Beautiful Kate Pulls Funny Faces For Adoring Subjects

29th May 2014

Now those are photos i'd love to own!

Aw...the lavatory face, lovely. 


Sorry Andy, but those pics just don't do her any justice!!, especially the second one chief.  

She's famous for her elegant dress sense and glossy mane but the Duchess of Cambridge was happy to show off her sillier side today, pulling a funny face for the cameras - much to the delight of one young fan.
After getting a taste of a proper Scotch single malt courtesy of the Famous Grouse Distillery earlier today, the Duke and Duchess arrived in the pretty village of Forteviot in the Scottish Highlands to a rapturous reception from Saltire and Union Jack waving locals.
Whisked off to open the village fete, the royal couple were busy meeting and greeting locals, when the Duchess happened upon a young fan waving an iPad and, laughing, wrinkled her nose for the camera.





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2642814/Kate-The-Duchess-Cambridge-pulls-funny-face-Fonteviot-village-fete.html#ixzz338Oo4R7f

she is getting on a bit now though look at her wrinkles , still she is a good laugh which is more than the other royals

That's it,,where one lacks looks, they definitely can often make up for in personality.

I think it's good that she can move her face as she usually only has one or two expressions. Good for her!

But kate is pretty and has personality i am not a royalist but i do like her and Wills .

Raggamuffin wrote:I think it's good that she can move her face as she usually only has one or two expressions. Good for her!

Stick it up your arse Ragga!

Vicar of Dibley wrote:she is getting on a bit now though look at her wrinkles , still she is a good laugh which is more than the other royals

We'll all have wrinkles one day, and she looks wonderful with them!

BigAndy9 wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:she is getting on a bit now though look at her wrinkles , still she is a good laugh which is more than the other royals

We'll all have wrinkles one day, and she looks wonderful with them!

I agree and i have wrinkles too and i look wonderful with them
I'm 50 this year  ::D:: 

Like i said she and Wills are the best royals who actually seem normal .

BigAndy9 wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:I think it's good that she can move her face as she usually only has one or two expressions. Good for her!

Stick it up your arse Ragga!

What?

Vicar of Dibley wrote:she is getting on a bit now though look at her wrinkles , still she is a good laugh which is more than the other royals

She's only 32.   

I like Pippa Middleton. I think she's a bit mischievous. Of course she wears too much eyeliner like her sister.   

BigAndy9 wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:she is getting on a bit now though look at her wrinkles , still she is a good laugh which is more than the other royals

We'll all have wrinkles one day, and she looks wonderful with them!

I think she always looks lovely but her dress sense is a bit..staid.

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:


We'll all have wrinkles one day, and she looks wonderful with them!

I agree and i have wrinkles too and i look wonderful with them
I'm 50 this year  ::D:: 

Like i said she and Wills are the best royals who actually seem normal .

They're not normal and they don't need to be - they are regal!

BigAndy9 wrote:

Vicar of Dibley wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:


We'll all have wrinkles one day, and she looks wonderful with them!

I agree and i have wrinkles too and i look wonderful with them
I'm 50 this year  ::D:: 

Like i said she and Wills are the best royals who actually seem normal .

They're not normal and they don't need to be - they are regal!

Maybe some day they'll get to meet the top of your head!

Ah. The royal princess who, according to many, many people, did not give birth to the child they called 'son'

   weird but possible

eddie wrote:Ah. The royal princess who, according to many, many people, did not give birth to the child they called 'son'

   weird but possible

Preposterous!

BigAndy9 wrote:

eddie wrote:Ah. The royal princess who, according to many, many people, did not give birth to the child they called 'son'

   weird but possible

Preposterous!

Is it?

eddie wrote:

BigAndy9 wrote:


Preposterous!

Is it?

This is a conspiracy theory I have not heard before!

How is that possible??

FluffyBunny wrote:

eddie wrote:

Is it?

This is a conspiracy theory I have not heard before!

How is that possible??

I'll find the link fluffs x

Edit: http://xi4.com/2013/07/23/royal-baby-scam-jill-dandos-murder-link-and-fiance-in-charge-of-the-scam-all-you-need-to-know-kate-was-and-has-not-been-pregnant-why-did-they-kill-the-nurse-what-a-right-royal-scam/

And then:
https://youtu.be/rftu9tY0244

eddie wrote:

FluffyBunny wrote:

This is a conspiracy theory I have not heard before!

How is that possible??

I'll find the link fluffs x

Edit: http://xi4.com/2013/07/23/royal-baby-scam-jill-dandos-murder-link-and-fiance-in-charge-of-the-scam-all-you-need-to-know-kate-was-and-has-not-been-pregnant-why-did-they-kill-the-nurse-what-a-right-royal-scam/

And then:
https://youtu.be/rftu9tY0244

Oh no I don't want to believe anything bad about baby George!