General Election 2015: 5 surprising facts about parties' spending plans
Page 1 of 1
General Election 2015: 5 surprising facts about parties' spending plans
The SNP will not end austerity
Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP leader, has put ending Tory austerity at the heart of her party's manifesto. According to the IFS, however, all is not quite as it seems.
It says that the SNP will effectively prolongue austerity for another year by softening the blow in the first four years of the next Parliament.
The approach means that Labour is likely to spend significantly more than the SNP on public services over the next Parliament.
The IFS says: "There is considerable disconnect between this rhetoric [the SNP's anti-austerity claims] and their stated plans for total spending, which imply a bigger cut to total spending by 2019-20 than Labour's plans".
The difference between Labour and Tories is biggest for a generation
The IFS has said that there is a bigger difference between the main political parties in fiscal terms than at any point since 1992.
The figures in its analysis are stark. Under Labour Britain's national debt will be £90billion higher than under the Tories.
Labour will raise overall taxes by £12billion, the Tories will cut them by £4billion. Labour will spend £42.8billion more on public services over the next five years, while under the Tories it will still be £2.5billion lower.
Paul Johnson, the head of the IFS, said: "The difference between the parties is bigger than at any time since 1992 in terms of the scale of the differences in terms of where their fiscal rules will take them."
Spending will utimately rise whoever wins the election
Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP will all increase public spending in real terms over the next Parliament, and while it will fall in real terms under the Tories it is still on an upward trajectory.
The IFS said that as the economy grows, public sector pay is likely to rise in line with pay in the private sector. "If you want to keep it flat you have to have really quite big cuts in things you're not protecting," the IFS said.
Under the Tories, total public spending will fall marginally by £2.5billion. Under Labour it will rise by £42billion, the Lib Dems £3billion and the SNP £28billion.
The Tories will spend more on the NHS than Labour
Labour, which is positioning itself as the party which will "save" the NHS, has actually commited to spending less on it than Labour.
The Conservative Party pledged meet a request by NHS chiefs for £8billion extra a year by 2020. Labour has failed to make the same pledge.
The IFS says that a Tory government spending on the NHS will rise by 7 per cent over the next Parliament, compared to 3.7 per cent under Labour.
The IFS says: "This would be, by historical standards, a very tight settlement for the NHS and it would not be surprising if a Labour government were to increase spending by more than this."
Only a change in the law can make the parties tell voters exactly what they're planning
The IFS criticised all the parties for not providing full details of the cuts and tax rises they would have to make to deliver their plans.
It also suggested that only a change in the law to allow the Treasury's Office for Budget Responsibility might force the politicians to be more open with voters about their policies.
The institute said the Tories need to be more forthcoming about how they will raise £5billion from tax avoidance and cut social security by £10billion.
It said Labour has been "considerably more vague" about how much it wants to borrow.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11558138/General-Election-2015-5-surprising-facts-about-parties-spending-plans.html
Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP leader, has put ending Tory austerity at the heart of her party's manifesto. According to the IFS, however, all is not quite as it seems.
It says that the SNP will effectively prolongue austerity for another year by softening the blow in the first four years of the next Parliament.
The approach means that Labour is likely to spend significantly more than the SNP on public services over the next Parliament.
The IFS says: "There is considerable disconnect between this rhetoric [the SNP's anti-austerity claims] and their stated plans for total spending, which imply a bigger cut to total spending by 2019-20 than Labour's plans".
The difference between Labour and Tories is biggest for a generation
The IFS has said that there is a bigger difference between the main political parties in fiscal terms than at any point since 1992.
The figures in its analysis are stark. Under Labour Britain's national debt will be £90billion higher than under the Tories.
Labour will raise overall taxes by £12billion, the Tories will cut them by £4billion. Labour will spend £42.8billion more on public services over the next five years, while under the Tories it will still be £2.5billion lower.
Paul Johnson, the head of the IFS, said: "The difference between the parties is bigger than at any time since 1992 in terms of the scale of the differences in terms of where their fiscal rules will take them."
Spending will utimately rise whoever wins the election
Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP will all increase public spending in real terms over the next Parliament, and while it will fall in real terms under the Tories it is still on an upward trajectory.
The IFS said that as the economy grows, public sector pay is likely to rise in line with pay in the private sector. "If you want to keep it flat you have to have really quite big cuts in things you're not protecting," the IFS said.
Under the Tories, total public spending will fall marginally by £2.5billion. Under Labour it will rise by £42billion, the Lib Dems £3billion and the SNP £28billion.
The Tories will spend more on the NHS than Labour
Labour, which is positioning itself as the party which will "save" the NHS, has actually commited to spending less on it than Labour.
The Conservative Party pledged meet a request by NHS chiefs for £8billion extra a year by 2020. Labour has failed to make the same pledge.
The IFS says that a Tory government spending on the NHS will rise by 7 per cent over the next Parliament, compared to 3.7 per cent under Labour.
The IFS says: "This would be, by historical standards, a very tight settlement for the NHS and it would not be surprising if a Labour government were to increase spending by more than this."
Only a change in the law can make the parties tell voters exactly what they're planning
The IFS criticised all the parties for not providing full details of the cuts and tax rises they would have to make to deliver their plans.
It also suggested that only a change in the law to allow the Treasury's Office for Budget Responsibility might force the politicians to be more open with voters about their policies.
The institute said the Tories need to be more forthcoming about how they will raise £5billion from tax avoidance and cut social security by £10billion.
It said Labour has been "considerably more vague" about how much it wants to borrow.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11558138/General-Election-2015-5-surprising-facts-about-parties-spending-plans.html
Guest- Guest
Re: General Election 2015: 5 surprising facts about parties' spending plans
From the Torygraph lol
Here's a few nuggets of truth from the actual IFS report...
Here's a few nuggets of truth from the actual IFS report...
Irn Bru- The Tartan terror. Keeper of the royal sporran. Chief Haggis Hunter
- Posts : 7719
Join date : 2013-12-11
Location : Edinburgh
Similar topics
» Purdah - 2015 General Election begins on 30 March 2015
» General Election 2015 'Portillo Moments' And The Candidates Hoping To Decapitate A Big Beast
» General Election 2015: Prospect of Labour-SNP coalition makes one in four voters less likely to support Ed Miliband, says survey
» General Election 2015: Ukip candidate Christopher Gillibrand quits as vice president of far-right Traditional Britain Group
» Labour plans big rise in NHS spending
» General Election 2015 'Portillo Moments' And The Candidates Hoping To Decapitate A Big Beast
» General Election 2015: Prospect of Labour-SNP coalition makes one in four voters less likely to support Ed Miliband, says survey
» General Election 2015: Ukip candidate Christopher Gillibrand quits as vice president of far-right Traditional Britain Group
» Labour plans big rise in NHS spending
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill