Peter Sutcliffe set to be moved from Broadmoor...

Stormee wrote:We should not waste money keeping scum like him alive.
We have many of our own people who need that money to survive.

If ever this country struggled to get a hangman they can call on me to take the job GRATIS, I kid you not.

Lord Foul wrote:he was judged insane at the time...hence broadmoor

you DO NOT execute the insane

I mean what do you do about the kids, and yes at the time they were kids, who killed Little Jamie bulger??

i wonder if stormee would happily execute a couple of 10yos???

Syl wrote:I remember hearing on the BBC news the tape sent to the police by the nutter with the Geordie accent.
Creepy...and it certainly doesn't seem that long ago.

Syl wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:he was judged insane at the time...hence broadmoor

you DO NOT execute the insane

I mean what do you do about the kids, and yes at the time they were kids, who killed Little Jamie bulger??

i wonder if stormee would happily execute a couple of 10yos???

He didn't show signs of insanity till after he was caught......and because of it he has so far served his time in an easier place than he would have done had he not been declared insane.

knew him personally then??

You cant compare, judge or treat the same  the acts of a child to the acts of an adult.

Lord Foul wrote:he was judged insane at the time...hence broadmoor

you DO NOT execute the insane

I mean what do you do about the kids, and yes at the time they were kids, who killed Little Jamie bulger??

i wonder if stormee would happily execute a couple of 10yos???

Raggamuffin wrote:

Syl wrote:I remember hearing on the BBC news the tape sent to the police by the nutter with the Geordie accent.
Creepy...and it certainly doesn't seem that long ago.

Exactly. That threw them off the scent for a while didn't it?

I'd been to Alma Road in Leeds where he killed his last victim. I remember the row of shops and the KFC place, and after he was caught it seemed obvious that's where he'd been hanging around when he saw her. I knew the area in Sheffield where they caught him too.

Lord Foul wrote:

Syl wrote:

He didn't show signs of insanity till after he was caught......and because of it he has so far served his time in an easier place than he would have done had he not been declared insane.

knew him personally then??

You cant compare, judge or treat the same  the acts of a child to the acts of an adult.

Syl wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

No I didn't know him personally....his brother and father did though, and they said similar.

Stormee wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:he was judged insane at the time...hence broadmoor

you DO NOT execute the insane

I mean what do you do about the kids, and yes at the time they were kids, who killed Little Jamie bulger??

i wonder if stormee would happily execute a couple of 10yos???

No need to wonder, ask me direct, milord.

Lord Foul wrote:

Syl wrote:


No I didn't know him personally....his brother and father did though, and they said similar.

and, by the same token...none of the parents/friends/relativers of these jihadis have any idea that their precious has been radicalised, an idea swallowed hook line and sinker by some folks, whos comfy little world would collapse if the opposite were proved true, since it would nean that many many more folks were "culpable", and the infection much deeper than they like to claim it is

that is to say it would no longer be "only a few"

Stormee wrote:NO NO NO, milord.

I do consider your comparison to be rather incomparable.

Lord Foul wrote:ok...so...why execute anyone?

if you are going to be selective about it, upon what criteria do you base your selectivity???

Syl wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

and, by the same token...none of the parents/friends/relativers of these jihadis have any idea that their precious has been radicalised, an idea swallowed hook line and sinker by some folks, whos comfy little world would collapse if the opposite were proved true, since it would nean that many many more folks were "culpable", and the infection much deeper than they like to claim it is

that is to say it would no longer be "only a few"

Well this is a thread that doesn't concern Islamic terrorists.....and I don't see the comparison either tbh.

obviously your comprehension is limited then
but to simplify it for you

you claimed his father and brother didnt see any "insanity" in him prior to his acts

well neither do the jihadis families

now either you accept what "social aquaintences" see is irrelevant... i.e the opinion of sutcliffes father and brother is irrelevant to the actuality which then absolves the "social aquiantences" of jihadis from possibly knowing


OR as you seem to think sutcliffs father and brothers opinion and "judgement" is factual and accurate...in which case the jihadis "social aquaintances " do know rather more than they let on and are hence culpable..






Sutcliffe was a family man who never strayed far from home pre internet, all his ideas were his own.

Furthermore I don't think many jihadis are claiming to be schizophrenic.

No? well actually they (or rather their appologists) claim they are "radicalised", and equate it to some sort of mental malfunction. and consider it "cureable" too

Lord Foul wrote:

Syl wrote:

Well this is a thread that doesn't concern Islamic terrorists.....and I don't see the comparison either tbh.

obviously your comprehension is limited then
but to simplify it for you

you claimed his father and brother didnt see any "insanity" in him prior to his acts

well neither do the jihadis families

now either you accept what "social aquaintences" see is irrelevant... i.e the opinion of sutcliffes father and brother is irrelevant to the actuality which then absolves the "social aquiantences" of jihadis from possibly knowing


OR as you seem to think sutcliffs father and brothers opinion and "judgement" is factual and accurate...in which case the jihadis "social aquaintances " do know rather more than they let on and are hence culpable..






Sutcliffe was a family man who never strayed far from home pre internet, all his ideas were his own.

Furthermore I don't think many jihadis are claiming to be schizophrenic.

No? well actually they (or rather their appologists) claim they are "radicalised", and equate it to some sort of mental malfunction. and consider it "cureable" too