Reason: Common sense, for the common good

by Guest Fri Sep 07, 2018 8:54 pm

An inside-look at the tactics of the left.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=32&v=k4q-VbAIMzU

Great piss take of the left

Laughing

by Andy Fri Sep 07, 2018 9:00 pm

You read the,Express too much.

by Guest Fri Sep 07, 2018 9:02 pm

Angry Andy wrote:You read the,Express too much.

You never even watched it did you Andy?

Come on its like listening to wolf, Veya and Quill.... Laughing

Espically the part about failed socialism, claiming its not real socialism

Where is your sense of humour mate?

lol!

by Guest Fri Sep 07, 2018 10:29 pm

''oh, Jeremy Corbyn''

Reason: Common sense, for the common good 3489511464

by 'Wolfie Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:44 am

Angry Andy wrote:

You read the,Express too much.

Let's not forget also, Andy, that the likes of Dodger, gelico, DYKnose and Ragga' have proved intellectually incapable of understanding the basic differences between autocratic communism and "democratic socialist states" on the one hand, and more equitable and successful socialist democracies on the other side..

To their rigid and regimented way of thinking, anyone to the left of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan's "free market"/supply side/"greed is good"/union-bashing philosophy, is automatically a terrorist-loving freeloading "Marxist" troublemaker.

The presenter in that video really does need to get out a bit more, and smell the roses -- and get a bit of sunshine into that pasty, unhealthy pallor or hers..

by Guest Sat Sep 08, 2018 5:23 am

ha ha ha ha

Oh dear, did someone ask the wolf to be in this video?

Oh my goodness

Wolf has to go down as the worst apologist of socialism there is

lol!

by Guest Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:30 am

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Angry Andy wrote:

You read the,Express too much.

Let's not forget also, Andy, that the likes of Dodger, gelico, DYKnose and Ragga' have proved intellectually incapable of understanding the basic differences between autocratic communism and "democratic socialist states" on the one hand, and more equitable and successful socialist democracies on the other side..

To their rigid and regimented way of thinking, anyone to the left of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan's "free market"/supply side/"greed is good"/union-bashing philosophy, is automatically a terrorist-loving freeloading "Marxist" troublemaker.

The presenter in that video really does need to get out a bit more, and smell the roses -- and get a bit of sunshine into that pasty, unhealthy pallor or hers..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcjbI6RjRTo

Laughing

by veya_victaous Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:04 am

because individual freeedom is and always was a lie
it never existed and doesn't exist

Only Dumbass dinguses are still Enthralled by that lie Razz

My God, the fools that sell their soul from the promise that 'There will be cake' Reason: Common sense, for the common good 202592697

by 'Wolfie Mon Sep 10, 2018 3:34 am

Didge still can't rationally argue his support for his "greed is good"/"stuff the workers" standpoint...

All he keeps on doing is posting those lame apologist propaganda videos for his corporatist/free market/Thatcherist overlords..

I wonder why Dodge carries so much contempt and apparent hatred towards average workers and small business owners and poor people ?

by Original Quill Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:01 am

veya_victaous wrote:because individual freeedom is and always was a lie
it never existed and doesn't exist

Only Dumbass dinguses are still Enthralled by that lie

My God, the fools that sell their soul from the promise that 'There will be cake'

I was just gonna say...

I can't believe the old world, hackneyed aphorisms he believes. It's like, circa 1949.

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:07 am

So the above two do not think they have freedoms and are enslaved

wow

I certainly have the freedom to do absolutely anything

by veya_victaous Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:25 am

Didge wrote:So the above two do not think they have freedoms and are enslaved

wow

I certainly have the freedom to do absolutely anything

I'm not totally Free

You have the Freedom to do anything you are capable of because you are Very Incapable and have little to know capacity for imagination and invention

I on the other hand prevented from doing all sorts of things.... which is probably a 'good thing' for you Razz

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:27 am

veya_victaous wrote:
Didge wrote:So the above two do not think they have freedoms and are enslaved

wow

I certainly have the freedom to do absolutely anything

I'm not totally Free

You have the Freedom to do anything you a capable of because you are Very Incapable and have little to know capacity for imagination and invention

I on the other hand prevented from doing all sorts of things.... which is probably a 'good thing' for you

The above does not actually reason anything

You simple disagree

by veya_victaous Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:29 am

Am I free to empty your bank account?

No Dingus Wink

those that are Capable are Restricted because they are too Capable

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:30 am

veya_victaous wrote:Am I free to empty your bank account?

No Dingus
those that are Capable are Restricted because they are too Capable

Yes, as again who is going to stop you?

In fact it happens all the time with people having their money taken by others

by veya_victaous Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:34 am

police... You see they would Put me in Jail and that would be the End of My Freedom Because YOU ARE NOT FREE to do anything

You mean you are free to do whatever IF you evade the Law Enforcement and Ignore all concepts of Society Rolling Eyes

Freedom is a fraudulent concept to Enthrall the Simple

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:38 am

veya_victaous wrote:police... You see they would Put me in Jail and that would be the End of My Freedom Because YOU ARE NOT FREE to do anything

You mean you are free to do whatever IF you evade the Law Enforcement and Ignore all concepts of Society

Freedom is a fraudulent concept to Enthrall the Simple

The Police have to identify you first and catch

It still means you are free to do so

Your freedom is only denied by being caught and then only for a certain lengh of time.

It may not even be investigated

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6149273/34-000-probes-dropped-Scotland-Yard-24-hours-leaving-criminals-free.html

In some cases you may even have a suspended sentence, dependent on which country you are in

In reality these laws are there to protect the rights of people, but people are still free to act in any which way they choose

by veya_victaous Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:25 am

No it doesn't, not by any definition anywhere but you moronic head
the LAW defines what you are free to do
You are not free to do something when Someone Imposes a consequence for doing it
Basic definition of freedom Rolling Eyes

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:27 am

As Veya has to resort again to abuse

As I said, if anyone atempts to start a mud slining match, I will by-pass and ignore them

I shall leave the post for any others to answer and see whether they think they have freedom to act or not.

by 'Wolfie Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:36 am

Didge wrote:
As Veya has to resort again to abuse

As I said, if anyone atempts to start a mud slining match, I will by-pass and ignore them

I shall leave the post for any others to answer and see whether they think they have freedom to act or not.

Why don't you just do it, and shut the fuck up, Dodger...

Instead of telling us every 20 minutes how you're going to grow up, change your ways, and become a good boy..

by Guest Mon Sep 10, 2018 1:21 pm

Didge wrote:As Veya has to resort again to abuse

As I said, if anyone atempts to start a mud slining match, I will by-pass and ignore them

I shall leave the post for any others to answer and see whether they think they have freedom to act or not.

To get back the debate on track

by veya_victaous Mon Sep 10, 2018 11:53 pm

there is no debate
who can debate that 'freedom is defined by the laws' .... Suspect

it is indisputable fact

You just want argue cause your a knob
THAT is not debating, Your just disagreeing with ZERO basis in reality behind your argument because You wont accept universal definition of Freedom...

Again there is no debate, Just You trying to bully people and force people to pretend accept your stupidity as fact ... or until they get sick of dealing with idiocy and walk away

This is not Abuse, this is a statement of Fact.

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 5:39 am

Didge wrote:As Veya has to resort again to abuse

As I said, if anyone atempts to start a mud slining match, I will by-pass and ignore them

I shall leave the post for any others to answer and see whether they think they have freedom to act or not.

by veya_victaous Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:15 am

Reason: Common sense, for the common good I4bCrSj

Like I said there is really NO debate Wink

@op
show them for the idiots that are ... it's not hard with right whingers Razz

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:18 am

So as seen my point still stands.

People have the freedom to act with anything

We live in one of the most free societies that there is

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:00 am

Didge wrote:So as seen my point still stands.

People have the freedom to act with anything

the point being made is that we are only as free as the law allows us to be

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:06 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:So as seen my point still stands.

People have the freedom to act with anything

the point being made is that we are only as free as the law allows us to be

Everyone is free to act, just some acts have consequences.

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:10 am

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

the point being made is that we are only as free as the law allows us to be

Everyone is free to act, just some acts have consequences.

that was exactly the point being made that you were arguing against

if an action has consequences that you dont like then it curtails your freedom somewhat

you are free to drive at 15o miles an hour while drunk but we will take away your licence and possibly lock you up means that it isn't a freedom it is a crime

if you drove at 150 miles an hour while drunk and the cops pulled you over, had a chat and then let you go on your way, that would be freedom

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:13 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Everyone is free to act, just some acts have consequences.

that was exactly the point being made that you were arguing against

if an action has consequences that you dont like then it curtails your freedom somewhat

you are free to drive at 15o miles an hour while drunk but we will take away your licence and possibly lock you up means that it isn't a freedom it is a crime

if you drove at 150 miles an hour while drunk and the cops pulled you over, had a chat and then let you go on your way, that would be freedom

That was not the point being made at all and it still fails to see that people are still free to act

Veya, claimed we do not have freedoms, when we do

So people are free to act and even if there is conseuqences you have to be caught

Even when caught, you may not even face any conseuqnces

So you are free to act. That is why murder still happens, as people are free to act.

