this forum is a joke, a sick joke at that...you

[Guest]

First topic message reminder :

you can yell swear, call, wish death on someone but if you say something against gays its against the rules....        

absolutely pathetic ben, very very sad...

[Eilzel]

I'm guessing it was more hate filled bile? I have lost sympathy for the witch tbh, we communicated by PM a while back and I felt we'd cleared the air, but she is as bad as him. Both are mentally unstable idiots.

[Fluffyx]

Well I'm gonna put it out that some one may not be welcome back     

VOD has left of Own Free will... I'm the only Mod on and I didn't ban her I have hidden a thread after she left but that was just spouting shit at ben

She literally left minutes ago

Hiding the evidence IS a LW trait.

What rubbish.

[scrat]

Still, a reflection on society, albeit a slice with too many RWhingers, and restricting their words by restricting what they really want to say simply makes the game harder to play and gives them the opportunity to cwy pc, let them say what they want to say, if they open themselves up for prosecution, ho hum they get learned.

This is what I fear.
That society had gone so RW for some reason and that people want to abuse others and use hurtful language,why? Why are they so full of hate? Why can't people accept other people are different to them and as long as nobody is hurting others,why can't the RW's just jolly well get on with their own lives instead of trying to force their narrow mined ideals onto others?

Hi Fluffybunny, Society has not gone right wing, the RWhinge are required to maintain the balance as globalisation marches on, responsible governments are figuring out the best way to use the resource at its disposal, which is us.

Immigration is a matter of concern, fanatical religions are a matter of concern, these are simply matters used to avoid or slow down the pace of change, a smokescreen used whilst the have's extract more from the have nots.

It's a struggle I know, but what I fear is that the restriction of free speech, is an extension to restrict free thought, and all so that we might be easier to utilise.

[Guest]

you can yell swear, call, wish death on someone but if you say something against gays its against the rules....        

absolutely pathetic ben, very very sad...

 :-:cawg:-:   :-:cawg:-:   :-:cawg:-: 

LET'S just look at the heavenlycancercurescamster's own outstanding record on here, so far, shall we ?!?

* Insults and freely abuses anyone to the left of Attilla the Hun as being a "liberal-socialist-commie" soldier of Satan, hell bent on destroying heavenly'&VoD's mythical illusions of a fabled whitebread Christian England fortress, the last sanctity of their imaginary wholesome fairytales;

* Claims to have "all natural" cancer cures available that only he and VoD apparently knows of;

* VoD then claims some kind of home-based self-employment opportunity ~ which has reputedly given them a wonderful mansion, two new Mercedes, a swimming pool, and numerous overseas trips whenever they want; while putting numerous offspring through Uni' and college;

* AND YET, those two clowns still manage to be on here 24/7 hours between them;

* ALL the while spouting their rabid hatred of non-Christians (especially their hated Muslim enemies), "blacks", gays, "liberals", and anyone else clearly superior to themselves, across this forum with their usual wild and careless abandon..

* OVER this past couple weeks, the heavenlyfraudster has further cemented his pathetic and unchallenged position as the forums most stupid dingbat, by stealing the insults that JD, veya, Didge, and myself have used against him, to throw back at us in recent days ~ so proving what a juvenile and puerile little dullard he truly is, of limited vocabulary and little imagination !   ::dedhrs:: 

...your damn right Bee and some of this cancer cure alternatives was a disgusting and personal dig at someone with cancer, and also Eilzel a was absolutely correct as well in that they have never change and are still mentally unstable idiots.

I can honestly say I hope they don't come back unless  they have developed a whole change of personality , but that's as unlikely as any of is becoming Prime Minister...

I'm sick of their false and nauseous  apologies only to come back and spews the  same stuff again and again.

I just hope we have seen the last of the venomous God freaks, but I doubt it, anyway..

I'm all for second chances but these two are vile trolls who relish in trolling and make it their sole aim.

And back to Bee..yes,they are always robbing our sayings! 

[eddie]

Hi chap, it's Bens forum he can do what he likes, it's just restriction does not weigh with free speech.

