Lilly Allen: I'm Sorry for Spreading Anti-Tory Fake News

https://order-order.com/2018/01/17/lily-allen-im-sorry-spreading-fake-news/

She should delete the original, unless her thinking is that deleting it would look like she's trying to act like she never wrote it.

Totally understand her guilt over her role in spreading a lie. Good for her.

Ben Reilly wrote:She should delete the original, unless her thinking is that deleting it would look like she's trying to act like she never wrote it.

Totally understand her guilt over her role in spreading a lie. Good for her.

You really are not up to speed on this women are you?

This is just one in a line of dumb things she says and as seen she has not deleted this.

I bet in a few days she deletes her apology though, when this blows over

She's a nut job, wagging her tongue and criticising everyone, yet does nothing herself.

Poor little rich girl.

Lilly Allen supposedly has "countless young fans", hanging off and strongly influenced by her loopy tweets ???

Methinks some over-imaginative reporter is having a bit of a wank there, in the O/P..

She's a fucking idiot.

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:She should delete the original, unless her thinking is that deleting it would look like she's trying to act like she never wrote it.

Totally understand her guilt over her role in spreading a lie. Good for her.

You really are not up to speed on this women are you?

This is just one in a line of dumb things she says and as seen she has not deleted this.

I bet in a few days she deletes her apology though, when this blows over

Well, she may be embarrassed but decided to leave the tweet so that she doesn't seem to be trying to sweep the whole thing under the rug. Deleting tweets is for people trying to cover their ass, not correct the record. Same with a news organization -- you don't delete an article you got wrong, you append a correction to it.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:


You really are not up to speed on this women are you?

This is just one in a line of dumb things she says and as seen she has not deleted this.

I bet in a few days she deletes her apology though, when this blows over

Well, she may be embarrassed but decided to leave the tweet so that she doesn't seem to be trying to sweep the whole thing under the rug. Deleting tweets is for people trying to cover their ass, not correct the record. Same with a news organization -- you don't delete an article you got wrong, you append a correction to it.

Its not an article though

And she has deleted plenty of tweets where she has made an arse of herself

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/lily-allen-causes-more-drama-9637948

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/multi-millionaire-lily-allen-sparks-11639904


So why did she delete those tweets and not this one?

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:


You really are not up to speed on this women are you?

This is just one in a line of dumb things she says and as seen she has not deleted this.

I bet in a few days she deletes her apology though, when this blows over

Well, she may be embarrassed but decided to leave the tweet so that she doesn't seem to be trying to sweep the whole thing under the rug. Deleting tweets is for people trying to cover their ass, not correct the record. Same with a news organization -- you don't delete an article you got wrong, you append a correction to it.

Its not an article though

And she has deleted plenty of tweets where she has made an arse of herself

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/lily-allen-causes-more-drama-9637948

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/multi-millionaire-lily-allen-sparks-11639904


So why did she delete those tweets and not this one?

I honestly don't give a shit, I was just offering a possible explanation.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Its not an article though

And she has deleted plenty of tweets where she has made an arse of herself

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/lily-allen-causes-more-drama-9637948

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/multi-millionaire-lily-allen-sparks-11639904


So why did she delete those tweets and not this one?

I honestly don't give a shit, I was just offering a possible explanation.

Contradiction alert

So much for your nice post the other night, whats up grumpy?

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Its not an article though

And she has deleted plenty of tweets where she has made an arse of herself

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/lily-allen-causes-more-drama-9637948

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/multi-millionaire-lily-allen-sparks-11639904


So why did she delete those tweets and not this one?

I honestly don't give a shit, I was just offering a possible explanation.

Contradiction alert

So much for your nice post the other night, whats up grumpy?

It's very poor of you to decide that you know I'm grumpy simple because I gave a brief response. Think through why I might have said that.

Take your time.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Contradiction alert

So much for your nice post the other night, whats up grumpy?

It's very poor of you to decide that you know I'm grumpy simple because I gave a brief response. Think through why I might have said that.

Take your time.

Your contradiction and more to the point, it was because I easily rubbished your reply with evidence. That you became very agitated. Hence your flippant reply.

So what is up grumpy?

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Contradiction alert

So much for your nice post the other night, whats up grumpy?

It's very poor of you to decide that you know I'm grumpy simple because I gave a brief response. Think through why I might have said that.

Take your time.

Your contradiction and more to the point, it was because I easily rubbished your reply with evidence. That you became very agitated. Hence your flippant reply.

So what is up grumpy?

You simple didn't take enough time.

Take your time.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Your contradiction and more to the point, it was because I easily rubbished your reply with evidence. That you became very agitated. Hence your flippant reply.

So what is up grumpy?

You simple didn't take enough time.

Take your time.

No, I was right the first time

So what is up grumpy?

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Your contradiction and more to the point, it was because I easily rubbished your reply with evidence. That you became very agitated. Hence your flippant reply.

So what is up grumpy?

You simple didn't take enough time.

Take your time.

No, I was right the first time

So what is up grumpy?

Simple put, poor. Take your time.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

No, I was right the first time

So what is up grumpy?

Simple put, poor. Take your time.

Oh I was very much correct, there is another post where you seem to have paranoia on another thread.

head never accused you of being like Hilter or Stalin, he simple said "did not the Nazi's and Communists have approved news media"

You seem very agitated tonight

So what is up grumpy?

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

No, I was right the first time

So what is up grumpy?

Simple put, poor. Take your time.

Oh I was very much correct, there is another post where you seem to have paranoia on another thread.

head never accused you of being like Hilter or Stalin, he simple said "did not the Nazi's and Communists have approved news media"

You seem very agitated tonight

So what is up grumpy?

Poor take simple put time your.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Oh I was very much correct, there is another post where you seem to have paranoia on another thread.

head never accused you of being like Hilter or Stalin, he simple said "did not the Nazi's and Communists have approved news media"

You seem very agitated tonight

So what is up grumpy?

Poor take simple put time your.

Maybe you should have a lie down?

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Oh I was very much correct, there is another post where you seem to have paranoia on another thread.

head never accused you of being like Hilter or Stalin, he simple said "did not the Nazi's and Communists have approved news media"

You seem very agitated tonight

So what is up grumpy?

Poor take simple put time your.

Maybe you should have a lie down?

SIMPLE TAKE PUT TIME POOR YOUR!

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Maybe you should have a lie down?

SIMPLE TAKE PUT TIME POOR YOUR!

No need to shout dear, its not my fault, you do not like been shown wrong in your assumtpions

As adequately seen here

All you had to do was a little research to see she is a prolific deleter of things she has said on twitter

So what is up Grumpy?

Not able to admit you were mistaken here?

Take as long as you like to think on that

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Maybe you should have a lie down?

SIMPLE TAKE PUT TIME POOR YOUR!

No need to shout dear, its not my fault, you do not like been shown wrong in your assumtpions

As adequately seen here

All you had to do was a little research to see she is a prolific deleter of things she has said on twitter

So what is up Grumpy?

Not able to admit you were mistaken here?

Take as long as you like to think on that

Oh man, thanks. You know, I think I simple felt really pressed for time. I appreciate you allowing me all the time I need.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

No need to shout dear, its not my fault, you do not like been shown wrong in your assumtpions

As adequately seen here

All you had to do was a little research to see she is a prolific deleter of things she has said on twitter

So what is up Grumpy?

Not able to admit you were mistaken here?

Take as long as you like to think on that

Oh man, thanks. You know, I think I simple felt really pressed for time. I appreciate you allowing me all the time I need.

No worries, you seem to be struggling tonight

Like I said, takes as long as you like

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

No need to shout dear, its not my fault, you do not like been shown wrong in your assumtpions

As adequately seen here

All you had to do was a little research to see she is a prolific deleter of things she has said on twitter

So what is up Grumpy?

Not able to admit you were mistaken here?

Take as long as you like to think on that

Oh man, thanks. You know, I think I simple felt really pressed for time. I appreciate you allowing me all the time I need.

No worries, you seem to be struggling tonight

Like I said, takes as long as you like

You are such an admirable person. I'm sorry I was acting so poor.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

No worries, you seem to be struggling tonight

Like I said, takes as long as you like

You are such an admirable person. I'm sorry I was acting so poor.

Makes a change from how you think I have no friends on here. Though I did laugh at your playground trash talk lol

Are you Dr Jekyll?

Russel Crow does a good impression of you in the 2017 film "The Mummy"

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:

Its not an article though

And she has deleted plenty of tweets where she has made an arse of herself

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/lily-allen-causes-more-drama-9637948

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/multi-millionaire-lily-allen-sparks-11639904


So why did she delete those tweets and not this one?

I honestly don't give a shit, I was just offering a possible explanation.

Contradiction alert

So much for your nice post the other night, whats up grumpy?

It's very poor of you to decide that you know I'm grumpy simple because I gave a brief response. Think through why I might have said that.

Take your time.

You know, this will go right over his head. He simple doesn’t see it no matter how much time he takes hence your poor judgement here.

This is the day Eddie finally and sadly lost the ability of free thinking.

She sadly joined the "yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full shackle club.

May her free thinking mind, rest in peace.

Amen

Didge wrote:This is the day Eddie finally and sadly lost the ability of free thinking.

She sadly joined the "yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full shackle club.

May her free thinking mind, rest in peace.

Amen

Thank you! It’s awfully nice when someone prays for your mind. Is this something you do regularly as an atheist?

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:This is the day Eddie finally and sadly lost the ability of free thinking.

She sadly joined the "yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full shackle club.

May her free thinking mind, rest in peace.

Amen

Thank you! It’s awfully nice when someone prays for your mind. Is this something you do regularly as an atheist?

You are welcome, but are you allowed to say thank you, did you get permission?

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:This is the day Eddie finally and sadly lost the ability of free thinking.

She sadly joined the "yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full shackle club.

May her free thinking mind, rest in peace.

Amen

Thank you! It’s awfully nice when someone prays for your mind. Is this something you do regularly as an atheist?

You are welcome, but are you allowed to say thank you, did you get permission?

Permission from whom? Get to the point didge - no need take your time.

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


You are welcome, but are you allowed to say thank you, did you get permission?

Permission from whom? Get to the point didge - no need take your time.  

Like I said, your free thinking mind is dead

I just thinking its funny how you constantly jump in and defend Ben, when he cocked up here and then got flippant

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


You are welcome, but are you allowed to say thank you, did you get permission?

Permission from whom? Get to the point didge - no need take your time.  

Like I said, your free thinking mind is dead

I just thinking its funny how you constantly jump in and defend Ben, when he cocked up here and then got flippant

Yeah, I kinda figured that the jokes went right over your head. You don’t even rexognise your own words.

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:

Like I said, your free thinking mind is dead

I just thinking its funny how you constantly jump in and defend Ben, when he cocked up here and then got flippant

Yeah, I kinda figured that the jokes went right over your head. You don’t even rexognise your own words.  

And mine went completely over both your head it seems

Of course I saw he was poorly trying to mimic me, hence why I took the piss back.

Like I said, your free thinking mind is clearly dead

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:

Like I said, your free thinking mind is dead

I just thinking its funny how you constantly jump in and defend Ben, when he cocked up here and then got flippant

Yeah, I kinda figured that the jokes went right over your head. You don’t even rexognise your own words.  

And mine went completely over both your head it seems

Of course I saw he was poorly trying to mimic me, hence why I took the piss back.

Like I said, your free thinking mind is clearly dead

Yeah. Right on.

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


And mine went completely over both your head it seems

Of course I saw he was poorly trying to mimic me, hence why I took the piss back.

Like I said, your free thinking mind is clearly dead

Yeah. Right on.

Thanks, I know I am here

Didge. You know I think I need to make myself clear: Before any relationship occurred between Ben and myself, I still went with his rules because as one of his mods - my role was and still is, to help him run this site.  
Our relationship on here is separate from any personal closeness.
Our co-working relationship, on our current and future books, is another separate one.
If you think for one moment that he and I sit in agreement on every single thing then you don’t know either of us hotheads very well! Do you think we don’t have heated debates about subjects like we always did amd always will? Jesus. We are two very unique and indicudual thinkers - who happen to dig each other quite a lot - but we are still two individuals.  
Evolution is a hotly debated topic quite frequently between us - nothing has changed.  We are still the same two people you have always seen on here.

If I disagree with him, or vice versa, we would say so.

I’m not sure why you wouldn’t understand that.

eddie wrote:Didge. You know I think I need to make myself clear: Before any relationship occurred between Ben and myself, I still went with his rules because as one of his mods - my role was and still is, to help him run this site.  
Our relationship on here is separate from any personal closeness.
Our co-working relationship, on our current and future books, is another separate one.
If you think for one moment that he and I sit in agreement on every single thing then you don’t know either of us hotheads very well! Do you think we don’t have heated debates about subjects like we always did amd always will? Jesus. We are two very unique and indicudual thinkers - who happen to dig each other quite a lot - but we are still two individuals.  
Evolution is a hotly debated topic quite frequently between us - nothing has changed.  We are still the same two people you have always seen on here.

If I disagree with him, or vice versa, we would say so.

I’m not sure why you wouldn’t understand that.

Ha ha never laughed so much in all my life

Like I said, your free thinking mind is clearly dead

In the past, you would have been one of the first up in arms over his idea to ban websites

Would I? I don’t know if that’s true because it never happened before and like you always say, as humans we should learn from our mistakes and listen to those who have more knowledge. I certainly wouldn’t debate history with anyone as it’s not an area I know at all.
Likewise, some media links are suspect - I’ve put up a link here a few months back that Ben pulled me up on (it might even have been infowars come to think of it).

It’s all rather beside the point didge anyway, because you often seem to think you know what I’m thinking and doing, for some weird reason.

eddie wrote:Would I? I don’t know if that’s true because it never happened before and like you always say, as humans we should learn from our mistakes and listen to those who have more knowledge. I certainly wouldn’t debate history with anyone as it’s not an area I know at all.
Likewise, some media links are suspect - I’ve put up a link here a few months back that Ben pulled me up on (it might even have been infowars come to think of it).

It’s all rather beside the point didge anyway, because you often seem to think you know what I’m thinking and doing, for some weird reason.

Well for one the Daily wire is not suspect, which is the point and we are having to take the left leaning bias view on Ben on this, who is not listening to anyone.

The further problem here, is there is an unblanced moderation team, again very left leaning. So his influnce on this is again biased.

I very much doubt he is a balanaced and fair sports writer, based on him thinking the Daily wire is a fake news site, that is for sure.

I am happy you are both together, but as seen you lacked neutrailty on this very thread. Which is no bother. At the end of the day, he made the error here, thinking he was being smart and it backfired. He did not realise what an awfful women she is by her tweets online and that she often deleteds them. He tried to use this to back his view on the truth and again it backfired, hence why he got flippant

Didge I never made a post about the actual topic so I don’t see how I lacked neutrality on the topic.
Never mind. I’m bored now.

eddie wrote:Didge I never made a post about the actual topic so I don’t see how I lacked neutrality on the topic.
Never mind.  I’m bored now.  

Then why did you jump in, when I clearly knew very well what Ben was up to, after his original gaff?

Yeah Didge. I’ll need to take my time now and think about the poor judgment I have made hence the reason you are disappointed in me etc etc

Nap time for me.

eddie wrote:Yeah Didge. I’ll need to take my time now and think about the poor judgment I have made hence the reason you are disappointed in me etc etc

Nap time for me.  

Who said i was disappointed?

Can you not ask why you did jump in?

Simple question really