Australian Judge Says Incest May No Longer Be a Taboo

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.
Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and “unnatural” but is now widely accepted.
He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.
“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner,” the judge said.
- See more at: http://nationalblackroberegiment.com/australian-judge-says-incest-may-longer-taboo/#sthash.CbCNxZBP.dpuf

It will obviously go that way, no holds barred . shag what you want how you want, will that be good for society...

I'm not convinced it will be....

My cat could be at risk?

nicko wrote:My cat could be at risk?

just keep it away from this forum it should be fine.....

lol

A couple got married in Jersey one day and went off on honeymoon.
Late at night the grooms father answered a frantic knocking on the door.
On the door step stood his son, the groom. "Dad dad! I had to come home, she was a virgin!"
Dad replied "Quite right son, if she isn't good enough for her family she isn't good enough for ours"

Nems wrote:A couple got married in Jersey one day and went off on honeymoon.
Late at night the grooms father answered a frantic knocking on the door.
On the door step stood his son, the groom. "Dad dad! I had to come home, she was a virgin!"
Dad replied "Quite right son, if she isn't good enough for her family she isn't good enough for ours"

lol...

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:It will obviously go that way, no holds barred . shag what you want how you want, will that be good for society...

I'm not convinced it will be....

But if two people love each other it's okay so we keep being told .

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:It will obviously go that way, no holds barred . shag what you want how you want, will that be good for society...

I'm not convinced it will be....

But if two people love each other it's okay so we keep being told .

of course how could love be wrong....

OK HF as Quill pointed out. since most western govts work in most the same way

what COMPELLING reason is there to deny incestuous couples??


take a while and think on it......

but no diversions this time.....

I will even give you a clue here ...

ONCE UPON A TIME.....there were 2 very good and non religious reasons for banning incest

neither now apply.......

and once upon a time there was a good reasons for banning homosexuality , but that has now been accepted .

Vicar of Dibley wrote:and once upon a time there was a good reasons for banning homosexuality , but that has now been accepted .

could that be because as Quill says...there is now NO compelling reason to ban it?

and thats not what The question I asked is about ....deflection alert

what's with the sudden accusation 'deflection alert' lol

anyway it may be banned for now but just as homosexuality was banned and now isn't it is a concern that incest will be legalized .

what COMPELLING reason is there to deny incestuous couples??

well homosexuals were and are still considered abnormal by billions of people but they have had their sick relationships legalized .

VOD, you and HF are ignoring a fundamental difference in that there is no "incest rights" movement protesting, holding parades, petitioning governments and asking for the right to marry.

Incest is such a rare thing that there will never be a large movement pushing for its legal acceptance across the world. Most people are simply biologically wired to not be attracted to people they were raised with as siblings (whether actually related or not). (This also explains how siblings not reared together can sometimes unwittingly enter into sexual relationships).

oh well VoD ...I understand that questions like this are too much for your limited intellect....

however the same can be asked for both


what COMPELLING reason is there to deny incestuous couples??
what COMPELLING reason is there to deny gay couples??

Tony Abbott and the Right of the RIGHT wing here are having a shit fit over gay marriage

Tony has basically banned any free vote on the issue under his leadership if anyone doesn't follow the party line (Almost half disagree in the RW party) they will lose an higher positions in the party