The Guardian view on George Osborne: he cannot be serious
Page 1 of 1
The Guardian view on George Osborne: he cannot be serious
The chancellor poses as steadfast, but he continually rewrites his ‘long-term plan’ and has not come clean about the dreadful consequences of the endless cutting buried in the smallprint
He’s a politician, of course, and so this close to the election there were bound to be a few gimmicks, which were duly delivered in the form of church roof funds, air ambulances for the Tory shires and – most eye-catching of all – reduced stamp duty for ordinary home buyers. But the one underlying characteristic that George Osborne was determined to convey in his autumn statement, before he was rudely interrupted by Vince Cable, was seriousness. The choice confronting the country was, he said, whether to stick the course of a “long-term economic plan” which was working, or whether instead to hand power back to a Labour party that would “squander the economic security” he had painstakingly built, through cavalier decisions on borrowing and public spending.
Presenting himself as the most steadfast of chancellors, he asked the Commons to cast its mind back four years, to the moment when he had “presented the accounts of an economy in crisis” in his first autumn statement. If we accept his invitation to compare late 2010 with today, we do indeed make several instructive contrasts. The distinction that Mr Osborne is concerned to highlight is that between an economy which was then slowing down, with the one which is currently picking up pace. But there are other big differences too, most notably in relation to that proclaimed long-term plan, which turned out to need a short-term rewrite. The resolute Mr Osborne of 2010 stated that the national debt would by now be falling, from a maximum of just below 70% of GDP, but instead it continues to march towards a peak which he now concedes will be over 80%. He was, he said then, on course to “meet our fiscal mandate to eliminate the structural current budget deficit one year early, in 2014-15”, something he now accepts will not be done until well into the next parliament. And the headline measure of the government overdraft, which the “long-term plan” had initially pencilled in as £40bn this year, was on Wednesday revised up to £91.3bn, which represents slippage of well over 100%.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/03/guardian-view-george-osborne-statement-cannot-be-serious?CMP=twt_gu
Every time George Osborne steps up to the despatch box he comes out with a revised plan for the economy before telling us that Plan A is working. He has failed every single target he set himself and what he promised back in 2010 will not now be delivered until well into the next parliament - assuming the Tories are re-elected and there are no further revisions.
According to the OBRs own figures household debt is set to rocket to levels that even outstrip those that existed in 2007/2008 and caused much of the problems resulting in the global banking collapse.
Here it is...
Get this clown out.
He’s a politician, of course, and so this close to the election there were bound to be a few gimmicks, which were duly delivered in the form of church roof funds, air ambulances for the Tory shires and – most eye-catching of all – reduced stamp duty for ordinary home buyers. But the one underlying characteristic that George Osborne was determined to convey in his autumn statement, before he was rudely interrupted by Vince Cable, was seriousness. The choice confronting the country was, he said, whether to stick the course of a “long-term economic plan” which was working, or whether instead to hand power back to a Labour party that would “squander the economic security” he had painstakingly built, through cavalier decisions on borrowing and public spending.
Presenting himself as the most steadfast of chancellors, he asked the Commons to cast its mind back four years, to the moment when he had “presented the accounts of an economy in crisis” in his first autumn statement. If we accept his invitation to compare late 2010 with today, we do indeed make several instructive contrasts. The distinction that Mr Osborne is concerned to highlight is that between an economy which was then slowing down, with the one which is currently picking up pace. But there are other big differences too, most notably in relation to that proclaimed long-term plan, which turned out to need a short-term rewrite. The resolute Mr Osborne of 2010 stated that the national debt would by now be falling, from a maximum of just below 70% of GDP, but instead it continues to march towards a peak which he now concedes will be over 80%. He was, he said then, on course to “meet our fiscal mandate to eliminate the structural current budget deficit one year early, in 2014-15”, something he now accepts will not be done until well into the next parliament. And the headline measure of the government overdraft, which the “long-term plan” had initially pencilled in as £40bn this year, was on Wednesday revised up to £91.3bn, which represents slippage of well over 100%.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/03/guardian-view-george-osborne-statement-cannot-be-serious?CMP=twt_gu
Every time George Osborne steps up to the despatch box he comes out with a revised plan for the economy before telling us that Plan A is working. He has failed every single target he set himself and what he promised back in 2010 will not now be delivered until well into the next parliament - assuming the Tories are re-elected and there are no further revisions.
According to the OBRs own figures household debt is set to rocket to levels that even outstrip those that existed in 2007/2008 and caused much of the problems resulting in the global banking collapse.
Here it is...
Get this clown out.
Irn Bru- The Tartan terror. Keeper of the royal sporran. Chief Haggis Hunter
- Posts : 7719
Join date : 2013-12-11
Location : Edinburgh
Similar topics
» Nick Clegg: George Osborne is a 'very dangerous man'
» No more cuts, Tory councils tell George Osborne
» Why does George Osborne have it in for the workers?
» George Osborne doesn’t rate May
» FactCheck: where has it gone wrong for George Osborne? 30 March 2015
» No more cuts, Tory councils tell George Osborne
» Why does George Osborne have it in for the workers?
» George Osborne doesn’t rate May
» FactCheck: where has it gone wrong for George Osborne? 30 March 2015
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill