Please respect the anonymity of your fellow members

Raggamuffin wrote:I think it's good that the issue is addressed because some people clearly have a different idea as to what constitutes doxing, and what information is allowed on here.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:I think it's good that the issue is addressed because some people clearly have a different idea as to what constitutes doxing, and what information is allowed on here.

in the end doxing as you call it unless for illegal purposes is not illegal reporters do it every day i have had it done to me such as it can be
But i don`t get my knickers in a twist over information i have published my self on the internet or have had published about me unless its inaccurate or a lie but then again i don`t publish stuff i am bothered about people knowing
If i did well tuff

thats why there are no pictures of me on the Internet anywhere thats why the only people who know anything about me are people i implicitly trust like victor,ben,sassy,irn,even Nems

if its in the public domain technically any privacy issues  have been forfeited, or are inapplicable.unless the information is illegally obtained or for fraudulent or malicious purposes ,but they are exceptions even to that
something you learn as part of a computer ethics course

now if you would like to discuss the ethics then fine i am open to that but you would need to stop these unfounded and "technically malicious" accusations about me  

Raggamuffin wrote:I'm going to ask eddie to remove part of your post as you are just using this as an excuse to get personal about a member of this forum yet again.

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
in the end doxing as you call it unless for illegal purposes is not illegal reporters do it every day i have had it done to me such as it can be
But i don`t get my knickers in a twist over information i have published my self on the internet or have had published about me unless its inaccurate or a lie but then again i don`t publish stuff i am bothered about people knowing
If i did well tuff

thats why there are no pictures of me on the Internet anywhere thats why the only people who know anything about me are people i implicitly trust like victor,ben,sassy,irn,even Nems

if its in the public domain technically any privacy issues  have been forfeited, or are inapplicable.unless the information is illegally obtained or for fraudulent or malicious purposes ,but they are exceptions even to that
something you learn as part of a computer ethics course

now if you would like to discuss the ethics then fine i am open to that but you would need to stop these unfounded and "technically malicious" accusations about me  

If I see you dox anyone else on this forum, I will alert a moderator. You clearly don't understand the rules. I gather that you had a warning for criminal harassment before, so you've got form for it.

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
yet we where at the time talking about the link in my signature you then brought up deans picture and its very clear you are in a right mess and that because you made a mistake your trying to backtrack and justify that mistake with parts of posts taken out of sequence

And as far as stoo goes he himself uses his name on his own and other sites and the fact he is a convicted criminal hence his name is on a government web site and local papers as discovered by others  is hardly my doing but i am sure he will appreciate you dragging it all up again as i have not mentioned any where in years till you dragged my name in to it with your accusations

And as to sassy and didge really could not care less they are both grown ups they can sort it out them selfs with the admins and mods its not my place to tell ether of any of them what is right and wrong or how to run there forum

No, I was not talking about Dean at the time, and neither were you. You know that, I know that, and so would anyone else who bothered to read this stuff. You're trying to backtrack because you know you messed up and got it wrong.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:I'm going to ask eddie to remove part of your post as you are just using this as an excuse to get personal about a member of this forum yet again.

fuck of i was answering you question you the one that brought it all up Jeeze do hypocracy much

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, I was not talking about Dean at the time, and neither were you. You know that, I know that, and so would anyone else who bothered to read this stuff. You're trying to backtrack because you know you messed up and got it wrong.

yea bullshit and you know it

Raggamuffin wrote:Anyway Korban, the fact is that you're a doxer, and a malicious one at that. Maybe one day you'll get your comeuppance. I sincerely hope so.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

If I see you dox anyone else on this forum, I will alert a moderator. You clearly don't understand the rules. I gather that you had a warning for criminal harassment before, so you've got form for it.

your just a thick malicious ass hole raggs and no i have had no warnings for criminal anything it would be nice if you got your facts straight once in a while

A complaint has been made to the police about a web site http://the-clockwork-lamppost.co.uk that is being is being used to post video’s and harass a member of the public where there face is used in short video’s. Following enquiries and Data Protection requests this site has been found to be linked to yourselves. If it continues further police action may be taken.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Anyway Korban, the fact is that you're a doxer, and a malicious one at that. Maybe one day you'll get your comeuppance. I sincerely hope so.

i sincerely hope you choke on your own twisted lying tongue  

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
fuck of i was answering you question you the one that brought it all up Jeeze do hypocracy much

No, I've been talking about you linking to someone's name - you're the one going on and on about what you read "elsewhere". You're just using this as an excuse to do it all again.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

No, I've been talking about you linking to someone's name - you're the one going on and on about what you read "elsewhere". You're just using this as an excuse to do it all again.

you brought it all up i havent posted for ages till you did and brought my name in to it with your accusations  And you blame me ......fucking priceless

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
i sincerely hope you choke on your own twisted lying tongue  

I hope you get arrested for criminal harassment. You clearly think you can do what you like.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I hope you get arrested for criminal harassment. You clearly think you can do what you like.

harassment ? you really are as think as pig shit

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
you brought it all up i havent posted for ages till you did and brought my name in to it with your accusations  And you blame me ......fucking priceless

I said you were a doxer, and you are. You're the one who keeps on repeating the other stuff. You're a malicious, creepy stalker.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I said you were a doxer, and you are. You're the one who keeps on repeating the other stuff. You're a malicious, creepy stalker.

yet your the one stirring the shit with your accusations after all it was you who started this not me sweetheart i haven`t mentioned ether of them for years till you opened your fat gob i am sure they are chuffed with that  

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
harassment ? you really are as think as pig shit

I'm not a stalker though, like you. You were warned to stop your criminal harassment - I do hope you complied.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I'm not a stalker though, like you. You were warned to stop your criminal harassment - I do hope you complied.

complied ? i have never been warned to stop anything not sure where you get that bullshit from

A complaint has been made to the police about a web site http://the-clockwork-lamppost.co.uk that is being is being used to post video’s and harass a member of the public where there face is used in short video’s. Following enquiries and Data Protection requests this site has been found to be linked to yourselves. If it continues further police action may be taken.

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
yet your the one stirring the shit with your accusations after all it was you who started this not me sweetheart i haven`t mentioned ether of them for years till you opened your fat gob i am sure they are chuffed with that  

You clearly didn't learn anything from years ago though did you? You still think you can harass someone or dox them with impunity.

I don't care who is chuffed and who isn't. This is about you and your habit of doxing and harassing people.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You clearly didn't learn anything from years ago though did you? You still think you can harass someone or dox them with impunity.

I don't care who is chuffed and who isn't. This is about you and your habit of doxing and harassing people.

you have clearly snapped your gourd no you dont care that you dragged something that was over years ago back up to further your insentient need to cause arguments and strife
what  a pretty sad life you must have

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
complied ? i have never been warned to stop anything not sure where you get that bullshit from

A complaint has been made to the police about a web site http://the-clockwork-lamppost.co.uk that is being is being used to post video’s and harass a member of the public where there face is used in short video’s. Following enquiries and Data Protection requests this site has been found to be linked to yourselves.  If it continues further police action may be taken.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

it did continue you pillock and NO action has been taken because it was classed as malicious and they (the police where more intrested in the homophobic tweet made by the same individual who made the complaint  
so yes it was found to be unfounded you stupid fucking ass HENCE the site is still up that was posted by me no actions where necessary or taken no warnings or requests to remove
it was posted to show exactly what dean had done ...do you think for one second if the  claims made where accurate the site would still be up

your a bloody moron lol  

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
you have clearly snapped your gourd no you dont care that you dragged something that was over years ago back up to further your insentient need to cause arguments and strife
what  a pretty sad life you must have

It wasn't from years ago - it was March this year when you posted that. Did you write it yourself then? After all, you're denying that you were warned for criminal harassment.

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:




it did continue you pillock and NO action has been taken because it was classed as malicious and they (the police where more intrested in the homophobic tweet made by the same individual who made the complaint  
so yes it was found to be unfounded you stupid fucking ass HENCE the site is still up that was posted by me no actions where necessary or taken no warnings or requests to remove
it was posted to show exactly what dean had done ...do you think for one second if the  claims made where accurate the site would still be up

your a bloody moron lol  

But you have removed stuff from your site haven't you? In other words, you did comply in order to avoid further action.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

But you have removed stuff from your site haven't you? In other words, you did comply in order to avoid further action.

well yes i have hidden some stuff but not because of that because after 8 years was enough me and i think dean have moved on would you like me to repost them ?
i can quite easily as they are still there i have no problem with doing that and in fact not all the stuff about dean is gone i also pointed out on this forum that i had hidden them because we and dean had not interacted for a good length of time and i had happily made my point

however say the word raggs i can post them again no skin of my nose but make it clear to dean it was at your request

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
well yes i have hidden some stuff but not because of that because after 8 years was enough me and i think dean have moved on would you like me to repost them ?
i can quite easily as they are still there i have no problem with doing that and in fact not all the stuff about dean is gone i also pointed out on this forum that i had hidden them because we and dean had not interacted for a good length of time and i had happily made my point

however say the word raggs i can post them again no skin of my nose but make it clear to dean it was at your request

I don't recall requesting you to do so. I disapprove of that kind of thing, and I'm delighted that you saw sense after that warning and removed it.

korban dallas wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't recall requesting you to do so. I disapprove of that kind of thing, and I'm delighted that you saw sense after that warning and removed it.

your stilll not getting it you stupid cow I HAD NO WARNING what so fucking ever after they investigated the false claim (as they a re required to do )and am free to post them without prejudice they acctualy want to speak to him and his details where given to the MET cyber crime unit by the officer i spoke to not only at my local police but the detective i spoke to in dorset on the phone  i think where the complaint was made as i said at the time
And i just checked (i dont go to the site often) they are still a couple up there  so would you like me to re post then to prove i was not "warned " about anything as if i was warned it would be a pretyy silly thing to do now wouldn`t it but first you best let dean know you have dragged this shit up again so he knows it wasn`t my idea i just needed to prove a point at you prompting

Raggamuffin wrote:

korban dallas wrote:
your stilll not getting it you stupid cow I HAD NO WARNING what so fucking ever after they investigated the false claim (as they a re required to do )and am free to post them without prejudice they acctualy want to speak to him and his details where given to the MET cyber crime unit by the officer i spoke to not only at my local police but the detective i spoke to in dorset on the phone  i think where the complaint was made as i said at the time
And i just checked (i dont go to the site often) they are still a couple up there  so would you like me to re post then to prove i was not "warned " about anything as if i was warned it would be a pretyy silly thing to do now wouldn`t it but first you best let dean know you have dragged this shit up again so he knows it wasn`t my idea i just needed to prove a point at you prompting

You're the one threatening to post them again - I haven't asked you to do so so. That makes it your idea, not my idea. I wouldn't advise that you do something like that though.