How Some Wikipedia Editors Tried—and Failed—To Erase The UK Labour Party’s Anti-Semitism Problem
Page 1 of 1
How Some Wikipedia Editors Tried—and Failed—To Erase The UK Labour Party’s Anti-Semitism Problem
Rather than purge the prejudice from their party, some online activists have instead quietly attempted to purge the evidence of it.
This past December, Jon Lansman, the founder of Britain’s premier far-left group, Momentum, offered a frank assessment of the anti-Semitism scandals that have plagued the U.K. Labour party. As has been extensively reported, under the leadership of leftist MP Jeremy Corbyn, whom Momentum propelled to power, Labour has been forced to suspend scores of officials for anti-Jewish invective, including a former mayor of London. Some of these bigots claimed Jewish bankers control Britain. Others insisted the Mossad was behind ISIS and the Sandy Hook massacre or falsely labeled Jews the “chief financiers” of the African slave trade. The problem became so acute that 100 of the party’s 229 MPs issued a statementrebuking their own party for failing to confront anti-Semitism. One of Labour’s Jewish MPs famously declared, “a Labour Party under his [Corbyn’s] stewardship cannot be a safe space for British Jews.” Last election, only 13% of British Jews saidthey would vote for Labour, an identical percentage to the number of Muslims who voted for Donald Trump. And yet, despite all this, Lansman observed, “there is a lot of denial of anti-Semitism” in the party.
Lansman was likely referring to leftist activists on the ground who have attacked the party’s nascent efforts to expunge anti-Semites as a “witch hunt.” But he might as well have been referring to activists on the internet, who have been quietly attempting to erase traces of the party’s Jewish problem from Wikipedia.
Last month, these enterprising editors attempted to delete the entire “Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party” page from the online encyclopedia. The ensuing debate over the prospect can be read here. The initial advocate for deletion called the entry “an attack page” that “lacks notability,” as though an outpouring of prejudice that caused nearly half of the Labour party’s own sitting politicians to denounce it was simply a slander served up by shadowy (presumably Jewish) smear artists. Other similarly inclined editors asserted that there should be no “Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party” page given that there was no parallel “Anti-Semitism in the Conservative Party” page, as though the solution to incomplete documentation of hate is to suppress that which has already been documented.
To be sure, like many Wikipedia pages, this one could surely have used more citations, research, and polish. But that was clearly not what its critics had in mind. They did not want to remedy the page’s deficiencies, but to eliminate it entirely. Ultimately, the facts of the case won out, and no consensus was reached to delete the page. It remained published but in limbo.
Having failed to remove the evidence of Labour’s anti-Semitism outright, the activist editors moved instead to obfuscate it. A proposal was put forward to rename the page “Labour party (UK) antisemitism allegations,” thus casting doubt on the existence of this well-documented prejudice in the party. This effort, too, failed to achieve consensus after a lengthy debate. As of this writing, the “Anti-Semitism in the Labour party” page remains, though it will undoubtedly be assailed again by those who’d rather suppress awareness of prejudice in Corbyn’s Labour party than confront it.
Indeed, tellingly, the word “anti-Semitism” does not appear on Jeremy Corbyn’s own extensive Wikipedia page, despite the fact that it has been a defining issue of his leadership tenure.
http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/252972/how-some-wikipedia-editors-tried-and-failed-to-erase-the-uk-labour-partys-anti-semitism-problem
This past December, Jon Lansman, the founder of Britain’s premier far-left group, Momentum, offered a frank assessment of the anti-Semitism scandals that have plagued the U.K. Labour party. As has been extensively reported, under the leadership of leftist MP Jeremy Corbyn, whom Momentum propelled to power, Labour has been forced to suspend scores of officials for anti-Jewish invective, including a former mayor of London. Some of these bigots claimed Jewish bankers control Britain. Others insisted the Mossad was behind ISIS and the Sandy Hook massacre or falsely labeled Jews the “chief financiers” of the African slave trade. The problem became so acute that 100 of the party’s 229 MPs issued a statementrebuking their own party for failing to confront anti-Semitism. One of Labour’s Jewish MPs famously declared, “a Labour Party under his [Corbyn’s] stewardship cannot be a safe space for British Jews.” Last election, only 13% of British Jews saidthey would vote for Labour, an identical percentage to the number of Muslims who voted for Donald Trump. And yet, despite all this, Lansman observed, “there is a lot of denial of anti-Semitism” in the party.
Lansman was likely referring to leftist activists on the ground who have attacked the party’s nascent efforts to expunge anti-Semites as a “witch hunt.” But he might as well have been referring to activists on the internet, who have been quietly attempting to erase traces of the party’s Jewish problem from Wikipedia.
Last month, these enterprising editors attempted to delete the entire “Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party” page from the online encyclopedia. The ensuing debate over the prospect can be read here. The initial advocate for deletion called the entry “an attack page” that “lacks notability,” as though an outpouring of prejudice that caused nearly half of the Labour party’s own sitting politicians to denounce it was simply a slander served up by shadowy (presumably Jewish) smear artists. Other similarly inclined editors asserted that there should be no “Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party” page given that there was no parallel “Anti-Semitism in the Conservative Party” page, as though the solution to incomplete documentation of hate is to suppress that which has already been documented.
To be sure, like many Wikipedia pages, this one could surely have used more citations, research, and polish. But that was clearly not what its critics had in mind. They did not want to remedy the page’s deficiencies, but to eliminate it entirely. Ultimately, the facts of the case won out, and no consensus was reached to delete the page. It remained published but in limbo.
Having failed to remove the evidence of Labour’s anti-Semitism outright, the activist editors moved instead to obfuscate it. A proposal was put forward to rename the page “Labour party (UK) antisemitism allegations,” thus casting doubt on the existence of this well-documented prejudice in the party. This effort, too, failed to achieve consensus after a lengthy debate. As of this writing, the “Anti-Semitism in the Labour party” page remains, though it will undoubtedly be assailed again by those who’d rather suppress awareness of prejudice in Corbyn’s Labour party than confront it.
Indeed, tellingly, the word “anti-Semitism” does not appear on Jeremy Corbyn’s own extensive Wikipedia page, despite the fact that it has been a defining issue of his leadership tenure.
http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/252972/how-some-wikipedia-editors-tried-and-failed-to-erase-the-uk-labour-partys-anti-semitism-problem
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» 51% Say Labour Has An Anti-Semitism Problem, 34% Think Corbyn Anti-Semitic
» Trouble for Jeremy Corbyn? Almost 100 Labour MPs and peers attend the first meeting of a 'party within a party' moderate group set up by his deputy Tom Watson after anti-Semitism row
» Labour anti-Semitism row threatens to divide the Party
» Only four Labour MPs back party leaders in anti-Semitism definition row
» The anti-Semitism crisis shows that Labour is now truly the nasty party
» Trouble for Jeremy Corbyn? Almost 100 Labour MPs and peers attend the first meeting of a 'party within a party' moderate group set up by his deputy Tom Watson after anti-Semitism row
» Labour anti-Semitism row threatens to divide the Party
» Only four Labour MPs back party leaders in anti-Semitism definition row
» The anti-Semitism crisis shows that Labour is now truly the nasty party
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill