NewsFix
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Johnny VS Anber

3 posters

Go down

Johnny VS Anber Empty Johnny VS Anber

Post by gelico Wed Jun 15, 2022 6:33 pm




Did anyone here follow the court case?


if so, what are your thoughts?

gelico
Forum Detective

Posts : 1673
Join date : 2019-05-03

Back to top Go down

Johnny VS Anber Empty Re: Johnny VS Anber

Post by Tommy Monk Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:06 pm




Didn't see any of it... Sorry...



_________________
“Truth is ever to be found in the simplicity, and not in the multiplicity and confusion of things.” — Isaac Newton

'The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.'  — George Orwell
Tommy Monk
Tommy Monk
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 26292
Join date : 2014-02-12

Back to top Go down

Johnny VS Anber Empty Re: Johnny VS Anber

Post by Original Quill Thu Jun 16, 2022 4:33 pm

Of the seven-person jury, 5 were men, 2 were women.  That might have made a difference, since domestic violence tends to go along male/female lines.  A lot of domestic disputes are provoked by women, and there was strong evidence of that in this case - Amber is no delicate flower.  The jury ranged in age from people in their twenties to a person in his sixties, and were of varying ethnicities.

One juror said in a post-verdict interview that Amber was not credible - that she looked like she was faking it.  She would always turn to the jury before answering a question, as if giving a speech, and would cry on cue.  She was always crying, as if selling it.  She was an actor.  Her story was unbelievable.

These are the comments that were on this morning's news.  I don't know - the burden of proof was on Depp as plaintiff, and the question was whether she defamed him in a Washington Post Op-Ed article.  Turning it into a he said/she said/they said from the stand, seems a little off-point to me as a lawyer.  They were judging character on existential testimony, not on whether the Op-Ed that appeared in the Washington Post was defamatory.  The latter was the real question.  Finally, they must determine if Heard published each of the statements with actual malice.

Of course, truth is the essence of defamation.  So, they were allowed to go into the truth of the matter.  Basically, it was relevant.  But it seemed a little demonstrative!

https://en.as.com/latest_news/johnny-depp-vs-amber-heard-trial-how-many-jury-members-are-there-and-what-exactly-do-they-have-to-decide-n/

_________________
“Little thieves are hanged, but great thieves are praised.” — Old Russian proverb, offered by Vladimir Putin to Donald Trump, Helsinki, July, 2018.

"One Nation, under Guns, with License and Liberty to Kill." ― New pledge.

"I don't stand by anything."  ― Donald Trump, interview with John Dickerson, 5.1.17...

“That's libertarians for you — anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.” ― Kim Stanley Robinson, Green Mars (1993).

Original Quill
Forum Detective ????‍♀️

Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 57
Location : Northern California

Back to top Go down

Johnny VS Anber Empty Re: Johnny VS Anber

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum