Jan Morgan first class Idiot and Racist.

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/jan-morgan-makes-her-gun-cave-shooting-range-a-Muslim-free-zone/story-fnh81jut-1227075291463

A WOMAN has declared her gun range a “Muslim free zone” in the wake of global terrorism and Islamic State threats, and she’s outlined her reasoning in 10 points.

Jan Morgan, who owns The Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range in Hot Springs Arkansas, announced the ban by posting her 10 reasons on her official website.

The conservative blogger and NRA-certified Firearms Instructor lists a series of incidents that have triggered her decision including “the barbaric act of beheading an innocent American in Oklahoma by a Muslim”, the Boston bombings, the Fort Hood mass shooting and the 9/11 attacks.

She also revealed that she had received death threats for her views of Islam, which formed another part of her reasoning for banning Muslims.

In her second reason, she said: “My life has been threatened repeatedly by Muslims in response to my publication of those verses from their Koran.”

She also reverenced a recent situation where two Muslims came to her range with “Allah akbar ringtone and message alert tones” on their phones.

She said they spoke very little English, one did not have U.S. citizenship, but they wanted to shoot guns.

“Their behaviour was unnerving to my patrons. No one would enter the range to shoot while they were there. (can you blame them?),” she wrote.

While she said her ban was also instigated by Muslims who also support ISIS, al-Qaeda and Hamas, and therefore support the killing of Americans, she does concede that “not all Muslims are terrorists”.

But she said her decision to ban Muslims was not racial discrimination, because she does not see Islam as a religion, and she doesn’t care about peoples’ religious beliefs when they come to her gun range. Her priority is her customers’ safety while they shoot.

“Not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists in the world right now are Muslim,” she wrote.

OK clearly she is an insane racist and is not in touch with reality (the whole most terrorists are Muslims which has been show to be statically untrue at every level) SO why is she allowed to own a Gun at all Let alone a Gun store?

No wonder they don't want checks, Even the store owners couldn't pass for a decent human being with sufficient the intellect and responsibility to own a firearm.

After what has happened i'd be extremly wary of being close to a Muslim with a loaded gun!

@nicko
I'd be wary next to anyone with a loaded gun.

But this is discrimination plain and simple, we are better than ISIS and others because we don't approve of discrimination.

And they still get more Crazy Christian Shooters in the USA than anything else

nicko wrote:After what has happened  i'd be extremly wary of being close to a Muslim with a loaded gun!

Look at all the crimes committed daily by white people brought up Christian. If you were to lump them all into an out-group and assign them all the same "agenda," you'd be just as afraid of them as you apparently are of Muslims ...

The reason you don't do that is because you're familiar with them. But Muslims, hey, a lot of them come in funny colors, languages and religious views, so it's just way too easy to view them as a different species that somehow share a hive-mind where they all act exactly the same!

All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

nicko wrote:All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

All African Americans are nervous of southern crackers with white sheets. If I owned a gun range I wouldn't let 'em near the place.

nicko wrote:All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

Where's that survey data?

Original Quill wrote:

nicko wrote:All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

All African Americans are nervous of southern crackers with white sheets. If I owned a gun range I wouldn't let 'em near the place.

Don't hear much about southern 'crackers' with white sheets but we do know that 90% of all inter-racial crime in USA is against whites by blacks.....

Tommy Monk wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

nicko wrote:All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

All African Americans are nervous of southern crackers with white sheets. If I owned a gun range I wouldn't let 'em near the place.

Don't hear much about southern 'crackers' with white sheets but we do know that 90% of all inter-racial crime in USA is against whites by blacks.....

I wonder what would happen to that stat if we were to criminalize hiring and advancement discrimination, educational discrimination, usurous "payday loans," attempts to deny U.S. citizens the right to vote that discriminate against minorities, discriminatory housing policies, selective enforcement of laws based on race, etc.?

@ben
not even and Here is why Actually understanding Maths is Important.

90% of interracial crime against whites, so 90% of not white on white crime...

Seems All your other minorities are just Super law abiding and statistically (because Latino is and ethnicity not a race and counts as European) Blacks make up over 70% of non-European minorities. So it is not a huge difference than what you'd expect based on population numbers, and considering that Asian Immigrants are generally highly law abiding and have below average numbers, blacks are only slightly higher than average.

BUT Tommy's number makes it seem like 9 times out 10 if a white guy get robbed it is by a black person. but actually it is saying IF a white guy gets robbed and it is not another white person robbing him (which it gives no reference too, but it is about 84% so 17 times out of 20 it is white guy robbing the white guy) than 9 times out of 10 it will be a black person but 7 out 10 not 'white or Latino' guys are Black.

There are such people everywhere and in every country. Racists and bigots.

At least in the UK it is illegal to discriminate against a race, religion, sexuality or gender, when providing/selling a good/service.

But I would rather know a persons genuine view about me (even if it is unpalatable), than be swept under the carpet with some incitement law. I get my security from knowing that the vast majority of people (like many of you guys in this forum) are decent and rational.

@zack
the problem is too many people are stupid from either persuasion. So even if decent people want to get along the stupid will fight and say dumb insulting things do stupid stuff like in the OP and ruin it for the rest of us.

She is an extremist and sees Muslims as terrorists and Muslim extremists see her and think all Americans are a bigoted and hate-filled as her. they fuel each other so the only solution is to shut them both up,.... like dealing with toddlers.

veya_victaous wrote:@zack
the problem is too many people are stupid from either persuasion. So even if decent people want to get along the stupid will fight and say dumb insulting things do stupid stuff like in the OP and ruin it for the rest of us.

She is an extremist and sees Muslims as terrorists and Muslim extremists see her and think all Americans are a bigoted and hate-filled as her. they fuel each other so the only solution is to shut them both up,.... like dealing with toddlers.

A fair point. But I would rather people shut them up and not some law.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Original Quill wrote:
All African Americans are nervous of southern crackers with white sheets. If I owned a gun range I wouldn't let 'em near the place.

Don't hear much about southern 'crackers' with white sheets but we do know that 90% of all inter-racial crime in USA is against whites by blacks.....

That is simply not true, nicko.  We've been through this, and proved conclusively that it is false. Remember? It was just another case of how to deceive with statistics.

Moving back to the real issue, the KKK has over the years posed a much greater terrorist problem than the Middle-Easterners.  They wrote the book.

Quill, you'v got me mixed up with Tommy there mate!

veya_victaous wrote:@ben
not even and Here is why Actually understanding Maths is Important.

90% of interracial crime against whites, so 90% of not white on white crime...

Seems All your other minorities are just Super law abiding and statistically (because Latino is and ethnicity not a race and counts as European)  Blacks make up over 70% of non-European minorities. So it is not a huge difference than what you'd expect based on population numbers, and considering that Asian Immigrants are generally highly law abiding and have below average numbers, blacks are only slightly higher than average.

BUT Tommy's number makes it seem like 9 times out 10 if a white guy get robbed it is by a black person. but actually it is saying IF a white guy gets robbed and it is not another white person robbing him (which it gives no reference too, but it is about 84% so 17 times out of 20 it is white guy robbing the white guy) than 9 times out of 10 it will be a black person but 7 out 10 not 'white or Latino' guys are Black.

Oh, I realize the stat is bullshit in the first place. My new thing is proving that even the bullshit is bullshit

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:
Don't hear much about southern 'crackers' with white sheets but we do know that 90% of all inter-racial crime in USA is against whites by blacks.....

That is simply not true, nicko.  We've been through this, and proved conclusively that it is false. Remember? It was just another case of how to deceive with statistics.
Moving back to the real issue, the KKK has over the years posed a much greater terrorist problem than the Middle-Easterners.  They wrote the book.

No, we've been through it before and I showed how you were trying to waffle and spin the truth away and it didn't work then and it ain't working now!!!



I proved conclusively that it was true!!!!


:

No matter how many times lefties try to make it so, Islam is not and will never be a race. If there were Christian terrorists killing and enslaving people on a daily basis worldwide then would it be racist to ban Christians from shooting ranges?

nicko wrote:All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

There are more British Muslims fighting for ISIS than there are in our Armed Forces. That just about says it all nicko.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/defence/article4183684.ece
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2659237/More-Brits-signing-fight-jihadist-militants-Iraq-Syria-UK-Army-Reserve.html

Tommy Monk wrote:

Original Quill wrote:
That is simply not true, nicko.  We've been through this, and proved conclusively that it is false. Remember? It was just another case of how to deceive with statistics.
Moving back to the real issue, the KKK has over the years posed a much greater terrorist problem than the Middle-Easterners.  They wrote the book.

No, we've been through it before and I showed how you were trying to waffle and spin the truth away and it didn't work then and it ain't working now!!!

I proved conclusively that it was true!!!!:

Haha...that's you perspective I'm sure Tommy. But then you are not very good at reasoning things through. Look at the nonsense you write on abnormality and natural design, and the myths you create.

Ahh...well. Light reading is good for relaxation.

The Puzzler wrote:No matter how many times lefties try to make it so, Islam is not and will never be a race.

I agree with you Puzzler...not a race. But an inspiration, as are all religions.

The Puzzler wrote:If there were Christian terrorists killing and enslaving people on a daily basis worldwide then would it be racist to ban Christians from shooting ranges?

Again, I agree. There are christian terrorists about in the world, known as the Ku Klux Klan. Since there are so many bad guys about, the better idea would be just to close down shooting ranges. They can't be good.

yea though I walk through the valley ect that hardly applies to you does it?

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

No, we've been through it before and I showed how you were trying to waffle and spin the truth away and it didn't work then and it ain't working now!!!
I proved conclusively that it was true!!!!:

Haha...that's you perspective I'm sure Tommy. But then you are not very good at reasoning things through. Look at the nonsense you write on abnormality and natural design, and the myths you create.
Ahh...well. Light reading is good for relaxation.

You seem to be in denial here quill.....



http://www.examiner.com/article/interracial-crime

Tommy Monk wrote:

Original Quill wrote:
Haha...that's you perspective I'm sure Tommy. But then you are not very good at reasoning things through. Look at the nonsense you write on abnormality and natural design, and the myths you create.
Ahh...well. Light reading is good for relaxation.

You seem to be in denial here quill.....
http://www.examiner.com/article/interracial-crime

We have been all over this. I have discredited all of these arguments by pointing out that the are all statistical lies.

Go back and restudy the page.

The source is FBI figures.....



Think you need to stop lying.....!

The Puzzler wrote:No matter how many times lefties try to make it so, Islam is not and will never be a race. If there were Christian terrorists killing and enslaving people on a daily basis worldwide then would it be racist to ban Christians from shooting ranges?

What makes you think there aren't?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_of_Tripura

http://time.com/42131/anti-balaka-central-african-republic/

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/Swami%20Laxmananand%20feared%20for%20his%20life:%20NGO/1/14653.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/audio_video/programmes/panorama/transcripts/transcript_17_06_01.txt

http://religiondispatches.org/is-norways-suspected-murderer-anders-breivik-a-christian-terrorist/

http://www.theguardian.com/katine/2007/oct/20/about.uganda

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/251815.stm

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/army-of-god-anthrax-threats/

http://blog.chron.com/believeitornot/2010/02/george-tillers-killer-has-no-regrets-doesnt-ask-for-forgiveness/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8593975.stm

Ben_Reilly wrote:

The Puzzler wrote:No matter how many times lefties try to make it so, Islam is not and will never be a race. If there were Christian terrorists killing and enslaving people on a daily basis worldwide then would it be racist to ban Christians from shooting ranges?

What makes you think there aren't?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_of_Tripura

http://time.com/42131/anti-balaka-central-african-republic/

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/Swami%20Laxmananand%20feared%20for%20his%20life:%20NGO/1/14653.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/audio_video/programmes/panorama/transcripts/transcript_17_06_01.txt

http://religiondispatches.org/is-norways-suspected-murderer-anders-breivik-a-christian-terrorist/

http://www.theguardian.com/katine/2007/oct/20/about.uganda

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/251815.stm

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/army-of-god-anthrax-threats/

http://blog.chron.com/believeitornot/2010/02/george-tillers-killer-has-no-regrets-doesnt-ask-for-forgiveness/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8593975.stm

@Puzzled
And YES it would still be prejudice and bigotry and we would say racist because ethnicist and religiousist are hard to pronounce and they basically mean the same thing, which is bigot.

No it is xenophobia not racism, it is only racism if the stereotype is placed upon the Muslim based on his or her ethnicity.
For example to say all Muslims have big noses is a poor stereotype made in regards to Arabs as well as Jews, this would be racist to say.
People need to understand the difference that a religion is made up of many groups of ethnicity, where only Jews seem to be unique being a religious an ethnic group.
Again racism is around a superiority or inferior concept based off the terminology of races, where the world has designated how they defined groups of people.

xenophobia
noun
1.
an unreasonable fear or hatred of foreigners or strangers or of that which is foreign or strange.

Yes it would be Xenophobia to Fear All Christians because of all the terrorist acts committed by people of the Christians Faith, but it would be discrimination/prejudice to then restrict their freedom of movement/business beyond the rest of the community. To do that would make you a Bigot, in the most generic terms. yes, Christians aren't a race so technically not racist but who use the term religionist?

AND the ultimate 'superiority or inferior concept' is to suggest your group deserves a right that should be denied to another group

My name's Puzzler not Puzzled veya. It's religious bigotry, or islamophobia, but not racism, she was an idiot to blanket ban all Muslims but we live in a climate Islam is causing most conflict worldwide- so it was understandable. The trouble is she is lumping in peaceful sects like Alawites and Druze with fundamentalists like Wahhabis and hardline Sunni/Shia groups.

The Puzzler wrote:My name's Puzzler not Puzzled veya. It's religious bigotry, or islamophobia, but not racism, she was an idiot to blanket ban all Muslims but we live in a climate Islam is causing most conflict worldwide- so it was understandable. The trouble is she is lumping in peaceful sects like Alawites and Druze with fundamentalists like Wahhabis and hardline Sunni/Shia groups.

No, it's not understandable.

She was acting out of fear. Not very rational.

Actually Pretty sure Money is still causing most conflicts world wide

ISIS is bad but not Unique look at the South American Drug Cartels
http://listverse.com/2013/08/22/ten-atrocities-committed-by-mexican-drug-cartels/

Half the conflicts in Africa and Middle East (Indeed Even Iraq) can be attributed to more powerful nations trying to secure resources of economic importance.

And Your example was Christians, so Islamophobia is no more accurate than Racist. BUT anyway Means the same thing, too put such emphasis on using 'Anglo' language structure is also Racist as it makes it more difficult for other races that have an equal right to joint he conversation to do so... PLUS it shows at the core a belief that the 'Anglo way' is superior to others which is the very definition of Racism. Language will evolve to be more inclusive of others by focusing on the the ideas being purveyed rather than the semantics of an archaic dialect that by 'luck' is evolving into the core of the global language.

::footie::

Tommy Monk wrote: The source is FBI figures.....

Think you need to stop lying.....!

One of the things I love about conservatives is their dedication to repetitiveness over reason, and their willingness to tell the big lie.  The last time we had this discussion, you were humiliated to an extent that I worried about you.  But true to your tiny black conservative soul, you just lay low and waited for about 6-weeks, and then tried the same shiet all over again.

I think it was Adolph Hitler who wrote about the value of the big lie in Mein Kampf:

Hitler wrote:All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.

Welcome back with your bullshit, Tommy.  Let's see if others remember you ran this line of shite before.  Or is it just too big of a lie for them to believe you would have the audacity to tell it twice.  Lol.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

No, we've been through it before and I showed how you were trying to waffle and spin the truth away and it didn't work then and it ain't working now!!!
I proved conclusively that it was true!!!!:

Haha...that's you perspective I'm sure Tommy. But then you are not very good at reasoning things through. Look at the nonsense you write on abnormality and natural design, and the myths you create.
Ahh...well. Light reading is good for relaxation.

You seem to be in denial here quill.....



http://www.examiner.com/article/interracial-crime

That is just a copy and paste from stormfront and you will note ONLY the headline has an asterisk and is a stat, the REST IS MADE UP BY STORMFRONT!!!
It has been going around online since 2002 and debunked Multiple times AND racist fuckwits keep moving the date forward and literally copy and pasting as if it is a NEW release



and the Racist that YOU posted from is not a Expert his only professional credit is
"historical documentary series titled Visions: Four True Stories of Spiritualism, Secret Societies & Murder."
So not even related.


AND that stat says that if it is NOT white on White Crime, in the USA 83% of crimes against Whites are committed by Other Whites, 9 times out of 10 it will be Black as opposed to Asian or Middle Eastern.

You forgot the pendejos, Veya, they commit some crimes too

@Ben
Nope
that is Spanish Decent
Spain is part of Europe, they are European decent

That WHY the stat is 90%!!! IT IS CHERRY PICKED BY STROMFRONT FOR A REASON

the Stat actually comes from 1999 FBI stats it is taken out of context AND the Original even admits using old race definitions because of the raw data available.

If you go into Some of the pages that post that exact line tommy posted (cause it is a long running fraud that fools keep falling for) you will notice that whites commit virtually no crime and even Native Americans commit more crimes than whites, I think some of them take the per capita percentage than do the per capita equations on it a second time making any % attached to a minority go through the roof.

I have not been reading stormfront.



The key words here are inter racial crime.....


Of which 90% are against whites.


Blacks make up only about 12% of USA population but about 50% of prison population.


They don't get there for good behaviour!!!




Here in UK the black crime rate and prison population is also hugely disproportionately higher than others.








Here are some more shocking statistics:


1) More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year.


2) Blacks murder Whites at 18 times [1,800%] the rate Whites murder Blacks, and many of the "whites" that do murder blacks are Hispanics (part Native American/part Spanish).


3) About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by Blacks in 1992.



4) In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.


5) Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than Whites the same age.


6) Some 90% of the victims of race crimes are Whites.


7) Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites, although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.


On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than Whites.


9) Some 27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992 alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only 2% involved White offenders and Black victims.


10) 1.3 million of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S. each year are interracial. 11) Between 1964 and 1994, more than 45,000 people were killed in interracial murders in the U.S., compared to 58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam and 38,000 killed in Korea. Over 95% of these interracial murders were blacks killing whites.


The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan, who dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media. One wonders how many Whites have to be killed by Blacks before the N.Y. Times and Dan Rather break the conspiratorial silence about the number of White casualties in the guerrilla war being waged against them by Blacks. Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime. Mr. Taylor reveals:


1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.


2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.


3) 73% of all "justified self-defense" killings are committed by Blacks.


4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times.


5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.


In 1989, the FBI reported the following:


A) Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than Whites.


B) Blacks commit 9 times [900%] more rapes than Whites.


C) Blacks commit 14 times [1,400%] more murders than Whites.


D) Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies.


E) Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than White neighborhoods.


F) There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed in 1985 (the last year the FBI "chose" to report this information). Some nine out of every ten [90%] were committed by Blacks against Whites.


G. Black males (6% of the population) make up 46% of the nation's prison population, with Hispanics next, followed by whites.


This is from the French magazine, La Griffe du Lion (no American magazine would dare publish something like this):


"The data reveal two causes of white victimization by blacks. First, a black is 3 times more likely than a white to commit violent crime. However, as a neighborhood turns black, this factor could increase black-on-white violence at most by a factor of 3, and then only when a neighborhood is virtually all black. The observed level of white victimization is much too high to blame on general tendencies of blacks to be violent. A more important reason is simply that blacks prefer white victims.

The best and most complete evidence comes from the Justice Department. Its annual National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) canvasses a representative sample of about 80,000 Americans, from roughly 43,000 households. From this survey, a picture of crime is painted by its victims. The last full report of the NCVS was issued in 1994. From it we learn that blacks committed 1,600,951 violent crimes against whites. In the same year, whites committed 165,345 such offenses against blacks [NOTE: the majority of these anti-black offenses were committed by Hispanics]. Despite being only 13 percent of the population, blacks committed more than 90 percent of the violent interracial crime. Less than 15 percent of these had robbery as a motive. The rest were assaults and rapes.

nicko wrote:yea though I walk through the valley ect that hardly applies to you does it?

Haha...thanks for noticing, nicko. It's a common saying among lawyers...braggadocio to clients, who hire gunslingers to do their legal work. I posted it long ago and forgot about it.

Since I have been mainly into peacemaking in the past 25-years, it probably doesn't fit anymore.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

nicko wrote:
All British and American Soldiers are now a little nervous of Muslim soldiers with guns. It's only to be expected.

Where's that survey data?

nicko - and Tommy, too - usually seem to get their info' from the same places...

Their own imaginations !

Original Quill wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:
The source is FBI figures.....

Think I need to stop lying.....!

One of the things I love about conservatives is their dedication to repetitiveness over reason, and their willingness to tell the big lie.  The last time we had this discussion, you were humiliated to an extent that I worried about you.  But true to your tiny black conservative soul, you just lay low and waited for about 6-weeks, and then tried the same shite all over again.

I think it was Adolph Hitler who wrote about the value of the big lie in Mein Kampf:

Hitler wrote:All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.

Welcome back with your bullshit, Tommy.  Let's see if others remember you ran this line of shite before.  Or is it just too big of a lie for them to believe you would have the audacity to tell it twice.  Lol.

NOT only is Tommy M. the stupidest member on this forum...

BUT he is also determined to outdo the likes of non-independentforts and nicko as the prime liar and resident thicko, as well..

Coming from flea keeper who insists I have made up claims about my military service when I have never posted anything about any military service........ main reason being that I have never served in the military!!!!




But don't let the facts get in the way of A good bit of bullshit eh old wolf...!?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

The Puzzler wrote:
My name's Puzzler not Puzzled veya. It's religious bigotry, or islamophobia, but not racism, she was an idiot to blanket ban all Muslims but we live in a climate [sic] Islam is causing most conflict worldwide - so it was understandable. The trouble is she is lumping in peaceful sects like Alawites and Druze with fundamentalists like Wahhabis and hardline Sunni/Shia groups.

No, it's not understandable.

She was acting out of fear. Not very rational.

THE only-to-be-expected reactions and excuses from our own resident Islamophobes Puzzled, Tommy M. and nicko are also equally irrational...

THE outright lie that the Puzzled one just made up above, that Islamists cause most conflicts, only goes to prove that he doesn't bother to let a small thing like the truth get in the way of his usual ignorant rants
( ).

AS all religious-based conflicts bundled in together only account for maybe ~40% [+/-2% S.D.] of wars and skirmishes globally, not only do the stat's not support Puzzled's ongoing lies, but the Islamists can't even be anywhere near the "majority" cause [i.e. >50%+1..], let alone the main one !

LONE PUSSIE, why do you keep including me in idiotic posts? just fuck off and stop making things up about me,are you going through the change or something? fucking nutter.