UK, France and US join in military strikes on Syria that feel good

by Original Quill Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:19 am

First topic message reminder :

Once again we are gong to bomb Syria in response to Assad's use of chemical weapons on his own people. Trump announces that it will be an open-ended commitment. A new war? To what end? Last year, in April, we proved that deterrence does not work. We bombed cornfields beside an airstrip, as a warning. No result. They did it again last Saturday, April 7th.

Clearly, deterrence doesn't work. The military realizes this. So, this can only be punitive...and Trump says it's "open-ended". Let's think about this: WE ARE GOING TO WAR, POSSIBLY FOR THE NEXT 15-YEARS, NO DOUBT COMMITTING ANOTHER $17-TRILLION, TO PUNISH BAD GUYS, WHO WON'T BE PUNISHED. Does that make sense? Russians warn of potential for retaliation; Syria positions its assets close to Russians.

No deterrence. No punishment. What can this be all about? Perhaps EGO's? Like masturbation...it just feels good! Evil or Very Mad

BTW, it's clearly illegal. It's in clear violation of Art. I of the US Constitution. More impeachment material??

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:13 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:It took over 100 missiles to bomb three buildings? That doesn't sound very efficient.

85

Sounds perfect to me and it worked very well

by Original Quill Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:23 pm

Business Insider wrote:The US fired more than 118 missiles at Syria in coordinated response to suspected chemical weapons attack
Tara Francis Chan
Apr. 13, 2018, 11:52 PM

* The US fired more than 118 missiles in "precision strikes" on Syria on Friday night.

* Defense Secretary James Mattis said the number of weapons used was "a little over double" that of a 2017 air strike on Syria which involved 59 Tomahawk missiles.

* If Tomahawk missiles were used, the minimum weapons cost of the Friday strike would be $165 million.

The US fired more than 118 missiles on Syria on Friday in precision strikes that were fired in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack last weekend.

US Defense Secretary James Mattis confirmed that the US used more than twice as many missiles as it did in a 2017 strike on Syria's Sharyat Airbase on April 7, 2017. That attack used 59 Tomahawk missiles, and was ordered by Failing Cheeto-Faced Ferret-Wearing Shit Gibbon, who said the action was in response to a chemical attack three days earlier.

"We used a little over double the number of weapons this year than we used last year," Mattis said on Friday.

"We were very precise and proportionate, but at the same time it was a heavy strike," he said.

It's unclear yet what weapons were used. But if the Raytheon-produced Tomahawk missiles, which have an estimated cost of $1.4 million each, were used in Friday's strike, that puts the minimum weapons cost at $165.2 million.

Friday's strike was launched in retaliation for a suspected chemical weapons attack last Saturday which killed dozens of people, and injured scores more.

Shortly after the attack, Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron agreed to a "strong, joint response" if it was found the attack believed to be made by Assad's regime used a chemical weapon. UK Prime Minister Theresa May reportedly also spoke with Trump this week.

France and the UK have joined the US military operation.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-us-syria-strike-how-many-missiles-were-fired-2017-2018-4

Think of how $165-million would have contributed to healthcare in this nation!!

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:28 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:It took over 100 missiles to bomb three buildings? That doesn't sound very efficient.

85

Sounds perfect to me and it worked very well

That was just from the US. There were more than that. It sounds highly inefficient to me.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:31 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

85

Sounds perfect to me and it worked very well

That was just from the US. There were more than that. It sounds highly inefficient to me.

Wrong on every point

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:35 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

That was just from the US. There were more than that. It sounds highly inefficient to me.

Wrong on every point

You're the one who doesn't know how many missiles were fired, and you're the one who thinks it should take that many to wreck three buildings. That makes you wrong.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:37 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

Wrong on every point

You're the one who doesn't know how many missiles were fired, and you're the one who thinks it should take that many to wreck three buildings. That makes you wrong.

It was 85 fired in total

It does take many, to destroy 3 facilities

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:38 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

You're the one who doesn't know how many missiles were fired, and you're the one who thinks it should take that many to wreck three buildings. That makes you wrong.

It was 85 fired in total

It does take many, to destroy 3 facilities

Wrong.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:43 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

It was 85 fired in total

It does take many, to destroy 3 facilities

Wrong.

Prove me wrong then ?

by Original Quill Sun Apr 15, 2018 4:51 pm

There may have been the Israelis mixed in there too.

HOT AiR wrote:Okay, Which One Of You Jokers Fired The Missiles At Syria?
JAZZ SHAWPosted at 8:01 am on April 9, 2018

Less than 24 hours ago I was saying that we should probably get ready for some sort of retaliatory strike against Syria following their latest alleged chemical weapons attack. Last night some missiles did apparently strike that country in the vicinity of the city of Homs, killing at least 14 people. One revealing nugget of information coming out in the hours immediately following the strike is that the dead were probably all Iranians or members of groups supporting Iran in Syria. (Fox News)

Airstrikes on Monday reportedly killed 14 people, including Iranians, at a military airport near the city of Homs shortly after a suspected chemical attack that killed at least 40 people in a suburb of the capital city, Damascus, over the weekend.

Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, says most of the 14 killed were either Iranians or members of Iran-backed groups

It was not immediately clear which country launched the strikes. The report on SANA said the attack on the T4 military airbase “is likely to be an American aggression.”

That brings us to the $64,000 question: who launched the attack? The Syrians are blaming us, and to be fair, it wasn’t an implausible claim in the moments following the missile strikes. But the White House is saying we didn’t do it. And based on the description of the damage and casualties, it doesn’t really look like an American attack. If this was Trump launching his “immediate action” in response to Assad’s chemical weapons attack, I’d expect that we’d see a rain of cruise missiles hitting a site suspected of chemical weapons storage and some stealth bombers dropping massive bunker-busters. This was some sort of direct, air-to-surface conventional missile attack from the sounds of it.

So if it wasn’t us, who was it? Some are blaming Israel and it’s not really a crazy suggestion. (More from Fox)

Al-Manar TV station of Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah group, which is fighting in Syria alongside the government forces, described the attack as an “Israeli aggression.”

The Observatory says it wasn’t immediately clear who was behind the attack…

Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, says most of the 14 killed were either Iranians or members of Iran-backed groups.

Why isn’t it unreasonable to think it might have been the Israelis? The Homs airbase was the same airfield that Israeli warplanes struck back in February. That attack was prompted by an Iranian drone crossing over into Israeli airspace. It’s a target that’s obviously within easy reach for Israel and there’s no love lost between them and Assad.

But if it was an Israeli attack, completely justified though it may be, we’re left with the questions of why now and how did the plan for this unfold so quickly? Was it in retaliation for the chemical weapons attack or was this perhaps something that Israel had already been planning anyway because of the friction with Iran. (Remember, as noted above, the attack took out Iranian forces, not the Syrians.) Still, Bibi Netanyahu must have realized that any attack last night would toss gasoline on the fire surrounding the recent chemical attacks.

But whether it was pre-planned or a rapid response, would Isreal strike without consulting Trump first? That sounds unlikely in the extreme. We’re their number one military partner and defender. Keep in mind that all the White House has said thus far is that it wasn’t an American attack. That doesn’t mean that we didn’t know about it. But if that’s the case and Israel was responsible, somebody is going to have to fess up pretty quickly and it will become obvious that we were in the loop. Why not just announce it straight away and take credit for hitting the tyrant?

Having Russia, Turkey and Iran involved in the mix makes all of this horribly complicated. At this point, the only way to blunt any fallout from last night’s attack would probably be to launch one of our own. Buckle up, kids. This is turning into an epic crapstorm at a rapid pace.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/04/09/okay-one-jokers-fired-missiles-syria/

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:01 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Wrong.

Prove me wrong then ?

Quill already did that. Take a cursory glance at the news and you'll see.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:09 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

Prove me wrong then ?

Quill already did that. Take a cursory glance at the news and you'll see.

has he?

Dont think so

Try again

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:10 pm

Funniest thing I have ever seen, Quill using a Conservative psuedo website

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Air

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:16 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Quill already did that. Take a cursory glance at the news and you'll see.

has he?

Dont think so

Try again

Don't get upset because you've been caught lying yet again.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:24 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

has he?

Dont think so

Try again

Don't get upset because you've been caught lying yet again.

Have I lied?

It seems you are upset fatty

Laughing

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:28 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Don't get upset because you've been caught lying yet again.

Have I lied?

It seems you are upset fatty

Yes, you have lied and now you're upset, pervert.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:33 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

Have I lied?

It seems you are upset fatty

Yes, you have lied and now you're upset, pervert.

Can you show how I have lied?

Or are you unblae to get through the newsfix door?

Razz

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:41 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Yes, you have lied and now you're upset, pervert.

Can you show how I have lied?

Or are you unblae to get through the newsfix door?

Can you prove there were 85 missiles, or are you too busy perving?

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:45 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

Can you show how I have lied?

Or are you unblae to get through the newsfix door?

Can you prove there were 85 missiles, or are you too busy perving?

hang on, you claimed i was lying

Over to you fatty

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:46 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Didge wrote:

Can you show how I have lied?

Or are you unblae to get through the newsfix door?

Can you prove there were 85 missiles, or are you too busy perving?

perving? is that what we're calling binge drinking now?

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:53 pm

gelico wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Can you prove there were 85 missiles, or are you too busy perving?

perving? is that what we're calling binge drinking now?

Oh now I see, so apparantly, where i do not drink, you claim I am binge drinking

Well, it proves what new low levels of disinformation you do stoop to Gelico

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:57 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

perving? is that what we're calling binge drinking now?

Oh now I see, so apparantly, where i do not drink, you claim I am binge drinking

stop lying, you drunken old fool

can't stand lying drunks like you

you're pathetic

go see a psychiatrist rather than coming on here off your skull

by Raggamuffin Sun Apr 15, 2018 5:59 pm

Didge wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Can you prove there were 85 missiles, or are you too busy perving?

hang on, you claimed i was lying

Over to you fatty

You are lying. Over to you, pervert.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:00 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Oh now I see, so apparantly, where i do not drink, you claim I am binge drinking

stop lying, you drunken old fool

can't stand lying drunks like you

you're pathetic

go see a psychiatrist rather than coming on here off your skull

Well considering I have not had an alcoholic drink in years, it proves you are an idiot

You though continue to post crap and disinformation from white supremacist sources

So at least there is evidence to what i claim on you

You though are making unfounded accusations to divert from the fact you are a vile racist low life

How about you go and meet some ethnically diverse people and stop being a racist C u nt

by Original Quill Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:01 pm

Didge wrote:Funniest thing I have ever seen, Quill using a Conservative psuedo website

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Air

I knew that when I wrote that post. There was a bit of mirth in my posting the point. Sometimes you want to go to the other wall, especially if the point is relatively neutral and it conforms to what others (including you) are saying.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:02 pm

Original Quill wrote:
Didge wrote:Funniest thing I have ever seen, Quill using a Conservative psuedo website

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Air

I knew that when I wrote that post. Sometimes you want to go to the other wall, especially if the point is relatively neutral and it conforms to what others (including you) are saying.

hmmm, okay, no worries mate

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:03 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

stop lying, you drunken old fool

can't stand lying drunks like you

you're pathetic

go see a psychiatrist rather than coming on here off your skull

Well considering I have not had an alcoholic drink in years, it proves you are an idiot

yeah, yeah, you can stop with the silly lies

pathetic old piss head you are

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:09 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Well considering I have not had an alcoholic drink in years, it proves you are an idiot

yeah, yeah, you can stop with the silly lies

pathetic old piss head you are

Oh dear, again, I have given you so many chances to admit you were wrong. Like with the claims on Clinton and you avoid doing so. Which says to me, you still believe the fake news on this.

You seriously are one hell of a warped and fucked up insecure individual, that buys into so much conspiracy bullshit

Stop allowing fear to lead and control your life

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:12 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

yeah, yeah, you can stop with the silly lies

pathetic old piss head you are

Stop allowing fear to lead and control your life

stop with the sly secret drinking and then trying to lie about it

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:14 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Stop allowing fear to lead and control your life

stop with the sly secret drinking and then trying to lie about it

I dont have any secrets and tell people of importance what happens in my life

The fact I have told Ben, Eddie and Victor things that are going on, shows, that you are of zero importance to me

So they are not secrets, you are just not considered a friend to know what is going on in my life and alcohol plays no part of this

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:17 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

stop with the sly secret drinking and then trying to lie about it
I dont have any secrets and tell people of importance what happens in my life

people of importance? on a chat forum? you sad fuck! LOLOL

The fact I have told Ben, Eddie and Victor things that are going on, shows, that you are of zero importance to me

aw, now I'm feeling all sad and left out (NOT)

So they are not secrets, you are just not considered a friend to know what is going on in my life and alcohol plays no part of this

alcohol completely rules your life, you lying little pisshead

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:22 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:
I dont have any secrets and tell people of importance what happens in my life

people of importance? on a chat forum? you sad fuck! LOLOL

The fact I have told Ben, Eddie and Victor things that are going on, shows, that you are of zero importance to me

aw, now I'm feeling all sad and left out (NOT)

So they are not secrets, you are just not considered a friend to know what is going on in my life and alcohol plays no part of this

alcohol completely rules your life, you lying little pisshead

No cancer of my prostrate rules my life at the moment and radiotherapy has not worked

Surgery is the next option

I do not drink Gelico, I just have to deal with this in my life. As well as my 26 year old Niece who has Luekemia and is under going Chemo. With on top of that my best friends daughter, who is 19 has a heart and lung disease called primary pulmonary hypertension. Basically a death sentence and she is on borrrowed time, unless she has a heart and lung transplant.

Now I have told you why at times I get angry and it has nothing to do with drink, because believe me, there is nothing more than what I would love to do right now, is have a drink, but I am disciplined and dont

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:24 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

alcohol completely rules your life, you lying little pisshead

No cancer of my prostrate rules my life at the moment and radiotherapy has not worked

Surgery is the next option

I do not drink Gelico, I just have to deal with this in my life. As well as my 26 year old Niece who has Luekemia and is under going Chemo. With on top of that my best friends daughter, who is 19 has a heart and lung disease called primary pulmonary hypertension. Basically a death sentence and she is on borrrowed time, unless she has a heart and lung transplant.

Now I have told you why at times I get angry and it has nothing to do with drink, because believe me, there is nothing more than what I would love to do right now, is have a drink, but I am disciplined and dont

i am so not interested in hearing you babble on about your sob stories

we all have shit to deal with

grow up

pisshead

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:27 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

No cancer of my prostrate rules my life at the moment and radiotherapy has not worked

Surgery is the next option

I do not drink Gelico, I just have to deal with this in my life. As well as my 26 year old Niece who has Luekemia and is under going Chemo. With on top of that my best friends daughter, who is 19 has a heart and lung disease called primary pulmonary hypertension. Basically a death sentence and she is on borrrowed time, unless she has a heart and lung transplant.

Now I have told you why at times I get angry and it has nothing to do with drink, because believe me, there is nothing more than what I would love to do right now, is have a drink, but I am disciplined and dont

i am so not interested in hearing you babble on about your sob stories

we all have shit to deal with

grow up

pisshead

You call actual real life problems sob stories

I shall leave others to judge you on those views

I dont hate you Gelico, i am just constantly disappointed you buy into such poor false information

That is why i get angry, as I do care about you

If that is how you feel, no worries, I may not be around much longer for you to worry about anyway, if things dont go right for me with the surgery

by Tommy Monk Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:27 pm

http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nigel-farage/callers-powerful-plea-for-left/

I listened to the show from about 10.30 to 12.00... and there were many interesting points raised...

