Facebook bans the far right.

First topic message reminder :

Correct decision.

BBC News - Facebook bans UK far right groups and leaders
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47974579

Perhaps Newsfix should follow their lead.

gelico wrote:


final post for the night in the hope that you can understand this

i'm not here to answer your questions

i dont give a stuff about smelly's racist joke

i don't give a stuff that he got punished in the basement for it

clear?

If you dont give a stuff, then why did you bring it up gelico?

I never asked whether you gave a stuff about his hateful view of africans. That compared them to chimps

I simple asked, whether you condemned this and yet you still refuse to do this, you pathetic little BNP wannabe

So there is many things clear here

You are a vile defender of a racist

You dont want to condemn him and you have a new religion called Tommy Robinson

If you are not here to answer  my questions, then you are nothing more than pathetic

Its a debate forum

So continue to run away and worship racist scum

Its what you do best

>THE Ben Reilly< wrote:It was obvious he was asking if anybody could tell the difference between the chimp and the black people in the video, which is a racial slur, which we don't tolerate here.

Smelly is free to say that black people are this, that and whatever, we just don't tolerate the slurs. I can cite the rule if needed.

Of course you can cite the rule if you want, you make it up as you go along

I mean, didn't you or eddie make a thread called "answer the post not the poster" did elizel bother to answer or address my post and challenge me??

Nope, he skipped over your advice and went straight to the answering the poster but, and when I say answer I mean basementing the poster

You guys gave failed your own standards

If he had of asked me I would have informed him that I was referring to the ak47 and how I couldn't tell the difference between an ak and a type 56

But nothing gets in the way of feelings round here

gelico wrote:

>THE Ben Reilly< wrote:It was obvious he was asking if anybody could tell the difference between the chimp and the black people in the video, which is a racial slur, which we don't tolerate here.

Smelly is free to say that black people are this, that and whatever, we just don't tolerate the slurs. I can cite the rule if needed.

one time hubby and me were meeting some bloke who had been asked to pass on his wages.  he was a black dude and he had grey hair and was wearing a silver grey puffer jacket at the time.

hubby pulled up and announced to the bloke that he looked like a photo negative, the bloke was like 'oh, do I' not sure he got the meaning

was that a racial slur?

we both thought it was funny

You better watch your step round here with jokes like that, we don't like unfunny jokes

smelly-bandit wrote:

>THE Ben Reilly< wrote:It was obvious he was asking if anybody could tell the difference between the chimp and the black people in the video, which is a racial slur, which we don't tolerate here.

Smelly is free to say that black people are this, that and whatever, we just don't tolerate the slurs. I can cite the rule if needed.

Of course you can cite the rule if you want, you make it up as you go along

I mean, didn't you or eddie make a thread called "answer the post not the poster" did elizel bother to answer or address my post and challenge me??

Nope, he skipped over your advice and went straight to the answering the poster but, and when I say answer I mean basementing the poster

You guys gave failed your own standards

If he had of asked me I would have informed him that I was referring to the ak47 and how I couldn't tell the difference between an ak and a type 56

But nothing gets in the way of feelings round here

Well that has got to be the biggest lie going

You never asked a comparrison on the guns

Just the humans and the chimp

Maybe he saw right through the fact you were being a vile racist

Frankly, he did the wrong thing

I would have rather made you explain the science behind your claim and watch you embarress yourself

You are free to say as you like, but I wish you would back this up with science

smelly-bandit wrote:

gelico wrote:

one time hubby and me were meeting some bloke who had been asked to pass on his wages.  he was a black dude and he had grey hair and was wearing a silver grey puffer jacket at the time.

hubby pulled up and announced to the bloke that he looked like a photo negative, the bloke was like 'oh, do I' not sure he got the meaning

was that a racial slur?

we both thought it was funny

You better watch your step round here with jokes like that, we don't like unfunny jokes

Do you find this funny smelly?



I dont

gelico wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:



From what I remember... all he said was... "can anyone tell the difference?"...


And I took it to mean... the difference between the monkey with the gun, and the couple of white soldiers in the picture...

white?  i didn't see any white soldiers.  i thought they were all black, that was the point of smelly saying, i can't tell the difference

riddle me this,,,,,

which one has the highest IQ?

A human who decides to give a loaded gun to a chimp?

A Chimp who points loaded gun at human and fires?


I say the chimp is genius level in comparison to (that particular) human

I didn't watch the video... but just saw the still image that shows before "play" is clicked...


I saw the monkey in middle of still pic... with the soldier in the background on the right looked to me like he had white/tanned looking arms and legs, and maybe had some camouflage face painted stripes on...


Like I said... I didn't watch the video... and I only glanced at the thread and still vid pic briefly...


But I thought the smelly comment was something about the difference between the chimp and the 'white' soldier... and something about them both being types of 'monkeys with guns'... one being literally a monkey trained to hold a gun, and other being a politically controlled trained monkey with a gun...


Obviously I didn't see the whole picture... and was reading a bit more into it than others...

Tommy Monk wrote:

gelico wrote:


white?  i didn't see any white soldiers.  i thought they were all black, that was the point of smelly saying, i can't tell the difference

riddle me this,,,,,

which one has the highest IQ?

A human who decides to give a loaded gun to a chimp?

A Chimp who points loaded gun at human and fires?


I say the chimp is genius level in comparison to (that particular) human

I didn't watch the video... but just saw the still image that shows before "play" is clicked...


I saw the monkey in middle of still pic... with the soldier in the background on the right looked to me like he had white/tanned looking arms and legs, and maybe had some camouflage face painted stripes on...


Like I said... I didn't watch the video... and I only glanced at the thread and still vid pic briefly...


But I thought the smelly comment was something about the difference between the chimp and the 'white' soldier... and something about them both being types of 'monkeys with guns'... one being literally a monkey trained to hold a gun, and other being a politically controlled trained monkey with a gun...


Obviously I didn't see the whole picture... and was reading a bit more into it than others...

There was no white soldiers

What picture di d you see, where there was in your imagination Tommy?

There is nothing worse when people invent lies to defend racism

You have done this and so has gelico

I can take gelico doing this, due to being naive.

She is that utterly stupid

Not a picture, you idiot... I was talking about the still image showing where the video is displayed, before you hit the play button...

Tommy Monk wrote:

Not a picture, you idiot... I was talking about the still image showing where the video is displayed, before you hit the play button...

You mean the one you made up with white people?

Was that an advert you dumb ignorant idiot?

No... just a quick glance at the still image that was showing for the video...

If you are not here to answer my questions, then you are nothing more than pathetic

Nobody told me that the purpose of being on this forum was to answer Didge's questions, otherwise we're just pathetic.

Tommy Monk wrote:

gelico wrote:


white?  i didn't see any white soldiers.  i thought they were all black, that was the point of smelly saying, i can't tell the difference

riddle me this,,,,,

which one has the highest IQ?

A human who decides to give a loaded gun to a chimp?

A Chimp who points loaded gun at human and fires?


I say the chimp is genius level in comparison to (that particular) human

I didn't watch the video... but just saw the still image that shows before "play" is clicked...


I saw the monkey in middle of still pic... with the soldier in the background on the right looked to me like he had white/tanned looking arms and legs, and maybe had some camouflage face painted stripes on...


Like I said... I didn't watch the video... and I only glanced at the thread and still vid pic briefly...


But I thought the smelly comment was something about the difference between the chimp and the 'white' soldier... and something about them both being types of 'monkeys with guns'... one being literally a monkey trained to hold a gun, and other being a politically controlled trained monkey with a gun...


Obviously I didn't see the whole picture... and was reading a bit more into it than others...

There were no men in the still.

I do take your point. Nobody commented on the stupidity of a man handing a loaded gun to a chimp.

Guest wrote:

phildidge wrote:



What I would rather gelico, is you condemn smelly for his blatant racism.

well there you are then, didge.  that's where your problem lies

i'm not here to care about what you would rather

i am here to post as i please

hope that clears things up for you

He'll never understand that.

Sorry you deleted your account.

Tommy Monk wrote:No... just a quick glance at the still image that was showing for the video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt3aLev041E

You are exposed for lying again Tommy

Why the hell don't people just put that stupid argumentative fucker on ignore?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Guest wrote:

well there you are then, didge.  that's where your problem lies

i'm not here to care about what you would rather

i am here to post as i please

hope that clears things up for you

He'll never understand that.

Sorry you deleted your account.  

Gelico got caught out trying to make light of smell's racism

She was the one that brought this up and then ducked out of defending her position

Where she clearly responded to many points

I see the girlie gang is out in force to defend her

Score

HoratioTarr wrote:Why the hell don't people just put that stupid argumentative fucker on ignore?

Ah bless, the manipulative woman, is back with her gang to stir up more hate

Priceless

Please continue to cower from me, as its what you do best

Like i say, Gelico, could not take criticism, from where she made light of smelly's racism

phildidge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

He'll never understand that.

Sorry you deleted your account.  

Gelico got caught out trying to make light of smell's racism

She was the one that brought this up and then ducked out of defending her position

Where she clearly responded to many points

I see the girlie gang is out in force to defend her

Score

She made it clear that she doesn't care what you "rather" she did. That's what you don't get - she wasn't here to please you or to explain anything to you.

HoratioTarr wrote:Why the hell don't people just put that stupid argumentative fucker on ignore?

which one??

Raggamuffin wrote:

phildidge wrote:

Gelico got caught out trying to make light of smell's racism

She was the one that brought this up and then ducked out of defending her position

Where she clearly responded to many points

I see the girlie gang is out in force to defend her

Score

She made it clear that she doesn't care what you "rather" she did. That's what you don't get - she wasn't here to please you or to explain anything to you.

Why did she continally respond to my views?

Its a debate forum and people will find difficult points raised to them

She got annoyed, because I exposed her hypocrisy in how she made light of smelly;s racism

She worships Tommy Robinson and thinks we are at war with Islam. Only the Far right propose such a warped conspiracy

So how is pointing this out, within a debate wrong, being she did make light of smelly's racism?

phildidge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

She made it clear that she doesn't care what you "rather" she did. That's what you don't get - she wasn't here to please you or to explain anything to you.

Why did she continally respond to my views?

Its a debate forum and people will find difficult points raised to them

She got annoyed, because I exposed her hypocrisy in how she made light of smelly;s racism

She worships Tommy Robinson and thinks we are at war with Islam. Only the Far right propose such a warped conspiracy

So how is pointing this out, within a debate wrong, being she did make light of smelly's racism?

It doesn't matter how much you try to defend your terrible behavior - she still didn't care what you "rather" she did.  Just accept that no matter how much you harangue someone, they're not obliged to explain anything to you.

Raggamuffin wrote:

phildidge wrote:


Why did she continally respond to my views?

Its a debate forum and people will find difficult points raised to them

She got annoyed, because I exposed her hypocrisy in how she made light of smelly;s racism

She worships Tommy Robinson and thinks we are at war with Islam. Only the Far right propose such a warped conspiracy

So how is pointing this out, within a debate wrong, being she did make light of smelly's racism?

It doesn't matter how much you try to defend your terrible behavior - she still didn't care what you "rather" she did.  Just accept that no matter how much you harangue someone, they're not obliged to explain anything to you.

So being critical of someone who is defending a racist, being racist. Is terrible behaviour now to you?

I think your moral compass is well and truely broken

She explained plenty and continued to do so

Seriously, Gelico can speak for herself, and you insult her to think you speak for her

She is not a child, so stop treating her as such eh?

Can you imagine Rags in a proper debate in public, refusing to answer points and questions?  

To then want to be on a debate forum

When people refuse to answer or back their claims. It means, they have surrendered the debate, because they know they are in the wrong.

They as seen like Gelico, who knew she had been caught out. Make poor excuses and try to deflect onto me, claiming I am incoherant.

If people want to defend that, good luck, you make yourself even more look silly

I have no doubt she is going through a rough time at the moment, then clearly she needs a break from the place, but to claim its horrible to challenge posters on their views, is nothing short os immature and quite frankly stupidity from rags

I have nothing personal against gelico, and she knows this. I actually respect her loads, but this is a place where people will have their views challenged. She and others need to accept that.

phildidge wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:


It doesn't matter how much you try to defend your terrible behavior - she still didn't care what you "rather" she did.  Just accept that no matter how much you harangue someone, they're not obliged to explain anything to you.

So being critical of someone who is defending a racist, being racist. Is terrible behaviour now to you?

I think your moral compass is well and truely broken

She explained plenty and continued to do so

Seriously, Gelico can speak for herself, and you insult her to think you speak for her

She is not a child, so stop treating her as such eh?

You called her vile and pathetic - that's abuse. You really are horrible sometimes. Now she's left because of you.

Raggamuffin wrote:

phildidge wrote:

So being critical of someone who is defending a racist, being racist. Is terrible behaviour now to you?

I think your moral compass is well and truely broken

She explained plenty and continued to do so

Seriously, Gelico can speak for herself, and you insult her to think you speak for her

She is not a child, so stop treating her as such eh?

You called her vile and pathetic - that's abuse. You really are horrible sometimes. Now she's left because of you.

After she called me incoherant, but you ignore that

I was right that it is vile and pathetic to defend someone being racist

How else would you call defending racism?

You think that is being horrible?

Again, I suggest you check your moral compass

We do not know if she left because of me, you are making assumptions

phildidge wrote:


Bing Crosby ------

He was singing about snow

Do you understand the vast difference between the song and the racist BNP Christmas card?

Well exactly. As dog whistling messages go, that particular meme is up there with the most notorious of them!

Jules wrote:

phildidge wrote:


Bing Crosby ------

He was singing about snow

Do you understand the vast difference between the song and the racist BNP Christmas card?

Well exactly. As dog whistling messages go, that particular meme is up there with the most notorious of them!

+1

And I don't care if the card is photoshopped.
The whole point of the photoshop was to spell out the hidden meaning behind those words. Cryptic messages should be explained.


ETA Thanks Didge.
Don't worry about things being quietish on here. It's a bank holiday.
Things will pick up when the likes of Syl, maddog, Cass & Sexymamma return from their breaks.

For fuck sake Didge ,have you left the forum or not ?

Jules wrote:And I don't care if the card is photoshopped.
The whole point of the photoshop was to spell out the hidden meaning behind those words. Cryptic messages should be explained.


ETA Thanks Didge.
Don't worry about things being quietish on here. It's a bank holiday.
Things will pick up when the likes of Syl, maddog, Cass & Sexymamma return from their breaks.

Indeed, they make the forum, with their different views Jules

nicko wrote:For fuck sake Didge ,have you left the forum or not ?

I am sorry, but do you want me to leave?

I am here still posting, so does that not answer your question?

Why are you so bothered?

phildidge wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:Why the hell don't people just put that stupid argumentative fucker on ignore?

Ah bless, the manipulative woman, is back with her gang to stir up more hate

Priceless

Please continue to cower from me, as its what you do best

Like i say, Gelico, could not take criticism, from where she made light of smelly's racism

Too true that, Didge...

Horatio Fartface, the troll 'Queen of Haters'..

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

phildidge wrote:

Ah bless, the manipulative woman, is back with her gang to stir up more hate

Priceless

Please continue to cower from me, as its what you do best

Like i say, Gelico, could not take criticism, from where she made light of smelly's racism

Too true that,  Didge...

Horatio Fartface,  the troll 'Queen of Haters'..

I know mate and she is nothing but a shit stirrer, touting for people to join her dead forum

She is the biggest troll on here, with her pathetic man hating gang

smelly-bandit wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:Why the hell don't people just put that stupid argumentative fucker on ignore?

which one??

How about you for starters, you racist little piece of dog vomit..

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

which one??

How about you for starters,  you racist little piece of dog vomit..

I would never ignore smelly, but he cowers from me. The last time, due to the fact he wrongly made a poor and inncorrect claim on Eilzel. He ran away with his tail between his leg and that is why smelly constantly has me on ignore, He hates me pulling him up and makes more excuses than Nixon did with Watergate.

I have never claimed to think I am always right. If i did, I would never be an athiest or have changed my views on many things

Its why the claims from smelly and co, are so  bad, its basically excuses to duck out of debating. Just as gelico, tried to poorly do here. Though, I take into account, she is going through a hard time. That does not excuse though, her trying to excuse smelly;s racism. Even worse where she relays a personal story. As if this excuses then smellys racism through comedy. Where she found funny at the expense of someone black. Thinking its her view that matters to claim whether something is racist or not. Even worse that she thinks black people have to understand her racial humour and also laugh at this. 

Come again?

In fact the story she relayed was how racism is allowed to fester. She thinks she is the bases to state what racism is to black people and being so as a white person. It had no relevance and detracted from the fact there was nothing funny in what smelly said. As its intent was pure and unadulterated racial hatred towards Africans and Gelico, as seen tried to down play this. Then took offense because she got taken to task over this.

What really happened, is that Gelico, could not take genuine criticism to her views. Where now, after she started the insults, I am being blamed for. I will wear that badge with pride, because I was never abusive to her here on this debate. I simple questioned her view, to where she downplayed smelly's racism. If that is wrong to do, then again people need to check their faulty moral compass

Didge ,I'm not bothered at all, but you remind me of the Okey-Cocy,, in out, in out .Don't know weather you shake it all about though .

nicko wrote:Didge ,I'm not bothered at all, but you remind me of the Okey-Cocy,, in out, in out .Don't know weather you shake it all about though .

No worries. You remind me of a Walter Mitty

I'v looked in the bothered pocket--------it's empty !

nicko wrote:I'v looked in the bothered pocket--------it's empty !

No problem Walter

Still want the last word I see, now fuck off,.. your boring me.

phildidge wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:


How about you for starters,  you racist little piece of dog vomit..

I would never ignore smelly, but he cowers from me. The last time, due to the fact he wrongly made a poor and inncorrect claim on Eilzel. He ran away with his tail between his leg and that is why smelly constantly has me on ignore, He hates me pulling him up and makes more excuses than Nixon did with Watergate.

I have never claimed to think I am always right. If i did, I would never be an athiest or have changed my views on many things

Its why the claims from smelly and co, are so  bad, its basically excuses to duck out of debating. Just as gelico, tried to poorly do here. Though, I take into account, she is going through a hard time. That does not excuse though, her trying to excuse smelly;s racism. Even worse where she relays a personal story. As if this excuses then smellys racism through comedy. Where she found funny at the expense of someone black. Thinking its her view that matters to claim whether something is racist or not. Even worse that she thinks black people have to understand her racial humour and also laugh at this. 

Come again?

In fact the story she relayed was how racism is allowed to fester. She thinks she is the bases to state what racism is to black people and being so as a white person. It had no relevance and detracted from the fact there was nothing funny in what smelly said. As its intent was pure and unadulterated racial hatred towards Africans and Gelico, as seen tried to down play this. Then took offense because she got taken to task over this.

What really happened, is that Gelico, could not take genuine criticism to her views. Where now, after she started the insults, I am being blamed for. I will wear that badge with pride, because I was never abusive to her here on this debate. I simple questioned her view, to where she downplayed smelly's racism. If that is wrong to do, then again people need to check their faulty moral compass

I wouldn't dream of associating you with Nazism in any way, of course, but you do sound just a bit like Adolph Hitler boasting to be the greatest military brain since Frederick the Great...just as the Russians were shelling the Reichstag.

Fred Moletrousers wrote:

phildidge wrote:


I would never ignore smelly, but he cowers from me. The last time, due to the fact he wrongly made a poor and inncorrect claim on Eilzel. He ran away with his tail between his leg and that is why smelly constantly has me on ignore, He hates me pulling him up and makes more excuses than Nixon did with Watergate.

I have never claimed to think I am always right. If i did, I would never be an athiest or have changed my views on many things

Its why the claims from smelly and co, are so  bad, its basically excuses to duck out of debating. Just as gelico, tried to poorly do here. Though, I take into account, she is going through a hard time. That does not excuse though, her trying to excuse smelly;s racism. Even worse where she relays a personal story. As if this excuses then smellys racism through comedy. Where she found funny at the expense of someone black. Thinking its her view that matters to claim whether something is racist or not. Even worse that she thinks black people have to understand her racial humour and also laugh at this. 

Come again?

In fact the story she relayed was how racism is allowed to fester. She thinks she is the bases to state what racism is to black people and being so as a white person. It had no relevance and detracted from the fact there was nothing funny in what smelly said. As its intent was pure and unadulterated racial hatred towards Africans and Gelico, as seen tried to down play this. Then took offense because she got taken to task over this.

What really happened, is that Gelico, could not take genuine criticism to her views. Where now, after she started the insults, I am being blamed for. I will wear that badge with pride, because I was never abusive to her here on this debate. I simple questioned her view, to where she downplayed smelly's racism. If that is wrong to do, then again people need to check their faulty moral compass

I wouldn't dream of associating you with Nazism in any way, of course, but you do sound just a bit like Adolph Hitler boasting to be the greatest military brain since Frederick the Great...just as the Russians were shelling the Reichstag.

Well you could not go much lower than Hitler after the Nazi'.
No worries, i am sure your adoing fans, will revel in your childish wit.
You remind me of Chamberlain, always ready to knuckle under.

No didge I won't let you draw me in the nude

Now stop obsessing over me.

Good lord, I haven't had this much attention from a stalker since 2003 when some cum trench wouldn't take the hint that she was a single use item

smelly-bandit wrote:No didge I won't let you draw me in the nude

Now stop obsessing over me.

Good lord, I haven't had this much attention from a stalker since 2003 when some cum trench wouldn't take the hint that she was a single use item

So much for having me on ignore then...

The reality is smelly, you continue to prove what a hateful racist that you are

Some idiots as seen want to defend your hatred sadly

You sadly think you are like Milo. Neither having his intelligence or wit

So seriously find your own persona  

smelly-bandit wrote:

>THE Ben Reilly< wrote:It was obvious he was asking if anybody could tell the difference between the chimp and the black people in the video, which is a racial slur, which we don't tolerate here.

Smelly is free to say that black people are this, that and whatever, we just don't tolerate the slurs. I can cite the rule if needed.

Of course you can cite the rule if you want, you make it up as you go along

I mean, didn't you or eddie make a thread called "answer the post not the poster" did elizel bother to answer or address my post and challenge me??

Nope, he skipped over your advice and went straight to the answering the poster but, and when I say answer I mean basementing the poster

You guys gave failed your own standards

If he had of asked me I would have informed him that I was referring to the ak47 and how I couldn't tell the difference between an ak and a type 56

But nothing gets in the way of feelings round here

It was me that made the thread and I always answer the post, not the poster. And you know that.

It did seem as though you were being racist and I think you actually were, I’m not sure why you’re denying it.

Didge wrote:What really happened, is that Gelico, could not take genuine criticism to her views. Where now, after she started the insults, I am being blamed for. I will wear that badge with pride, because I was never abusive to her here on this debate. I simple questioned her view, to where she downplayed smelly's racism. If that is wrong to do, then again people need to check their faulty moral compass.

No didge, she has her opinions and you have yours but what you keep failing to see is that you can’t hound someone until they see things your way. You can never just walk away and say “Fair enough, we will agree to disagree” because you think your opinions are right.
People grow tired and bored of going round in circles with you. You tell them they’re stupid because they don’t think like you.
Do you understand that as soon as you get nasty and call people names they don’t want to engage with you?

You have to look at your style of debating didge. It often leaves a lot to be desired.

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:What really happened, is that Gelico, could not take genuine criticism to her views. Where now, after she started the insults, I am being blamed for. I will wear that badge with pride, because I was never abusive to her here on this debate. I simple questioned her view, to where she downplayed smelly's racism. If that is wrong to do, then again people need to check their faulty moral compass.

No didge, she has her opinions and you have yours but what you keep failing to see is that you can’t hound someone until they see things your way. You can never just walk away and say “Fair enough, we will agree to disagree” because you think your opinions are right.
People grow tired and bored of going round in circles with you. You tell them they’re stupid because they don’t think like you.
Do you understand that as soon as you get nasty and call people names they don’t want to engage with you?

You have to look at your style of debating didge. It often leaves a lot to be desired.

You must be reading a different thread

Look at the exchange and how Gelico was the one throwing insults

I simple pulled her up on the fact she down played smellys racism

There was no nasty name calling from me

I will also do as I please when I see something wrong

So this was not a case of being right, unless of course you agree with her view to down play smelly's racism?

The reality is Gelico did not like getting taken to task over her views and its a forum to discuss said views

So I dont need to change anything. You have your style of debating and I have mine

So I am not going to back down, when someone defends the reacist actions of someone

No, she got bored of trying to say her piece and you did your usual thing where you just want someone to agree with you.
She actually said you’d bored her. People get tired of repeating themselves and you’re not good at listening sometimes.

eddie wrote:No, she got bored of trying to say her piece and you did your usual thing where you just want someone to agree with you.
She actually said you’d bored her. People get tired of repeating themselves and you’re not good at listening sometimes.  

I dont care who I bore, as I am not here to make friends, but debate.

Her first reply was abusive to me, because I challenged her defense of smelly

Im not going to listen to you, best you understand that. As again i feel strongly about racism and I will not stand down from challenging people when they defend this.

I certainly do listen to people like Eilzel and Victor. Maybe you could learn from them, as to why I do