Maajid Nawaz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6z9JG53Gpc








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LR7IdYx29V4

Dont agree with his politics particularly,  but he is an exceptional radio broadcaster  and a fine person.

Angry Andy wrote:Dont agree with his oolitics particularly,  but he is an exceptional radio broadcaster  and a fine person.

Well said Andy, he is a great speaker.

He is an excuer of islamist evil...

You fucking cretin. Have you ever heard him?

You are the fucking cretin...


And yes Ihave heard him twisting and spinning in his attempts to excuse islamist evil...

Angry Andy wrote:You fucking cretin. Have you ever heard him?

Clearly not it seems.

I've never heard of him if that helps ...

Raggamuffin wrote:I've never heard of him if that helps ...

He was a former extremist who is now a progressive Muslim Rags.

He is now just an excuser of islamist evil...

Tommy yet again showing his jaw dropping stupidity

I've heard him at it...

Personally, I've always had a huge crush on Maajid, he's so melty - no good me trying to argue the toss with him cos i'd just sit there gazing at him and enjoying watching his lips move and nodding inanely at everything he said.

i've heard him arguing some points of the koran with callers on LBC. no doubt about it he does try. One of them I remember was the right for a man to hit his wife if she disobeys him

he was saying 'do you think that's acceptable' and she said 'no, of course not,,,BUT it shouldn't happen as it is only accepted as a last resort when other methods have not worked''. they were going round in circles with this for some time then he said ''if you agree it's unnacceptable for a man to hit his wife then shouldn't that be taken out'' and she said,,,,''no of course it shouldn't be taken out,,,it's part of the sharia and must remain, but we should always remember that it is only a last resort'' (apparently this is viewed as some kind of merciful benevolent concession from mohammed.

there's no doubt he does try but the problem is that people like him who speak out plainly are disregarded and even labelled as islamophobes FFS!

hi didge, you good?

Raggamuffin wrote:I've never heard of him if that helps ...

Nor me Raggs

gelico wrote:Personally, I've always had a huge crush on Maajid, he's so melty - no good me trying to argue the toss with him cos i'd just sit there gazing at him and enjoying watching his lips move and nodding inanely at everything he said.

i've heard him arguing some points of the koran with callers on LBC.  no doubt about it he does try.  One of them I remember was the right for a man to hit his wife if she disobeys him

he was saying 'do you think that's acceptable' and she said 'no, of course not,,,BUT it shouldn't happen as it is only accepted as a last resort when other methods have not worked''.  they were going round in circles with this for some time then he said ''if you agree it's unnacceptable for a man to hit his wife then shouldn't that be taken out'' and she said,,,,''no of course it shouldn't be taken out,,,it's part of the sharia and must remain, but we should always remember that it is only a last resort'' (apparently this is viewed as some kind of merciful benevolent concession from mohammed.

there's no doubt he does try but the problem is that people like him who speak out plainly are disregarded and even labelled as islamophobes FFS!

hi didge, you good?

Hi Gelico

Am well thanks and you?

That is the problem. He is in the minority on trying to bring about change. I like how he challenges other Muslims and as seen, because they take the Quran as the word of their God. They thus find it impossible to disagree with anything with in the book. As seen above, the woman could not bring herself to condemn the actual verse. As by believing any part could be wrong, would bring their whole belief system into question.
He is trying to make a difference, but it also takes the part of Muslims to recognize where things are completely wrong.

http://www.alternet.org/grayzone-project/self-invention-maajid-nawaz-fact-and-fiction-life-counter-terror-celebrity


And his 'quilliam' think tank has had millions of uk taxpayer money...!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:http://www.alternet.org/grayzone-project/self-invention-maajid-nawaz-fact-and-fiction-life-counter-terror-celebrity


And his 'quilliam' think tank has had millions of uk taxpayer money...!!!

Max Blumenthal???

Do you know who he is Tommy, the joint writer of this hearsay views made against Nawaz?

I did not find a single part in that which offered sources, just some claims made by some who knew him, without ever quoting one of them.

Never realised Tommy you backed such a regressive leftist as your source.