No worries chap

Now why can't you agree to disagree with everyone like that?   

[Guest]

This is what I fear.
That society had gone so RW for some reason and that people want to abuse others and use hurtful language,why? Why are they so full of hate? Why can't people accept other people are different to them and as long as nobody is hurting others,why can't the RW's just jolly well get on with their own lives instead of trying to force their narrow mined ideals onto others?

Hi Fluffybunny, Society has not gone right wing, the RWhinge are required to maintain the balance as globalisation marches on, responsible governments are figuring out the best way to use the resource at its disposal, which is us.

Immigration is a matter of concern, fanatical religions are a matter of concern, these are simply matters used to avoid or slow down the pace of change, a smokescreen used whilst the have's extract more from the have nots.

It's a struggle I know, but what I fear is that the restriction of free speech, is an extension to restrict free thought, and all so that we might be easier to utilise.

The haves extract more from the have nots?

How does that work scrat - tell me who contributes to the pot - the haves or the have nots?

You've really confused me here, i thought contributions from workers paid for the non-workers.

[scrat]

Hi Fluffybunny, Society has not gone right wing, the RWhinge are required to maintain the balance as globalisation marches on, responsible governments are figuring out the best way to use the resource at its disposal, which is us.

Immigration is a matter of concern, fanatical religions are a matter of concern, these are simply matters used to avoid or slow down the pace of change, a smokescreen used whilst the have's extract more from the have nots.

It's a struggle I know, but what I fear is that the restriction of free speech, is an extension to restrict free thought, and all so that we might be easier to utilise.

The haves extract more from the have nots?

How does that work scrat - tell me who contributes to the pot - the haves or the have nots?

You've really confused me here, i thought contributions from workers paid for the non-workers.

Morning Andy,

wot pot?

[Lone Wolf]

Well I'm gonna put it out that some one may not be welcome back     

VOD has left of Own Free will... I'm the only Mod on and I didn't ban her I have hidden a thread after she left but that was just spouting shit at ben

She literally left minutes ago

Hiding the evidence IS a LW trait.

  

IS "Phillipa" yet another of Drinky's numerous alter-egos ???   

[Guest]

The haves extract more from the have nots?

How does that work scrat - tell me who contributes to the pot - the haves or the have nots?

You've really confused me here, i thought contributions from workers paid for the non-workers.

Morning Andy,

wot pot?

A government pot of money to spend - let's take ours for instance.

The welfare budget.

NHS budget.

Do the haves force the have nots to pay for all of that?

[scrat]

Morning Andy,

wot pot?

A government pot of money to spend - let's take ours for instance.

The welfare budget.

NHS budget.  

Do the haves force the have nots to pay for all of that?

You mean the increase taxes we pay to subsides employers so that their staff can live on the minimum wage, or the NI we pay to have a world class health care system.

As for your "pot",,,,,it's full of debt, debt built up in preparation for globalisation.

[Guest]

A government pot of money to spend - let's take ours for instance.

The welfare budget.

NHS budget.  

Do the haves force the have nots to pay for all of that?

You mean the increase taxes we pay to subsides employers so that their staff can live on the minimum wage, or the NI we pay to have a world class health care system.

As for your "pot",,,,,it's full of debt, debt built up in preparation for globalisation.

Tell me scrat - in England, who are the have nots and who are the haves?

Just generally, i'm not asking for exact specifics.

And generally, what do the have nots not have?

[Raggamuffin]

Morning Andy,

wot pot?

A government pot of money to spend - let's take ours for instance.

The welfare budget.

NHS budget.  

Do the haves force the have nots to pay for all of that?

No they don't. I never see anyone paying for prescriptions - except myself.   

The haves are very important as they do pay for those who can't or won't pay for themselves. There's no point slagging them off all the time because without them there would be a lot more have nots.

[Fluffyx]

A government pot of money to spend - let's take ours for instance.

The welfare budget.

NHS budget.  

Do the haves force the have nots to pay for all of that?

No they don't. I never see anyone paying for prescriptions - except myself.   

The haves are very important as they do pay for those who can't or won't pay for themselves. There's no point slagging them off all the time because without them there would be a lot more have nots.

In Wales,no one pays for their prescriptions,  

I would make millionaires pay alot more tax than they currently do.

[scrat]

You mean the increase taxes we pay to subsides employers so that their staff can live on the minimum wage, or the NI we pay to have a world class health care system.

As for your "pot",,,,,it's full of debt, debt built up in preparation for globalisation.

Tell me scrat - in England, who are the have nots and who are the haves?

Just generally, i'm not asking for exact specifics.

And generally, what do the have nots not have?

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

[Guest]

No they don't. I never see anyone paying for prescriptions - except myself.   

The haves are very important as they do pay for those who can't or won't pay for themselves. There's no point slagging them off all the time because without them there would be a lot more have nots.

In Wales,no one pays for their prescriptions,  

I would make millionaires pay alot more tax than they currently do.

Why would you do that Fluffy?

Do you not like people who earn lots of money?

[Guest]

Tell me scrat - in England, who are the have nots and who are the haves?

Just generally, i'm not asking for exact specifics.

And generally, what do the have nots not have?

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

You haven't answered:

What do the haves have that is so special?

What do the have nots, not have?

[Fluffyx]

In Wales,no one pays for their prescriptions,  

I would make millionaires pay alot more tax than they currently do.

Why would you do that Fluffy?

Do you not like people who earn lots of money?

Of course I don't have a problem with people who have alot of money! But since they have plenty and there are so many in poverty if the very rich paid more tax more money could be put into helping the homeless and poverty stricken.

[Fluffyx]

Tell me scrat - in England, who are the have nots and who are the haves?

Just generally, i'm not asking for exact specifics.

And generally, what do the have nots not have?

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

Good post.

[Guest]

Tell me scrat - in England, who are the have nots and who are the haves?

Just generally, i'm not asking for exact specifics.

And generally, what do the have nots not have?

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

Bang on the money Scrat.

[Guest]

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

Good post.

And can you answer - what do they have?

What do some not have?

Some people go without medicine because they can't afford it - you don't i see.

So therefore you are one of the haves!

[Guest]

Scrat, Fluffy and JD - are you against immigration?

Do you now agree with BigAndy9 that it is the ruling left wing elite who are flooding the English market to keep us all down?

[Raggamuffin]

Tell me scrat - in England, who are the have nots and who are the haves?

Just generally, i'm not asking for exact specifics.

And generally, what do the have nots not have?

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

The city? The establishment? Do you mean people who work in those areas?  They pay tax, do they not?

Who has to work longer and harder for less? Do you mean that employers are extending working hours and paying people the same money? Those who are on minimum wage are often paid hourly rates, so that doesn't apply to them.

[scrat]

The city and the establishment are the haves, they are the ruling elite who inflict austerity on us, due to their own poor judgement in pursuit of greed.

The have nots are the increasing army of low paid, having to work longer and harder for less.

Immigration is used to fuel the economy for our future pensions and flood  the market with cheap labour, so that people at the bottom will accept less and less.

You haven't answered:

What do the haves have that is so special?

What do the have nots, not have?

The haves have wealth and power to influence the world and create a fair and decent society, but they do not.

The have nots want a fair and decent society but they do not have, the power, wealth or influence to achieve it.

You bat for the wrong side, Andy chap.

[Raggamuffin]

You haven't answered:

What do the haves have that is so special?

What do the have nots, not have?

The haves have wealth and power to influence the world and create a fair and decent society, but they do not.

The have nots want a fair and decent society but they do not have, the power, wealth or influence to achieve it.

You bat for the wrong side, Andy chap.

The have nots have the power to spend their money wisely, and they have the power to not take out stupid mortgages which push house prices up. They have the power to be decent people themselves.

How do you think the haves can create a fair and decent society then?

[Guest]

Scrat, Fluffy and JD - are you against immigration?

Do you now agree with BigAndy9 that it is the ruling left wing elite who are flooding the English market to keep us all down?

