the worlds second transracial

First topic message reminder :

it really was only a matter of time.

cant wait for the collective explosion of libtard heads and melting of snowflakes over this one

White flight attendant turned glamour model with 32S breasts says she now identifies as black after injecting her skin with melanin

A white glamour model who spent £50,000 on surgery in a bid to transform herself into an 'exotic Barbie' appeared on TV to tell the world she now 'identifies as black woman'.

Former air hostess Martina Big, who claims she is 28 and a size 6, has boosted her breasts to a size 32S, and used tanning injections and her own powerful 50-tube sunbed to achieve her 'dark, crispy brown' complexion.

The German tanning addict, who claims her breasts are 'Europe's biggest', appeared on The Maury Show where she told the host: 'I am black. That is my race. I can't wait to go to Africa because I hear the food is tasty.

'It's better to be black, the feeling inside is just better.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4906206/White-flight-attendant-says-identifies-black.html

HoratioTarr wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Is he saying he had his dick on top of a bush petal and had himself an organism...!?

I'm interpreting it as a gang bang sans reach around and a shared pair of panties afterwards.  OrgasismsRus.

I was fingering her kebab fine and dandy, whilst banging her.

smelly-bandit wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

What part of the thread.  It's evolved.

First post first page

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

HoratioTarr wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

First post first page

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

Seriously, this is hilarious.

You must have been the talk in the school playground with that kind of bitch talk lol 

ha ha

Thorin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

I'm interpreting it as a gang bang sans reach around and a shared pair of panties afterwards.  OrgasismsRus.

I was fingering her kebab fine and dandy, whilst banging her.

How uncouth! You'd have thought she'd have put her food down for five seconds while you did the deed.

HoratioTarr wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

First post first page

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

That's a statement not a question

Oh I give up, clearly I overestimated your intellectual prowess.

I should have taken heed of the first signs, you talking to didge

HoratioTarr wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I was fingering her kebab fine and dandy, whilst banging her.

 How uncouth!  You'd have thought she'd have put her food down for five seconds while you  did the deed.

You got to be kidding, she said the chilli sauce was too mild and it needing spicing up..

smelly-bandit wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

That's a statement not a question

Oh I give up, clearly I overestimated your intellectual prowess.

I should have taken heed of the first signs, you talking to didge

Now take heed Horatio, that is how to be a bitch....

smelly-bandit wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

That's a statement not a question

Oh I give up, clearly I overestimated your intellectual prowess.

I should have taken heed of the first signs, you talking to didge

He's boring the 'wrong 'un' off me, so he's back on ignore now.

I have no idea what you're on about, it's true. My crystal ball's at the menders.

HoratioTarr wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

That's a statement not a question

Oh I give up, clearly I overestimated your intellectual prowess.

I should have taken heed of the first signs, you talking to didge

He's  boring the 'wrong 'un' off me, so he's back on ignore now.    

I have no idea what you're on about, it's true.  My crystal ball's at the menders.

"Please be my friend smelly"

"I promise to not post to him"

Thorin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

He's  boring the 'wrong 'un' off me, so he's back on ignore now.    

I have no idea what you're on about, it's true.  My crystal ball's at the menders.

"Please be my friend smelly"

"I promise to not post to him"

I know you're desperate for the repartee, but I genuinely can't be arsed. Try jumping up and down for attention with Syl or Eddie, they have more patience with you than I.

What complete fuckeries.

HoratioTarr wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

That's a statement not a question

Oh I give up, clearly I overestimated your intellectual prowess.

I should have taken heed of the first signs, you talking to didge

He's  boring the 'wrong 'un' off me, so he's back on ignore now.    

I have no idea what you're on about, it's true.  My crystal ball's at the menders.

I had such high hopes for you, but I feel the question really is important, I'll just have to wait for someone with a mind for the subtle to come along.

Could be a long wait

HoratioTarr wrote:

Thorin wrote:


"Please be my friend smelly"

"I promise to not post to him"

I know you're desperate for the repartee, but I genuinely can't be arsed.  Try jumping up and down for attention with Syl or Eddie, they have more patience with you than I.  

I dont look for attention darling and it was you that decided to derail this thread.

Tommy was completely on the ropes on questions i asked him and you decided to jump in and act like the petulant brat that you are.

I suggest seriously you grow some backbone.

Good luck with that.

Thorin wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


Is he saying he had his dick on top of a bush petal and had himself an organism...!?

No mate it was shaved....

His bush petal was shaved...!?


And your female partner is called 'Donna' and with a flange like a greasy chilli sauce laden kebab...!!!???


No wonder you keep going on about anal sex being the 'right' way for you...!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:


No mate it was shaved....

His bush petal was shaved...!?


And your female partner is called 'Donna' and with a flange like a greasy chilli sauce laden kebab...!!!???


No wonder you keep going on about anal sex being the 'right' way for you...!!!

Absolutely Tommy, you bet.

Have you not given oral sex to a woman?

Which goes back to my points

You mean it shows that your views would conflict to many people getting marry, based on your wierd view in how you believe something is intended.

Now was the mouth indended to suck cock or even deep throat them in some cases, based on your warped claim that something is intended?

How about a cock or dildo up a womans arse?

So if you think anal sex and oral sex is wrong, does that not mean you would be against the vast majority of the adult population marrying?

Being as most have oral sex?

I mean what about getting down and munching on a kebab?

Tommy Monk wrote:

gelico wrote:

so should straight couples also only kiss or show any kind of affections behind close doors?  or is it ok for straight couples to be open about it?

I may not agree that homosexuality is right, but I do think that it is up to them and they should not be persecuted or bullied/attacked for it...!

regardless of the opinions on the rights and wrongs of gays having church weddings,,,

dont you realise that constantly referring to people as abnormal, subnormal, etc and saying that they shouldnt expect the same 'status and respect' - whatever the fuck that is meant to mean - IS bullying and attacking

you may see it as just giving your opinion

would you say to a disabled person that they are not normal and not worthy of the respect of an able bodied person?

Marriage has to be consumated... which is absolutely nothing to do with consuming a bit of Donna's greasy chilli laden kebab... and nothing to do with putting a 'hotdog up a rusty starfish into some chocolate flavoured water'...!!!


Maybe that is why you are so confused...!!!???

HoratioTarr wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

I have the answer, but you need to ask the question.

It is a serious question related to this thread, but do you have the wit to see it??

Give us a clue.  Is it anything to do with taking it up the 'wrong 'un'?

splutters

Thorin wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

I'm interpreting it as a gang bang sans reach around and a shared pair of panties afterwards.  OrgasismsRus.

I was fingering her kebab fine and dandy, whilst banging her.

wtf is going on?

the ape?

Tommy Monk wrote:Marriage has to be consumated... which is absolutely nothing to do with consuming a bit of Donna's greasy chilli laden kebab... and nothing to do with putting a 'hotdog up a rusty starfish into some chocolate flavoured water'...!!!


Maybe that is why you are so confused...!!!???

Well that is a bugger for all the Nuns married to Jesus then...

Also do you then support like some religions, that no contraceptives are used, with consumated?

I guessed you were religious that you would use something religious in thinking haha

Now again

Have you not given oral sex to a woman?

Which goes back to my points

You mean it shows that your views would conflict to many people getting marry, based on your wierd view in how you believe something is intended.

Now was the mouth indended to suck cock or even deep throat them in some cases, based on your warped claim that something is intended?

How about a cock or dildo up a womans arse?

So if you think anal sex and oral sex is wrong, does that not mean you would be against the vast majority of the adult population marrying?

Being as most have oral sex?

I mean what about getting down and munching on a kebab?

gelico wrote:

Thorin wrote:


I was fingering her kebab fine and dandy, whilst banging her.

wtf is going on?

the ape?

I told a story about being naughty with a woman on the top deck of a bus and some prudes here think poorly of me.

It was not an ape, just it is Horatio having a hissy fit

gelico wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:





I may not agree that homosexuality is right, but I do think that it is up to them and they should not be persecuted or bullied/attacked for it...!

regardless of the opinions on the rights and wrongs of gays having church weddings,,,

dont you realise that constantly referring to people as abnormal, subnormal, etc and saying that they shouldnt expect the same 'status and respect' - whatever the fuck that is meant to mean - IS bullying and attacking

you may see it as just giving your opinion

would you say to a disabled person that they are not normal and not worthy of the respect of an able bodied person?

Quote me properly Geli... and don't twist what I said, or put words up that I didn't say, please...!?

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:


wtf is going on?

the ape?

I told a story about being naughty with a woman on the top deck of a bus and some prudes here think poorly of me.

It was not an ape, just it is Horatio having a hissy fit

a woman? not your missus? was she busy down at the Twat and Trumpet that night? and,,,,,are you 100% certain it was not an ape?

just idle curiousity

gelico wrote:

Thorin wrote:

I told a story about being naughty with a woman on the top deck of a bus and some prudes here think poorly of me.

