Why is anti-racist a codeword for anti-White?

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White
Why is anti-racist a codeword for anti-White?

In Africa, there are no “anti-racists” telling Africans they have no right to patrol their borders and kick out illegal immigrants.

In Asia, there are no “anti-racists” telling Asians that mixed race people are genetically superior than separate races, and the whole world should all mix together.

These kinds of social policies ONLY exist in White countries. The people that scream “diversity” and “progress” say that they are “anti-racist”.

But ONLY White countries and areas have this “racism” problem that needs to be solved with “diversity”. By “racism” problem, it is meant “White” problem.

Whenever an “anti-racist” opens their mouths, the next thing they say, is usually in support of a future where White people become a vanishing minority – which is genocide.

That’s why anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/anti-racist-is-a-codeword-for-anti-white/

Here's a comment (reply to post) that interested me:


Will
February 19, 2015 at 5:51 am
I never thought about this. But I fear it to be true in some cases. I am a white male, living in Holland. In the (leftsided) newspaper I read, there is a column by an Afro-European woman in which she often welcomes the fact that in a growing number of Dutch cities the percentage of white people has declined to under 50%. She is very happy about this, and she thinks this development will reduce racism. She is happy there is no racial majority anymore. Less whites means less racism to her. I am afraid that for her anti-racist means in fact anti-white.
We have to open the eyes of people, this is not harmless!

No racism in countries with a brown skin?  Buddists killing Muslims in Burma and saying they are inferior, same in China, Indian caste system etc etc.  Don't know who wrote that but they don't know what they are talking about Eddie.

Add Sri Lanka with the Tamils and the civil war to Sassy list.

it is just tricks and spin words to make people feel guilty, all the phobia words do the same..

If you want to protect your country you was once a patriot, these days you are a racist or xenophobe...

it cons you in to thinking right is wrong...

because nations have/are been consumed by empires  

All goes as it must, a new religion should be kicking off about now in the west. the empire will grow and peak and we will have a new dark age in 500 odd years if goes as well as last time

It's not just white people who have members who think they're racially superior.

Arabs, Indians, Chinese - you'll find racists on every other continents too.

I think others have said this already.

But fair skin can get you a long way in some Arab countries and India and in those same countries the darker skins are treated like (barely) paid slaves.

I see the guys point though: this is how I feel that some people on here area I've said it over and over, it's almost like we have to hate whites people because racism exists.
It's okay to have a massive dig at whites for something, but a black guy does it?
Well we won't say much.

It's getting tiresome.

That's a very white-centric piece in the first place. There are far-right parties in Japan who oppose Korean immigration into their country ... in Mexico, lighter-skinned people get better-paying jobs than darker skinned people ... really, the whole "racism pertains to white-black relations" view is outdated. Being anti-racist means being in favor of equality of rights and opportunities regardless of skin color.

But you do constantly see this right-wing effort to create a kind of New Speak:

"Anti-racism is anti-white"

"Feminism is female supremacy"

"Patriotism is xenophobia"

"Hatred is natural"

My point is, some bend so far over to try not to be racist it becomes a bit of "white-bashing" to them

Loads of it going on Eddie... white British (males especially) have become bottom of the pile now with all other groups being prioritised above for one reason or another... all in the name of equality mind!!!

eddie wrote:My point is, some bend so far over to try not to be racist it becomes a bit of "white-bashing" to them

Eddie, why do you think people try not to be racist, when they are not racist or have any inclination to do so? Its like you are claiming this is genetic and people are having to fight some natural urge from within themselves. Are you saying we should at times be racist, as this will normalize the problem of racism somehow, Of those people who understand that racism is an ideology based on no evidence? We know biologically races do not exist in humans. So do you think it would help eradicate racism if people who know racism is wrong, were sometimes racist? Or are you saying that many people do have racist tendencies and some of them try to hide it then being hypocrites?

I really am quite interested in your point, if you think we are all racist, born this way?
Or are you making a different point I am unable to see?


Anyway really have to go, so I will be very interested in your reasons regarding your comment, so hope you have a really lovely evening.

Simply put didge, whether it's white guilt (as zack claims) or fashionable or simply that they are so desperate to appear non-racist that they go way OTT!!

I've seen poster here pick apart a white man for killing a black man (and the terrible reasons that white man is so racist!) yet I've not seen the vice versa of that??!

No stories about all the fights and stabbing a that blacks do to whites!
Or if it's touched upon, no one really comments about it.

It's a little lopsided and unbalanced.

It's very anti-white, this forum, at times

That really never answered the questions I asked Eddie

Who is desperate not to appear racist?

Everyone?
Some?
Who?


Anyway am late so bye Eddie

It doesn't really do a lot of harm to white men, actually. Nobody is oppressing white men.

It,s also anti-British sometimes Eddie.

Twelve white firefighters who sued after not getting promotions they were in line to get have been awarded a total of more than $2.5 million from the city of Buffalo.

The men sued the city in 2007, claiming the fire department illegally allowed promotional lists with their names on them to expire so they could promote African-American firefighters instead.

The firefighters' awards were based on how far their promotions would have taken them - $49,000 to $500,000 - plus emotional damages, which ranged from $20,000 to $30,000, reported NBC affiliate WGRZ.com.

"The two fellows who are getting the most were selected for promotion to lieutenant in the fall of 2005 by the fire commissioner, and then again around the end of January 2006 by a new fire commissioner. Those two fellows have never made it to lieutenant," an attorney representing the plaintiffs, Andrew Fleming, told msnbc.com on Thursday. "They had been working 10 or 12 years by 2006. So the judge looked at what their prospective promotions would have been, and ruled that it was likely they would have made battalion commander."

Those two were each given $500,000 based on the judge's calculations, he said.

'They really felt betrayed'

The compensation ruling was awarded on Tuesday by state Supreme Court Justice John Michalek, who 15 months ago made the initial ruling that Buffalo had illegally failed to promote the firefighters because of racial discrimination.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/02/09/10362607-white-firefighters-awarded-25-million-in-discrimination-case

Giving some people a leg up because of ethnicity or race is racist and discriminatory against others... all in the name of equality... which will not exist while some are so set on allowing this special treatment to carry on.

Ben_Reilly wrote:It doesn't really do a lot of harm to white men, actually. Nobody is oppressing white men.

Ben, if you went out into the job centres and council housing offices, you'd be told by the people who live it, that your comment wasn't entirely correct.

Did you know that the majority of homeless men are white people?
72% of the homeless population in the UK, are white.
(And if you go on the streets of London they are mostly men.)

http://www.poverty.org.uk/81/index.shtml


Your comment is really actually quite ignorant for two reasons: one, because you have stated that as of it's a fact and two, it's actually impossible that there aren't cases of white men being oppressed (or feeling oppressed which amounts to the same thing)

72% of homeless people are white in UK, but we make up 87% of the overall population. That means we are proportionally under represented among homeless people. The bigger picture there bring important.

White people are not oppressed or any such nonsense asserted by tommy. We are top of the pile in the UK in terms of jobs, pay, education, opportunity, living standard etc. Being white also gives advantages all across the world, where (likely to due to our colonial history) being white is linked with wealth and success. The scales are still tipped massively, fairly or not, in our favour. Anyone thinking otherwise is sadly short sighted. Anti-white attitudes may or may not exist in some white people (though I'm doubtful), but the effect is negligible and in comparison to the racism, worldwide, against other ethnic minorities, not really comparable at all.

Cuchulain wrote:

eddie wrote:My point is, some bend so far over to try not to be racist it becomes a bit of "white-bashing" to them

Eddie, why do you think people try not to be racist, when they are not racist or have any inclination to do so? Its like you are claiming this is genetic and people are having to fight some natural urge from within themselves. Are you saying we should at times be racist, as this will normalize the problem of racism somehow, Of those people who understand that racism is an ideology based on no evidence? We know biologically races do not exist in humans. So do you think it would help eradicate racism if people who know racism is wrong, were sometimes racist? Or are you saying that many people do have racist tendencies and some of them try to hide it then being hypocrites?

I really am quite interested in your point, if you think we are all racist, born this way?
Or are you making a different point I am unable to see?


Anyway really have to go, so I will be very interested in your reasons regarding your comment, so hope you have a really lovely evening.

This is bumped because I would like answers please to my questions based off  Eddies point:

eddie wrote:My point is, some bend so far over to try not to be racist it becomes a bit of "white-bashing" to them

eddie wrote:Simply put didge, whether it's white guilt (as zack claims) or fashionable or simply that they are so desperate to appear non-racist that they go way OTT!!

I've seen poster here pick apart a white man for killing a black man (and the terrible reasons that white man is so racist!) yet I've not seen the vice versa of that??!

No stories about all the fights and stabbing a that blacks do to whites!
Or if it's touched upon, no one really comments about it.

It's a little lopsided and unbalanced.

It's very anti-white, this forum, at times

At least in the UK and U.S., I do think white peoples feel they have an obligation to be non-racist.

This may be white guilt, or it could be that those in power feel they have a responsibility towards equality.

