Can we clarify whether Signatures should be Nice quotes and not offensive remarks about Posters?

eddie wrote:I'd say no to anything that is inflaming the forum wars at the moment.
Personal threads aren't allowed so nor should personal sigs be either.

korban dallas wrote:

eddie wrote:I'd say no to anything that is inflaming the forum wars at the moment.
Personal threads aren't allowed so nor should personal sigs be either.

Funny how some demand free speech as a right set down in stone  then try to deny it to others:no:

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
Funny how some demand free speech as a right set down in stone  then try to deny it to others:no:

Again as i stated I am happy either way, but there has to be balance on the rules

If no posters are not allowed to slag each other off, then why would they be allowed to do so by having such a signature

You do understand the difference between free speech and hate speech?

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:


Again as i stated I am happy either way, but there has to be balance on the rules

If no posters are not allowed to slag each other off, then why would they be allowed to do so by having such a signature

You do understand the difference between free speech and hate speech?

yet you slag people of all the time dude ,seems a bit rich you now complaining about it

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
yet you slag people of all the time dude ,seems a bit rich you now complaining about it

That is up to admin to deal with.

If you have issue with that, then why have you not acted?

That is your own failing not mine

I am bringing balance

Follow the rules if you have issue with my posts

If not, tough titties

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:


That is up to admin to deal with.

If you have issue with that, then why have you not acted?

That is your own failing not mine

I am bringing balance

Follow the rules if you have issue with my posts

If not, tough titties

failing? not running to admin or post a me me me me me thread because you said nasty wasty things

yea 55 years old dude not 5

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
failing? not running to admin or post a me me me me me thread because you said nasty wasty things

yea 55 years old dude not 5

Sorry can we have that understandable English please?

Again if you have issue take it up

If not tough titties

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:


Sorry can we have that understandable English please?

Again if you have issue take it up

If not tough titties

the English is fine not poetic sure but fine never the less

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:


Again as i stated I am happy either way, but there has to be balance on the rules

If no posters are not allowed to slag each other off, then why would they be allowed to do so by having such a signature

You do understand the difference between free speech and hate speech?

yet you slag people of all the time dude ,seems a bit rich you now complaining about it

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
the English is fine not poetic sure but fine never the less

I beg to differ

Look the issue is not whether someone wants to have an abusive signature about me
I am not concerned at that.
I am however if it involved other posters

Does that help?

Stormee wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
yet you slag people of all the time dude ,seems a bit rich you now complaining about it

Why don't you name your "SOME"?

Raggamuffin wrote:The signature in question is inflammatory, but even if admin think so, will they remove it? I doubt it.

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:

I beg to differ

Look the issue is not whether someone wants to have an abusive signature about me
I am not concerned at that.
I am however if it involved other posters

Does that help?

Please don`t beg if you need a few BoB let me know

what i find hypocritical 4/2 reading your last post
is it seems as long as your abuse isn`t reported you feel free to continue demeaning people
but if somebody does the same to you and you report it it should be dealt with

well i will keep a keen eye on this as its always nice to see Kama at work !

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:The signature in question is inflammatory, but even if admin think so, will they remove it? I doubt it.

Is it ? i am not inflamed in the slightest

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
Is it ? i am not inflamed in the slightest

I think it is - it's having a go at a poster in every single post.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think it is - it's having a go at a poster in every single post.

your entitled to you opinion raggs
personally i see it as kama

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think it is - it's having a go at a poster in every single post.

your entitled to you opinion raggs
personally i see it as kama

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
your entitled to you opinion raggs
personally i see it as kama

I don't think it's fair really. It's provocative, and if the person who it's aimed at decided to do the same thing back, it would get a bit out of hand.

I've been on forums where it's been impossible to follow any thread because the signatures got completely out of hand. I think this one might go the same way.  

Raggamuffin wrote:Also, the word "karma" is being misused on here.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't think it's fair really. It's provocative, and if the person who it's aimed at decided to do the same thing back, it would get a bit out of hand.

I've been on forums where it's been impossible to follow any thread because the signatures got completely out of hand. I think this one might go the same way.  

Well if you want to be strict about it your signature is technically aimed at  new posters and current ones as well

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
your entitled to you opinion raggs
personally i see it as kama

That shows you fail to understand Karma lol

Again the issue is not with myself

Water off a ducks back

So karma, I suggest you read what it means

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't think it's fair really. It's provocative, and if the person who it's aimed at decided to do the same thing back, it would get a bit out of hand.

I've been on forums where it's been impossible to follow any thread because the signatures got completely out of hand. I think this one might go the same way.  

Well if you want to be strict about it your signature is technically aimed at  new posters and current ones as well

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:

That shows you fail to understand Karma lol

Again the issue is not with myself

Water off a ducks back

So karma, I suggest you read what it means

Oh do grow up 4/2 cause and effect
you cause most of the shit you sow
the effect you get it back at you

Kama

idiot

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
Well if you want to be strict about it your signature is technically aimed at  new posters and current ones as well

If I was asked to remove them on the grounds that they were provocative, I would.

Neither of them are aimed at new posters.

The first line is a quote from Wolfman about me, which I found amusing. The second one is also a quote from a member here, but she said it on another forum to someone who is not a member here.

Also, I'm not slagging off another poster and telling them to leave in every single post.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

If I was asked to remove them on the grounds that they were provocative, I would.

Neither of them are aimed at new posters.

The first line is a quote from Wolfman about me, which I found amusing. The second one is also a quote from a member here, but she said it on another forum to someone who is not a member here.

Also, I'm not slagging off another poster and telling them to leave in every single post.

Oh but you are

!Did you read the bit where I said "forums should be fun?"......take note....now piss off."  

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
Oh do grow up 4/2 cause and effect
you cause most of the shit you sow
the effect you get it back at you

Kama

idiot

lol contradiction highlighted

I am not bothered at any shit given to me

Hence no karma

lol, not the brightest spark are you mate?

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
Oh but you are

!Did you read the bit where I said "forums should be fun?"......take note....now piss off."  

That's a quote from another forum, it's not something I wrote myself in order to tell a particular person to leave this forum. Do you not see the difference?

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:

lol contradiction highlighted

I am not bothered at any shit given to me

Hence no karma

lol, not the brightest spark are you mate?

Are you some kind of idiot savant  cause your not very smart

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

That's a quote from another forum, it's not something I wrote myself in order to tell a particular person to leave this forum. Do you not see the difference?

do the people reading it know that ? same thing in the round

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
Are you some kind of idiot savant  cause your not very smart

based on you not being able to reason why

I would say that is yet again an epic fail from you

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
do the people reading it know that ? same thing in the round

The signature we are discussing is clearly designed to cause trouble here, and is clearly inflammatory. If you can't see the difference, it's because you're biased.

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:


based on you not being able to reason why

I would say that is yet again an epic fail from you

yes declaring a victory when your up a pole number 7 on the didge/4/2 response manual, you do that a lot
doesn`t make it true just makes you look a idiot 4/2

Didge wrote:Anyway, I not going to entertain Korbens hysterics anymore on this thread and will allow the admin team to decide what is best on this issue

I mean the funniest part is not anything to do with me, but this clown wants to make it about me, and by doing so is defending the stance to have abusive signatures which attack posters. Hey ho, that is what you call having more issue with the poster than anything else the poor child

Time to get back to the debate, as someone really is throwing his dummies out of the pram this morning lol

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:Anyway, I not going to entertain Korbens hysterics anymore on this thread and will allow the admin team to decide what is best on this issue

I mean the funniest part is not anything to do with me, but this clown wants to make it about me, and by doing so is defending the stance to have abusive signatures which attack posters. Hey ho, that is what you call having more issue with the poster than anything else the poor child

Time to get back to the debate, as someone really is throwing his dummies out of the pram this morning lol

OOOOoooooOOOOooooooOOOOoooooooo delusional that we knew all ready

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
yes declaring a victory when your up a pole number 7 on the didge/4/2 response manual, you do that a lot
doesn`t make it true just makes you look a idiot 4/2

lol

korban dallas wrote:

Didge wrote:




lol

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
OOOOoooooOOOOooooooOOOOoooooooo delusional that we knew all ready

Didge wrote:Exhibit one.

Troll #1 stated > > > So you will forgive me when I have to say I am very disgusted in the attitude of Ben.  ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!  If you abhor this place as much as you WHINE about everything then 'do not let that door 'HIT YOU' where the good lord 'SPLIT YOU'...BYE-BYE Cease being so 'self-inflicted stupid' and vacate the community!  

This is the signature of aspca4ever  A.K.A Adolf Titler

It also includes a view of a poster.

Please clarify if we are not allowed to use signatures that
We can copy quotes off posters?
Be abusive about another poster on them?
Also trying to push posters off the forum, in about the poorest and most childish immature fashion

Though the religious aspect of "good Lord" made me chuckle, clearly religious and a Buddhist from what i understand lol

I await your responses just so we can clarify what is allowed
Happy either way what is decided

Thanks

Didge wrote:

korban dallas wrote:

aspca4ever wrote:

Didge wrote:Exhibit one.

Troll #1 stated > > > So you will forgive me when I have to say I am very disgusted in the attitude of Ben.  ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!  If you abhor this place as much as you WHINE about everything then 'do not let that door 'HIT YOU' where the good lord 'SPLIT YOU'...BYE-BYE Cease being so 'self-inflicted stupid' and vacate the community!  

This is the signature of aspca4ever  A.K.A Adolf Titler

It also includes a view of a poster.

Please clarify if we are not allowed to use signatures that
We can copy quotes off posters?
Be abusive about another poster on them?
Also trying to push posters off the forum, in about the poorest and most childish immature fashion

Though the religious aspect of "good Lord" made me chuckle, clearly religious and a Buddhist from what i understand lol

I await your responses just so we can clarify what is allowed
Happy either way what is decided

Thanks

OMG...how amusing and now you've quantified that you claim the TROLLtitle as your very own---so shocking that you would own up to your horrid behaviour;  yet it is a sign of maturity

But too keep repeating; 'water off a ducks back' while WHINING about your very own written words...is really absurd---but then again it suits your posting skills!