Donald Trump threatens to pull £700m investment from Scotland

First topic message reminder :

Donald Trump has threatened to withhold £700m of investment in Scotland if he is banned from entering the UK.

MPs will debate later this month whether the US presidential hopeful should be refused entry.

It follows the billionaire property tycoon calling for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the US.

More than half a million people backed a petition calling on the tycoon to be barred for his comments, triggering a debate in the Commons.

However, there will be no vote at the end of the debate and it will be up to Home Secretary Theresa May to decide whether or not Mr Trump should be excluded from the UK.

MPs to debate calls to ban Donald Trump
Could Trump really be US president?
22 things that Donald Trump believes

Mr Trump owns the Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire as well as Trump International Golf Links near Aberdeen.

In a statement, his Trump Organisation said it had planned to invest more than £200m at Turnberry and a further £500m at the Aberdeenshire course.

But it warned that any action to restrict travel would force it to "immediately end these and all future investments we are currently contemplating in the United Kingdom".

It added: "Westminster would create a dangerous precedent and send a terrible message to the world that the United Kingdom opposes free speech and has no interest in attracting inward investment.

"This would also alienate the many millions of United States citizens who wholeheartedly support Mr Trump and have made him the forerunner by far in the 2016 presidential election.

"Many people now agree with Mr Trump that there is a serious problem that must be resolved. This can only be achieved if we are willing discuss these tough issues openly and honestly."

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon last month joined the calls for Mr Trump to be considered for exclusion from the UK.

Prime Minister David Cameron has previously labelled Mr Trump's comments "stupid" but said he did not support a ban, telling MPs the tycoon would "unite us all against him" if he visited the UK.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-35246991

i am sure i speak for many Scots when i say Trump can go and fuck him self

Richard The Lionheart wrote:There lies your problem here Koben, "we"
That "we" does not include many others, who were once "we" as a nation.
Its no good having many exports when you need to draft new treaties or have to be accepted into the EU, which independence does not auto provide Scotland with.
You see you make arguments to make people different in English and Scottish and leave out of the equation the Northern Irish and the Welsh, as if they are insignificant. There again lies the problem, with the concept of "we", because then it becomes, "them" and "us". It was the Union that brought an end to  "them" and "us".
Its fine having such identities and independence but not when played off a view of  "them" and "us", of which the SNP fundementally play off, just as you just did.

Anyway have to go, so goodnight

countrys would be knocking down our door for trade ,and yes it was the treaty of union that pulled us together but that was after a armed invasion the highland clearances banning of our national dress and language

the Irish well that`s not exactly a stable situation at least we don`t go out blowing things up and killing people to try and get our independence

But i lived in england most of my life and experienced first had how some (not all) view the scots
i remember when this old English guy was interviewed on sky news about a tennis match between murry and some player from abroad. he would have preferred the other player to win rather than murry because murry was a scot

says it all really

Raggamuffin wrote:Of course a lot of Scottish people will admire Nicola Sturgeon because she puts Scotland before England, or the rest the UK. I might admire her if I was in Scotland. If you're not in Scotland, you're less likely to admire someone who clearly doesn't give a toss about the rest of the UK. It stands to reason really.

I'm glad to see you admitting that ...

korban dallas wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:There lies your problem here Koben, "we"
That "we" does not include many others, who were once "we" as a nation.
Its no good having many exports when you need to draft new treaties or have to be accepted into the EU, which independence does not auto provide Scotland with.
You see you make arguments to make people different in English and Scottish and leave out of the equation the Northern Irish and the Welsh, as if they are insignificant. There again lies the problem, with the concept of "we", because then it becomes, "them" and "us". It was the Union that brought an end to  "them" and "us".
Its fine having such identities and independence but not when played off a view of  "them" and "us", of which the SNP fundementally play off, just as you just did.

Anyway have to go, so goodnight

countrys would be knocking down our door for trade ,and yes it was the treaty of union that pulled us together but that was after a armed invasion the highland clearances banning of our national dress and language

the Irish well that`s not exactly a stable situation at least we don`t go out blowing things up and killing people to try and get our independence

But i lived in england most of my life and experienced first had how some (not all) view the scots
i remember when this old English guy was interviewed on sky news about a tennis match between murry and some player from abroad. he would have preferred the other player to win rather than murry because murry was a scot

says it all really

Certainly does.   OH used to get really angry about that!

korban dallas wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:There lies your problem here Koben, "we"
That "we" does not include many others, who were once "we" as a nation.
Its no good having many exports when you need to draft new treaties or have to be accepted into the EU, which independence does not auto provide Scotland with.
You see you make arguments to make people different in English and Scottish and leave out of the equation the Northern Irish and the Welsh, as if they are insignificant. There again lies the problem, with the concept of "we", because then it becomes, "them" and "us". It was the Union that brought an end to  "them" and "us".
Its fine having such identities and independence but not when played off a view of  "them" and "us", of which the SNP fundementally play off, just as you just did.

Anyway have to go, so goodnight

countrys would be knocking down our door for trade ,and yes it was the treaty of union that pulled us together but that was after a armed invasion the highland clearances banning of our national dress and language

the Irish well that`s not exactly a stable situation at least we don`t go out blowing things up and killing people to try and get our independence

But i lived in england most of my life and experienced first had how some (not all) view the scots
i remember when this old English guy was interviewed on sky news about a tennis match between murry and some player from abroad. he would have preferred the other player to win rather than murry because murry was a scot

says it all really

Wow, you did not read or take in a single point I made and actually just further proved my poitnts based on some of the most in accurate history I have seen and based on again a "them and us" attitude.
Not really concerned over one tennis player.
Nice of you to think of the Northern Irish that way.
Nice of you not to even care and thuink of the Welsh.
No, countries will not be linning up, its up to the Scottish to be able to make and create trade aggreements, which it seems you fail to grasp.
Anyway, you seem more interested in measuring Scottish dicks, which is of very little interest to me, being as you fail to grasp a single point.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
countrys would be knocking down our door for trade ,and yes it was the treaty of union that pulled us together but that was after a armed invasion the highland clearances banning of our national dress and language

the Irish well that`s not exactly a stable situation at least we don`t go out blowing things up and killing people to try and get our independence

But i lived in england most of my life and experienced first had how some (not all) view the scots
i remember when this old English guy was interviewed on sky news about a tennis match between murry and some player from abroad. he would have preferred the other player to win rather than murry because murry was a scot

says it all really

Wow, you did not read or take in a single point I made and actually just further proved my poitnts based on some of the most in accurate history I have seen and based on again a "them and us" attitude.
Not really concerned over one tennis player.
Nice of you to think of the Northern Irish that way.
Nice of you not to even care and thuink of the Welsh.
No, countries will not be linning up, its up to the Scottish to be able to make and create trade aggreements, which it seems you fail to grasp.
Anyway, you seem more interested in measuring Scottish dicks, which is of very little interest to me, being as you fail to grasp a single point.

you seem more interested at lambasting people for there views trust me when i say your attitude is getting very old and quite frankly i am sick of it
country's will be very eager to trade with Scotland just like they do now probably more so
and as to measuring dicks i think you will win in that regard

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Of course a lot of Scottish people will admire Nicola Sturgeon because she puts Scotland before England, or the rest the UK. I might admire her if I was in Scotland. If you're not in Scotland, you're less likely to admire someone who clearly doesn't give a toss about the rest of the UK. It stands to reason really.

I'm glad to see you admitting that ...

Are you? I didn't know you were a fan of patriotism.

korban dallas wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


Wow, you did not read or take in a single point I made and actually just further proved my poitnts based on some of the most in accurate history I have seen and based on again a "them and us" attitude.
Not really concerned over one tennis player.
Nice of you to think of the Northern Irish that way.
Nice of you not to even care and thuink of the Welsh.
No, countries will not be linning up, its up to the Scottish to be able to make and create trade aggreements, which it seems you fail to grasp.
Anyway, you seem more interested in measuring Scottish dicks, which is of very little interest to me, being as you fail to grasp a single point.

you seem more interested at lambasting people for there views trust me when i say your attitude is getting very old and quite frankly i am sick of it
country's will be very eager to trade with Scotland just like they do now probably more so
and as to measuring dicks i think you will win in that regard

I am really not concerned what you think of me, that is a very poor deflection to the points you failed not only to address or even to understand.
Again I have no problem with Scottish independence built around a view of self determination, not one of a poor "them and us" attitude which the SNP and yourself both have. Its derisive and sends the wrong message creating ill feeling which you seem to fail to grasp.
Now you can whine about me all day long but it just further proves you cannot grasp this and look to deflect.
So looking to debate at me just will not cut it, either address the points or stop wasting my time with pitiful excuses.
Again just as if the UK leaves the EU, you have to make new treaties, of which are not made over night which again you seem unable to grasp.
Glad you think my dick is bigger, but that is besides the poiint, grow up, as I do not deal woith immature children anymore

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
you seem more interested at lambasting people for there views trust me when i say your attitude is getting very old and quite frankly i am sick of it
country's will be very eager to trade with Scotland just like they do now probably more so
and as to measuring dicks i think you will win in that regard

I am really not concerned what you think of me, that is a very poor deflection to the points you failed not only to address or even to understand.
Again I have no problem with Scottish independence built around a view of self determination, not one of a poor "them and us" attitude which the SNP and yourself both have. Its derisive and sends the wrong message creating ill feeling which you seem to fail to grasp.
Now you can whine about me all day long but it just further proves you cannot grasp this and look to deflect.
So looking to debate at me just will not cut it, either address the points or stop wasting my time with pitiful excuses.
Again just as if the UK leaves the EU, you have to make new treaties, of which are not made over night which again you seem unable to grasp.
Glad you think my dick is bigger, but that is besides the poiint, grow up, as I do not deal woith immature children anymore

yes we are all beneath your vast and superior intellect its you that waste peoples time people address your points and you claim otherwise and its not that you have a bigger dick more that you "are" a bigger dick
you dont debate you spend your time telling everybody they don`t know what they are talking about and insulting peoples intelligence  like your some kind of know it all who thinks he knows everything

honestly i look forward to the times you throw your dummy out the pram and disappear only to come back with a different Handel  only to start your crap all over again
your nothing more than a sanctimonious self aggrandizing ass and its no wonder people get fed up with your crap
honestly i tried after our last debacal i thought you had matured a little your like a 5 year old stamping his feet to get what he wants
i  have had you to the back teeth  

so do me a favor put me on ignore because honestly you waste everybody`s time

korban dallas wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

I am really not concerned what you think of me, that is a very poor deflection to the points you failed not only to address or even to understand.
Again I have no problem with Scottish independence built around a view of self determination, not one of a poor "them and us" attitude which the SNP and yourself both have. Its derisive and sends the wrong message creating ill feeling which you seem to fail to grasp.
Now you can whine about me all day long but it just further proves you cannot grasp this and look to deflect.
So looking to debate at me just will not cut it, either address the points or stop wasting my time with pitiful excuses.
Again just as if the UK leaves the EU, you have to make new treaties, of which are not made over night which again you seem unable to grasp.
Glad you think my dick is bigger, but that is besides the poiint, grow up, as I do not deal woith immature children anymore

yes we are all beneath your vast and superior intellect your its you that waste peoples time people address your points and you claim otherwise and its not that you have a bigger dick more that you "are" a bigger dick
you dont debate you spend your time telling everybody they don`t know what they are talking about and insulting peoples intelligence  like your some kind of know it all who thinks he knows everything

honestly i look forward to the times you throw your dummy out the pram and disappear only to come back with a different Handel  only to start your crap all over again
your nothing more than a sanctimonious self aggrandizing ass and its no wonder people get fed up with your crap
honestly i tried after our last debacal i thought you had matured a little your like a 5 year old stamping his feet to get what he wants
i  have had you to the back teeth  

so do me a favor put me on ignore because honestly you waste everybody`s time

So nearly every sentence about me showing you are now completely deflecting, choosing 2 year old insults, where at no point have I thrown any insults at you, which sums up yoiu have allowed yourself to get wound up here over nothing
Again you need to understand I really am not concerned what you think of me, its irrelevant.
So you choose to be immature.
So you enjoy being that way, whilst I carry on debating with adults
I will debate any points I so choose, I suggest again you grow up, as you are being quite frankly silly.

Thanks

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
yes we are all beneath your vast and superior intellect your its you that waste peoples time people address your points and you claim otherwise and its not that you have a bigger dick more that you "are" a bigger dick
you dont debate you spend your time telling everybody they don`t know what they are talking about and insulting peoples intelligence  like your some kind of know it all who thinks he knows everything

honestly i look forward to the times you throw your dummy out the pram and disappear only to come back with a different Handel  only to start your crap all over again
your nothing more than a sanctimonious self aggrandizing ass and its no wonder people get fed up with your crap
honestly i tried after our last debacal i thought you had matured a little your like a 5 year old stamping his feet to get what he wants
i  have had you to the back teeth  

so do me a favor put me on ignore because honestly you waste everybody`s time

So nearly every sentence about me showing you are now completely deflecting, choosing 2 year old insults, where at no point have I thrown any insults at you, which sums up yoiu have allowed yourself to get wound up here over nothing
Again you need to understand I really am not concerned what you think of me, its irrelevant.
So you choose to be immature.
So you enjoy being that way, whilst I carry on debating with adults
I will debate any points I so choose, I suggest again you grow up, as you are being quite frankly silly.

Thanks

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla bla

ignore please

korban dallas wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

So nearly every sentence about me showing you are now completely deflecting, choosing 2 year old insults, where at no point have I thrown any insults at you, which sums up yoiu have allowed yourself to get wound up here over nothing
Again you need to understand I really am not concerned what you think of me, its irrelevant.
So you choose to be immature.
So you enjoy being that way, whilst I carry on debating with adults
I will debate any points I so choose, I suggest again you grow up, as you are being quite frankly silly.

Thanks

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla bla

ignore please

Thank you for proving how immature you are being.

Now please allow the adults to debate and stop spoiling this debate

Thanks

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla bla

ignore please

Thank you for proving hos immature you are being.

Now please allow the adults to debate and stop spoiling this debate

Thanks

i wonder is there any poster that you have not made the same claims about, not debating,immature not addressing points i don`t think there is you have said the same crap to every poster on this site repeatedly and many others it must be hard for you i am suprised your not in government or a more high profile job than building supplies given your ability to know every thing about everything

mr know it all strikes again never wrong even when the person know more about any subject than you do

i am not saying your not a clever person but its your attitude that lets you down the way you converse with people and the sanctimonious superiority complex you exhibit constantly that pisses people of you might want to see a shrink about that

and just to save time for your next gem

bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla blabla bla bla bla

ignore please

korban dallas wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Thank you for proving hos immature you are being.

Now please allow the adults to debate and stop spoiling this debate

Thanks

i wonder is there any poster that you have not made the same claims about, not debating,immature not addressing points i don`t think there is  you have said the same crap to every poster on this site repeatedly and many others it must be hard for you i am suprised your not in government or a more high profile job than building supplies given your ability to know every thing about everything

mr know it all strikes again never wrong even when the person know more about any subject than you do

i am not saying your not a clever person but its your attitude that lets you down the way you converse with people and the sanctimonious superiority complex you exhibit constantly that pisses people of you might want to see a shrink about that

Thank you again for your views on me, which again proves you are being immature

Again allow posters to debate as its clear you have utterly no interest in doing so now on here, and please take your pram on the way out

Thanks

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
i wonder is there any poster that you have not made the same claims about, not debating,immature not addressing points i don`t think there is  you have said the same crap to every poster on this site repeatedly and many others it must be hard for you i am suprised your not in government or a more high profile job than building supplies given your ability to know every thing about everything

mr know it all strikes again never wrong even when the person know more about any subject than you do

i am not saying your not a clever person but its your attitude that lets you down the way you converse with people and the sanctimonious superiority complex you exhibit constantly that pisses people of you might want to see a shrink about that

Thank you again for your views on me, which again proves you are being immature

Again allow posterws to debate, and please take your pram on the way out

Thanks

see previous post

ps and since you started with your views on me first
turn about is fair don`t you think

And back to the debate.

Went to Scotland once, scenery was beautiful but residents, once they knew you were English were first class wankers. The Severn Valley, Vale of Evesham and the Lake District just as good.----------[il'l get my coat]

Donal Trump can keep his money Scotland will keep its dignity by removing this man as an ambassador for our nation.

Correct decision and the comments about Nicola Sturgeon are childish and immature.

Irn Bru wrote:Donal Trump can keep his money Scotland will keep its dignity by removing this man as an ambassador for our nation.

Correct decision and the comments about Nicola Sturgeon are childish and immature.

I think it works both ways. If Nicola Sturgeon et al don't want Trump around, they shouldn't benefit from any investments he makes either. However, it's not up to her to ban him from Scotland anyway.

There are enough childish comments about English politicians on here, so I don't see why Nicola Sturgeon is exempt.

Irn Bru wrote:Donal Trump can keep his money Scotland will keep its dignity by removing this man as an ambassador for our nation.

Correct decision and the comments about Nicola Sturgeon are childish and immature.

You of all people do not speak for all the Scottish people let alone Britain. of which Scotland is part of the UK.

As IB is a thoroughbed Scot, he has more knowledge of Scots people and their politics than most on here - clearly more than Didge.
As for the debate - virtually nobody is interested i debating with Didge -he just becomes personally abusive and spoils for an arguement.
Perhaps he will quit and come back as Andrea Borman.

Handy Andy wrote:As IB is a thoroughbed  Scot, he has more knowledge of Scots people and their politics than  most on here - clearly more than Didge.
As for the debate - virtually nobody is interested i debating with Didge -he just becomes personally abusive and spoils for an arguement.
Perhaps he will quit and come back as Andrea Borman.

Interesting show me anywhere that I was abusive on this thread?
If not I suggest you apologise
All you are doing is offering an opinion not substanciated.
As one individual does not speak for a whole nation.
Also very much deflecting from my points.
Again what you think of me is irrelevant

Trump pulling his investment??  Hasn't anyone read The Art of the Deal?  

You begin with a threat, and then wait for the phone calls.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:Donal Trump can keep his money Scotland will keep its dignity by removing this man as an ambassador for our nation.

Correct decision and the comments about Nicola Sturgeon are childish and immature.

You of all people do not speak for all the Scottish people let alone Britain. of which Scotland is part of the UK.

"of all poeple"?

I don't speak for all the people of Scotland but Nicola Sturgeon was given a mandate by the people of Scotland and if she sacks Trump as an ambassador for Scotland then that is right and properand I support her in that decision. Are you upset that she did that?

The comments about Scotland's first minister were childish and immature.

Irn Bru wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

You of all people do not speak for all the Scottish people let alone Britain. of which Scotland is part of the UK.

"of all poeple"?

I don't speak for all the people of Scotland but Nicola Sturgeon was given a mandate by the people of Scotland and if she sacks Trump as an ambassador for Scotland then that is right and properand I support her in that decision. Are you upset that she did that?

The comments about Scotland's first minister were childish and immature.

So by your methodology, Hitler was given a mandate by the people and if Germany decides to wxterminate the Jews, all are accountable in Germans, Yes?
You do not speak for Scotland and neither does a leader.
She only thinks she speaks for others dependent on her or his popularity at the time.
Hence your point was, very level 4 year old

Well in that case, Winston Churchill didn't speak for us did he?

sassy wrote:Well in that case, Winston Churchill didn't speak for us did he?

No he did not, but people believed he did, and that is what matters.


Next

Oh My, best laugh of the night.

Well, the people who voted for Sturgeon, a huge majority, think she speaks for them, and that's what matters.

Next.

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

You of all people do not speak for all the Scottish people let alone Britain. of which Scotland is part of the UK.

"of all poeple"?

I don't speak for all the people of Scotland but Nicola Sturgeon was given a mandate by the people of Scotland and if she sacks Trump as an ambassador for Scotland then that is right and properand I support her in that decision. Are you upset that she did that?

The comments about Scotland's first minister were childish and immature.

So by your methodology, Hitler was given a mandate by the people and if Germany decides to wxterminate the Jews, all are accountable in Germans, Yes?
You do not speak for Scotland and neither does a leader.
She only thinks she speaks for others dependent on her or his popularity at the time.
Hence your point was, very level 4 year old

I never said she did speak for Scotland, just pointing out she was given a mandate to make decisions by a majprity of the people of Scotland - same as any other elected leader really. Do you dispute that?

Oh dear Didge. This is a far cry from a while back when your praise for Nicola was gushing out of you in buckets in that she was so clever and absolutely brilliant in doing what she thought was right for Scotland and doing it democratically as well.

Have you forgot?

The comments about Scotland's first minister were childish and immature.

sassy wrote:Oh My, best laugh of the night.

Well, the people who voted for Sturgeon, a huge majority, think she speaks for them, and that's what matters.

Next.

People last 4 years in politics, do you think they never change their mind?
Strange how the left go and do everything to cover for one of the biggest blunders daily, by Irn

Irn Bru wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


So by your methodology, Hitler was given a mandate by the people and if Germany decides to wxterminate the Jews, all are accountable in Germans, Yes?
You do not speak for Scotland and neither does a leader.
She only thinks she speaks for others dependent on her or his popularity at the time.
Hence your point was, very level 4 year old

I never said she did speak for Scotland, just pointing out she was given a mandate to make decisions by a majprity of the people of Scotland - same as any other elected leader really. Do you dispute that?

Oh dear Didge. This is a far cry from a while back when your praise for Nicola was gushing out of you in buckets in that she was so clever and absolutely brilliant in doing what she thought was right for Scotland and doing it democratically as well.

Have you forgot?

The comments about Scotland's first minister were childish and immature.

But you tries to speak for Scotland, as if you are in anyway important.
That made me roll over so thanks
So again why do you deflect when you screwed up onto me?
Because you are so wound up?
Its the only explanation

It's a great shame, but you are delusional Didge, totally delusional, the blunder was yours, hole, dug, dug deeper, fell in.  Priceless.

sassy wrote:It's a great shame, but you are delusional Didge, totally delusional, the blunder was yours, hole, dug, dug deeper, fell in.  Priceless.

So sassy again claims I am wrong by telling me, but for some reason, never abole to reason or prove it. lol

lol

Next

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


So by your methodology, Hitler was given a mandate by the people and if Germany decides to wxterminate the Jews, all are accountable in Germans, Yes?
You do not speak for Scotland and neither does a leader.
She only thinks she speaks for others dependent on her or his popularity at the time.
Hence your point was, very level 4 year old

I never said she did speak for Scotland, just pointing out she was given a mandate to make decisions by a majprity of the people of Scotland - same as any other elected leader really. Do you dispute that?

Oh dear Didge. This is a far cry from a while back when your praise for Nicola was gushing out of you in buckets in that she was so clever and absolutely brilliant in doing what she thought was right for Scotland and doing it democratically as well.

Have you forgot?

The comments about Scotland's first minister were childish and immature.

But you tries to speak for Scotland, as if you are in anyway important.
That made me roll over so thanks
So again why do you deflect when you screwed up onto me?
Because you are so wound up?
Its the only explanation

That's a classic even for you Didge. Keep up making hot air ain that factory of your if it keeps you happy

Irn Bru wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


But you tries to speak for Scotland, as if you are in anyway important.
That made me roll over so thanks
So again why do you deflect when you screwed up onto me?
Because you are so wound up?
Its the only explanation

That's a classic even for you Didge. Keep up making hot air ain that factory of your if it keeps you happy

Classic defloection and avoidance answer lol

Next

Classic Didge using deflection (which he can't spell) as a deflection to avoid answering.

Next

sassy wrote:Classic Didge using deflection (which he can't spell) as a deflection to avoid answering.

Next

I am happy that my spelling is pants, at least as poor as that is, it still is far better than any argument you have ever made sassy.



Next

Didge. Have you forgot about you gushing praise for Nicola? Of course you were arguing with Tommy on that one so maybe that explains why you were so taken with her.

I never forget anything Irn, I never said I do not praise all deeds by an individual, but she is still is derisive, even the best of leaders are at times, but she is nothing special.
Is that your defense so good things I said once about her.
Hold the press

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

sassy wrote:Classic Didge using deflection (which he can't spell) as a deflection to avoid answering.

Next

I am happy that my spelling is pants, at least as poor as that is, it still is far better than any argument you have ever made sassy.



Next

Only in your head Dodge.  Your delusions are amazing, you should write about them, make a great comedy.

sassy wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


I am happy that my spelling is pants, at least as poor as that is, it still is far better than any argument you have ever made sassy.



Next

Only in your head Dodge.  Your delusions are amazing, you should write about them, make a great comedy.

Nothing  on the debate, only about me, counter fail


Next

Richard The Lionheart wrote:I never forget anything Irn, I never said I do not praise all deeds by an individual, but she is still is derisive, even the best of leaders are at times, but she is nothing special.
Is that your defense so good things I said once about her.
Hold the press

That would be DEVISIVE Dodge, lol

Richard The Lionheart wrote:

sassy wrote:


Only in your head Dodge.  Your delusions are amazing, you should write about them, make a great comedy.

Nothing  on the debate, only about me, counter fail


Next

Ah we are playing The Waltons again.  What debate, you haven't been debating, just talking gibberish.

Next.

sassy wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:I never forget anything Irn, I never said I do not praise all deeds by an individual, but she is still is derisive, even the best of leaders are at times, but she is nothing special.
Is that your defense so good things I said once about her.
Hold the press

That would be DEVISIVE Dodge, lol

No

Search Results

derisive

expressing contempt or ridicule.

sassy wrote:

Richard The Lionheart wrote:


Nothing  on the debate, only about me, counter fail


Next

Ah we are playing The Waltons again.  What debate, you haven't been debating, just talking gibberish.

Next.

8 th copout answer


Next

Goodnight John-Boy lol

sassy wrote:Goodnight John-Boy lol

Good night sassy

Richard The Lionheart wrote:I never forget anything Irn, I never said I do not praise all deeds by an individual, but she is still is derisive, even the best of leaders are at times, but she is nothing special.
Is that your defense so good things I said once about her.
Hold the press

No Didge. It's the sheer hypocrisy that catches you out because on a different thread you were also likening her to Jimmy Krankie and you made that comment in a reply to another poster who descibed her as the posioned dwarf. You actually got the whole issue wrong on that one as well.

Just like on this thread the comments were childish and immature.

Your memory is faulty Didge and it shows

So Irn turns completely to talking about me and now Jimmie Krankie which really shows his age lol

I shall leave my points standing and leave these two flapping like fish out of water lol

No points standing, only one flapping is you.  G'night John'boy lol