load of outright lying bullshit...

You are just as pathetic as your fascist friends Tommy and Stormee..

You losers are the ones who really need to "get a life" !

You Tommy apologist, you..      

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

eddie wrote:
The floor is a word that's used in the UK - we say that more often than ground, in some areas.

Floor and ground mean pretty much the same thing.
Talk about nit-picking.

Seriously, get a life.

WHAT a load of outright lying bullshit...

You are just as pathetic as your fascist friends Tommy and Stormee..

You losers are the ones who really need to "get a life" !

You Tommy apologist, you..      

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

eddie wrote:
The floor is a word that's used in the UK - we say that more often than ground, in some areas.

Floor and ground mean pretty much the same thing.
Talk about nit-picking.

Seriously, get a life.

WHAT a load of outright lying bullshit...

You are just as pathetic as your fascist friends Tommy and Stormee..

You losers are the ones who really need to "get a life" !

You Tommy apologist, you..      

VOICES
Rope Burns On A Black Schoolgirl’s Neck Weren’t Criminal, Police Say

The 12-year-old was injured on a school field trip.

07/26/2016 02:07 pm ET
Andy Campbell    Reporter, The Huffington Post


Authorities in Blanco County, Texas, say there’s no evidence of a crime after a 12-year-old black girl, identified only as K.P., sustained severe rope burns on her neck during a school field trip.
A photo of the girl’s injuries went viral after she alleged that three boys wrapped a rope around her neck and dragged her during the overnight trip in April with Live Oak Classical School.
Now, Blanco County investigators say the incident was an accident.
“The victim’s story seems to have evolved some, but no evidence was revealed that indicates that this was more than an accident,” Blanco County Sheriff’s Capt. Ben Ablon wrote in his seven-page conclusion.
He added: “As to the allegation, by the attorney, that this injury was the result of a racially motivated attack, there was no evidence found of any racially motivated act toward this victim by anyone at or associated with LOCS. This was even supported by the victim’s statement.”
The girl’s parents, Sandy Rougely and Kevin Parker, are suing the school for $3 million in damages, alleging negligence. 
The girl told police, and the lawsuit alleges, that she was with a group of children at the camp on April 28, when the following happened: 

Behind her in this group, within an arms length, were three boys, one of whom was the same boy Sandy had alerted Live Oak was bullying K.P. During one swing, K.P. watched as some of the other kids pulled the pull-rope back, ready to swing another child. She watched the kids let the rope go, thinking this was just like every other turn. However, she did not see what the boys behind her were doing, and the next thing K.P. knew, she felt the rope wrap around her neck and she was violently jerked to the ground with the pull-rope wrapped around her neck. 

Investigators, however, say K.P. has changed her tune, and said she was never targeted because of her race at school. The sheriff’s office also replicated the incident using an officer, and found that just by pulling the rope swing back and letting it go, one could get hurt. Ablon wrote in his report:

I did discover that if I pulled the swing back as far as I could, then did not let go until it pulled back away, the end of the rope would snap or whip away from me. I had Cpl. Acosta stand where the victim had indicated she was when injured. Even without the force that would be added by having a child in the swing, the rope whipped with enough force to cause a rope burn to Cpl. Acosta’s neck, as it hit him.

Blanco County District Attorney David Hall told the Waco Tribune that there were inconsistent statements from all the students involved throughout the investigation process.
“The many inconsistent statements also leave much room for reasonable doubt,” Hall said. “If I see clear reasonable doubt, I cannot in good conscience file criminal charges and try to convince a judge or jury otherwise.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/black-schoolgirl-rope-burns-texas_us_57979124e4b0d3568f8499be

"Too many inconsistent statements made by the students involved throughout the investigation process";  wouldn't that be a valid reason to have a hearing/file charges - find out which child is NOT telling the truth - that horrid mark on her neck just didn't appear by MAGIC?  

BTW - I know we've kicked this around but it wasn't relocated to this topic so it's out there in the open forum, somewhere.  I do remember Tommykins many rants about 'faked rope burn marks' ...so this has been kicked around by our investigative group

Original Quill wrote:Classic cover-up.  White is right; blacks are bad.  Imagine if Hitler had won.

eddie wrote:I've amended the title as this is a twin of a thread, about this incident, so a continuation.
I needed to make that clearer as I bypassed it a few times myself.

Anyway, as to the OP. Pretty shocking, as it's clearly obvious this girl didn't simply have an "accident".

So all topic TITLE's will now have to pass a 'LITMUS' test per our Forum Police or just what annoys her on her PMS days?

eddie wrote:No.

The thread was here a while back we were discussing it for a while because Tommy was saying it was an accident due to the rope burn being down one side.

4EVER2 wrote:

eddie wrote:No.

The thread was here a while back we were discussing it for a while because Tommy was saying it was an accident due to the rope burn being down one side.

DUH ...Yes, that's what I STATED ...the question is WHERE and why wasn't it moved into HERE?  I'd just have attached this update to that original one had I BEEN ABLE TO FIND IT - SO WHERE IS IT? 

Tommy Monk wrote:I did point out rope burn was only on one side... and that the multi million dollar claim up may have been reason to tell a different story...
And I was subjected to plenty of abuse for daring to say it...

and then we all spend more time discussing that BS then the topic and why the charges won't be followed through with if so many of those 'PERFECT OTHER CHILDREN' can't keep their stories straight! 

I did discover that if I pulled the swing back as far as I could, then did not let go until it pulled back away, the end of the rope would snap or whip away from me. I had Cpl. Acosta stand where the victim had indicated she was when injured. Even without the force that would be added by having a child in the swing, the rope whipped with enough force to cause a rope burn to Cpl. Acosta’s neck, as it hit him.

 

Tommy Monk wrote:I did point out rope burn was only on one side... and that the multi million dollar claim up may have been reason to tell a different story...


And I was subjected to plenty of abuse for daring to say it...

eddie wrote:Bump to merge topic

This helps a lot ...especially when we have to keep refreshing Tommykins memory about his prior statements of 'non-facts' ...

Tommy Monk wrote:Maybe that was all just made up to add weight to the claim up attempt...

Tommy Monk wrote:A presumption is not a fact...

Tommy Monk wrote:Maybe that was all just made up to add weight to the claim up attempt...

Tommy Monk wrote:It was one side and bit of front... not all the way round and not 1 o'clock to 11 o'clock...


I have already provided photo to show this...


Mark starts from back left hand side of girls neck to front middle of girls neck...


That is half the neck or rather... 1 side...