Thierry Henry Backs Players Coming Out As Gay

First topic message reminder :



Arsenal legend Thierry Henry says it should be "OK by now" for gay footballers to feel comfortable being open about their sexuality.

Speaking on Sky News, Henry said: "We’re living in a different time, a different world, and people should accept that."

Professional athletes have long been hesitant about coming out as gay, partly because of concerns about how fans and sponsors would react.  But an increasing number of sports stars - including English rugby union player Sam Stanley - have decided to go public.

Henry, who is a Sky Academy ambassador, said he would have no problems playing alongside a team who was gay.

"It’s not a problem, we’re ultimately there to do a job. Whatever you believe in, whatever you do," he said. "If I was in a dressing room, that guy would still have been my teammate and I would still give him the ball, and I would still see him the same way, still go out with him. We're all human beings at the end of the day, so it doesn't really bother me."

The former France and Arsenal star is supporting the Sky Academy Confidence Month, which aims to help young people boost their confidence and fulfil their potential.

http://news.sky.com/story/1577129/thierry-henry-backs-players-coming-out-as-gay

Well said

Tommy Monk wrote:So women are wrong to feel uncomfortable by men leering at them?


I don't want some homosexual watching me getting changed and getting some sexual pleasure from it.


Public toilets have been closed because of homosexuals hanging about in there for various pervy reasons, some there for the voyeuristic opportunity of looking at other mens dicks etc...


The changing room is a perfect place for the homosexual perverts...

Don't be hysterical. Are you telling me that you cannot look at a woman without automatically getting sexual pleasure? I guess you must be the pervert.

I see you resorting to the usual homophobic terms 'some homosexual' and 'homosexual perverts'.

Again, fortunately most men are beyond your limited mentality thesedays.

As said, a woman may be intimidated by too many men making comments or going further.

Why do you think so many sports stars have no problem with this tommy where you do? Are they better than you? Kinder than you? More intelligent than you? Less paranoid than you? Less afraid than you? What is it?

Tommy Monk wrote:So women are wrong to feel uncomfortable by men leering at them?
I don't want some homosexual watching me getting changed and getting some sexual pleasure from it.
Public toilets have been closed because of homosexuals hanging about in there for various pervy reasons, some there for the voyeuristic opportunity of looking at other mens dicks etc... The changing room is a perfect place for the homosexual perverts...

Who said women were wrong to feel uncomfortable?
Nobody did, where there is a stark big difference why there is seperate changing rooms for men and women over nudity. So what is the issue then if daily men already get naked around other?
Nothing, a person no matter if they are prejudiced against homosexuals can already feel uncomfortable about getting naked in front of men. Again that is a problem the individual needs help with, but to use the most idiotic argument as you are doing has no validity. It is you that has created the problem for yourself and the facilities does not have to or shoud have to accomdate for bigoted idiots. As such idiots would be the last kind of people anyone would wish to help. If anyone did ever have any issue they either speak to the management to have something done, call the Police or join another facility.

See its not difficult and there is no reason the place needs to change for a bigot who has created his own paranoia,

You'll be advocating for peados to be allowed to work in schools next ..

Tommy Monk wrote:So women are wrong to feel uncomfortable by men leering at them?


I don't want some homosexual watching me getting changed and getting some sexual pleasure from it.

What worries women is the consequence...leering men are apt to become groping men. Absent that, who the fook cares?

Tommy Monk wrote:Public toilets have been closed because of homosexuals hanging about in there for various pervy reasons, some there for the voyeuristic opportunity of looking at other mens dicks etc...

The changing room is a perfect place for the homosexual perverts...

Homosexuals are no more predatory than heterosexuals. The public loos have been closed, if at all, by questionable characters of all persuasions. So it's not a homosexual issue, it's a general crime issue.

Don't worry tommy. You're safe.

Tommy Monk wrote:
You'll be advocating for peados to be allowed to work in schools next ..

How do you make that connection? And answer my questions, coward.

Why do you think so many sports stars have no problem with this tommy where you do? Are they better than you? Kinder than you? More intelligent than you? Less paranoid than you? Less afraid than you? What is it?

Tommy Monk wrote:
You'll be advocating for peados to be allowed to work in schools next ..

Really based on what exactly??
The laws have changed over the years to further protect children, so you arte just making even more idiotic points.
Again, you are the bigot, if you feel uncomfortable around homosexual men. Then again tough shit, as you are the daft prick who has created this problem for yourself. IT also shows you have no wish to integrate into society, when there is nothing stopping you from doing so.

Les, of course you will be arguing in favour of homosexuals being able to enter male changing rooms and see loads of naked men walking about...

Tommy Monk wrote:Les, of course you will be arguing in favour of homosexuals being able to enter male changing rooms and see loads of naked men walking about...

And tommy...of course you will be stumbling over simple thoughts and plain reasoning.  That's what conservatives do.

Tommy Monk wrote:Les, of course you will be arguing in favour of homosexuals being able to enter male changing rooms and see loads of naked men walking about...

It isn't an argument. There has never been a situation where gay and straight men have separate changing rooms and there has never been a problem. Its just you and your lot getting your nickers in a twist about something and nothing.

As I asked before:

Why do you think so many sports stars have no problem with this where you do? Are they better than you? Kinder than you? More intelligent than you? Less paranoid than you? Less afraid than you? What is it?

Tommy Monk wrote:Les, of course you will be arguing in favour of homosexuals being able to enter male changing rooms and see loads of naked men walking about...

Well I am sure homosexual men have been going to changing rooms since they were first invented.
Like I said, if you have the problem, it is one your formed and created yourself.

Waffle...

As expected. Get back to the stone age tommy. The rest of the country, including the world of sports, has left you behind to rot in your miserable old age.

You make the typical homophobe link to paedophilia- unsubstantiated.
You cannot answer why many are OK with this but you are not- showing your own silly minded paranoia.

So you are scared of gay men possibly being attracted to you, unsurprising. Don't worry if you are as ugly in physical form as you are in attitude you have little to worry about

No, I am uncomfortable at the prospect of undressing in a changing room with some homosexual leering at me...


Everyone I know thinks the same as this... nobody I know would be happy at the prospect of getting naked in a changing room with a homosexual watching them.

Didge wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

ALL Muslims believe the Quranis devine. So you think ALL Muslims are fundamentalists.

That's not just bigoted but highly illogical.

Anyway - I don't care what people think of me, extremist, fundamentalist, bigot - whatever - I was just pulling Ben's leg, hoping for a reaction.

Yes they are fundementalits if they believe it is the literal word of a mythical diety.
I suggest you look it up.

Hence the problem with literal religious people, as they are nothing more than sheep.
They blindly follow what is written in a book, thinking such a supreme being would make such daft bigoted, hateful commands. I mean if you understand an ounce what love is, you would know the Bible, Koran etc, are clearly the fiction of men.
Love is unconditional.
It is also freely given, which means it has to be consential.
To be against love, is the opposite hateful and also very prejudice.
So to literally claim it is a sin for two consenting adults to express their love for each other is barbaric.
So the works can only be either man made or if this God existsm is utterly evil and cruel.
But then as milliions suffer daily, he either is not powerful enough to do anything, is powerful enough and does not give a shit or the most likley does not exist at all.

Hey ho, you are a sheep at the end of the day.

Well, the new and matue Didge didnt last long.

And it's not people blindly believing a book, it is people agreeing with its message.

And once again you are conflating love with sexual desire. If that's what you think love is, then the one you love is probably being abused too.

Tommy Monk wrote:No, I am uncomfortable at the prospect of undressing in a changing room with some homosexual leering at me...
Everyone I know thinks the same as this... nobody I know would be happy at the prospect of getting naked in a changing room with a homosexual watching them.

Well being as the only people you know are imaginary friends, i am sure they all agree with you Tommy.
So do you have a problem with a good looking woman looking at you?
I am sure you do not, so the problem is created by yourself.
So being as there is utterly no reason to be bigoted towards homosexuals. All you have to do to cure your uncomfortablity around homosexuals, is to stop being a twat. Once you recognise there is no validty to your prejuduice views, your paranoid anxiety around homosexual men will disappear.

Didge wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Are you telling me there isn't a potential for a guy to be harassed by another guy, "how ever small"? What if the guy cannot defend himself? Happens (apparently) in prisons.

Even if it's just learning, some guys would find that uncomfortable. Women would definitely feel abused, guys would probably resort to violence.

If some men feel uncomfortable, tough shit, they are the ones with the issue and need to learn to deal with it, as I am sure they feel very comfortable when women eye them up. At the end of the day it is the individual that is making themselves feel uncomfortable and no doubt also because of their bigotry has created such a paranoia.

"Tough shit" is the basis of your argument. Lol!

By that logic, you must think it's "tough shit" for women who feel uncomfortable and they are the ones with the issue.

Your logic is pathetic and you're losing the argument by blindly clinching to your liberal bias.

Eilzel wrote:

Didge wrote:


If some men feel uncomfortable, tough shit, they are the ones with the issue and need to learn to deal with it, as I am sure they feel very comfortable when women eye them up. At the end of the day it is the individual that is making themselves feel uncomfortable and no doubt also because of their bigotry has created such a paranoia.

Exactly. The point on shared changing room is moot anyway; since men and women don't usually play sports together.

Gyms, swimming pools, ....

Tommy Monk wrote:No, I am uncomfortable at the prospect of undressing in a changing room with some homosexual leering at me...


Everyone I know thinks the same as this... nobody I know would be happy at the prospect of getting naked in a changing room with a homosexual watching them.

I guess its the crowds you hang around in. Some people move in modern thinking circles. Others only associate with those like themselves.

Regardless, even though I'm sure a few straight guys probably would feel paranoid sharing a changing room with a gay guy, they do not think so to the point they would object to doing. And they will get used to it like many sports stars already have. And realize nothing bad will come it.

Out of interest. What harm exactly comes of a gay guy being present as you get changed?

Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

Eilzel wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:So women are wrong to feel uncomfortable by men leering at them?


I don't want some homosexual watching me getting changed and getting some sexual pleasure from it.


Public toilets have been closed because of homosexuals hanging about in there for various pervy reasons, some there for the voyeuristic opportunity of looking at other mens dicks etc...


The changing room is a perfect place for the homosexual perverts...

Don't be hysterical. Are you telling me that you cannot look at a woman without automatically getting sexual pleasure? I guess you must be the pervert.

I see you resorting to the usual homophobic terms 'some homosexual' and 'homosexual perverts'.

Again, fortunately most men are beyond your limited mentality thesedays.

As said, a woman may be intimidated by too many men making comments or going further.

Why do you think so many sports stars have no problem with this tommy where you do? Are they better than you? Kinder than you? More intelligent than you? Less paranoid than you? Less afraid than you? What is it?

Now you are ignoring all the points raised.

Worse still, you're poorly trying to deflect Tommy's post as an irrelevance.

Tommy Monk wrote:Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

For the millionth time, intimidation.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Didge wrote:



Yes they are fundementalits if they believe it is the literal word of a mythical diety.
I suggest you look it up.

Hence the problem with literal religious people, as they are nothing more than sheep.
They blindly follow what is written in a book, thinking such a supreme being would make such daft bigoted, hateful commands. I mean if you understand an ounce what love is, you would know the Bible, Koran etc, are clearly the fiction of men.
Love is unconditional.
It is also freely given, which means it has to be consential.
To be against love, is the opposite hateful and also very prejudice.
So to literally claim it is a sin for two consenting adults to express their love for each other is barbaric.
So the works can only be either man made or if this God existsm is utterly evil and cruel.
But then as milliions suffer daily, he either is not powerful enough to do anything, is powerful enough and does not give a shit or the most likley does not exist at all.

Hey ho, you are a sheep at the end of the day.

Well, the new and matue Didge didnt last long.

And it's not people blindly believing a book, it is people agreeing with its message.

And once again you are conflating love with sexual desire. If that's what you think love is, then the one you love is probably being abused too.

Immature reponse looking as usual to be deflective because I am showing you rightly that you cannot think for yourself. Its blindly being in agreement, that makes you an utter sheep
Not conflating sexual desire at all, as are you claiming having sex is not an expression of love?
It certainly is one of the biggest expressions and intimacy of love to show to someone/
Hence your daft man made book has no understanding what love is.
So your made up god is against love.

Again this is a non issue. No one is seriously even questioning this. Nor is there reason to. They aren't going to have 4 separate changing rooms for gay, straight men and women when gay people constitute a small % of the population.

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:No, I am uncomfortable at the prospect of undressing in a changing room with some homosexual leering at me...
Everyone I know thinks the same as this... nobody I know would be happy at the prospect of getting naked in a changing room with a homosexual watching them.

Well being as the only people you know are imaginary friends, i am sure they all agree with you Tommy.
So do you have a problem with a good looking woman looking at you?
I am sure you do not, so the problem is created by yourself.
So being as there is utterly no reason to be bigoted towards homosexuals. All you have to do to cure your uncomfortablity around homosexuals, is to stop being a twat. Once you recognise there is no validty to your prejuduice views, your paranoid anxiety around homosexual men will disappear.

Yes I would be made to feel uncomfortable by that too!!!


If I'm in a changing room, I don't want anyone leering at me and getting sexual pleasure from It!!!

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Didge wrote:


If some men feel uncomfortable, tough shit, they are the ones with the issue and need to learn to deal with it, as I am sure they feel very comfortable when women eye them up. At the end of the day it is the individual that is making themselves feel uncomfortable and no doubt also because of their bigotry has created such a paranoia.

"Tough shit" is the basis of your argument. Lol!

By that logic, you must think it's "tough shit" for women who feel uncomfortable and they are the ones with the issue.

Your logic is pathetic and you're losing the argument by blindly clinching to your liberal bias.

Where did I say it was tough shit for womenn, as do they get to seperate from other women?
You are arguing off two different situations, where segregation had a calling as many women have been absued in such situations.
There is hardly anything that can be said the same in an all male situation outside prisons.
Not only that as seen women have a valid reason of haressment, where as men do not.

So yes tough shit.
If you would not to much of an idiot to blindly follow man made myths, you would not have an issue would you?

hence you are the maker of your own problemh
If you have

Eilzel wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:No, I am uncomfortable at the prospect of undressing in a changing room with some homosexual leering at me...


Everyone I know thinks the same as this... nobody I know would be happy at the prospect of getting naked in a changing room with a homosexual watching them.

I guess its the crowds you hang around in. Some people move in modern thinking circles. Others only associate with those like themselves.

Regardless, even though I'm sure a few straight guys probably would feel paranoid sharing a changing room with a gay guy, they do not think so to the point they would object to doing. And they will get used to it like many sports stars already have. And realize nothing bad will come it.

Out of interest. What harm exactly comes of a gay guy being present as you get changed?

You move around in the circles of people who think like yourself!!!


You like to call it 'modern thinking' but it is really just 'leftie thinking'...


Don't you realise that many people you know probably only agree with you to your face for fear of causing offence and being labeled as a homophobe etc!?

Tommy Monk wrote:

Didge wrote:

Well being as the only people you know are imaginary friends, i am sure they all agree with you Tommy.
So do you have a problem with a good looking woman looking at you?
I am sure you do not, so the problem is created by yourself.
So being as there is utterly no reason to be bigoted towards homosexuals. All you have to do to cure your uncomfortablity around homosexuals, is to stop being a twat. Once you recognise there is no validty to your prejuduice views, your paranoid anxiety around homosexual men will disappear.

Yes I would be made to feel uncomfortable by that too!!!


If I'm in a changing room, I don't want anyone leering at me and getting sexual pleasure from It!!!

So you feel uncomfortable around women attracted to you even if they are good looking.

Now wonder you are single.

Again the seperation of changing rooms is due to harressment, not leering, which you and the little Muslim boy cannot seem to figure out.

So again it is yourself that has created the porblem and that is your own tough shit

Eilzel wrote:Again this is a non issue. No one is seriously even questioning this. Nor is there reason to. They aren't going to have 4 separate changing rooms for gay, straight men and women when gay people constitute a small % of the population.

They are confusing where a seperation was needed where women were being harressed.
You cannot stop people peering at you in the street or outside the changing room then once using the facility.
Hence why both these clowns are complete idiots, but I expect nothing less from prejudiced muppets

The leering argument is a non-argument, you just have to humour these idiots.

Eilzel wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

For the millionth time, intimidation.

Yes, a man could feel intimidated by this too!!!


All part of feeling uncomfortable you bell end!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

I guess its the crowds you hang around in. Some people move in modern thinking circles. Others only associate with those like themselves.

Regardless, even though I'm sure a few straight guys probably would feel paranoid sharing a changing room with a gay guy, they do not think so to the point they would object to doing. And they will get used to it like many sports stars already have. And realize nothing bad will come it.

Out of interest. What harm exactly comes of a gay guy being present as you get changed?

You move around in the circles of people who think like yourself!!!


You like to call it 'modern thinking' but it is really just 'leftie thinking'...


Don't you realise that many people you know probably only agree with you to your face for fear of causing offence and being labeled as a homophobe etc!?