There is simple possible consequences for some acts

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:17 am

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

that was exactly the point being made that you were arguing against

if an action has consequences that you dont like then it curtails your freedom somewhat

you are free to drive at 15o miles an hour while drunk but we will take away your licence and possibly lock you up means that it isn't a freedom it is a crime

if you drove at 150 miles an hour while drunk and the cops pulled you over, had a chat and then let you go on your way, that would be freedom

That was not the point being made at all and it still fails to see that people are still free to act

Veya, claimed we do not have freedoms, when we do

So people are free to act and even if there is conseuqences you have to be caught

Even when caught, you may not even face any conseuqnces

So you are free to act. That is why murder still happens, as people are free to act.

There is simple possible consequences for some acts

like those in North Korea are free to leave the country? Just cos they get killed if they do doesn't mean they aren't free, right?

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:19 am

veya_victaous wrote:because individual freeedom is and always was a lie
it never existed and doesn't exist

Only Dumbass dinguses are still Enthralled by that lie

My God, the fools that sell their soul from the promise that 'There will be cake'

Here is Veya first post Gelico

We certainly have laws that protect individual freedoms

He only argued this to back a view of socialism through control of individuals

Do you think you do not have freedoms Gelico?

by nicko Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:21 am

I could shoot you in the head, and i'm free to do that if I want ! Mind you i'd be arrested and charged with Murder !

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:21 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

That was not the point being made at all and it still fails to see that people are still free to act

Veya, claimed we do not have freedoms, when we do

So people are free to act and even if there is conseuqences you have to be caught

Even when caught, you may not even face any conseuqnces

So you are free to act. That is why murder still happens, as people are free to act.

There is simple possible consequences for some acts

like those in North Korea are free to leave the country? Just cos they get killed if they do doesn't mean they aren't free, right?

Well that is example of Totalitarism, where individual freedom is denied

The video was rightly showing this is what always happens with socialism

That individual freedom is denied

Veya claimed nobody has individual freedoms

That claim is false

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:24 am

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

like those in North Korea are free to leave the country? Just cos they get killed if they do doesn't mean they aren't free, right?

Well that is example of Totalitarism, where individual freedom is denied

no, they have individual freedom to leave, to do whatever they like. The fact that they have harsher consequences for certain acts than other countries doesn't make them any less free to do as they like

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:26 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Well that is example of Totalitarism, where individual freedom is denied

no, they have individual freedom to leave, to do whatever they like. The fact that they have harsher consequences for certain acts than other countries doesn't make them any less free to do as they like

They do not have individual freedom to leave, there is a huge demilitarized zone, which is protected by thousands of North Korean soldiers stopping them. If you wanted to leave tomorrow you can

The point you are missing it seems, is the video was going off how socialism always denies individual freedoms and it does

veya then claimed we do not have individual fredoms, we do

So again I ask, are you claiming you have no individual freedoms?

Are you denied the right to marry?

Have sex with your husband or partner?

Go to work?

Go to school?

Have friends?

Free speech?

Vote?

I can go on

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:32 am

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

no, they have individual freedom to leave, to do whatever they like. The fact that they have harsher consequences for certain acts than other countries doesn't make them any less free to do as they like

They do not have individual freedom to leave, there is a huge demilitarized zone, which is protected by thousands of North Korean soldiers stopping them. If you wanted to leave tomorrow you can

The point you are missing it seems, is the video was going off how socialism always denies individual freedoms and it does

veya then claimed we do not have individual fredoms, we do

So again I ask, are you claiming you have no individual freedoms?

Are you denied the right to marry?

Have sex with your husband or partner?

Go to work?

Go to school?

Have friends?

Free speech?

Vote?

I can go on

my cousin lived in socialist romania before they left and went to israel

in romania they were free to marry and go to school and have friends and go to work and go out in the evenings etc

i get what you're saying but just think veya brings a good point

by Guest Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:37 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

They do not have individual freedom to leave, there is a huge demilitarized zone, which is protected by thousands of North Korean soldiers stopping them. If you wanted to leave tomorrow you can

The point you are missing it seems, is the video was going off how socialism always denies individual freedoms and it does

veya then claimed we do not have individual fredoms, we do

So again I ask, are you claiming you have no individual freedoms?

Are you denied the right to marry?

Have sex with your husband or partner?

Go to work?

Go to school?

Have friends?

Free speech?

Vote?

I can go on

my cousin lived in socialist romania before they left and went to israel

in romania they were free to marry and go to school and have friends and go to work and go out in the evenings etc

i get what you're saying but just think veya brings a good point

I went there too, as well as Hungary, Poland as well under communism, when I played in the Croydon Youth Philharmonic.

They were not free to vote, have free speech, an education indoctrinated and many other freedoms denied

And many people I met, seriously asked me about escaping back with me

Well I do not think he has a good point, as under socialism. In history, people have been denied countless individual freedoms and we certainly have in the west many individual freedoms.

by JulesV Tue Sep 11, 2018 12:26 pm

Didge wrote:

The author should learn to spell.
Looks very unprofessional when his logo design contains a glaring & distracting typo.

by veya_victaous Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:12 am

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Well that is example of Totalitarism, where individual freedom is denied

no, they have individual freedom to leave, to do whatever they like. The fact that they have harsher consequences for certain acts than other countries doesn't make them any less free to do as they like

They do not have individual freedom to leave, there is a huge demilitarized zone, which is protected by thousands of North Korean soldiers stopping them. If you wanted to leave tomorrow you can

The point you are missing it seems, is the video was going off how socialism always denies individual freedoms and it does

veya then claimed we do not have individual fredoms, we do

So again I ask, are you claiming you have no individual freedoms?

Are you denied the right to marry?

Have sex with your husband or partner?

Go to work?

Go to school?

Have friends?

Free speech?

Vote?

I can go on

they have the SAME amount of freedom to break the law as a westerner

So your contradict your own argument Which is FINE because you were totally wrong as you have now yourself proven Wink

by 'Wolfie Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:33 am

Dodger simply keeps on confusing genuine socialism with communism and autocratic systems...

There is simply no point in even trying to debate the subject with an ignorant dolt like him, when that clueless fucker doesn't even recognise the differences between various economic systems..

His very economic ignorance is well demonstrated by the simple fact that he still believes that the sun shines out of Margaret Thatcher's long-dead arse; and that he repeatedly labels veya, Quill and me as "Marxists" and "communists".

The bullshit that Dodger keeps on spouting repeatedly on political and economic topics also brings into question his claims to degrees in history and psychology, as well as he his self-proclaimed "intellectual superiority" over everyone els around here..

by Guest Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:54 am

I am not confuising anything on socialism

I have stacks of history of socialism in practice to point this out

by Guest Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:56 am

veya_victaous wrote:
Didge wrote:

They do not have individual freedom to leave, there is a huge demilitarized zone, which is protected by thousands of North Korean soldiers stopping them. If you wanted to leave tomorrow you can

The point you are missing it seems, is the video was going off how socialism always denies individual freedoms and it does

veya then claimed we do not have individual fredoms, we do

So again I ask, are you claiming you have no individual freedoms?

Are you denied the right to marry?

Have sex with your husband or partner?

Go to work?

Go to school?

Have friends?

Free speech?

Vote?

I can go on

they have the SAME amount of freedom to break the law as a westerner

So your contradict your own argument Which is FINE because you were totally wrong as you have now yourself proven

They do have the same amount of freedom to break the law but far worse consequences

Talk to the people in concentration camps in North Korea, who are denied religious freedom, political freedom, free speech, gay rights etc

They have far less individuals freedoms than western democracies

by Guest Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:09 am

Didge wrote:
veya_victaous wrote:

they have the SAME amount of freedom to break the law as a westerner

So your contradict your own argument Which is FINE because you were totally wrong as you have now yourself proven

They do have the same amount of freedom to break the law but far worse consequences

Talk to the people in concentration camps in North Korea, who are denied religious freedom, political freedom, free speech, gay rights etc

They have far less individuals freedoms than western democracies

very true didge, but the point is that no matter what country you are in, you are only as free as the law allows you to be

by Guest Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:10 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

They do have the same amount of freedom to break the law but far worse consequences

Talk to the people in concentration camps in North Korea, who are denied religious freedom, political freedom, free speech, gay rights etc

They have far less individuals freedoms than western democracies

very true didge, but the point is that no matter what country you are in, you are only as free as the law allows you to be

You mean under that belief system Gelico

Hence back to the first point that was tried to be denied

That socialism, always needs Totalitarianism to work, except with Veya. Who thought socialism must be cool, because nobody has individual freedoms. As seen we do have many individual freedoms. It was a poor attempt to justify totalitarianism.

Hence there clearly is a difference between belief systems on individual freedoms?

by Sponsored content