Tommy Robinson arrested - yet again.

by Andy Fri May 25, 2018 11:41 am

First topic message reminder :

This time whilst on licence following his previous conviction.

Are all far right extremists this dense?

Probably.

EDL founder Tommy Robinson 'arrested filming outside grooming trial'

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/english-defence-league-founder-tommy-12594167#ICID=Android_TMNewsApp_AppShare

by Andy Tue May 29, 2018 4:27 pm

No matter how much Frau Geli bleats and whines, Robinson, or Yaxley or whatever name he is using , has GORN DOWN for 13 months.

Party time

by Guest Tue May 29, 2018 5:22 pm

gelico wrote:
WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

What a load of empyty bullshit opinions...

Once again gelico shows her odious neo-nazi leanings.

except they are not opinions they are facts, you utter dullard!

it was live streamed for one and half hours so it was all seen.

did your brain cell commit suicide through loneliness and despair?

It seems Tommy does not agree with you

Robinson sentenced to 13 months after admitting offence following Facebook broadcast

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/29/edl-founder-tommy-robinson-jailed-13-months

Ex-EDL leader Tommy Robinson jailed at Leeds court

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44287640

Robinson got 10 months for contempt of court and a further three months for breaching the terms of a previous suspended sentence.

https://news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-ex-leader-of-english-defence-league-jailed-for-breaching-court-orders-11389226

The reality is Gelico, you should be condemning Tommy. As now its very possible he has provided ammuntion to the defence team of the suspects of the 3 ongoing trials to have their cases dropped, through prejudice. If those cases collapse. It will be directly down to Tommy's complete irresponsibility.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:15 am

Angry Andy wrote:This time whilst on licence following his previous conviction.

Are all far right extremists this dense?

Probably.

EDL founder Tommy Robinson 'arrested filming outside grooming trial'

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/english-defence-league-founder-tommy-12594167#ICID=Android_TMNewsApp_AppShare

you just broke the law with that post and even discussion the case until yesterday when reporting restrictions were removed.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:19 am

Raggamuffin wrote:He's a rebel isn't he? He likes being in the news, and he's drawing attention to the grooming gangs.

he was a fool for getting himself arrested when he did not have to. there is a reason that the 3 trials have reporting restrictions and he put all 3 trials in jeopardy by thinking he was above the law.

However people who wrote about the story before yesterday are getting visits from plod as we speak.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:20 am

Didge wrote:I do not care whether Tommy Robinson is arrested or not

What I care about is how disingenuous he is.

He claims to care about the victims of child sex abuse

Where on earth is he, to the multitude of child sex crime court cases that are not grooming gangs?

Yes, we need to openly speak about the problems of grooming gangs, espcially within the South Asian community, but all Tommy is doing is trying to exploit these crimes to sow the seeds of hate.

How many of the victims, has he actually gone to visit and speak too?

Seriously?

What you have to understand here is what motivates people and what motivates Tommy is a deep centered hate.

If Tommy really cared, then he would go to the victims and actually champion their cause. He does not do that.

So I do not care how many cops it took tackle him. I was once a footie thug, but grew up. Tommy has not and still wants attention.

he is told about grooming gangs by the people affected.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:22 am

Didge wrote:P.S.

We know it was criminal how grooming gangs were covered up by the Police, social services and councils and to me, they should all be prosecuted for these crimes. Yet this is now well known and documented. So what is Tommy really fighting for here, when many cases have been brought to trial?
He is only attending active trials, not suspect cases is he?

So people need to ask themselves what his motivation really is?

Have they?

I very much doubt it and as seen Tommy is emphatically hateful. That is beyond dispute and is easily backed up by the fact he cares only for himself and his beliefs. He cares fuck all for the victims of child abuse. All he cares about is pushing his own agenda.

I am all for free speech, but what is Tommy there for at the trials exactly and why does he need to excercize his free speech there and at every grooming case?

Again ask yourself?

Should he have been arrested?

No, but he is afirst class twat, period and a hateful twat at that.

these gangs have been operating for decades. Only 300 or so have faced prosecution so far. That is the tip of the iceberg.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:22 am

nicko wrote:Why were the Photographers who were outside the courts when Saville and Rolph Harris were being tried not arrested ?

they weren't tried because there were no reporting restrictions on those trials. there were no reporting restrictions because the trial was not split into 3

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:26 am

Didge wrote:
nicko wrote:Why were the Photographers who were outside the courts when Saville and Rolph Harris were being tried not arrested ?

Well were they there to take photo's mate?

What was Tommy there for?

Is he now a photographer?

you missed the point. They photographed and published because there was no reporting restrictions. tommy published when there were. there are reporters and members of the public in the trials that are happening now, but none of them can publish anything until october when the last trial finishes.

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 9:31 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:I do not care whether Tommy Robinson is arrested or not

What I care about is how disingenuous he is.

He claims to care about the victims of child sex abuse

Where on earth is he, to the multitude of child sex crime court cases that are not grooming gangs?

Yes, we need to openly speak about the problems of grooming gangs, espcially within the South Asian community, but all Tommy is doing is trying to exploit these crimes to sow the seeds of hate.

How many of the victims, has he actually gone to visit and speak too?

Seriously?

What you have to understand here is what motivates people and what motivates Tommy is a deep centered hate.

If Tommy really cared, then he would go to the victims and actually champion their cause. He does not do that.

So I do not care how many cops it took tackle him. I was once a footie thug, but grew up. Tommy has not and still wants attention.
he is told about grooming gangs by the people affected.

So does that mean he then can break the law on onging trials?

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 9:32 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:P.S.

We know it was criminal how grooming gangs were covered up by the Police, social services and councils and to me, they should all be prosecuted for these crimes. Yet this is now well known and documented. So what is Tommy really fighting for here, when many cases have been brought to trial?
He is only attending active trials, not suspect cases is he?

So people need to ask themselves what his motivation really is?

Have they?

I very much doubt it and as seen Tommy is emphatically hateful. That is beyond dispute and is easily backed up by the fact he cares only for himself and his beliefs. He cares fuck all for the victims of child abuse. All he cares about is pushing his own agenda.

I am all for free speech, but what is Tommy there for at the trials exactly and why does he need to excercize his free speech there and at every grooming case?

Again ask yourself?

Should he have been arrested?

No, but he is afirst class twat, period and a hateful twat at that.
these gangs have been operating for decades. Only 300 or so have faced prosecution so far. That is the tip of the iceberg.

What has that got to do with Tommy knowingly breaking the restrictions on filiming such trials. Which is not only stupid, but places such trials in jeopardy?

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 9:33 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Well were they there to take photo's mate?

What was Tommy there for?

Is he now a photographer?
you missed the point. They photographed and published because there was no reporting restrictions. tommy published when there were. there are reporters and members of the public in the trials that are happening now,
but none of them can publish anything until october when the last trial finishes.

Yes there is many reporters at the trial, but who are restricted on reporting anything until the trials are finished

Or did you not know that?

i suggest you stop reading too much into Rebel TV, Breibart and Fox news for your info mate

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:36 am

nicko wrote:As far as I know he was trying to draw attention to Muslim Pedo's who seem to be untouchable in a lot of cases. The Police seem keen to ignore Muslim offences as they know arresting one will cause a riot.
That's my take on it according to reports in the Media.Perhaps i'm wrong, I don't know !

HE was not, he was identifying defendants, who are innocent until proven guilty, as they walked into court. The live stream is available on youtube. He breaks the reporting restrictions in the very first minute of the stream. He also says during the stream that he is likely to be nicked for this so he could not even argue that he did not know what he was doing.
amongst the 10000 people watching the live stream there would have ben coppers watching as well and when he broke the restrictions they would have kicked it upstairs for approvals and he was arrested and hour and 15 minutes after the broadcast started. He was arrested under breach of the peace which if you read what that is seems to qualify as it could be said he was inciting his watchers. However his legal team might want to make something out of that at any appeal. what is incontrovertible is that the contempt was apparent in the live stream and there is little chance he could get off that charge which is why he plead guilty to reduce the sentence to 10 months rather than the possible maximum of 2 years. the trial judge was quite within his rights to try him there and then and there is no requirement for a jury.
He has a 13 month sentence because he was already on a 3month suspended sentence for a previous contempt at another grooming trial .
His passion for getting grooming gangs is his downfall and got him both sentences. He has no one to blame but himself.
The one dimensional football thug image presented by the media and the left is just that one dimensional. If you watch any of his interviews with various people, Muslims included, he is streets away from that.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:39 am

Raggamuffin wrote:The point is that he was probably arrested for being Tommy Robinson. It irrelevant what people think of him personally.

not true at all, people are being visited by the cops as we speak for breaking the reporting restrictions on this trial and tommys case. anyone in the UK is in contempt for reporting any details of the trials and up until yesterday, tommy's case. I know of at least one person on twitter who was visited by the cops yesterday

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 9:39 am

What does the above matter about his image or not?

He was warned at the last trial, that if the did this again, he would go to jail

He did it again, breaking the restrictions of the trial. Doing so with the upmost irresponsibility

And people are crying like babbies, because he again got his just deserves

When are people going to understand he broke the law

Not once but twice on such restrictions

He is not above the law

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:45 am

gelico wrote:

the judge ordered a media blackout over TR's arrest

it's all very strange from what I hear

how many signatures does it take for a change.org petition to be presented and discussed in parliament?

anyone know?

he did and you just broke it by discussing it. that petition could have a billion sigs and it would not have to be discussed in parliament as it is not the parliamentary petition site. The petition itself is stupid as it is calling for the PM to release him, last time I looked we had not become a banana republic yet where el presidente has control over who goes to prison or not.
Most of the people who are arguing tommys corner probably do not have a clue why he was arrested, and when told do not care.
the biggest winner from this will probably be the defendants who's legal team will be scouring social media to find a way to argue for dismissal or a retrial.
the 3 girls case was almost lost because the groomers tried to orchestrate something similar.

Tommy Robinson arrested - yet again. - Page 2 Nazir_10

Tommy Robinson arrested - yet again. - Page 2 Nazir_10

This whole issue is being manipulated by people who have their own agenda and that agenda may have little to do with Tommy himself.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:49 am

gelico wrote:
Vintage wrote:You need the support of five people for it to be submitted, then 10,000 signatures will get you a reply and 100,000 to have the subject debated.

thanks vin

this petition must have been started when the news broke (on social media not via MSM). Tommy Robinson arrested for breach of the peace (even though video evidence shows clearly that there was not a breach of the peace at all). Yet he went before a judge and was immediately found guilty of ''contempt of court'' and sentenced to 13 months in jail

meanwhile his london solicitor contacted Leeds police to make arrangements to come down but they lied and told her there was no need as he was being released, then they took him into coourt with a useless duty solicitor.

the judge has also ordered a total media blackout on this

there was a demo outside parliament yesterday

so far there is over 200,000 signatures within the last 36 hours or so. He is garnering support from some very unexpected quarters.

Think the establishment may have overstepped the mark a bit too much here

his own legal team would have been incompetent if they told him to plead not guilty .He is banged to rights with the live stream .

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 9:50 am

Angry Andy wrote:Robinson is an extreme far right racist Nazi thug. Of course the police and security services monitor him and are all over him when he steps out of line.
As they do with extreme far left and extreme militant Muslims.

Rightly so.

they are probably monitoring you as well as you have broken the reporting restrictions as well.

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 9:56 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Angry Andy wrote:Robinson is an extreme far right racist Nazi thug. Of course the police and security services monitor him and are all over him when he steps out of line.
As they do with extreme far left and extreme militant Muslims.

Rightly so.
they are probably monitoring you as well as you have broken the reporting restrictions as well.

Rubbish, he made no point on the trial case

Speaking about Tommy, does not conflict with the trial itself, which is why the judge released the media ban. After the Independent sought a lift of the restriction. As they argued many misleading accounts were circulating

To put the record straight

Or did you not know that either, that it was the main press that sought a lifting on the restrictions of Tommy being jailed?

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:05 am

gelico wrote:Gerard Batten MEP
‏
Verified account

@GerardBattenMEP
Follow Follow @GerardBattenMEP
More
Tommy Robinson latest: UKIP Peer Malcolm Lord Pearson has written to Home Secretary Sajid Javid today saying : if Tommy is murdered or injured in prison he and others will mount a private prosecution against Mr Javid as an accessory, or for misconduct in public office.

I saw a report earlier that he had indeed been 'injured' while in jail and was being treated for said injuries. No further info

yes this image
Tommy Robinson arrested - yet again. - Page 2 Tommybruised2

has been doing the rounds after claims he was attacked by 4 Muslims and sent to hull hospital were made .
however that image is from 2011 when he was attacked by a gang on asians and beaten unconscious.
i found it on this site after a one click search after seeing it on twitter yesterday
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/12/breaking-tommy-robinson-attacked-by.html

I am sorry to say Mr Batten appears to be using this case for his own ends as he is presumably an intelligent man who is perfectly capable of understanding the law and this case, but he chooses not to.
He has made several tweets about the case which follow the police state line.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:06 am

nicko wrote:Meanwhile Muslims can march in their hundreds [thousands]?screaming vile threats and threatening to behead anyone who dares to insult Allah,waving placards saying Muslims will rule the Earth, and the Police protect them !

one doesn't justify the other

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:07 am

gelico wrote:

this has now turned into an international incident

the judge ordered a media blackout on the imprisonment of TR

threatened journalists with jail if they reported on this

they lied to his solicitor

it is being discussed outside of UK though

Geet Wilders has waded in

Its in American media

Protest rallys in Australia

and despite the media crackdown on this, there is now over 300k petition signatures on this

something weird about it all being done in secret

yes and ask yourself who benefits from this?

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:08 am

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Take your pick

https://www.google.co.uk/search?safe=off&ei=ffQLW6aYOuqUgAbiyI-4Ag&q=tommy+robinson+&oq=tommy+robinson+&gs_l=psy-ab.12..35i39k1l2j0i131k1l3j0l2j0i131k1j0j0i67k1.270645.270645.0.273318.1.1.0.0.0.0.190.190.0j1.1.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.1.190....0.v1WF9R_pZtE

that is about his initial arrest

not the fact that he got 13 months jail in a 3 minute hearing

why did they lie to his solicitor

why did the judge order the press not to report on the fact that he was jailed?

there is absolutely no reason for the secrecy

3 months for the suspended sentence and 10 months for the current contempt. Had he pleaded not guilty he could have got 2 years.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:13 am

nicko wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong Quill. But those defendants going into Court had already been found guilty and were going in to receive their sentences, there fore anything that Tommy would do would be of no account because it could not change the verdict of the Court ?

I have been arguing with people on twitter for three days about the point that the restrictions apply to all 3 trials that end in october.
It's not a hard concept to understand. there are 29 defendants, the judge decided to split the trial into 3, all 3 trials deal with the same cases. Reporting on one could influence another and help defendants get off.

In october everyone will get to hear every sordid detail of these trials. this is not a blackout on Muslim trials. It is a blackout to ensure the victims get the justice they deserve.

this trial was not blacked out and was reported only last month
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-39580591

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:35 am

Didge wrote:
nicko wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong Quill. But those defendants going into Court had already been found guilty and were going in to receive their sentences, there fore anything that Tommy would do would be of no account because it could not change the verdict of the Court ?

Yes he is, because the trial has not finished and he was filming

Again victims/witnesses could be there, that have a right of anonymity.

Again, one of the conditions of his suspended sentence, was not to do this again

He did it again and is rightly now in jail

actually you are wrong. The blackout is in place until october when the last trial, which starts in february ends.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:38 am

Raggamuffin wrote:He's been arrested, he hasn't been convicted, so it's not an automatic jail sentence.

he was tried by the trial judge of the case that was ongoing. That is perfectly legal. there is a page on contempt on wiki if you want the easier version.He was tried and convicted quickly that is true, but a judge CAN jail you immediately if you commit contempt in a courtroom .

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:39 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Yes he is, because the trial has not finished and he was filming

Again victims/witnesses could be there, that have a right of anonymity.

Again, one of the conditions of his suspended sentence, was not to do this again

He did it again and is rightly now in jail
actually you are wrong. The blackout is in place until october when the last trial, which starts in february ends.

Where did I deny the blackout was until oct?

never did cathy Newman

I clearly said the trial had not finished, did I not?

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:39 am

gelico wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:He's been arrested, he hasn't been convicted, so it's not an automatic jail sentence.

hi raggs

he was arrested for breach of the peace, despite that not happening at all.

they took him off and told his solicitor and his camerman that he was being released when they enquired.

then they took him straight to court and he was jailed for 13 months

not for breach of the peace which was what he was arrested for but for contempt of court

he was not on court precincts
he did not shout abuse at anyone
he did not film any witnesses or relatives
he did not claim them to be guilty (he always said alleged)
the court case was actually finished and they were there to get the verdict
no one could have been influenced in anyway

it was a clear set up

not only was he jailed but the judge immediately ordered a media blackout on this and threatened journalists there with jail if they reported anything.

Read the breach of the peace page on wiki. The defendant does not have to be involved if he is sown to be inciting others. He was broadcasting to 10000 people and has over a 1/4million subscribers. That will be where they get the incitement aspect from.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:41 am

Angry Andy wrote:No matter how much Frau Geli bleats and whines, Robinson, or Yaxley or whatever name he is using , has GORN DOWN for 13 months.

Party time

as you could for having reported it whilst reporting restrictions were in place. Remember you are not anonymous on here.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:42 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
these gangs have been operating for decades. Only 300 or so have faced prosecution so far. That is the tip of the iceberg.

What has that got to do with Tommy knowingly breaking the restrictions on filiming such trials. Which is not only stupid, but places such trials in jeopardy?

about as much as your hatred for him for only pursuing Muslim grooming cases.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:43 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
you missed the point. They photographed and published because there was no reporting restrictions. tommy published when there were. there are reporters and members of the public in the trials that are happening now,
but none of them can publish anything until october when the last trial finishes.

Yes there is many reporters at the trial, but who are restricted on reporting anything until the trials are finished

Or did you not know that?

i suggest you stop reading too much into Rebel TV, Breibart and Fox news for your info mate

fuck me you could argue in an empty room

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:44 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
you missed the point. They photographed and published because there was no reporting restrictions. tommy published when there were. there are reporters and members of the public in the trials that are happening now,
but none of them can publish anything until october when the last trial finishes.

Yes there is many reporters at the trial, but who are restricted on reporting anything until the trials are finished

Or did you not know that?

i suggest you stop reading too much into Rebel TV, Breibart and Fox news for your info mate

I suggest you actually read what is posted instead of believing you are the only one who understands the trial.
you obviously didn't as you were posting about it whilst restrictions were in place.

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:45 am

Didge wrote:What does the above matter about his image or not?

He was warned at the last trial, that if the did this again, he would go to jail

He did it again, breaking the restrictions of the trial. Doing so with the upmost irresponsibility

And people are crying like babbies, because he again got his just deserves

When are people going to understand he broke the law

Not once but twice on such restrictions

He is not above the law

bloody hell your hatred to the guy throws out all rationality doesn't it. you are little better than handy andy and the rest of the vile left

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:46 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Yes there is many reporters at the trial, but who are restricted on reporting anything until the trials are finished

Or did you not know that?

i suggest you stop reading too much into Rebel TV, Breibart and Fox news for your info mate
I suggest you actually read what is posted instead of believing you are the only one who understands the trial.
you obviously didn't as you were posting about it whilst restrictions were in place.

Well maybe you should read mine before posting, as I have covered everything you have state, bar the claim on Tommy being beaten up

You obviously didnt did you

Again that has been lifted and makes no difference what I posted

Or did you also not know that?

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:47 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
they are probably monitoring you as well as you have broken the reporting restrictions as well.

Rubbish, he made no point on the trial case

Speaking about Tommy, does not conflict with the trial itself, which is why the judge released the media ban. After the Independent sought a lift of the restriction. As they argued many misleading accounts were circulating

To put the record straight

Or did you not know that either, that it was the main press that sought a lifting on the restrictions of Tommy being jailed?

he reported it. Can you not see the thread title? you do understand what reporting restrictions mean dont you?
Why do you think no media reported it until yesterday

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:48 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
actually you are wrong. The blackout is in place until october when the last trial, which starts in february ends.

Where did I deny the blackout was until oct?

never did cathy Newman

I clearly said the trial had not finished, did I not?

Yes he is, because the trial has not finished and he was filming

there

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:48 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:What does the above matter about his image or not?

He was warned at the last trial, that if the did this again, he would go to jail

He did it again, breaking the restrictions of the trial. Doing so with the upmost irresponsibility

And people are crying like babbies, because he again got his just deserves

When are people going to understand he broke the law

Not once but twice on such restrictions

He is not above the law
bloody hell your hatred to the guy throws out all rationality doesn't it. you are little better than handy andy and the rest of the vile left

So me saying he is irresponsible, makes you think I hate him

I dont cathy Newman

I think he is an idiot and glad he has gone to jail

He does support ffar right veiws and a belief that Islam is taking over the west. Which is very paranoid and goes beyond criticism of Islam

To go on about videos, where I have watched them also, shows he has simple polished his performances

He is still very much of the view to stop Muslim immigration

If you cannot see that, then you are very blind indeed

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:49 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
I suggest you actually read what is posted instead of believing you are the only one who understands the trial.
you obviously didn't as you were posting about it whilst restrictions were in place.

Well maybe you should read mine before posting, as I have covered everything you have state, bar the claim on Tommy being beaten up

You obviously didnt did you

Again that has been lifted and makes no difference what I posted

Or did you also not know that?

I have but to be honest you have not been the least bit objective in your posts have you.

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:49 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Rubbish, he made no point on the trial case

Speaking about Tommy, does not conflict with the trial itself, which is why the judge released the media ban. After the Independent sought a lift of the restriction. As they argued many misleading accounts were circulating

To put the record straight

Or did you not know that either, that it was the main press that sought a lifting on the restrictions of Tommy being jailed?
he reported it. you do understand what reporting restrictions mean dont you?
Why do you think no media reported it until yesterday

Yes I very much understand them

as again what did he say that would have caused a problem to the trial?

Nothing

Try again Cathy

by Andy Wed May 30, 2018 10:50 am

Head spamming here because his own sad forum has all but died?

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:50 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Where did I deny the blackout was until oct?

never did cathy Newman

I clearly said the trial had not finished, did I not?
Yes he is, because the trial has not finished and he was filming

there

Show me where I denied this Cathy?

Did I not say the trial was not finished?

Yes or no?

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:51 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Well maybe you should read mine before posting, as I have covered everything you have state, bar the claim on Tommy being beaten up

You obviously didnt did you

Again that has been lifted and makes no difference what I posted

Or did you also not know that?
I have but to be honest you have not been the least bit objective in your posts have you.

Oh my Cathy, did I say was objective?

I know Tommy's views very well and am a critic of islam myself, but he goes well beyond that

Or did you not know that either Cathy?

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 10:57 am

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

except they are not opinions they are facts, you utter dullard!

it was live streamed for one and half hours so it was all seen.

did your brain cell commit suicide through loneliness and despair?

It seems Tommy does not agree with you

Robinson sentenced to 13 months after admitting offence following Facebook broadcast

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/29/edl-founder-tommy-robinson-jailed-13-months

Ex-EDL leader Tommy Robinson jailed at Leeds court

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44287640

Robinson got 10 months for contempt of court and a further three months for breaching the terms of a previous suspended sentence.

https://news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-ex-leader-of-english-defence-league-jailed-for-breaching-court-orders-11389226

The reality is Gelico, you should be condemning Tommy. As now its very possible he has provided ammuntion to the defence team of the suspects of the 3 ongoing trials to have their cases dropped, through prejudice. If those cases collapse. It will be directly down to Tommy's complete irresponsibility.

he had little choice but to plead guilty as the evidence is obvious in his stream, had he not then he would likely got 2 years

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 10:59 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

It seems Tommy does not agree with you

Robinson sentenced to 13 months after admitting offence following Facebook broadcast

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/29/edl-founder-tommy-robinson-jailed-13-months

Ex-EDL leader Tommy Robinson jailed at Leeds court

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44287640

Robinson got 10 months for contempt of court and a further three months for breaching the terms of a previous suspended sentence.

https://news.sky.com/story/tommy-robinson-ex-leader-of-english-defence-league-jailed-for-breaching-court-orders-11389226

The reality is Gelico, you should be condemning Tommy. As now its very possible he has provided ammuntion to the defence team of the suspects of the 3 ongoing trials to have their cases dropped, through prejudice. If those cases collapse. It will be directly down to Tommy's complete irresponsibility.
he had little choice but to plead guilty as the evidence is obvious in his stream, had he not then he would likely got 2 years

You mean, he would have been an idiot if he had pleaded not guilty

I mean who gives a stuff really

He is nothing more than an idiot and irresponsible, that could have placed this trials having to have a re-trial

Do you think he should get sympathy for such stupditym, where he cares more about his own ego than the actual victims?

because if he cared for the victims, he would not have filmed the trial, after already being warned previously when on trial

by The Devil, You Know Wed May 30, 2018 11:22 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
he had little choice but to plead guilty as the evidence is obvious in his stream, had he not then he would likely got 2 years

You mean, he would have been an idiot if he had pleaded not guilty

I mean who gives a stuff really

He is nothing more than an idiot and irresponsible, that could have placed this trials having to have a re-trial

Do you think he should get sympathy for such stupditym, where he cares more about his own ego than the actual victims?

because if he cared for the victims, he would not have filmed the trial, after already being warned previously when on trial

have I said or intimated he should get sympathy for this arrest?

by Guest Wed May 30, 2018 11:24 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

You mean, he would have been an idiot if he had pleaded not guilty

I mean who gives a stuff really

He is nothing more than an idiot and irresponsible, that could have placed this trials having to have a re-trial

Do you think he should get sympathy for such stupditym, where he cares more about his own ego than the actual victims?

because if he cared for the victims, he would not have filmed the trial, after already being warned previously when on trial
have I said or intimated he should get sympathy for this arrest?

Never claimed you did and hence why I asked you a question on this. Why I am stating he has got what has been coming to him

His ego is bigger than the need to ensure justice happens for the victims of grooming gangs

by The Devil, You Know Thu May 31, 2018 10:00 am

for those suffering from hard of thinking syndrome this explains the situation succinctly
https://thesecretbarrister.com/2018/05/25/what-has-happened-to-poor-tommy-robinson/

by The Devil, You Know Thu May 31, 2018 10:03 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
he reported it. you do understand what reporting restrictions mean dont you?
Why do you think no media reported it until yesterday

Yes I very much understand them

as again what did he say that would have caused a problem to the trial?

Nothing

Try again Cathy

reporting of his arrest was a breach of the order.

by The Devil, You Know Thu May 31, 2018 10:09 am

Didge wrote:
The Devil, You Know wrote:
have I said or intimated he should get sympathy for this arrest?

Never claimed you did and hence why I asked you a question on this. Why I am stating he has got what has been coming to him

His ego is bigger than the need to ensure justice happens for the victims of grooming gangs

no of course you didn't
Tommy Robinson arrested - yet again. - Page 2 Didge_10

by Guest Thu May 31, 2018 10:44 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Never claimed you did and hence why I asked you a question on this. Why I am stating he has got what has been coming to him

His ego is bigger than the need to ensure justice happens for the victims of grooming gangs
no of course you didn't

Thanks the question mark is even clear in your shot

Its a question, plain and simple

by Guest Thu May 31, 2018 10:45 am

The Devil, You Know wrote:
Didge wrote:

Yes I very much understand them

as again what did he say that would have caused a problem to the trial?

Nothing

Try again Cathy
reporting of his arrest was a breach of the order.

Really, when its been lifted, and argued to lift did not effect the case

I think you have tuiedc yourself up in knots over this

by Sponsored content