One of the callers was a field marshal and a Lord... can't remember his name... but he was very doubtful of Syrian govt forces being responsible...

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:35 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

i am so not interested in hearing you babble on about your sob stories

we all have shit to deal with

grow up

pisshead

You call actual real life problems sob stories

They are when you only use them to try to justify your drinking, your anger, and your abusive behaviour YES! I am also going through some real heavy shit right now but I don't find it necessary to come on here and take it out on other people.

I shall leave others to judge you on those views

How fortunate for me then that I don't give a shit about others judging me

I dont hate you Gelico, i am just constantly disappointed you buy into such poor false information

best get used to disappointment then, cos I'm damn sure I ain't changing my views just to keep you happy

That is why i get angry, as I do care about you

You don't even know me IRL you muppet

If that is how you feel, no worries, I may not be around much longer for you to worry about anyway, if things dont go right for me with the surgery

I've never worried about you before so I hardly think I'm likely to start now

All the best

lots of love

from the racist, white supremacist scum that I am

xxxx

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:42 pm

Again i do not drink gelico and do not need to justify that I do not

Again my anger is directed at your gullability to lies on the web and how even worse your are not sorry for promoting disinformation

I am sorry you are going through a bad time

The problem is Gelico, you do not even try to use the very same skeptism you have to things you buy into. It shows what is faulty with your beliefs.

I mean take the recent video you posted

I proved it was an actual play and not once did you admit to your error. That means to me, you are fanatical in your beliefs and that does worry and concern me. Even I can be wrong and have been wrong at times. Its why I have over time changes some of my views

I hope you can get your problems resolved, but as you continue to buy into white supremacist conspiracy sites, then you will always remain an immature gullible idiot.

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:44 pm

Didge wrote:Again i do not drink gelico and do not need to justify that I do not

Again my anger is directed at your gullability to lies on the wen and how even worse your are not sorry for promoting disinformation

I am sorry you are going through a bad time

The problem is Gelico, you do not even try to use the very same skeptism you have to things you buy into. It shows what is faulty with your beliefs.

I mean take the recent video you posted

I proved it was an actual play and not once did you admit to your error. That means to me, you are fanatical in your beliefs and that does worry and concern me. Even I can be wrong and have been wrong at times. Its why I have over time changes some of my views

I hope you can get your problems resolved, but as you continue to buy into white supremacist conspiracy sites, then you will always remain an immature gullible idiot.

all i saw was blah blah blah.

here's something to cheer you up though

enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wE5rhZa2L4

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:47 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:Again i do not drink gelico and do not need to justify that I do not

Again my anger is directed at your gullability to lies on the wen and how even worse your are not sorry for promoting disinformation

I am sorry you are going through a bad time

The problem is Gelico, you do not even try to use the very same skeptism you have to things you buy into. It shows what is faulty with your beliefs.

I mean take the recent video you posted

I proved it was an actual play and not once did you admit to your error. That means to me, you are fanatical in your beliefs and that does worry and concern me. Even I can be wrong and have been wrong at times. Its why I have over time changes some of my views

I hope you can get your problems resolved, but as you continue to buy into white supremacist conspiracy sites, then you will always remain an immature gullible idiot.

all i saw was blah blah blah.

here's something to cheer you up though

enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wE5rhZa2L4

Here is something right up your street

Try not to masterbate to much eh

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:59 pm

Didge wrote:
gelico wrote:

all i saw was blah blah blah.

here's something to cheer you up though

enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wE5rhZa2L4

Here is something right up your street

Try not to masterbate to much eh

there is no such thing as too much masterbation[/quote]

by Guest Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:03 pm

gelico wrote:
Didge wrote:

Here is something right up your street

Try not to masterbate to much eh

there is no such thing as too much masterbation

[/quote]

Are you sure?