But Andy, you don't have a problem with some ruthless and greedy Employers knowingly breaking the law by paying illegal or legal immigrants a pittance , for some still do.

[Guest]

You haven't answered:

What do the haves have that is so special?

What do the have nots, not have?

The haves have wealth and power to influence the world and create a fair and decent society, but they do not.

The have nots want a fair and decent society but they do not have, the power, wealth or influence to achieve it.

You bat for the wrong side, Andy chap.

This country gives more of its money away than almost any other.

This country takes more from those who work and gives to those who don't work than almost any other.

Those who never work want for nothing.

Those who never work get to choose our leaders.

How much fairer could it be?

Tell us the answer scrat.

[Raggamuffin]

Scrat, Fluffy and JD - are you against immigration?

Do you now agree with BigAndy9 that it is the ruling left wing elite who are flooding the English market to keep us all down?

But Andy, you don't have a problem with some ruthless and greedy Employers knowingly breaking the law by paying illegal or legal immigrants a pittance , for some still do.

That's a different issue - ie, catching such people and applying the law.

[Guest]

Scrat, Fluffy and JD - are you against immigration?

Do you now agree with BigAndy9 that it is the ruling left wing elite who are flooding the English market to keep us all down?

But Andy, you don't have a problem with some ruthless and greedy Employers knowingly breaking the law by paying illegal or legal immigrants a pittance , for some still do.

I do JD.

But i believe the root cause of the problem is the immigration - i believe that came first, causing the problem.

If immigration continues the low wages will continue.

And you, scrat and Fluffy agreed with me, you just didn't quite realise what you were saying until i pointed it out.

[Guest]

Well I'm not fooled on this, and you can't have it both ways Andy...

Many on the right support low wages in order for the employer to pay a pittance and make a very good profit, so without many of these immigrants , I think many more Employers would be fcuked.

That's my take,name it's been proven correct in the past.

I just don't buy right into this ' the immigrant keeps the wages low'...

They are the ones on more of a pittance than those on NMW...which should never have been taxed for so long(partly labour fault ) , but at least it was aLabour government who created and gave folk the NMW...

Before that people were paid as little as £1.50 an hour in some jobs.

It's not all the immigrants fault Andy, it's bad governing by this Tory led coalition and picking on the poor with bedroom taxes etc.

[Raggamuffin]

If legal immigrants are being paid less than minimum wage, why do they not report the company? Are some British people being paid less than minimum wage too?

[Guest]

If legal immigrants are being paid less than minimum wage, why do they not report the company? Are some British people being paid less than minimum wage too?

Clearly some must do:

Government 'names and shames' minimum wage underpayers

The employers were investigated by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) after members of staff called a free helpline to report they were being underpaid.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27751722

Right sun is shinning, so byee

[scrat]

The haves have wealth and power to influence the world and create a fair and decent society, but they do not.

The have nots want a fair and decent society but they do not have, the power, wealth or influence to achieve it.

You bat for the wrong side, Andy chap.

This country gives more of its money away than almost any other.

This country takes more from those who work and gives to those who don't work than almost any other.

Those who never work want for nothing.

Those who never work get to choose our leaders.

How much fairer could it be?

Tell us the answer scrat.

This country is Great Britain, if it wishes to maintain a seat of influence, it must meet its obligation with a 0.72% contribution! now bare in mind that at least £70bn is lost in revenue to tax evasion, and you must also consider the fact that British citizens have an estimate £1.3 TRILLION locked away in tax havens, all of this adds to the perspective.

This country takes more from those who work to pay for millionaire tax breaks and the clusterfuck caused by banking greed.

Those living on the poverty line suffer because of ignorance and your RWhinge stupidity.

The ruling elite get to choose the government, you follow the herd bleating inanely.

What's your solution to all your woes!,,,,you'll blame Muslims and immigrants because the truth is a tad too much for you to comprehend.

[nicko]

Load of bollocks scrat, How are you by the way? we haven't swapped opinions for some time.

[Guest]

This country gives more of its money away than almost any other.

This country takes more from those who work and gives to those who don't work than almost any other.

Those who never work want for nothing.

Those who never work get to choose our leaders.

How much fairer could it be?

Tell us the answer scrat.

This country is Great Britain, if it wishes to maintain a seat of influence, it must meet its obligation with a 0.72% contribution! now bare in mind that at least £70bn is lost in revenue to tax evasion, and you must also consider the fact that British citizens have an estimate £1.3 TRILLION locked away in tax havens, all of this adds to the perspective.

This country takes more from those who work to pay for millionaire tax breaks and the clusterfuck caused by banking greed.

Those living on the poverty line suffer because of ignorance and your RWhinge stupidity.

The ruling elite get to choose the government, you follow the herd bleating inanely.

What's your solution to all your woes!,,,,you'll blame Muslims and immigrants because the truth is a tad too much for you to comprehend.

An excellent post Scrat,,,I knew a heap of money was lost due to tax evasion in this country , but I had no idea it was near as much as £70 BILLION ffs!!

The tax  loopholes which many many of the rich who have inherited money have exploited , should have been closed many, many years ago.


..I've always said that those who have inherited large amounts of money and deceived the tax man have been hiding money under their mattress and cheating the system.

SCROUNGERS!!!!

[Raggamuffin]

Hasn't the inheritance already had tax paid on it one way or another though? I think it's absurd that people have to pay again - especially if they lose the family home or whatever because they have to pay tax.

[Guest]

Fraudsters and criminals...

Look at the telly programmes on the amount of criminals who have robbed people amd avoided taxes now living in Marbella.

[Raggamuffin]

Fraudsters and criminals...

Look at the telly programmes on the amount of criminals who have robbed people amd avoided taxes now living in Marbella.

Do you mean people who have robbed banks or whatever?

I wouldn't have thought they were in a majority.   

[Ben Reilly]

In Wales,no one pays for their prescriptions,  

I would make millionaires pay alot more tax than they currently do.

Why would you do that Fluffy?

Do you not like people who earn lots of money?

Of course I don't have a problem with people who have alot of money!  But since they have plenty and there are so many in poverty if the very rich paid more tax more money could be put into helping the homeless and poverty stricken.

Very well put. It's the exact same position as the thinker we now consider the father of capitalism, Adam Smith:

"The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state."

"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich . . . . It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."

- The Wealth of Nations

[Guest]

Strange how nobody remembers that!

[Ben Reilly]

Strange how nobody remembers that!

I suspect that's because while Smith was a scientist, so many of the people who promote capitalism these days also believe in debunked things like social Darwinism   

[stardesk]

I personally don't fear any word, but on the other hand I've put a lot of time and a suffered a lot of frustration due to this board, and slurs are where I draw the line.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Ben. But isn't that partly your own fault, especially when you tell people to 'F' off. I can swear as well as the next person, but in discussion forums I don't think it's necessary. Put your self across as a nice person and you'll usually get a nice response.

Not nit-picking mate, just trying to be helpful.

PS: I'm surprised that admin can't automatically filter out rude words.

[Fluffyx]

I personally don't fear any word, but on the other hand I've put a lot of time and a suffered a lot of frustration due to this board, and slurs are where I draw the line.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Ben. But isn't that partly your own fault, especially when you tell people to 'F' off. I can swear as well as the next person, but in discussion forums I don't think it's necessary. Put your self across as a nice person and you'll usually get a nice response.

Not nit-picking mate, just trying to be helpful.

PS: I'm surprised that admin can't automatically filter out rude words.

People can think i'm sucking up to Admin if they want but infact i'm giving an honest appraisal.i have encountered admin on other forums who are personally abusive and frankly,mad.The Admin here are the fairest,most normal I have encountered.

[Guest]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Ben. But isn't that partly your own fault, especially when you tell people to 'F' off. I can swear as well as the next person, but in discussion forums I don't think it's necessary. Put your self across as a nice person and you'll usually get a nice response.

Not nit-picking mate, just trying to be helpful.

PS: I'm surprised that admin can't automatically filter out rude words.

People can think i'm sucking up to Admin if they want but infact i'm giving an honest appraisal.i have encountered admin on other forums who are personally abusive and frankly,mad.The Admin here are the fairest,most normal I have encountered.

That's always going to happen Fluffy   

Truth be told ...this is the most tolerant forum I've ever seen...

And those who make these claims know that...

Although they may or may not admit that.

[stardesk]

Agreed, our Admin are tolerant, but surely it isn't necessary to use such words as F's and C's. Freedom of speech is a great thing, but surely there should be limits to such usage in public forums. How do you think old folk or perhaps retired professional people would respond, on seeing such language? They most likely would F off and not come back. The forum, and any forum, would benefit by filtering out bad language.

[Guest]

Agreed, our Admin are tolerant, but surely it isn't necessa


ry to use such words as F's and C's. Freedom of speech is a great thing, but surely there should be limits to such usage in public forums. How do you think old folk or perhaps retired professional people would respond, on seeing such language? They most likely would F off and not come back. The forum, and any forum, would benefit by filtering out bad language.

Hey Stars, I know what you mean, but there would be so many different opinions on the issue of swear words...I think minor swear words are acceptable, we are all adults, but I still hear what you say Stars

[Guest]

Agreed, our Admin are tolerant, but surely it isn't necessary to use such words as F's and C's. Freedom of speech is a great thing, but surely there should be limits to such usage in public forums. How do you think old folk or perhaps retired professional people would respond, on seeing such language? They most likely would F off and not come back. The forum, and any forum, would benefit by filtering out bad language.

Hi Stardesk, hope you are well. Well love, I'm of a different persuasion, I wish he would tell a few other people to f... off, there are some I find very offensive.

[Guest]

Agreed, our Admin are tolerant, but surely it isn't necessary to use such words as F's and C's. Freedom of speech is a great thing, but surely there should be limits to such usage in public forums. How do you think old folk or perhaps retired professional people would respond, on seeing such language? They most likely would F off and not come back. The forum, and any forum, would benefit by filtering out bad language.

Hi Stardesk, hope you are well.   Well love, I'm of a different persuasion, I wish he would tell a few other people to f... off, there are some I find very offensive.

Sassy I completely agree, like when a posters family is dragged into it and called vile names..and abused, and you and SM have had that more than anybody...

Ben is good lad, I've always liked him and he and the entire admin here are a good bunch, but if it were up to me , I would just ban those idiots who drag posters family members into things.

Not to mention the disgusting 'kill gays' attitude of them.

And yet, they pass themselves off as god Christian people   

[TC]

Agreed, our Admin are tolerant, but surely it isn't necessary to use such words as F's and C's. Freedom of speech is a great thing, but surely there should be limits to such usage in public forums. How do you think old folk or perhaps retired professional people would respond, on seeing such language? They most likely would F off and not come back. The forum, and any forum, would benefit by filtering out bad language.

Va te faire foutre connard stupide, vous putain connard.

Il ya des choses plus importantes à penser dans le monde.

Les jurons sont un problème mineur.   

[TC]

  

[Original Quill]

Agreed, our Admin are tolerant, but surely it isn't necessary to use such words as F's and C's. Freedom of speech is a great thing, but surely there should be limits to such usage in public forums. How do you think old folk or perhaps retired professional people would respond, on seeing such language? They most likely would F off and not come back. The forum, and any forum, would benefit by filtering out bad language.

Ol' folk...y'all mean like me?  Here...'an a proff'sunal 'an all. Fuck man...I ain't heard bad language lik 'at since I was a lil' fucker meself.  Shit...my tiny ear lobes turn all hot and pink when I hear them words...ain't no aszholes here in the ole folks home what talk lik 'at an' all.

Speakin' 'o hot and pink...sur' would lik som pun'tang tho, Star.    An' a 12-piece bucket o' that KFC, wid sum cold-slaw.  Cud y'all range to hab 'at sent ova har to da home?  Ain't had none o' 'at since they tuk 'way my teefe.   

[Sponsored content]