Could also be that many white countries needed the darkies to come over after the war to rebuild and do jobs others white people thought beneath them. The establishment (mainly white, if not all) still hold on to power but lower class whites and the darkies will be treated as equals.

At the same time, divisions will be created between the lower class whites and the darkies, so they can blame each other for their inequality in life, rather than blame those really in power - the white upper class establishment.

Any of that sound familiar?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

eddie wrote:Simply put didge, whether it's white guilt (as zack claims) or fashionable or simply that they are so desperate to appear non-racist that they go way OTT!!

I've seen poster here pick apart a white man for killing a black man (and the terrible reasons that white man is so racist!) yet I've not seen the vice versa of that??!

No stories about all the fights and stabbing a that blacks do to whites!
Or if it's touched upon, no one really comments about it.

It's a little lopsided and unbalanced.

It's very anti-white, this forum, at times

At least in the UK and U.S., I do think white peoples feel they have an obligation to be non-racist.

This may be white guilt, or it could be that those in power feel they have a responsibility towards equality.

Could also be that many white countries needed the darkies to come over after the war to rebuild and do jobs others white people thought beneath them. The establishment (mainly white, if not all) still hold on to power but lower class whites and the darkies will be treated as equals.

At the same time, divisions will be created between the lower class whites and the darkies, so they can blame each other for their inequality in life, rather than blame those really in power - the white upper class establishment.

Any of that sound familiar?

Again this view as if we are racist and have to try not to be, when racism is an idea that lacks any scientific evidence. So why would some white people here have an obligation to be non-racist knowing racism is scientifically illogical? I am very interested why people claim this. I am sure there is some people out there that are like this, but such a view would mean racism is genetic to prevent ourselves from being racist. Does not reasoning allow to understand why such unscientific prejudices are wrong which deny people equality under the law. Lower classes and blacks are disadvantaged but the former far less than the later. Though it is fear which is the biggest factor promoted through the channels of the media and today's technology that create further resentment between people. You do not have to be the lower class to to find people blaming others like immigrants for example. Persuasion by means of the media more than anything fuels blaming others.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

eddie wrote:Simply put didge, whether it's white guilt (as zack claims) or fashionable or simply that they are so desperate to appear non-racist that they go way OTT!!

I've seen poster here pick apart a white man for killing a black man (and the terrible reasons that white man is so racist!) yet I've not seen the vice versa of that??!

No stories about all the fights and stabbing a that blacks do to whites!
Or if it's touched upon, no one really comments about it.

It's a little lopsided and unbalanced.

It's very anti-white, this forum, at times

At least in the UK and U.S., I do think white peoples feel they have an obligation to be non-racist.

This may be white guilt, or it could be that those in power feel they have a responsibility towards equality. that is definitely true here in part due to relationship with aboriginals

Could also be that many white countries needed the darkies to come over after the war to rebuild and do jobs others white people thought beneath them. The establishment (mainly white, if not all) still hold on to power but lower class whites and the darkies will be treated as equals.

At the same time, divisions will be created between the lower class whites and the darkies, so they can blame each other for their inequality in life, rather than blame those really in power - the white upper class establishment.

Any of that sound familiar?

I agree with Zack

I think The only part that is not 100% correct is the Establishment is not 100% white it is in most western nations but you still have the house of Saudi and Asia has both Japanese and Chinese, And the Chinese in particular are the fastest growing group within the establishment.

But all the other foreign nations who are 100% of their own specific nationality/race etc is ok to the lefties... it's only white British who are racist to them...


What's ours is theirs and what's theirs is theirs too... that is the lefties way OF thinking...

veya_victaous wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

At least in the UK and U.S., I do think white peoples feel they have an obligation to be non-racist.

This may be white guilt, or it could be that those in power feel they have a responsibility towards equality. that is definitely true here in part due to relationship with aboriginals

Could also be that many white countries needed the darkies to come over after the war to rebuild and do jobs others white people thought beneath them. The establishment (mainly white, if not all) still hold on to power but lower class whites and the darkies will be treated as equals.

At the same time, divisions will be created between the lower class whites and the darkies, so they can blame each other for their inequality in life, rather than blame those really in power - the white upper class establishment.

Any of that sound familiar?

I agree with Zack

I think The only part that is not 100% correct is the Establishment is not 100% white it is in most western nations but you still have the house of Saudi and Asia has both Japanese and Chinese, And the Chinese in particular are the fastest growing group within the establishment.

True Veya - I guess I was just thinking of establishments in so called white countries - as per the topic of the thread.

But you are right that establishments in non Western nations who use divisions to hold on to power.

It's the oldest trick in the book.