They've done it again!

by Guest Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:30 pm

Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

by Guest Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:35 pm

Warren Moon wrote: Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

It doesn't matter if you are driven in a nice secure car through the cesspit streets and don't have to communicate to anybody.

They do not have to stand next to East Europeans in a factory all day.

They don't have to shop in a busy Tesco's and only hear Eastern European voices.

Don't have to struggle to speak to a foreign bus driver, force their point across to African sounding nurses and doctors.

They won't get bumped to the bottom of the housing list.

They won't have their benefits reduced in order to pay for more refugees.

The one time Brown had to speak to his adoring supporters we learned what he really thought.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:33 am

BigAndy9 wrote:
Warren Moon wrote: Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

It doesn't matter if you are driven in a nice secure car through the cesspit streets and don't have to communicate to anybody.

They do not have to stand next to East Europeans in a factory all day.

They don't have to shop in a busy Tesco's and only hear Eastern European voices.

Don't have to struggle to speak to a foreign bus driver, force their point across to African sounding nurses and doctors.

They won't get bumped to the bottom of the housing list.

They won't have their benefits reduced in order to pay for more refugees.

The one time Brown had to speak to his adoring supporters we learned what he really thought.

The only sort of economic recovery, is only being seen, in the SE of England.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:34 am

London to be exact.

by Irn Bru Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:51 am

Warren Moon wrote: Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

Well considering that Cameron was prepared to fire cruise missiles into Syria in the belief that he would be helping the people of Syria to escape from the violence of the Assad regime I think he really needs to consider another way to help them by participating in the international efforts to help end the suffering of at least some of them.

Surely the decent thing to do in the circumstances.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:08 am

Irn Bru wrote:
Warren Moon wrote: Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

Well considering that Cameron was prepared to fire cruise missiles into Syria in the belief that he would be helping the people of Syria to escape from the violence of the Assad regime I think he really needs to consider another way to help them by participating in the international efforts to help end the suffering of at least some of them.

Surely the decent thing to do in the circumstances.

I can remember Dean getting so uppity, that we didn't get involved in that conflict. ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/:

I would suggest, that he wouldn't have given a flying shit, had he not been living in Mersin (Turkey)

Rolling Eyes

by Irn Bru Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:11 am

Catman wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Warren Moon wrote: Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

Well considering that Cameron was prepared to fire cruise missiles into Syria in the belief that he would be helping the people of Syria to escape from the violence of the Assad regime I think he really needs to consider another way to help them by participating in the international efforts to help end the suffering of at least some of them.

Surely the decent thing to do in the circumstances.

I can remember Dean getting so uppity, that we didn't get involved in that conflict. ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/:

I would suggest, that he wouldn't have given a flying shit, had he not been living in Mersin (Turkey)

Well if he was so committed to helping the people of Syria then I take it that he has no problem welcoming them to the safety of Mersin or even here in the UK.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:11 am

...Can't understand his distain towards the poor, when he lives on a poor estate in Mersin, and relies on the money that he receives from his ex council house here in London, to keep things running over there!

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:14 am

Irn Bru wrote:
Catman wrote:

I can remember Dean getting so uppity, that we didn't get involved in that conflict. ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/:

I would suggest, that he wouldn't have given a flying shit, had he not been living in Mersin (Turkey)

Well if he was so committed to helping the people of Syria then I take it that he has no problem welcoming them to the safety of Mersin or even here in the UK.

Well, no!

://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/:

..As long as that aren't in his manor!

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:21 am

Why is this tiny island always helping others when it needs to help its own people; the people who were flooded for one thing.

Let Switzerland, Austria, Sweeden, Norway, Chad, DCR, China, South Korea, Italy, France, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Poland, Spain, Portugal and many more take them.

The last thing GB needs is more Muslims living here.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:41 am

Catman wrote:...Can't understand his distain towards the poor, when he lives on a poor estate in Mersin, and relies on the money that he receives from his ex council house here in London, to keep things running over there!

Says the man living at the expense of the taxpayer in a Housing Association flat, who owns property in Spain!!!

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:03 am

Tess. wrote:
Catman wrote:...Can't understand his distain towards the poor, when he lives on a poor estate in Mersin, and relies on the money that he receives from his ex council house here in London, to keep things running over there!
Says the man living at the expense of the taxpayer in a Housing Association flat, who owns property in Spain!!!

No he doesn't, it is a family owned property, that has a sitting tenant, that because of will complications they haven't been allowed to sell for five years.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:06 am

Syrian refugees have been literally freezing to death in Lebanon etc, who have been trying to do their best for them, after they have been bombed, gassed and tortured. If we can't show a bit of humanity to a few, then there is something seriously wrong with us.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:11 am

Sassy wrote:
Tess. wrote:
Says the man living at the expense of the taxpayer in a Housing Association flat, who owns property in Spain!!!

No he doesn't, it is a family owned property, that has a sitting tenant, that because of will complications they haven't been allowed to sell for five years.

Sitting tenant? Is it a squatter, or were they let in?

Isn't it strange - those who receive benefits and are complaining about cuts want to let more foreigners in - that doesn't make sense at all.

Those who are teaching to those on benefits that we need to be more frugal know that we can't take more foreigners in - that makes perfect sense.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:13 am

You would have been someone who turned the jews away during the war. And don't say it's different, it isn't. Millions of Syrians, millions, are dying and are refugees. Doctors, dentists, accountants, shopkeepers, makes not difference what they are, they are having to flee from literal hell.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:15 am

Sassy wrote:You would have been someone who turned the jews away during the war.

No, i'd have been in the bunker with Eva, surely?

Twisted Evil

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:16 am

I think maybe you would have been in Eva's place.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:17 am

Sassy wrote:I think maybe you would have been in Eva's place.

lol

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:23 am

Sassy wrote:
Tess. wrote:
Says the man living at the expense of the taxpayer in a Housing Association flat, who owns property in Spain!!!

No he doesn't, it is a family owned property, that has a sitting tenant, that because of will complications they haven't been allowed to sell for five years.

Sorry, thought he said on here his brother's been living in it. I did probate for quite a few years - why couldn't they sell it for five years? Anyway never mind, none of my business. But he is living in a HA property so it's a bit rich to slag off someone else for doing the same don't you think?

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:37 am

Tess. wrote:
Sassy wrote:

No he doesn't, it is a family owned property, that has a sitting tenant, that because of will complications they haven't been allowed to sell for five years.
Sorry, thought he said on here his brother's been living in it. I did probate for quite a few years - why couldn't they sell it for five years? Anyway never mind, none of my business. But he is living in a HA property so it's a bit rich to slag off someone else for doing the same don't you think?

Not when they hold the views that Dean does lol

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:15 am

Sassy wrote:You would have been someone who turned the jews away during the war. And don't say it's different, it isn't. Millions of Syrians, millions, are dying and are refugees. Doctors, dentists, accountants, shopkeepers, makes not difference what they are, they are having to flee from literal hell.

Us Jews do not go around with explosives strapped to us trying to kill anyone that upsets us, a Big difference. When someone throws insults at the Torah or our God... we don't put a bounty on their head. Let Saudi Arabia show how benevolent Islam is to its fellow Muslims from Syria.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:22 am

Warren Moon wrote:
Sassy wrote:You would have been someone who turned the jews away during the war. And don't say it's different, it isn't. Millions of Syrians, millions, are dying and are refugees. Doctors, dentists, accountants, shopkeepers, makes not difference what they are, they are having to flee from literal hell.

Us Jews do not go around with explosives strapped to us trying to kill anyone that upsets us, a Big difference. When someone throws insults at the Torah or our God... we don't put a bounty on their head. Let Saudi Arabia show how benevolent Islam is to its fellow Muslims from Syria.

You have obviously forgotten the King David Hotel. And these people are blowing up no-one, they are the ones being blown up and gassed. Now, if you are jewish, surely you would have compassion for women and children being gassed?

Despite the lack of prospects for a short-term resolution of the situation, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon have demonstrated great generosity in welcoming the Syrian refugees and assisting them.

