Home
Gallery
Search
Register
Log in
About Us & RulesAmerica's first nation
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:26 am
In the absence of a European democratic model, the Founding Fathers turned to the apparently perfect state of the Iroquois Five Nations as a template for a federal United States, combining the best of both worlds, writes C.K. Ballatore.
Benjamin Franklin’s saying, ‘We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall hang separately’, seems more pertinent than ever. It is not widely known, however, that the advice originally came from the Mohawk Chief Canassatego, who, in the early 1740s, told Franklin to unify the colonies, counselling:
Our wise forefathers established union and amity between the Five Nations. This has made us formidable; this has given us great weight and authority with our neighbouring nations. We are a powerful confederacy; and by your observing the same methods our wise forefathers have taken you will acquire such strength and power. Therefore, whatever befalls you, never fall out with one another.
Arguably, federalism has been the Unites States’ foremost political contribution. The pattern of states within a nation held together not by clannishness or geography but by shared values mimics the structure of the Iroquois Confederacy. Since most of the colonies had more contact and trade with the Indians than they did with one another, the Iroquois preference for local government made sense.
The Iroquois Confederacy was the only living, breathing democracy the founders had witnessed when the time came to declare independence and, later, cobble together the Constitution when the Articles of Confederation were found wanting. Although Franklin and Jefferson were acquainted with the ideas of Locke and Rousseau, there were no current examples in Europe of democracy in action. In contrast, early colonists imagined that the American Indians lived in a perfect state of nature and were somehow descended from the Ancient Romans. As early as 1580, Michel de Montaigne wrote admiringly of the natives of the New World in his essay, On Cannibals:
I do not find that there is anything barbaric or savage about this nation, according to what I’ve been told, unless we are to call barbarism whatever differs from our own customs. Indeed, we seem to have no other standard of truth and reason than the opinions and customs of our own country. There at home is always the perfect religion, the perfect legal system – the perfect and most accomplished way of doing everything. These people are wild in the same sense that fruits are, produced by nature, alone, in her ordinary way. Indeed, in that land, it is we who refuse to alter our artificial ways and reject the common order that ought rather to be called wild, or savage. In them the most natural virtues and abilities are alive and vigorous, whereas we have bastardised them and adopted them solely to our corrupt taste. Even so, the flavour and delicacy of some of the wild fruits from those countries is excellent, even to our taste, better than our cultivated ones. After all, it would hardly be reason-able that artificial breeding should be able to outdo our great and powerful mother, Nature. We have so burdened the beauty and richness of her works by our innovations that we have entirely stifled her. Yet whenever she shines forth in her purity she puts our vain and frivolous enterprises amazingly to shame.
Later, in the late 1600s, the first colonial historian of the Indians, Cadwallader Colden, wrote that without ‘Men of experience among the Five Nations to advise and direct them on all emergencies of importance’, the British colonists would be sunk. Colden even attributed French dominance in early colonial America to their ties with the Five Nations.
By the mid-1700s, this sense of respect and curiosity filtered down to the Founding Fathers, many of whom studied Colden’s work. During this time, Franklin, Conrad Weiser, Thomas Paine, William Johnson, James Madison and John Adams all visited the Iroquois for extended periods to study their government and organisation. The Indians’ proximity to the eastern colonies enabled these frequent visits. Adams even included a survey of Iroquois government in his Defence of the Constitutions of the United States, published on the eve of the Constitutional Convention, in which he favourably compared the unicameral governing body of the United States to that of the Five Nations.
The colonists’ first attempt to organise as a cohesive state was at the Albany Conference in 1754, where representatives from each of the colonies attended, as well as many Iroquois Indians, including the Mohawk chief Canassatego. Franklin named the organising body the Grand Council, after the Grand Council of the Iroquois.
In the Iroquois tradition, the Grand Council does not interfere with local tribal matters. Each tribe has its own ‘constitution’ that governs the laws of their land, independent of the other tribes. In addition, they convene regularly with the other tribes to discuss matters that affect all of them, especially the decision to wage war. Otherwise, each tribe’s and each individual’s autonomy is recognised and respected as long as it does not hurt another. Franklin greatly admired this system of government and chastised the other colonists when they failed to cohere:
It would be a very strange thing if six nations of ignorant savages should be capable of forming a scheme for such an Union and be able to execute it in such a manner, as that it has subsisted Ages, and appears indissoluble, and yet a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a dozen English colonies.
