Migrant Crisis: David Cameron Considering Admitting At Least 3,000 Migrant Children Into The UK

First topic message reminder :

David Cameron is reportedly considering plans to admit several thousand migrant children into the UK within weeks, as pressure continues to mount on the government to provide greater assistant to young people who have fled their war-torn homelands. Downing Street said ministers were looking at calls from charities for the UK to admit at least 3,000 unaccompanied young people who have arrived in Europe from countries including Syria and Afghanistan, and who are at serious risk of falling prey to people traffickers, the Guardian reported.

The newspaper said the gesture would be in addition to the 20,000 refugees the UK has already agreed to accept by 2020.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2016/01/24/david-cameron-considering-admitting-3000-children-into-uk_n_9063026.html?utm_hp_ref=uk&utm_hp_ref=uk

Okay, now you want to be pendantic rags,. I am going to be right royal pain to you

Show me anywhere that i stated or even reasoned that EU nations are not good enough, to then back Tommy's accusation?

Didge wrote:Okay, now you want to be pendantic rags,. I am going to be right royal pain to you

Show me anywhere that i stated or even reasoned that EU nations are not good enough?

I didn't say you did, I said that Tommy said you did.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:Okay, now you want to be pendantic rags,. I am going to be right royal pain to you

Show me anywhere that i stated or even reasoned that EU nations are not good enough?

I didn't say you did, I said that Tommy said you did.

Right finally, so If i did not even say or argue that, then is it possible you are then mistaken yourself, being as he knew very well I had made no such claim?

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I didn't say you did, I said that Tommy said you did.

Right finally, so If i did not even say or argue that, then is it possible you are then mistaken yourself, being as he knew very well I had made no such claim?

No, I was merely pointing out your misunderstanding of what Tommy said, I made no claim that you said other European countries were inadequate.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

Right finally, so If i did not even say or argue that, then is it possible you are then mistaken yourself, being as he knew very well I had made no such claim?

No, I was merely pointing out your misunderstanding of what Tommy said, I made no claim that you said other European countries were inadequate.

You mean your misunderstand, I have know Tommy far longer than you

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, I was merely pointing out your misunderstanding of what Tommy said, I made no claim that you said other European countries were inadequate.

You mean your misunderstand, I have know Tommy far longer than you

No, you claimed that Tommy had said something he didn't say, and I merely pointed that out.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

You mean your misunderstand, I have know Tommy far longer than you

No, you claimed that Tommy had said something he didn't say, and I merely pointed that out.

Wrong

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, you claimed that Tommy had said something he didn't say, and I merely pointed that out.

Wrong

You did. You claimed he said this:

You also say this country looks after adequately and the people

He didn't say that. He said this:

he is also arguing that none of them are good enough to adequately look after any of the "unaccompanied asylum seeking 'children'" who are there, and how our country and people are the only ones who can look after them adequately enough and any other eu country looking after them would be 'barbaric'...!!!

In other words, he was claiming that you're the one saying that no other (European) country is good enough.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

Wrong

You did. You claimed he said this:

You also say this country looks after adequately and the people

He didn't say that. He said this:

he is also arguing that none of them are good enough to adequately look after any of the "unaccompanied asylum seeking 'children'" who are there, and how our country and people are the only ones who can look after them adequately enough and any other eu country looking after them would be 'barbaric'...!!!

In other words, he was claiming that you're the one saying that no other (European) country is good enough.

Wrong

learn context and how posters are

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You did. You claimed he said this:



He didn't say that. He said this:



In other words, he was claiming that you're the one saying that no other (European) country is good enough.

Wrong

learn context and how posters are

You're wrong - his words are there in black and white. Perhaps you still don't understand them.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didge wrote:

Wrong

learn context and how posters are

You're wrong - his words are there in black and white. Perhaps you still don't understand them.

Wrong, learn context and posters

Thanks

Didge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You're wrong - his words are there in black and white. Perhaps you still don't understand them.

Wrong, learn context and posters

Thanks

You're wrong - you still don't know what he said. Learn to read.

Wrong learn context

Didge wrote:Wrong learn context

You're wrong - learn to read.

Wrong again learn context and how posters are, which you have not the experience I have knowing Tommy, where agaion he lied the telling part you miss making a falsified claim onto me.
I knew exactly his context

If you do not,. that is your tough luck

Didge wrote:Wrong again learn context and how posters are, which you have not the experience I have knowing Tommy, where agaion he lied the telling part you miss making a falsified claim onto me.
I knew exactly his context

If you do not,. that is your tough luck

You have a problem understanding the written word Didge. It's nothing to do with context, it's to do with you not reading properly.

No, just you do not understand people

I do .

Didge wrote:No, just you do not understand people

I do .

Clearly you don't as you claimed he said something he didn't say.

Again you do not understand people Rags

Which you need to understand far more than what is written based of the arguments made and claims made and also how that poster is.

To be honest it seems as there is little debate, you are just striving for attention and will thus now deny you this on this thread.

Didge wrote:Again you do not understand people Rags

Which you need to understand far more than what is written based of the arguments made and claims made and also how that poster is.

To be honest it seems as there is little debate, you are just striving for attention and will thus now deny you this on this thread.

I merely pointed out that you misread or misunderstood what Tommy said. You're the one carrying it on instead of just acknowledging that you did indeed misread or misunderstand what he said.