I doubt it. Many of my friends are even more progressive than I am on social issues and sexuality. And no they aren't gay (very few of my friends are, and none of my closest).

As I said above, some may find it strange that one guy in the locker room is gay; but not to the point of objecting to them being there- and they'd get used to it.

It's only the real homophobes that would make a song and dance of it.

And I see you just resorted to vulgar insults. I guess that's where us grown up debators call it a day and leave you to scream and scream until your lungs give in

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Yes I would be made to feel uncomfortable by that too!!!


If I'm in a changing room, I don't want anyone leering at me and getting sexual pleasure from It!!!

So you feel uncomfortable around women attracted to you even if they are good looking.

Now wonder you are single.

Again the seperation of changing rooms is due to harressment, not leering, which you and the little Muslim boy cannot seem to figure out.

So again it is yourself that has created the porblem and that is your own tough shit

No, I said I would feel uncomfortable to be having to get undressed in a changing room with someone leering at me.


That is sexual harassment!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

For the millionth time, intimidation.

Yes, a man could feel intimidated by this too!!!


All part of feeling uncomfortable you bell end!!!

You were born with a small dick, so its no surprise that to see many men naked will make you feel intimidated.
What you need is some councilling, to help with such issues.
So are you saying if a man feels intimidated over his body size compared to another, the facility, should drop everything and built him a changing room all to himself?

Errrrr no

If you already undress around men and have no issue with this countless times and have no doubt actually done this many times without knowing,  other men were homosexual. It shows you are the one through paranoia allowing yourself to feel uncomfortable.

Also feeling uncomfortable being you are a prejudice bigot, is not a valid reason to have segregated hetrosexual and homosexual changing rooms.

Twisting again dodge...

Tommy Monk wrote:Twisting again dodge...

So no answer then.
The thing is I can list countless things that can make people uncomfotable in a grouping of people
So how many men actually feel uncomfortable around homosexual men?
There was valid reasons for the gender seperation, whereas prejudice discrmination, is not a valid reason to seperate homosexuals from hetrosexuals

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Yes, a man could feel intimidated by this too!!!


All part of feeling uncomfortable you bell end!!!

You were born with a small dick, so its no surprise that to see many men naked will make you feel intimidated.
What you need is some councilling, to help with such issues.
So are you saying if a man feels intimidated over his body size compared to another, the facility, should drop everything and built him a changing room all to himself?

Errrrr no

If you already undress around men and have no issue with this countless times and have no doubt actually done this many times without knowing, so of the otrher men were homosexual. It shows you are the one through paranoia allowing yourself to feel uncomfortable.

Also feeling uncomfortable being you are a prejudice bigot, is not a valid reason to have segregated hetrosexual and homosexual changing rooms.

True all that didge. I don't really know what tommy thinks could come from his protestations (and they are only his, no one in sports is asking for this...). If they started separating it would have only negative consequences.

1. A member or two of a team is ostracized from the rest of the team, and so jeopardizing team harmony.
2. A gay team mate stays closeted in order to be with his mates, damaging him and his potential abilities as a player.
3. Further costs for a sports club, having to provide facilities for a small number of individuals.

Complete and utter nonsense. Just because a pathetically small number of men might not like the idea that another man MIGHT glance at them in the changing room.

PS: In more entertaining sports related news, WHAT has happened to Chelsea, and I hope Arsenal are planning one of their usual mid season implosions some time soon

Eilzel wrote:

Didge wrote:


You were born with a small dick, so its no surprise that to see many men naked will make you feel intimidated.
What you need is some councilling, to help with such issues.
So are you saying if a man feels intimidated over his body size compared to another, the facility, should drop everything and built him a changing room all to himself?

Errrrr no

If you already undress around men and have no issue with this countless times and have no doubt actually done this many times without knowing, so of the otrher men were homosexual. It shows you are the one through paranoia allowing yourself to feel uncomfortable.

Also feeling uncomfortable being you are a prejudice bigot, is not a valid reason to have segregated hetrosexual and homosexual changing rooms.

True all that didge. I don't really know what tommy thinks could come from his protestations (and they are only his, no one in sports is asking for this...). If they started separating it would have only negative consequences.

1. A member or two of a team is ostracized from the rest of the team, and so jeopardizing team harmony.
2. A gay team mate stays closeted in order to be with his mates, damaging him and his potential abilities as a player.
3. Further costs for a sports club, having to provide facilities for a small number of individuals.

Complete and utter nonsense. Just because a pathetically small number of men might not like the idea that another man MIGHT glance at them in the changing room.

PS: In more entertaining sports related news, WHAT has happened to Chelsea, and I hope Arsenal are planning one of their usual mid season implosions some time soon

Brialliant points one, two and 3 and where do you draw the line? Next it will be the racist brigade calling for seperation for example if they are white or black, claiming they feel intimidated. Its idiotic at best from both these clowns and the reason it is born from their prejudiced beliefs. Its all bollocks, and trying to use where women were generally harrressed in comparability to men was completely daft.

I hope Arsenal do not fuck up lol
Yeah great to see Chelsea having a mare hee hee

Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

Tommy Monk wrote:
Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

Because there is lots of documented evidence through history of this happenning to women.
The thing is you already change around men, so changing in front of men is not an issue.
It is only created if you were to know someone was homosexual. Thus it is your paranoia that has made you feel uncomnfortable based off you having prejudice discrminating views.
I see no reason to accomadate or justify such daft reasoning, when there is a simple cure.
Stop being prejudiced against homosexuals, and your claim to feeling intimidated will disappear.

Because as didge says, a man looking at another man is not nearly like the way women are often harassed by men.

Again you haven't actually said what you would like to come from this at all.

^didge, Mourinho is currently comedy gold every time he opens his mouth

Eilzel wrote:Because as didge says, a man looking at another man is not nearly like the way women are often harassed by men.

Again you haven't actually said what you would like to come from this at all.

^didge, Mourinho is currently comedy gold every time he opens his mouth

Hee hee, so true Eilzel. I am shocked they are doing so badly, but very happy.
Still not much in it at the top at the moment and a long way to go. I feel City will still wing it as they have the stronger squad and injuries are starting to hit Arsenal.

Anyway, catch you later buiddy

Leering at someone sexually is sexual harassment...


Going into public toilets used to be an uncomfortable experience sometimes when there was an odd homosexual or two hanging about in there trying to get a peek at your Dick when you were having a piss...


The homosexuals hanging about in them was the main reason why most have closed.


Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

Amazingly we have survived our injuries; money can't buy the league, but it can but strength in depth haha

Still, not saying anything this year

i have roomed with a gay guy on a cricket tour. Single beds, they stayed single.
He had been with his partner longer than I had been married.
He had no inclination to shag me nor I him.
We both got very drunk in the hotel bar, had great banter with our team mates, then went to our room and sl3pt it off.
20 years on we remain great mates, he celebrated 25 years with his partner this year.
Tom is just being his racist, anti Muslim, homophobic, Nazi self.

And handy Andy again shows us how he has complete contempt for other peoples opinions...


Typical leftie...

I only have contempt for bigots, racists, homophobes,selective religion haters, abusive posters, and people who regard everyone left of Atilla the Hun a leftie.
I also hate people whose avatar is used deliberately to cause offence, such as yours.
Frankly Tom,you are too stupid,too far right wing and too far down the food chain to bother debating with.
Are you sure you shouldn't be a member of the BNP ,Britain first or the National Front. They would love you.

There's nothing wrong with my avatar.


And you lefties are the worst bigots and racists!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Leering at someone sexually is sexual harassment...


Going into public toilets used to be an uncomfortable experience sometimes when there was an odd homosexual or two hanging about in there trying to get a peek at your Dick when you were having a piss...


The homosexuals hanging about in them was the main reason why most have closed.


Why is it so accepted that a woman can feel uncomfortable by a man leering at her, and she has the right to not have to be subjected to this, but a man is wrong to feel uncomfortable by another man leering at him and has no right to not be subjected to this...!?

Would a gay man be exempt from sexual harassment laws? Of course not.

Is there a law that prevents homosexuals leering at men in changing rooms...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Is there a law that prevents homosexuals leering at men in changing rooms...?

Actually I think it would be covered in sexual harassment. if the uncomfortable party said as much and made efforts to not be exposed and then offender made efforts to by-pass those efforts it would be pretty open and shut case.. the big issue woudl be making sure that there was actual harassment and not just an 'over active imagination' on behalf of the complainant.

Tom is going to have to have tostart wearing full face burka when he walks down the street in case any gay men start eyeing him up..
Even if they fancy him, as soon as he opens his foul gob,they will run a mile.