Another useless sniffer dog...

Tommy Monk wrote:Eddie was highly trained both here in UK and in USA by FBI using real human body parts.
No evidence to coroborate this, have asked and none has been forth coming, in fact a report in the UK actually states the opposite in that dogs are not very well trained and includes as an example of Eddie, where twice her use brought about nothing

He was an expert in his field.




Your post of Waffle and conjecture changes nothing.

Tommy Monk wrote:If says involved in over 200 operational cases.
No supporting evidence, that is hearsay


Have already answered this on McCann thread.
No you have avoided

Details of dogs training and handlers experience can be found here......


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm
That comes from Grimes himself who also states evidence is needed to corroborate



Plus the licensing and accreditation details they had which you claimed didn't exist.
No I said he no longer has a licence and that the report states clearly they lack any credability



This is about dogs In general and their effectiveness not Eddie or keela in particular.

Tommy Monk wrote:MOre waffle from dodge ....

Tommy Monk wrote:These dogs aren't trained to indicate at any and every couch.



They are extensively trained to indicate at particular smells and scents, and brought in to particular locations to do so.


Only the reliable ones are used out in real investigations.


There was a case posted on other thread where a prosecution happened for murder when no body was found and sniffer dog evidence was used.


Another recent high profile case was the missing girl in Wales, April Jones, if I remember correctly, they never found her body either.



And now you are splitting hairs on why you were stopped.



You were stopped because The dog indicated scent of drugs.



Did you have a scent of drugs on you?




And just a side issue, these random dog searches were started in this country under labour.


They also increased the state and wanted ever increasing state control, and snooping, plus the massive proll out of cameras everywhere watching our every move. We are the most watched population in The world because of it.


Their mantra was 'if you're got nothing to hide, You have nothing to fear'....


They wanted to pass law giving them access to all our communications too.

Ben_Reilly wrote:
But who watches the cameras that watch the cameras that watch the cameras?   

harvesmom wrote:More bloody useless dogs...

http://www.nottinghamshire.police.uk/blog/2014-06-20/body-dogs-jack-and-charlie-not-be-sniffed

When the Force’s new ‘body’ dogs were called upon to assist in the Wycherleys murder case, you would be forgiven for thinking their lack of experience and the time passed may not bring results.

But three-year-old spaniels Jack and Charlie indicated at the burial site in the back garden of Blenheim Close, Forest Town, almost immediately.

PC Leigh Whitehead is Cocker Jack’s handler and PC Gav Berry takes Springer Charlie’s lead.

PC Whitehead said: “Our dogs are chosen for their drive and work ethic. Jack and Charlie have this in abundance.

"I’m not surprised by their performance that day. They did exactly what they are trained to do.

"The circumstances posed a significant challenge for them but I’m proud to say it’s a challenge they lived up to and surpassed.

He trained the canine cops over an eight-week period before they were licensed by PC Terry Arnett from the West Midlands Police in August 2013.

Since September, Jack and Charlie have been deployed 22 times.

nicko wrote:Eddie,i think he's a stalker, most likely in real life as well!!

nicko wrote:Eddie,i think he's a stalker, most likely in real life as well!!

Didge wrote:

nicko wrote:Eddie,i think he's a stalker, most likely in real life as well!!

No debating just more shit stirring, more proof you do not debate

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


No debating just more shit stirring, more proof you do not debate

Nicko debates as much as Lonely Wank does.

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Nicko debates as much as Lonely Wank does.

Does he fuck, all Nicko does is jump on people Eddie, proving he is an utter hypocrite

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


Does he fuck, all Nicko does is jump on people Eddie, proving he is an utter hypocrite

Hahahaha you didn't get it again.
That went right over your head didge.

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Hahahaha you didn't get it again.
That went right over your head didge.

No it did not, Bee is more open in what he says, Nicko is very underhanded, so I think you missed my point Eddie lol

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:



No it did not, Bee is more open in what he says, Nicko is very underhanded, so I think you missed my point Eddie lol

Be honest didge, do you ignore  how very stupid and stalkerish lone wolf is, because you like him?

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Be honest didge, do you ignore  how very stupid and stalkerish lone wolf is, because you like him?

You know I do not ignore, as I pulled him up over calling you and Tess fascists and that I hate him using the derogatory use of Dogs to females, or id you miss that part the other day?

You see I will pull up any, even if I get on with them, if I view something as wrong

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:



You know I do not ignore, as I pulled him up over calling you and Tess fascists and that I hate him using the derogatory use of Dogs to females, or id you miss that part the other day?

You see I will pull up any, even if I get on with them, if I view something as wrong

Fair enough.
But he doesn't debate he just finds our posts and starts his waffling maniac rants.
You'll see.

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Be honest didge, do you ignore  how very stupid and stalkerish lone wolf is, because you like him?

You know I do not ignore, as I pulled him up over calling you and Tess fascists and that I hate him using the derogatory use of Dogs to females, or id you miss that part the other day?

You see I will pull up any, even if I get on with them, if I view something as wrong

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Fair enough.
But he doesn't debate he just finds our posts and starts his waffling maniac rants.
You'll see.

Many do this Eddie, as seen today where I am debating something people jump in with childish insults, you cannot advocate just on one person when many are guilty of this

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:



Many do this Eddie, as seen today where I am debating something people jump in with childish insults, you cannot advocate just on one person when many are guilty of this

I don't doubt it didge but lone wolf is getting away with saying some really vile shit.
I never put people on ignore - even you lol - but he is honestly a waste of posting space x