It was not an ape, just it is Horatio having a hissy fit

a woman?  not your missus?  was she busy down at the Twat and Trumpet that night?  and,,,,,are you 100% certain it was not an ape?

just idle curiousity

No because I never dated you Gelico

curious as to what she said,,,,,'it's better to be black, the feeling inside is just better''

but she also says ''i can't wait to go to Africa I hear the food is tasty''

no mention of finding her roots or connecting with her own people

if she's already spent £50,000 on trying to look like Barbie, I suspect she is just going to the next level of ''look at me''

Thorin wrote:

gelico wrote:


a woman?  not your missus?  was she busy down at the Twat and Trumpet that night?  and,,,,,are you 100% certain it was not an ape?

just idle curiousity

No because I never dated you Gelico  

hahaha very quick didge - green

smelly-bandit wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

That's a statement not a question

Oh I give up, clearly I overestimated your intellectual prowess.

I should have taken heed of the first signs, you talking to didge

well what with you being so intellectually superior perhaps you should just say whatever it is you think should have been asked on this

gelico wrote:

Thorin wrote:

No because I never dated you Gelico  

hahaha very quick didge - green

You know i was only joking Gelico

x

HoratioTarr wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

What part of the thread.  It's evolved.

First post first page

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

Sorry, didge, but as a Hobbit/LOTR fan I couldn't help but laugh at that line. This might be the funniest devolvement of a thread ever people

Tommy Monk wrote:

gelico wrote:

regardless of the opinions on the rights and wrongs of gays having church weddings,,,

dont you realise that constantly referring to people as abnormal, subnormal, etc and saying that they shouldnt expect the same 'status and respect' - whatever the fuck that is meant to mean - IS bullying and attacking

you may see it as just giving your opinion

would you say to a disabled person that they are not normal and not worthy of the respect of an able bodied person?

Quote me properly Geli... and don't twist what I said, or put words up that I didn't say, please...!?

I dont think I've misquoted you or twisted anything tbh.

You have your views on marriage should be for a man and a woman - fine

but you have also said what I quoted

Eilzel wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Sorry, Smellykins, we keep getting waylaid by Thorin the Dwarf's weasel sized wedding tackle.

Um... I think I've already said that the white women with the Cuprinol tan is an attention seeking dick.

Sorry, didge, but as a Hobbit/LOTR fan I couldn't help but laugh at that line. This might be the funniest devolvement of a thread ever people

I do not mind buddy, to me they are just words, but can see the humour based off the connection to the name.

Though her intent was otherwise, lets be honest about that mate

Tommy Monk wrote:

Homosexuality is most certainly not the normal and natural way of things, as our biological design for sexual interaction is completely structured towards us having attraction to the opposite sex and sexual intercourse with the opposite sex...


It's so blatently obvious that this is the right way of things... that I can't help but think how strange and unnatural/abnormal it is for there to be people around who firstly don't ever feel any type of primeval sexual arousal/urges towards any people of the opposite sex, but instead get these feelings for those of the same sex... and secondly how these people must be able to see/know/understand the glaringly obvious fact that bioligical design and purpose of sexual interaction is between male and female, but they dismiss all the evidence (with their supposedly sane and rational minds), and then they carry on in pursuit of fulfilling their strange desires of 'alternative' interactions that they know full well will never result in a conception/childbirth/reproduction etc... although that is the fundamental basis for the whole biological design and reason for sexual attraction/interaction in the first place!!!

Gelico is right

Tommy Monk wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

But obviously we're not all 'hard wired' to be attracted to the opposite sex.   If what you say is true, then nature would only churn out straight people.   But nature doesn't.  Nature brings forth all sorts of people, with all sorts of personalities, physical attributes and sexual preferences.   Who are you to say what is 'normal'.    To be honest, you're actually a minority in your bigoted beliefs.  Does this make you abnormal?  

Would you say to a homosexual's face - 'you're not normal.'   Would you say to a person with cerebral palsy, 'you're not normal.'   I bet you wouldn't.  How about thinking along the lines of 'different' to you....and be more accepting of people?

Normal is male female attraction and sexual interaction... normal is not to have cerebal palsy...


That is undeniable!


Homosexuality and CP are not when things have gone 'right'... they are when something's gone wrong...!!!

More proof that Gelico is right in what Tommy has said

Tommy Monk wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

1. If we tried to have sexual relations with someone we had no sexual desires for, don't you think that would be rather weird and unnatural?

2. We don't choose our parters thinking they would make a good birthing partner, we choose them because we love them and are attracted to them, don't you?

What is 'weird and unnatural' is the sexual attraction/desire/interaction being with someone of the same sex... as it goes against all the biological and physical reasons for us having male/females and the different sexual organs, and the whole basis of sexual attraction/desire/interaction...

More proof that Gelico is right.

Tommy Monk wrote:And Les... opposite sex attraction is the normal thing and as nature intended... not something that should make you feel sick... while you are instead attracted to same sex, which is something that makes normal people feel sick...

More proof that Gelico is right

gelico wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:





I may not agree that homosexuality is right, but I do think that it is up to them and they should not be persecuted or bullied/attacked for it...!

regardless of the opinions on the rights and wrongs of gays having church weddings,,,

dont you realise that constantly referring to people as abnormal, subnormal, etc and saying that they shouldnt expect the same 'status and respect' - whatever the fuck that is meant to mean - IS bullying and attacking

you may see it as just giving your opinion

would you say to a disabled person that they are not normal and not worthy of the respect of an able bodied person?

Give the full quote please Gelico...?

Tommy wants a list?

One moment

Full quote please Gelico...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Full quote please Gelico...?

wtf?

now you're just taking the piss

fuck off

You know what?,,,,,

I feel like I should write to the tax man and demand my pension. I identify as being 65 so if they don't comply they are being bigoted and violating my rights

gelico wrote:


You know what?,,,,,

I feel like I should write to the tax man and demand my pension.  I identify as being 65 so if they don't comply they are being bigoted and violating my rights

Piss off gelico this is some serious shit..........

gelico wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


I have not had a religious upbringing... and I've already said many times that what two consenting adults choose to do behind closed doors is entirely a matter for them... just don't start trying to tell everyone else that they have to approve of it and/or accept it as normal/equal etc...!!!

so should straight couples also only kiss or show any kind of affections behind close doors?  or is it ok for straight couples to be open about it?

It's just an expression Geli... if I saw a gay/lesbian couple being picked on in public for holding hands or having a quick kiss etc then I would most certainly jump to their defence...!


I may not agree that homosexuality is right, but I do think that it is up to them and they should not be persecuted or bullied/attacked for it...!







You missed quoting the first bit of my post Geli..

gelico wrote:


You know what?,,,,,

I feel like I should write to the tax man and demand my pension.  I identify as being 65 so if they don't comply they are being bigoted and violating my rights

Can you think why, that could never happen?

I mean some people already feel older than they are.

smelly-bandit wrote:

gelico wrote:


You know what?,,,,,

I feel like I should write to the tax man and demand my pension.  I identify as being 65 so if they don't comply they are being bigoted and violating my rights

Piss off gelico this is some serious shit..........

piss off yerself ya mardy ratbag

what's this major question that we should all be asking?

gelico wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

Piss off gelico this is some serious shit..........

piss off yerself ya mardy ratbag

what's this major question that we should all be asking?

How many of the are you?? And between the lot of you there isn't enough brainpower to make a halfwit.

Considering how much you all pride yourself on "serious" debate, Its the very first question you should have asked,its right there, so obvious it may as well be smacking the slack jawed expression right off your face.

Tommy Monk wrote:

gelico wrote:

so should straight couples also only kiss or show any kind of affections behind close doors?  or is it ok for straight couples to be open about it?

It's just an expression Geli... if I saw a gay/lesbian couple being picked on in public for holding hands or having a quick kiss etc then I would most certainly jump to their defence...!


I may not agree that homosexuality is right, but I do think that it is up to them and they should not be persecuted or bullied/attacked for it...!


You missed quoting the first bit of my post Geli..

because, what's the point? you say that and then straight away go on to say ' weird, unnatural, makes normal people feel sick etc etc

if you honestly can't see what i'm saying then i'm fucked if i'm gonna waste my time explaining it to you

smelly-bandit wrote:

gelico wrote:

piss off yerself ya mardy ratbag

what's this major question that we should all be asking?

How many of the are you?? And between the lot of you there isn't enough brainpower  to make a halfwit.

Considering how much you all pride yourself on "serious" debate, Its the very first question you should have asked,its right there,  so obvious it may as well be smacking the slack jawed expression right off your face.

then do enlighten all us dimwits please, oh wise one

gelico wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

How many of the are you?? And between the lot of you there isn't enough brainpower  to make a halfwit.

Considering how much you all pride yourself on "serious" debate, Its the very first question you should have asked,its right there,  so obvious it may as well be smacking the slack jawed expression right off your face.

then do enlighten all us dimwits please, oh wise one

I haven't exhausted all the options yet, maybe Quill can chime in and entertain us with some legal jargon about why there legally no question to answer, or Wolfie, that towering intellectual is bound to figure it out.

Problem is smelly you are assuming people care about this question (and the doubtlessly mind blowing answer) you have as much as you do. If someone were going to ask it, they'd have asked already

Eilzel wrote:Problem is smelly you are assuming people care about this question (and the doubtlessly mind blowing answer) you have as much as you do. If someone were going to ask it, they'd have asked already

meh,,,,,i had already got distracted by something shiny and just wandered off

but that's me




nite les