How about this?

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 16, 2018 11:47 am

Tommy Monk wrote:
http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nigel-farage/callers-powerful-plea-for-left/

I listened to the show from about 10.30 to 12.00... and there were many interesting points raised...

One of the callers was a field marshal and a Lord... can't remember his name... but he was very doubtful of Syrian govt forces being responsible...

Lord West just on BBC news saying he doubts very much that Syria govt did any chemical attack last weekend... Also saying that the terrorist video is not credible...

by Guest Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:49 pm

Another one doubting countless evidence from the left

Stunning that Tommy keeps using lefties as his case.

Lets see what the OPCW comes up with shall we?

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:29 pm

What evidence...?

All there is, is a propaganda video produced by terrorists...!!!

by Guest Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:17 pm

Russia said a visit by chemical weapons inspectors to the site of a suspected gas attack in Syria's Douma today had been delayed as a result of Western air strikes. The British delegation to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said Russia and Syria had not yet allowed access.
But Dmitry Peskov, Vladimir Putin's spokesman, said: 'We consider such accusations against Russia to be groundless,' adding that Moscow was in favour of 'an impartial investigation'.

The British delegation said in a statement posted on Twitter: 'Unfettered access [is] essential. Russia and Syria must cooperate.'

Britain's ambassador to the OPCW also said Russian assertions about why a team of inspectors had so far been unable to reach Douma were incorrect.

Russian officials have said that the inspectors were unable to reach Douma because they had not been cleared by the United Nations and because of US-led strikes carried out on targets in Syria on Saturday prevented them.

But Ambassador Peter Wilson said at a news conference in The Hague that the United Nations had cleared the inspectors to go, and they had been unable to reach Douma because Syria and Russia had been unable to guarantee their safety.

Earlier, Russia vowed not to interfere in the work of a fact-finding mission sent to Syria by OPWC.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5620863/Russia-Syria-block-chemical-weapons-inspectors-team-accessing-site-Douma-gas-attack.html#ixzz5CrBl6hZY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Clearly stalling, so they can cover up the evidence

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:47 pm

They want to go into a terrorist controlled zone... to try to verify the terrorists claim in the video that the terrorists produced... so why don't they just go there under the protection of the terrorists there, who must be happy for them to come and see the 'evidence'...!?

by Guest Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:52 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

They want to go into a terrorist controlled zone... to try to verify the terrorists claim in the video that the terrorists produced... so why don't they just go there under the protection of the terrorists there, who must be happy for them to come and see the 'evidence'...!?

The area is under Syrian and Russian control.

As not long after the attack, the rebels negotiated with Russia to leave and withddraw.

That is how effected the use of chemical weapons are by Assad and why he used them

They have just shown their hand here by delaying the OPCW

And you need more evidence, even after the French provided evidence

wow

by Guest Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:53 pm

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-france-intellige/french-declassified-intelligence-report-on-syria-gas-attacks-idUSKBN1HL0N1

by eddie Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:00 pm

I’ve read through this thread and would like to just ask that we all be kind to each other as we have no idea what someone else is going through.

Thank you beautiful people.

by magica Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:28 pm

Totally agree Eds, have a greeny.

by Tommy Monk Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:30 pm

Didge wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:

They want to go into a terrorist controlled zone... to try to verify the terrorists claim in the video that the terrorists produced... so why don't they just go there under the protection of the terrorists there, who must be happy for them to come and see the 'evidence'...!?

The area is under Syrian and Russian control.

As not long after the attack, the rebels negotiated with Russia to leave and withddraw.

That is how effected the use of chemical weapons are by Assad and why he used them

They have just shown their hand here by delaying the OPCW

And you need more evidence, even after the French provided evidence

wow

REALLY...!!!???

Any evidence for that claim either...!!!???

by Sponsored content