Here Tommy, just to give you an idea what Max is all about and why he suffers from Islamophilia and stands against progressive Muslims like Nawaz.


http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2015/06/max-blumenthal-praises-work-of-islamist-group-that-wont-condemn-stoning-women/

Thorin wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:http://www.alternet.org/grayzone-project/self-invention-maajid-nawaz-fact-and-fiction-life-counter-terror-celebrity


And his 'quilliam' think tank has had millions of uk taxpayer money...!!!

Max Blumenthal???

Do you know who he is Tommy, the joint writer of this hearsay views made against Nawaz?

I did not find a single part in that which offered sources, just some claims made by some who knew him, without ever quoting one of them.

Never realised Tommy you backed such a regressive leftist as your source.

Names are given...


But Im more surprised at how you seem to automatically believe everything that Nawaz says is true...

Tommy Monk wrote:

Thorin wrote:

Max Blumenthal???

Do you know who he is Tommy, the joint writer of this hearsay views made against Nawaz?

I did not find a single part in that which offered sources, just some claims made by some who knew him, without ever quoting one of them.

Never realised Tommy you backed such a regressive leftist as your source.

Names are given...


But Im more surprised at how you seem to automatically believe everything that Nawaz says is true...

Really?

Where did I say I believed everything Nawaz has stated?

Never did.

The article, is by a known hater of Nawaz, which automatically means there will be a bias.

You can provide names, but that is pointless without quotes or links to quotes they have made. So the article lacks credibility, as it proves little to no supporting evidence. Mainly hearsay claims

Hence the poor  attempt at character assassination

It really has made me laugh though at this being your source

The author of article is telling a different story to Nawaz... doesnt make them a hater... maybe just hated for telling the truth...!?

gelico wrote:Personally, I've always had a huge crush on Maajid, he's so melty - no good me trying to argue the toss with him cos i'd just sit there gazing at him and enjoying watching his lips move and nodding inanely at everything he said.

i've heard him arguing some points of the koran with callers on LBC.  no doubt about it he does try.  One of them I remember was the right for a man to hit his wife if she disobeys him

he was saying 'do you think that's acceptable' and she said 'no, of course not,,,BUT it shouldn't happen as it is only accepted as a last resort when other methods have not worked''.  they were going round in circles with this for some time then he said ''if you agree it's unnacceptable for a man to hit his wife then shouldn't that be taken out'' and she said,,,,''no of course it shouldn't be taken out,,,it's part of the sharia and must remain, but we should always remember that it is only a last resort'' (apparently this is viewed as some kind of merciful benevolent concession from mohammed.

there's no doubt he does try but the problem is that people like him who speak out plainly are disregarded and even labelled as islamophobes FFS!

hi didge, you good?

Great post gels and yes, he's great on LBC and also pretty nice on the eye.

Angry Andy wrote:
Tommy yet again showing his jaw dropping stupidity

Poor little Tommy Monk...

Always telling anyone who will listen what a big tough "man" he thinks he is..

But across every thread he's posting on today, he just keeps on showing us what a spineless and groveling, xenophobic and bigoted, paedo' embracing,  uncaring and cowardly, slimy little grub he really is at heart.

You telling me you don't like him?

Nawaz is intelligent , articulate, thoroughly decent and ridiculously handsome.
Its clear why Tommy hates him and is intensely jealous of him.

Angry Andy wrote:Nawaz is intelligent , articulate, thoroughly decent and ridiculously handsome.
Its clear why Tommy hates him and is intensely jealous of him.

Yes to be honest I'm not entirely sure why Tommy would be against him when he seems to be saying what Tommy wants all Muslims to be saying.

Thorin wrote:

here's the thing though - he says islam says it's ok to take slaves 'during time of war'

within islam, however, any state/country/area is considered a 'house of war' until all inhabitants have submitted to islam

gelico wrote:

Thorin wrote:

here's the thing though - he says islam says it's ok to take slaves 'during time of war'

within islam, however, any state/country/area is considered a 'house of war' until all inhabitants have submitted to islam

Indeed Gelico.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb2QMuRhbwk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDkkiYvnD_Q

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX1QiuDhEj8


Talk about this woman being no way a Human rights activist. She dodged every question put to her and clearly is a Theocratic defender