What do we make of this? (Tommy, one for you!)

First topic message reminder :

Saw it on social media. Just thought I’d hear some opinions...feel free to research yourselves.

Well, all I can say is, the fact that you can't trust some people doesn't make you distrust everyone, does it? That's my whole point -- that you decide which media outlets are more trustworthy the same way you decide which people are more trustworthy.

Ben Reilly wrote:Well, all I can say is, the fact that you can't trust some people doesn't make you distrust everyone, does it? That's my whole point -- that you decide which media outlets are more trustworthy the same way you decide which people are more trustworthy.

And I repeat....

We, the public, shouldn’t have to play detective. We should be able to trust the people bringing us the news???

Anyhoos, this still happened,,,,

Oooh! How lovely! She looks beautiful! What a wonderful day for you all xxx

Come off it Ben...



https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm



Here it says...

"...as we prevent 3 deaths by vaccinating, we incur 2 deaths..."


And...

Thus, we need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and approximately four people will die from the consequences of being vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination, we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.


And...

The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit.