Do you feel sorry for these men?

by HoratioTarr Sat Jul 08, 2017 1:10 pm

What turned this doctor’s wife into the sexual predator from hell? How Sarah used Plenty of Fish to seduce a married Navy officer, two soldiers, an airman and fireman... then destroyed their lives

‘Scarlet’, as she was known, clearly was not shy about what she was after, listing herself on one website as a ‘cougar’— a word used to describe women looking for sex with younger men.

And find them the blonde former nurse certainly did. But what many will find deeply depressing is the type of man who answered her call.

All five claimed to be single but were married, the majority were parents, and all were living outwardly extremely respectable lives.

Lewis clearly had something of a thing for men in uniform. They included two high-ranking soldiers, a member of the Royal Navy and an airman. The fifth was in the fire brigade.

And these weren’t just lowly squaddies. The Daily Mail can reveal that they included officers from both the Army and the Navy, men whose service had seen them lauded for bravery and whose official duties brought them into contact with members of the Royal Family.

But nothing could have prepared them for their experience with Lewis. Following their encounters she would harass not only the men, but their families, too.

On one occasion she cried rape. On another she pretended she had become pregnant while also claiming to have caught a sexually transmitted infection.

One man was so distressed he was pushed to the brink of suicide after Lewis threatened to show his wife a naked picture of him.

Appearing in court last week having admitted five counts of stalking and one count of ‘revenge porn’, Lewis was handed a suspended prison sentence. It was claimed she was suffering from a personality disorder, had low self-esteem and had only ‘wanted to be loved’.

Given the carnage of broken marriages and blighted careers she left behind, her victims have little sympathy for her.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4676284/How-Sarah-Lewis-seduced-married-men-destroyed-lives.html

by HoratioTarr Sat Jul 08, 2017 1:10 pm

The people I feel sorry for are the wives and family of these men.

by Tommy Monk Sat Jul 08, 2017 1:31 pm

Plenty of fish... the odds are good... but the goods are odd...!

lol!

by HoratioTarr Sat Jul 08, 2017 4:46 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Plenty of fish... the odds are good... but the goods are odd...!

I met my husband on there. Been together nearly ten years.

by SEXY MAMA Sat Jul 08, 2017 5:50 pm

Nope don't feel sorry for such sad pathetic fools.

They bought it on themselves

by Tommy Monk Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:01 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:Plenty of fish... the odds are good... but the goods are odd...!

I met my husband on there. Been together nearly ten years.

by Syl Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:45 pm

No pity for the men at all.
The woman is obviously unhinged, had the men been single I would feel pity for them, as it is....the wives and children are the ones I pity.

by Tommy Monk Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:16 am

Thanks for the green (whoever that was from)...!

Laughing

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 12:14 pm

It all reminds me of Fatal Attraction really. The Michael Douglas character blatantly had an affair behind his wife's back, and then was supposedly the "victim".

by Syl Sun Jul 09, 2017 12:15 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:It all reminds me of Fatal Attraction really. The Michael Douglas character blatantly had an affair behind his wife's back, and then was supposedly the "victim".

It was a great film though. Twisted Evil

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 12:17 pm

Syl wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:It all reminds me of Fatal Attraction really. The Michael Douglas character blatantly had an affair behind his wife's back, and then was supposedly the "victim".

It was a great film though.

Yes, but it annoyed me. I know she went over the top, but he was awful to her and he led her on.

by Syl Sun Jul 09, 2017 12:22 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Syl wrote:

It was a great film though.

Yes, but it annoyed me. I know she went over the top, but he was awful to her and he led her on.

He did...he was a creep.
That's where the expression 'bunny boiler' originated, poor Glen Close's character got all the stick and died for her sins....obviously the cheating husband ended up back with his wife and child free to enjoy life.

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 12:27 pm

Syl wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Yes, but it annoyed me. I know she went over the top, but he was awful to her and he led her on.

He did...he was a creep.
That's where the expression 'bunny boiler' originated, poor Glen Close's character got all the stick and died for her sins....obviously the cheating husband ended up back with his wife and child free to enjoy life.

I know! His wife should at least have kicked him out!

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:15 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Syl wrote:

He did...he was a creep.
That's where the expression 'bunny boiler' originated, poor Glen Close's character got all the stick and died for her sins....obviously the cheating husband ended up back with his wife and child free to enjoy life.

I know! His wife should at least have kicked him out!

Let's demand a remake!!!!

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:40 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I know! His wife should at least have kicked him out!

Let's demand a remake!!!!

Yes! His wife would kick him out, and Glenn Close wouldn't die. She was fine until he messed with her head.

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:42 pm

Anyway, these men didn't just meet Sarah Lewis by chance. They must have actually joined that site, or at least been looking at it, so they were looking for trouble in the first place. I don't think she "seduced" them.

by Syl Sun Jul 09, 2017 2:12 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I know! His wife should at least have kicked him out!

Let's demand a remake!!!!

I read they did make an alternative ending but opted for the one where the family remain together.

Pity.....his wife (who was really lovely) should have buggered off with a handsome neighbour or someone.....leaving the cheating husband to be charged with Alex's murder. Twisted Evil

by eddie Sun Jul 09, 2017 4:37 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I know! His wife should at least have kicked him out!

Let's demand a remake!!!!

Yes! His wife would kick him out, and Glenn Close wouldn't die. She was fine until he messed with her head.

Erm no she wasn't?? They had a one-night stand where both parties were agreeable and then she got obsessed and started stalking him!!!

What are you lot on? Do you feel sorry for these men? 2190311264

Do you feel sorry for these men? 2190311264

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 4:59 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Yes! His wife would kick him out, and Glenn Close wouldn't die. She was fine until he messed with her head.

Erm no she wasn't?? They had a one-night stand where both parties were agreeable and then she got obsessed and started stalking him!!!

What are you lot on?

He shouldn't have had a one night stand in the first place. I recall it being more than that - they were cavorting in a park weren't they? Also, she got pregnant (allegedly), so obviously she wanted him to do the right thing, and he treated her like shite. It was absurd that his wife let him off.

by JulesV Sun Jul 09, 2017 5:10 pm

Do I feel sorry for adulterers? No. Many people flirt gently on line - no problem. But if you take it to another level it could come back to bite you.

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 5:34 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

Yes! His wife would kick him out, and Glenn Close wouldn't die. She was fine until he messed with her head.

Erm no she wasn't?? They had a one-night stand where both parties were agreeable and then she got obsessed and started stalking him!!!

What are you lot on?

It's still serves him right. I can't stand women who stand by their cheating men. She should have booted him out.

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 5:35 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:

Erm no she wasn't?? They had a one-night stand where both parties were agreeable and then she got obsessed and started stalking him!!!

What are you lot on?

He shouldn't have had a one night stand in the first place. I recall it being more than that - they were cavorting in a park weren't they? Also, she got pregnant (allegedly), so obviously she wanted him to do the right thing, and he treated her like shite. It was absurd that his wife let him off.

Typical cheater.

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 5:53 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

He shouldn't have had a one night stand in the first place. I recall it being more than that - they were cavorting in a park weren't they? Also, she got pregnant (allegedly), so obviously she wanted him to do the right thing, and he treated her like shite. It was absurd that his wife let him off.

Typical cheater.

She told him she was pregnant, and he said it was her choice. Evil or Very Mad

by eddie Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:23 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

He shouldn't have had a one night stand in the first place. I recall it being more than that - they were cavorting in a park weren't they? Also, she got pregnant (allegedly), so obviously she wanted him to do the right thing, and he treated her like shite. It was absurd that his wife let him off.

Typical cheater.

She told him she was pregnant, and he said it was her choice.

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:28 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

She told him she was pregnant, and he said it was her choice.

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

He didn't offer to help with expenses or say that he'd pay maintenance, or anything like that. He was a rotter, and he got off far too lightly.

by Original Quill Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:34 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

She told him she was pregnant, and he said it was her choice.

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

You're thinking of Basic Instinct, with Sharon Stone.

This whole thread proves my assertion that marriage is basically a predatory relationship.

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:35 pm

eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

She told him she was pregnant, and he said it was her choice.

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

No that was Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct. We're talking about Fatal Attraction.

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:35 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
eddie wrote:

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

He didn't offer to help with expenses or say that he'd pay maintenance, or anything like that. He was a rotter, and he got off far too lightly.

And he had a saggy arse...

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:38 pm

Original Quill wrote:
eddie wrote:

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

You're thinking of Basic Instinct, with Sharon Stone.

This whole thread proves my assertion that marriage is basically a predatory relationship.

Oh yes. I was thinking that I don't remember that scene from Fatal Attraction. Razz

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:39 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

He didn't offer to help with expenses or say that he'd pay maintenance, or anything like that. He was a rotter, and he got off far too lightly.

And he had a saggy arse...

Well there you are then - he should have been punished!

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:40 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
HoratioTarr wrote:

And he had a saggy arse...

Well there you are then - he should have been punished!

Strung up by the balls and whipped with nettles. lol!

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:44 pm

Michael Douglas was a dick in Basic Instinct too. He shot Beth for no reason and then thought nothing of it.

by eddie Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:53 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
eddie wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

She told him she was pregnant, and he said it was her choice.

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

No that was Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct. We're talking about Fatal Attraction.

Same thing different poorly-written film if I'm honest.

Fatal attraction was a great idea that went OTT and ruined itself due to lazy writing halfway through.

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:59 pm

eddie wrote:
HoratioTarr wrote:

No that was Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct. We're talking about Fatal Attraction.

Same thing different poorly-written film if I'm honest.

Fatal attraction was a great idea that went OTT and ruined itself due to lazy writing halfway through.

It wasn't the same at all. Basic Instinct was more of a murder mystery - did Sharon Stone do the evil deed or not?

by HoratioTarr Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:04 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:Michael Douglas was a dick in Basic Instinct too. He shot Beth for no reason and then thought nothing of it.

He's not the man his father was. bounce

by Guest Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:07 pm

How can people judge an actor based on how they portray them as a character? On this one performance?

Have a good evening everyone

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:10 pm

Thorin wrote:How can people judge an actor based on how they portray them as a character? On this one performance?

Have a good evening everyone

I don't mean Michael Douglas, I mean his character.

by Guest Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:13 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
Thorin wrote:How can people judge an actor based on how they portray them as a character? On this one performance?

Have a good evening everyone

I don't mean Michael Douglas, I mean his character.

Then I suggest you relate this to your argument on Southern Africa Rgs

by Raggamuffin Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:13 pm

Thorin wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't mean Michael Douglas, I mean his character.

Then I suggest you relate this to your argument on Southern Africa Rgs

There is no relevance to your point. I see you're in an argumentative mood again - take it elsewhere or pester someone else.

by Syl Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:41 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
eddie wrote:

Well it wan her choice, wasn't it?

It wasn't his fault she turned stalker. Nowhere in the film do I recall him making her promises. They were fucking. She's the one who turned up and his house and then made up a pregnancy!! Then she flashed her hairy muffin at the police.....

How is it his fault she was a looney-tune?

No that was Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct. We're talking about Fatal Attraction.

The two films came out around the same time, both starred Micheal Douglas, both had blonde temptresses in the leading role, both presumably had hairy muffins...its an easy mistake to make. Razz

by Original Quill Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:46 pm

One was 1987 the other was 1992...ehh, I guess that's around the same time.

by Syl Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:50 pm

Original Quill wrote:One was 1987 the other was 1992...ehh, I guess that's around the same time.

That sounds about right. I only go to the pics about once every 5 years.....and I saw them both at the cinema.

by Original Quill Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:59 pm

Syl wrote:
Original Quill wrote:One was 1987 the other was 1992...ehh, I guess that's around the same time.

That sounds about right. I only go to the pics about once every 5 years.....and I saw them both at the cinema.

Me too. Last film I went to a theater to see was Crocodile Dundee. I took my daughters...and now one has three kids, and the other two, and I guess they take their own children.

by Syl Sun Jul 09, 2017 9:10 pm

Original Quill wrote:
Syl wrote:

That sounds about right. I only go to the pics about once every 5 years.....and I saw them both at the cinema.

Me too. Last film I went to a theater to see was Crocodile Dundee. I took my daughters...and now one has three kids, and the other two, and I guess they take their own children.

Blimey...Crocodile Dundee...you are worse than me. Razz

Just checked...that film is 31 years old. Shocked

by Sponsored content