However, the ramifications of the Syria crisis are being felt even further away in a region where protection remains fragile at best. Indeed, the Syria situation has drawn attention away from other protracted or worsening situations, such as Yemen and Iraq. As such, in 2014 international support and burden-sharing will be essential not only to sustain assistance to those displaced by the Syria conflict but also to ensure protection and assistance for all people of concern in other States in the region.
| Response |
Strategies

The Syria displacement grew at an alarming rate in 2013, with close to 2 million refugees fleeing the country, chiefly to Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. Within the country, there were more than 6.8 million people in need of humanitarian assistance, including at least 4.25 million internally displaced people (IDPs). UNHCR will focus on maintaining the protection space in host countries through increased burden-sharing, including resettlement and humanitarian admissions, and by working with development actors to offset the impact of the refugee influx on national infrastructure and host communities.

In responding to needs of Syrian refugees and IDPs alike, coordination will be central to addressing potential protection and assistance gaps.

In this context, the Gulf countries will play a central role, not only in their hospitality to Syrian refugees on their soil, but in terms of advocacy and resource mobilization efforts, in line with their growing engagement in international humanitarian endeavours. UNHCR will maintain its momentum in building partnerships with a range of actors, including the Gulf Cooperation Council, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the League of Arab States.

In the subregion as a whole, the Office will advocate for the principle of non-refoulement, accessible and favourable asylum space, and durable solutions. Particular attention will also be paid to internal displacement situations in Yemen and Iraq, where political and security developments could jeopardize favourable national policies on displaced populations. In Iraq in particular, a key priority will remain the return and reintegration of IDPs and refugees.

http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e486976.html

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:23 am

No, they want to rid the world of us just like Hitler did. Just leave us alone.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:24 am

Warren Moon wrote:No, they want to rid the world of us just like Hitler did. Just leave us alone.

If they wanted to do that, they would have done it a long time ago, there are enough of them. Don't talk rot.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:28 am

I'm not talking rot.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:12 pm

With the billions of muslims there are in the world, if that was their intention they would have done it by now, so sorry Keith, you are talking rot.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:25 pm

No, Jewish people can never let the persecution ever happen again. They would rather take everybody out then go through another holocaust.

They've done it again! G82

They've done it again! Mass_Grave_3_at_Bergen-Belsen_concentration_camp

A fair few Muslims want this kind of thing to happen again. It will not!

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:30 pm

No they don't, and they have been the ones in concentration camps recently. Bosnia.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:32 pm

Okay, stay brainwashed.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:33 pm

No Keith, you are the one who is brainwashed.

by nicko Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:35 pm

didn't the British army save a lot of muslim lives there?

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:43 pm

As part of the United Nations force, they certainly did, and the Bosnians are very grateful, and prosecutions have been brought for genocide against them.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:53 pm

Anyone for a cuppa and a slice of cake?

by Fred Moletrousers Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:04 pm

Sassy wrote:
Warren Moon wrote:No, they want to rid the world of us just like Hitler did. Just leave us alone.

If they wanted to do that, they would have done it a long time ago, there are enough of them. Don't talk rot.

If you had ever witnessed at first hand the awesome military capabilities of the Israeli Defence Forces, as I have, you would realise just why they hadn't "done it a long time ago" Sassy.

And the declared ultimate objective of a number of Arab states to "push the Israelis into the sea..." has remained in effect since May 14th 1948.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:07 pm

Fred Moletrousers wrote:
Sassy wrote:

If they wanted to do that, they would have done it a long time ago, there are enough of them. Don't talk rot.

If you had ever witnessed at first hand the awesome military capabilities of the Israeli Defence Forces, as I have, you would realise just why they hadn't "done it a long time ago" Sassy.

And the declared ultimate objective of a number of Arab states to "push the Israelis into the sea..." has remained in effect since May 14th 1948.

It is a very good point, the Israeli's have the capability to wipe out all its neighbours and never have, which if we are to believe was there intention when opportunity has actually presented itself with conflicts, why they never have, of which is never explained.
It shows arguments from both sides are based on emotions and not any common sense me Lord

by Clarkson Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:09 pm

Catman wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

It doesn't matter if you are driven in a nice secure car through the cesspit streets and don't have to communicate to anybody.

They do not have to stand next to East Europeans in a factory all day.

They don't have to shop in a busy Tesco's and only hear Eastern European voices.

Don't have to struggle to speak to a foreign bus driver, force their point across to African sounding nurses and doctors.

They won't get bumped to the bottom of the housing list.

They won't have their benefits reduced in order to pay for more refugees.

The one time Brown had to speak to his adoring supporters we learned what he really thought.

The only sort of economic recovery, is only being seen, in the SE of England.

That's strange up north its pretty good as well.

Things would boom where you are if you got of your arse and did some work!!!

by Clarkson Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:10 pm

Sassy wrote:No Keith, you are the one who is brainwashed.

Keith to be brainwashed one has to have a brain.

Sassy doesn't wash and has no brain she's a lefty for goodness sake.

by Beekeeper Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:24 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Warren Moon wrote:
Just seen the news and Clegg has said that Britain will take lots of Syrian refugees. Does this man not understand that we are full and social resources are pushed to the limit?

It doesn't matter if you are driven in a nice secure car through the cesspit streets and don't have to communicate to anybody.

They do not have to stand next to East Europeans in a factory all day.

............................

WHEN did you ever work in a factory situation, L'ilAndy ???

WHETHER next to East, West, Southern or Northern Europeans ?? Or not..

I DOUBT that you would even know which end of a factory the workers go in, 'Andy !

://?roflmao?/:

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:02 pm

Fred Moletrousers wrote:
Sassy wrote:

If they wanted to do that, they would have done it a long time ago, there are enough of them. Don't talk rot.

If you had ever witnessed at first hand the awesome military capabilities of the Israeli Defence Forces, as I have, you would realise just why they hadn't "done it a long time ago" Sassy.

And the declared ultimate objective of a number of Arab states to "push the Israelis into the sea..." has remained in effect since May 14th 1948.

Except Keith was talking about muslims wanting to wipe out all none muslims, not Jews. The latest people to talk about pushing the other side into the sea is Israel, and Yasser Arrafat recognised them a long time ago and accepted their right to existence in 1993 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization). Of course Israel has a strong army, the amount of money the USA gives them for it.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:30 pm

Sassy wrote:
Fred Moletrousers wrote:

If you had ever witnessed at first hand the awesome military capabilities of the Israeli Defence Forces, as I have, you would realise just why they hadn't "done it a long time ago" Sassy.

And the declared ultimate objective of a number of Arab states to "push the Israelis into the sea..." has remained in effect since May 14th 1948.

Except Keith was talking about muslims wanting to wipe out all none muslims, not Jews. The latest people to talk about pushing the other side into the sea is Israel, and Yasser Arrafat recognised them a long time ago and accepted their right to existence in 1993 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization). Of course Israel has a strong army, the amount of money the USA gives them for it.

They have the ability to do so though, something that escapes you, they always have had, so why has this not happened?

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:34 pm

If the rest of the world looked the other way - they'd both do it to the other.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:46 pm

Going back to the topic .... Britain has done its share of charity and goodwill over the years, its time for about 20 years break. No more asylum seekers, refugees, immigrants or even visits from aliens!

Let North Korea, Chad, Sudan, Brazil, Ecuador and other countries take over such duties.

by Original Quill Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:04 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Sassy wrote:

No he doesn't, it is a family owned property, that has a sitting tenant, that because of will complications they haven't been allowed to sell for five years.

Sitting tenant? Is it a squatter, or were they let in?

Isn't it strange - those who receive benefits and are complaining about cuts want to let more foreigners in - that doesn't make sense at all.

Those who are teaching to those on benefits that we need to be more frugal know that we can't take more foreigners in - that makes perfect sense.

You guys fault me for discussing the personal affairs of others?? Phil's entitled to his privacy. Knock it off.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:09 pm

Original Quill wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Sitting tenant? Is it a squatter, or were they let in?

Isn't it strange - those who receive benefits and are complaining about cuts want to let more foreigners in - that doesn't make sense at all.

Those who are teaching to those on benefits that we need to be more frugal know that we can't take more foreigners in - that makes perfect sense.

You guys fault me for discussing the personal affairs of others?? Phil's entitled to his privacy. Knock it off.

Shut the fuck up, Phil's a mate and talks about it openly.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:11 pm

Original Quill wrote:
BigAndy9 wrote:

Sitting tenant? Is it a squatter, or were they let in?

Isn't it strange - those who receive benefits and are complaining about cuts want to let more foreigners in - that doesn't make sense at all.

Those who are teaching to those on benefits that we need to be more frugal know that we can't take more foreigners in - that makes perfect sense.

You guys fault me for discussing the personal affairs of others?? Phil's entitled to his privacy. Knock it off.

I'm glad you've brought that up - the other thread got locked before I could reply.

I don't want to know the real names of people on here Quill, it puts them and myself at risk.

I don't care if they are somewhere else on the internet - just concentrate on the topics here and if you have any interests bring them up.

I'm sure we are all on the internet somewhere - facefvck, instagram, myshare, but I believe it should be up to the person what happens with their information (and GCHQ and the NSA if they want), not you.

Goodnight all - Celeb Big Bro final tonight!!!!!!

by Original Quill Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:21 pm

Sassy wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

You guys fault me for discussing the personal affairs of others?? Phil's entitled to his privacy. Knock it off.

Shut the fuck up, Phil's a mate and talks about it openly.

Choked on that on, eh? You use your mouth much more than your brains, sassy.

by Original Quill Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:29 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Original Quill wrote:

You guys fault me for discussing the personal affairs of others?? Phil's entitled to his privacy. Knock it off.

I'm glad you've brought that up - the other thread got locked before I could reply.

Nor I.

BigAndy9 wrote:I don't want to know the real names of people on here Quill, it puts them and myself at risk.

I don't care if they are somewhere else on the internet - just concentrate on the topics here and if you have any interests bring them up.

Who the fuck cares what you want, andy? It was a game that Stephen started, and so I responded in kind. My point was, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Obviously, he got the point. He didn't wait around to offer any rebuttal. You didn't see him again on SF, nor here. As Bee has pointed out, the guy knew what he had done wrong.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:33 pm

Why should I have choked on it? Your buzz is not worse than a fly.

However, you obviously didn't like what Andy put.

And I thought you were saying that it was the wrong Stephen, so you hadn't done anything. Going back to the original, and saying it was the right Stephen now?

Stephen had done nothing wrong, and you are an idiot. I know why he is not here, he pm'd me when he joined.

by Original Quill Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:39 pm

Sassy wrote:Why should I have choked on it? Your buzz is not worse than a fly.

However, you obviously didn't like what Andy put.

And I thought you were saying that it was the wrong Stephen, so you hadn't done anything. Going back to the original, and saying it was the right Stephen now?

Stephen had done nothing wrong, and you are an idiot. I know why he is not here, he pm'd me when he joined.

Frankly, I was delighted when andy responded. It gave me a chance to say what I was going to say.

Riiiiight......Stephen was as innocent as the new driven snow? Spoken like a crony of his...my point on what was wrong with SF. Cronyism.

As for the information on who Stephen was, you completely misunderstood. I said he was the right Stephen, and my proof is that Vic went ahead with the ban. If he hadn't been the right Stephen, Vic would not have responded. No harm, no foul.

It's the logical dilemma you are caught in.

by Guest Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:46 pm

Original Quill wrote:
Sassy wrote:Why should I have choked on it? Your buzz is not worse than a fly.

However, you obviously didn't like what Andy put.

And I thought you were saying that it was the wrong Stephen, so you hadn't done anything. Going back to the original, and saying it was the right Stephen now?

Stephen had done nothing wrong, and you are an idiot. I know why he is not here, he pm'd me when he joined.

Frankly, I was delighted when andy responded. It gave me a chance to say what I was going to say.

Riiiiight......Stephen was as innocent as the new driven snow? Spoken like a crony of his...my point on what was wrong with SF. Cronyism.

As for the information, you completely misunderstood. I said he was the right Stephen, and my proof is that Vic went ahead. If he hadn't been the right Stephen, Vic would not have responded. No harm, no foul.

It's the logical dilemma you are caught in.

You really aren't a very good lawyer are you? The fact that you believed it was the right Stephen is why Victor banned you. And Stephen is as white as the driven snow, but you keep deluding yourself that he is the Stephen you were talking about, because if you get through your thick head that he wasn't, you look like the total tit you are.

by Sponsored content