David Cameron Fights for oppression and destruction of western ideals

In the wake of the devastating Paris terrorist attacks, British Prime Minister David Cameron said encrypted messaging services pose a national security threat because they can’t be easily monitored by intelligence agencies.

“The attacks in Paris demonstrated the scale of the threat that we face and the need to have robust powers through our intelligence and security agencies in order to keep our people safe,” Cameron said Monday, speaking at an event in London on how to best protect the country from terrorist attacks.

If re-elected in May, Cameron promised to ban encrypted online communication services — unless tech companies give British intelligence special access. Those backdoor permissions would be folded into legislation requiring telecommunications companies and broadband providers to collect and store citizens’ online communications.

“Are we going to allow a means of communications which it simply isn’t possible to read?” he said. “My answer to that question is: ‘No, we must not.’”

Cameron’s comments come a week after Paris suffered three days of fatal terrorist attacks that killed 17 people — 12 of whom were massacred at satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo’s offices Jan. 7.

The British government hasn’t been particularly amenable to the privacy movement; it notoriously forced London-based newspaper the Guardian in 2013 to destroy hard drives containing NSA files leaked by Edward Snowden. But Cameron’s stance contradicts movements from other European countries which have balked at intense government surveillance and tried to crack down on U.S. internet companies for violating citizens’ privacy rights.

Russia and Germany vowed earlier this year to switch to paper communications, handwritten notes and typewriters to avoid detection, while other countries are working on enhancing their own intelligence programs. Germany also said it would end its contract with U.S. wireless carrier Verizon because of legal requirements “to provide certain things to the NSA,” according to the German Interior Ministry.

darknessss wrote:Hey veya....
do me a favour will yah...

just read back through what i have posted about this "affair" business....

now is it me or.............

veya_victaous wrote:

darknessss wrote:Hey veya....
do me a favour will yah...

just read back through what i have posted about this "affair" business....

now is it me or.............

Bra said If you are in an abusive relationship you can always choose to leave. Victim Blaming ( I sort of agree so I will shut up  before Wimmuns  get here to abuse him )

BRA you forgot about "Emotional blah blah blah excuse"  ...

darknessss wrote:you clearly have NO idea about people and what drives them, what motivates or controls their decisions...and here's me thinking you knew something of psychology...

you really ARE a sanctimonious tit didge....

you have NO idea of what emotional blackmail can do
what emotional abuse can do to some one

FFS man why do you think I put up with both physical AND emotional abuse for 15 FUCKING YEARS

YOU ARE A STUPID SANCTIMONIOUS PILLOCK WITH FUCK ALL EXPERIENCE OF LIFE
now fuck off...

Brasidas wrote:I guess Victor cannot explain then


Opps

darknessss wrote:your input no longer interests me

i know your sort you are a match for my ex
self righteous
sanctionious
and utterly vile....

fin.

darknessss wrote:you clearly have NO idea about people and what drives them, what motivates or controls their decisions...and here's me thinking you knew something of psychology...

you really ARE a sanctimonious tit didge....

you have NO idea of what emotional blackmail can do
what emotional abuse can do to some one

FFS man why do you think I put up with both physical AND emotional abuse for 15 FUCKING YEARS

YOU ARE A STUPID SANCTIMONIOUS PILLOCK WITH FUCK ALL EXPERIENCE OF LIFE
now fuck off...

veya_victaous wrote:

Brasidas wrote:I guess Victor cannot explain then


Opps

be careful what you wish for
Some of the Chicks from Buzzfeed will be here to castrate you shortly
(no your, "but they had enough freedom to cheat" wont save you)

My opinion on the issue (which I have been assured by the women on Buzzfeed doesn't count because I have testicles   ) is that yes in OUR Secular society people do have the capacity to leave a relationship... but we also have the freedom to cheat if we want to, of course our partners have the right to leave if they don't like it.

veya_victaous wrote:

darknessss wrote:you clearly have NO idea about people and what drives them, what motivates or controls their decisions...and here's me thinking you knew something of psychology...

you really ARE a sanctimonious tit didge....

you have NO idea of what emotional blackmail can do
what emotional abuse can do to some one

FFS man why do you think I put up with both physical AND emotional abuse for 15 FUCKING YEARS

YOU ARE A STUPID SANCTIMONIOUS PILLOCK WITH FUCK ALL EXPERIENCE OF LIFE
now fuck off...

That is a very good Point
how many people stay in abusive relationship for 'the children' etc. abuse is not always Physical.

veya_victaous wrote:

darknessss wrote:you clearly have NO idea about people and what drives them, what motivates or controls their decisions...and here's me thinking you knew something of psychology...

you really ARE a sanctimonious tit didge....

you have NO idea of what emotional blackmail can do
what emotional abuse can do to some one

FFS man why do you think I put up with both physical AND emotional abuse for 15 FUCKING YEARS

YOU ARE A STUPID SANCTIMONIOUS PILLOCK WITH FUCK ALL EXPERIENCE OF LIFE
now fuck off...

That is a very good Point
how many people stay in abusive relationship for 'the children' etc. abuse is not always Physical.

Brasidas wrote:


The view was on whether it is morally or ethically right to cheat, my view is it is not to then be presented with extreme cases of abuse or laws, none of which I back happening to people, but on the view if people have the ability to have an affair they have the ability to get out of a relationship and now Victor has fucked me right off suggesting I back such shit the fucking idiot
This was an argument on concept

veya_victaous wrote:

Brasidas wrote:


The view was on whether it is morally or ethically right to cheat, my view is it is not to then be presented with extreme cases of abuse or laws, none of which I back happening to people, but on the view if people have the ability to have an affair they have the ability to get out of a relationship and now Victor has fucked me right off suggesting I back such shit the fucking idiot
This was an argument on concept

I have already learned that I cannot apply my Morality to the other members of society only the agreed upon laws count  trust me thing would be different if I were in Charge (Animal Cruelty penalties would be 10 time what they are now for 1).. But I'm not, such a shame  

Brasidas wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Brasidas wrote:


The view was on whether it is morally or ethically right to cheat, my view is it is not to then be presented with extreme cases of abuse or laws, none of which I back happening to people, but on the view if people have the ability to have an affair they have the ability to get out of a relationship and now Victor has fucked me right off suggesting I back such shit the fucking idiot
This was an argument on concept

I have already learned that I cannot apply my Morality to the other members of society only the agreed upon laws count  trust me thing would be different if I were in Charge (Animal Cruelty penalties would be 10 time what they are now for 1).. But I'm not, such a shame  

To be honest Veya I am too angry to angry that someone has tried to make me out in a way I am not, to me it was a debate on a concept, not how I actually feel on things.

Good night

From the eyes of the military, mass digital surveillance of the internet is just “phase 0”. This mass surveillance includes anything from private Facebook messages, to internet browsing history and even what has been purchased online. The surveillance will apparently be used to detect vulnerabilities in enemy computer systems, to then infiltrate and gain permanent access.

Once that is done, words like “dominate”, “control” and “destroy” get thrown around to describe what Five Eyes will do after a successful phase 0.

The documents show there is little differentiation between targets and civilians, with any internet user a possible victim. It’s through certain viruses that are injected in everyday internet tools like Facebook chat that the group can intercept content on your computer and take complete control of it.

Let’s not forget what the US was able to do with Israel back in 2010 when it caused physical damage to Iran’s nuclear capabilities by deploying a virus that destroyed much of the country’s ability to enrich uranium. That was 2010, now the NSA and Five Eyes are even deadlier.

And they will use their tools against anyone who isn’t a part of the Five Eyes alliance.