James Bulger's Father Calls for Jon Venables' Anonymity to Be Lifted | Good Morning Britain

Thor wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

What factors? The murder was 25 years ago, and he hasn't shown any inclination that he will kill another child.

Has he not?

Show me the psychological records to prove that?

Show me the records to prove he is not a risk to children?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thor wrote:


Has he not?

Show me the psychological records to prove that?

Show me the records to prove he is not a risk to children?

Eh? You show me the records to prove that he has. You say he's a risk to children, but what are you basing that on?

Thor wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Eh? You show me the records to prove that he has. You say he's a risk to children, but what are you basing that on?

You claimed he has shown no inclination that he will kill another child, not me.

Hence show me the reports on this.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thor wrote:


You claimed he has shown no inclination that he will kill another child, not me.

Hence show me the reports on this.

You show me the report which shows he has.

I'm not getting into a circular argument with you over this. Just tell me why you think he's a risk to children.

Thor wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You show me the report which shows he has.

I'm not getting into a circular argument with you over this. Just tell me why you think he's a risk to children.

So you basically cannot back up your statement, where I can go off timeless records, on people who reoffend

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thor wrote:


So you basically cannot back up your statement, where I can go off timeless records, on people who reoffend

You have records on Venables? We're not talking about other people. Anyway, I can't be bothered with this line of argument. You've lost the plot again.

Thor wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

You have records on Venables? We're not talking about other people. Anyway, I can't be bothered with this line of argument. You've lost the plot again.

I have no need, based on people who are multiple offenders and based on their risk factor

You however made claims Rags, you cannot back up

You then turn this onto me, because you know you are making a poor argument

No worries on that

Raggamuffin wrote:

Thor wrote:


I have no need, based on people who are multiple offenders and based on their risk factor

You however made claims Rags, you cannot back up

You then turn this onto me, because you know you are making a poor argument

No worries on that

You claimed that Venables is a risk to children, but you do not base that on his convictions for child porn. You refuse to say what you're basing it on, so you have no argument left. That's fine by me - you're about to wreck the thread anyway.