If Sassy is so concerned about Gaza...

eddie wrote:She isn't a well woman shady.

Nems wrote:

eddie wrote:She isn't a well woman shady.

Im sorry, bad form, but that did make me laugh!

eddie wrote:

Nems wrote:

Im sorry, bad form, but that did make me laugh!

I was being serous actually x

eddie wrote:She isn't a well woman shady.

lovedust wrote:

This thread is bullying.

victorisnotamused wrote:Double standards at work again.....


All I did was ask quill a very valid and straightforward question and the thread got locked and I was accused of baiting him by paranoid mods/admin......

here we have a thread designed to deliberately bait and no one seems to want to know...

Isnt it strange how things go.......

Sassy wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:Double standards at work again.....


All I did was ask quill a very valid and straightforward question and the thread got locked and I was accused of baiting him by paranoid mods/admin......

here we have a thread designed to deliberately bait and no one seems to want to know...

Isnt it strange how things go.......

Never mind Victor,  Nems, Shady and Bee really should go over to the Dogs forum, I'm sure bitches are welcome over there.   I believe vicious, ignorant, common as muck bitches are doubly welcome, so they are sure to feel well at home.

lovedust wrote:

This thread is bullying.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Sassy wrote:

Never mind Victor,  Nems, Shady and Bee really should go over to the Dogs forum, I'm sure bitches are welcome over there.   I believe vicious, ignorant, common as muck bitches are doubly welcome, so they are sure to feel well at home.

What are you picking on another forum for? There's enough bitching on here, so it's no worse on Dogs.

Sassy wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

What are you picking on another forum for? There's enough bitching on here, so it's no worse on Dogs.

Play on the word 'dogs'?   Plus it has a reputation to uphold I believe.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Sassy wrote:

Play on the word 'dogs'?   Plus it has a reputation to uphold I believe.

It's not as bad as Bitchfest, but then your mate Phil is on there.

eddie wrote:Is it baiting?
Shady is asking a question.
I have defended her.

Where's the bait vic? If I'm wrong I'll hold my hands up.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:Is it baiting?
Shady is asking a question.
I have defended her.

Where's the bait vic? If I'm wrong I'll hold my hands up.

Wolfman was a bit OTT.

victorisnotamused wrote:Double standards at work again.....


All I did was ask quill a very valid and straightforward question and the thread got locked and I was accused of baiting him by paranoid mods/admin......

here we have a thread designed to deliberately bait and no one seems to want to know...

Isnt it strange how things go.......

lovedust wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:Double standards at work again.....


All I did was ask quill a very valid and straightforward question and the thread got locked and I was accused of baiting him by paranoid mods/admin......

here we have a thread designed to deliberately bait and no one seems to want to know...

Isnt it strange how things go.......

victorisnotamused wrote:I was told...quite unequivocably that asking a perfectly valid question about a bit of international law, which I even conceeded might have been outside of quills sphere of knowlege was baiting, I was, as it were, deliberately asking leading questions with which to lay some sort of imaginary trap for another member.

so it is clearly forbidden to ask direct questions, especially about contentious issues, of another member

the O/P does just this...

IF the same standards are to be applied across ALL posts then if what I asked in all reasonable concience was baiting, then so is shady's question.....

simples.....

Lone Wolf wrote:

eddie wrote:She isn't a well woman shady.

  

SINCE WHEN have inborn stupidity, ingrained nastiness, inherent racism (I will put up sassy's multiple threads targeted against Jews, and a couple against Australian Aborigines, as evidence of her inexplicable bigotry), and just plain loopiness, been classified as medical conditions ?    

lovedust wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:I was told...quite unequivocably that asking a perfectly valid question about a bit of international law, which I even conceeded might have been outside of quills sphere of knowlege was baiting, I was, as it were, deliberately asking leading questions with which to lay some sort of imaginary trap for another member.

so it is clearly forbidden to ask direct questions, especially about contentious issues, of another member

the O/P does just this...

IF the same standards are to be applied across ALL posts then if what I asked in all reasonable concience was baiting, then so is shady's question.....

simples.....

... So will the people who accused Vic of starting a thread for the purpose of baiting accuse Shady of the same thing here?