The notion of personal freedom and liberty also descended from the Iroquois and, most notably, from the Mohawks, who had the most contact with the British colonists. Many colonists, in keeping with Montaigne, saw the Indian way of life as a ‘recapitulation of Eden’. When the founders tried to capture this in the laws of the New World, they aimed at describing a way of life akin to a state of nature, as they observed in the Indians. Hence, Jefferson replaced the right of property that was safeguarded in European constitutions with the right to happiness.
While the Magna Carta also treated the question of inalienable rights (in a more limited way), the last thing Jefferson and the other founders wanted was an imitation of the world from which they had escaped. They did not want to go back to the European way of life, but to form a new society that was neither civilised nor savage.
To Jefferson, the key to that difference was the notion of property versus the notion of happiness. If happiness is defined by the freedom from tyranny and want, then these two ideas are in direct opposition. It is the accumulation beyond what one needs that is the main impediment to liberty for all. This idea was derived from Locke, as well as from the colonists’ direct experience with the Indians. In contrast to European societies, the Iroquois culture was one based on the natural aristocracy of merit, rather than inherited wealth or religion. More important considerations were how well a man speaks, whether he is a good person or whether he can hunt with mercy and accuracy. The sachems, or chiefs, were public servants and, as such, they were supposed to be poorer and more stoic than the rest of the tribe. Indian ‘kings’ never looked toward their own interests before the public good and took great pains not to become angry when criticised. To appoint a merchant in charge of public affairs would be scandalous, not only because of the conflict of interest, but because merchants were known to lie as part of their trade. Hence, the Articles of Confederation prohibited public servants from receiving even a modest salary.
The restraint on public servants was reinforced by the Iroquois system of checks and balances. For example, all the sachems were men; but they were selected by the Clan Mothers. (Sadly, the social and spiritual equity of men and women among the Iroquois was not echoed by the American founders.)
Moreover, though the tribes, like the colonies, were of varying sizes and thereby smaller or larger presences at the Grand Council, each tribe only had two votes. In this way, the smaller tribes were protected. The American founders adopted a similar paradigm both in Congress and via the electoral college. The Council was a unicameral body, similar to what was proposed at Albany and in the Articles of Confederation by the original founders.
At the Council, each tribe had a role. The Iroquois Confederacy was made up of Five Nations, originally: the Mohawks, the Senecas, the Oneidas, the Cayugas and the Onandagas; later a sixth Nation, the Tuscaroras, was added. First, the Mohawks convened and divided into three parties: two to discuss and one to listen for errors. The matter was then referred to the Seneca statesmen (older brothers) to consider. On the opposite side of the longhouse, the Cayuga and Oneida statesmen (younger brothers) listened, then contributed and voted. Unlike the British Parliament, and later like the US Congress, there was no interrupting speakers. For final consideration, the matter would be referred to the Onandagas (the firekeepers). If there was a tie, the Onandagas would break it. It was a system which relied on the consent of the governed and it was the first of its kind that the founders had witnessed.
In Iroquois culture, no man has the right to rule another. Instead, the tribes are governed by the Great Law of Peace for the wellbeing of everyone. Public opinion and approval were required of any large undertaking. If a sachem acted out of accordance with the public good, there was a process by which he was impeached. This was rare, however, and overall the smaller local governments were less vulnerable to corruption because of their size and autonomy. This also appealed to Jefferson, who believed that through the freedom of press the people would be kept informed regarding their affairs. He wrote, in 1787:
The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, our very first object should be to keep that right, and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter ... I am convinced that those [Indian] societies who live without government enjoy in their general mass an infinitely greater degree of happiness than those who live under European governments.
When the colonists landed, they did not find a vast empty frontier in the New World, but an ancient civilisation spread out across North America. It is clear that the Indians represented freedom in the colonists’ minds; in several instances, the colonists expressed their discontent with British rule, most notably the Whiskey Rebellion and the Boston Tea Party, by dressing like Indians. Native American names and imagery dot the United States’ history.
More than any other nation, the US was formed on ideas: the commitment to representative democracy, checks and balances, the notion of freedom and natural rights, the value of public opinion and consent and the sovereignty of the people all derive from Native traditions. Even the language of Franklin’s final speech to the Constitutional Convention, titled ‘A Rising, Not a Setting Sun’, echoes the legend of Hiawatha and the influence of Iroquois ideals and beliefs.
After the Declaration of Independence, the founders scrambled to form a government and looked primarily to the Five Nations for positive examples. Franklin attested:
Happiness is more generally and equally diffused among Savages than in civilized societies. No European who has tasted savage life can afterwards bear to live in our societies.
The idea was to incorporate the best of both worlds, at least until the Constitution was revised some 20 years later. It has already lasted far longer and it will be interesting to see how long it survives.
C.K. Ballatore is a screenwriter based in Los Angeles. She is currently working on a book about disaster relief in Pakistan.
http://www.historytoday.com/c-k-ballatore/americas-first-nation
Benjamin Franklin’s saying, ‘We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall hang separately’, seems more pertinent than ever. It is not widely known, however, that the advice originally came from the Mohawk Chief Canassatego, who, in the early 1740s, told Franklin to unify the colonies, counselling:
Our wise forefathers established union and amity between the Five Nations. This has made us formidable; this has given us great weight and authority with our neighbouring nations. We are a powerful confederacy; and by your observing the same methods our wise forefathers have taken you will acquire such strength and power. Therefore, whatever befalls you, never fall out with one another.
Arguably, federalism has been the Unites States’ foremost political contribution. The pattern of states within a nation held together not by clannishness or geography but by shared values mimics the structure of the Iroquois Confederacy. Since most of the colonies had more contact and trade with the Indians than they did with one another, the Iroquois preference for local government made sense.
The Iroquois Confederacy was the only living, breathing democracy the founders had witnessed when the time came to declare independence and, later, cobble together the Constitution when the Articles of Confederation were found wanting. Although Franklin and Jefferson were acquainted with the ideas of Locke and Rousseau, there were no current examples in Europe of democracy in action. In contrast, early colonists imagined that the American Indians lived in a perfect state of nature and were somehow descended from the Ancient Romans. As early as 1580, Michel de Montaigne wrote admiringly of the natives of the New World in his essay, On Cannibals:
I do not find that there is anything barbaric or savage about this nation, according to what I’ve been told, unless we are to call barbarism whatever differs from our own customs. Indeed, we seem to have no other standard of truth and reason than the opinions and customs of our own country. There at home is always the perfect religion, the perfect legal system – the perfect and most accomplished way of doing everything. These people are wild in the same sense that fruits are, produced by nature, alone, in her ordinary way. Indeed, in that land, it is we who refuse to alter our artificial ways and reject the common order that ought rather to be called wild, or savage. In them the most natural virtues and abilities are alive and vigorous, whereas we have bastardised them and adopted them solely to our corrupt taste. Even so, the flavour and delicacy of some of the wild fruits from those countries is excellent, even to our taste, better than our cultivated ones. After all, it would hardly be reason-able that artificial breeding should be able to outdo our great and powerful mother, Nature. We have so burdened the beauty and richness of her works by our innovations that we have entirely stifled her. Yet whenever she shines forth in her purity she puts our vain and frivolous enterprises amazingly to shame.
Later, in the late 1600s, the first colonial historian of the Indians, Cadwallader Colden, wrote that without ‘Men of experience among the Five Nations to advise and direct them on all emergencies of importance’, the British colonists would be sunk. Colden even attributed French dominance in early colonial America to their ties with the Five Nations.
Benjamin Franklin, portrait by David Martin, 1767. Ⓒ akg-images.
By the mid-1700s, this sense of respect and curiosity filtered down to the Founding Fathers, many of whom studied Colden’s work. During this time, Franklin, Conrad Weiser, Thomas Paine, William Johnson, James Madison and John Adams all visited the Iroquois for extended periods to study their government and organisation. The Indians’ proximity to the eastern colonies enabled these frequent visits. Adams even included a survey of Iroquois government in his Defence of the Constitutions of the United States, published on the eve of the Constitutional Convention, in which he favourably compared the unicameral governing body of the United States to that of the Five Nations.
The colonists’ first attempt to organise as a cohesive state was at the Albany Conference in 1754, where representatives from each of the colonies attended, as well as many Iroquois Indians, including the Mohawk chief Canassatego. Franklin named the organising body the Grand Council, after the Grand Council of the Iroquois.
In the Iroquois tradition, the Grand Council does not interfere with local tribal matters. Each tribe has its own ‘constitution’ that governs the laws of their land, independent of the other tribes. In addition, they convene regularly with the other tribes to discuss matters that affect all of them, especially the decision to wage war. Otherwise, each tribe’s and each individual’s autonomy is recognised and respected as long as it does not hurt another. Franklin greatly admired this system of government and chastised the other colonists when they failed to cohere:
It would be a very strange thing if six nations of ignorant savages should be capable of forming a scheme for such an Union and be able to execute it in such a manner, as that it has subsisted Ages, and appears indissoluble, and yet a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a dozen English colonies.
The notion of personal freedom and liberty also descended from the Iroquois and, most notably, from the Mohawks, who had the most contact with the British colonists. Many colonists, in keeping with Montaigne, saw the Indian way of life as a ‘recapitulation of Eden’. When the founders tried to capture this in the laws of the New World, they aimed at describing a way of life akin to a state of nature, as they observed in the Indians. Hence, Jefferson replaced the right of property that was safeguarded in European constitutions with the right to happiness.
While the Magna Carta also treated the question of inalienable rights (in a more limited way), the last thing Jefferson and the other founders wanted was an imitation of the world from which they had escaped. They did not want to go back to the European way of life, but to form a new society that was neither civilised nor savage.
To Jefferson, the key to that difference was the notion of property versus the notion of happiness. If happiness is defined by the freedom from tyranny and want, then these two ideas are in direct opposition. It is the accumulation beyond what one needs that is the main impediment to liberty for all. This idea was derived from Locke, as well as from the colonists’ direct experience with the Indians. In contrast to European societies, the Iroquois culture was one based on the natural aristocracy of merit, rather than inherited wealth or religion. More important considerations were how well a man speaks, whether he is a good person or whether he can hunt with mercy and accuracy. The sachems, or chiefs, were public servants and, as such, they were supposed to be poorer and more stoic than the rest of the tribe. Indian ‘kings’ never looked toward their own interests before the public good and took great pains not to become angry when criticised. To appoint a merchant in charge of public affairs would be scandalous, not only because of the conflict of interest, but because merchants were known to lie as part of their trade. Hence, the Articles of Confederation prohibited public servants from receiving even a modest salary.
The restraint on public servants was reinforced by the Iroquois system of checks and balances. For example, all the sachems were men; but they were selected by the Clan Mothers. (Sadly, the social and spiritual equity of men and women among the Iroquois was not echoed by the American founders.)
Moreover, though the tribes, like the colonies, were of varying sizes and thereby smaller or larger presences at the Grand Council, each tribe only had two votes. In this way, the smaller tribes were protected. The American founders adopted a similar paradigm both in Congress and via the electoral college. The Council was a unicameral body, similar to what was proposed at Albany and in the Articles of Confederation by the original founders.
At the Council, each tribe had a role. The Iroquois Confederacy was made up of Five Nations, originally: the Mohawks, the Senecas, the Oneidas, the Cayugas and the Onandagas; later a sixth Nation, the Tuscaroras, was added. First, the Mohawks convened and divided into three parties: two to discuss and one to listen for errors. The matter was then referred to the Seneca statesmen (older brothers) to consider. On the opposite side of the longhouse, the Cayuga and Oneida statesmen (younger brothers) listened, then contributed and voted. Unlike the British Parliament, and later like the US Congress, there was no interrupting speakers. For final consideration, the matter would be referred to the Onandagas (the firekeepers). If there was a tie, the Onandagas would break it. It was a system which relied on the consent of the governed and it was the first of its kind that the founders had witnessed.
In Iroquois culture, no man has the right to rule another. Instead, the tribes are governed by the Great Law of Peace for the wellbeing of everyone. Public opinion and approval were required of any large undertaking. If a sachem acted out of accordance with the public good, there was a process by which he was impeached. This was rare, however, and overall the smaller local governments were less vulnerable to corruption because of their size and autonomy. This also appealed to Jefferson, who believed that through the freedom of press the people would be kept informed regarding their affairs. He wrote, in 1787:
The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, our very first object should be to keep that right, and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter ... I am convinced that those [Indian] societies who live without government enjoy in their general mass an infinitely greater degree of happiness than those who live under European governments.
When the colonists landed, they did not find a vast empty frontier in the New World, but an ancient civilisation spread out across North America. It is clear that the Indians represented freedom in the colonists’ minds; in several instances, the colonists expressed their discontent with British rule, most notably the Whiskey Rebellion and the Boston Tea Party, by dressing like Indians. Native American names and imagery dot the United States’ history.
More than any other nation, the US was formed on ideas: the commitment to representative democracy, checks and balances, the notion of freedom and natural rights, the value of public opinion and consent and the sovereignty of the people all derive from Native traditions. Even the language of Franklin’s final speech to the Constitutional Convention, titled ‘A Rising, Not a Setting Sun’, echoes the legend of Hiawatha and the influence of Iroquois ideals and beliefs.
After the Declaration of Independence, the founders scrambled to form a government and looked primarily to the Five Nations for positive examples. Franklin attested:
Happiness is more generally and equally diffused among Savages than in civilized societies. No European who has tasted savage life can afterwards bear to live in our societies.
The idea was to incorporate the best of both worlds, at least until the Constitution was revised some 20 years later. It has already lasted far longer and it will be interesting to see how long it survives.
C.K. Ballatore is a screenwriter based in Los Angeles. She is currently working on a book about disaster relief in Pakistan.
http://www.historytoday.com/c-k-ballatore/americas-first-nation
Guest- Guest
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 5:46 pm
Glad you found both articles interesting Quill.
This though was something, I admit to having little knowledge on.
We often think of the ancient Greeks for the inheritance of democracy and yet here. American Federalism was burrowed from the Indigenous Iroquois.
Which makes the early US very detached from European Imperialism for the time.
This though was something, I admit to having little knowledge on.
We often think of the ancient Greeks for the inheritance of democracy and yet here. American Federalism was burrowed from the Indigenous Iroquois.
Which makes the early US very detached from European Imperialism for the time.
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by 'Wolfie Fri Mar 31, 2017 5:56 pm
Greece touting itself as "the home of democracy" is one of the biggest nationalistic/political wanks of the 20th century...
Indeed, Greece itself didn't experience genuine democracy until well into the last century, after millenia of rotating between oligarchies/monarchies, plutocracy and dictatorships..
'Wolfie- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 8189
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 66
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:01 pm
WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Greece touting itself as "the home of democracy" is one of the biggest nationalistic/political wanks of the 20th century...
Indeed, Greece itself didn't experience genuine democracy until well into the last century, after millenia of rotating between oligarchies/monarchies, plutocracy and dictatorships..
Nobody has experienced genuine Democracy in the history of humanity, so what an absurd view point to make.
It certainly was the birth place of democracy in Greece.
So Greece was the home of democracy, as it was invented there. As we see the first forms of democracy started in Greece.
Why do you always step in with revisionist history?
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by 'Wolfie Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:15 pm
Ancient Greece was a Plutocracy, not a democracy...
1. Women didn't have a vote;
therefore half the adult population wasn't included..
2. Men had to (a) have done military service, and (b) own property, to have the right to participate in their government;
thereby reducing their so-called democratic participation to only 25% of the adult population..
It's the Greeks partaking in "revisionist history" here, Doddery Thorin -- not me !!!
'Wolfie- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 8189
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 66
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:18 pm
WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
Ancient Greece was a Plutocracy, not a democracy...
1. Women didn't have a vote;
therefore half the adult population wasn't included..
2. Men had to (a) have done military service, and (b) own property, to have the right to participate in their government;
thereby reducing their so-called democratic participation to only 25% of the adult population..
It's the Greeks partaking in "revisionist history" here, Doddery Thorin -- not me !!!
PMSL
You are talking about Liberal values on equality.
Was Democracy invented in Greece, no matter how primitive?
Yes
So Greece is the home of Democracy
Show me any society that has true democracy?
ie, a nation that allows the people to vote on every issue?
Again you are spouting revisionist babble.
It may be a sexist and a poor form of democracy, but it still was a form of Democracy and invented there
Doh
And you need to grow up from using such pathetic immature names, when constantly shown up
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by 'Wolfie Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:21 pm
It's your alternative definitions here that are being "revisionist", Dodge...
Alongside your own unique definition of "racism"..
'Wolfie- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 8189
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 66
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:23 pm
WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
It's your alternative definitions here that are being "revisionist", Dodge...
Alongside your own unique definition of "racism"..
Its Thorin, not Dodge.
Why do you constantly lack the ability to be civil to posters?
So you fail to counter my view point and thus concede and now make further unfounded accusations around racism.
PMSL again
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by Original Quill Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:24 pm
Thorin wrote:Glad you found both articles interesting Quill.
This though was something, I admit to having little knowledge on.
We often think of the ancient Greeks for the inheritance of democracy and yet here. American Federalism was burrowed from the Indigenous Iroquois.
Which makes the early US very detached from European Imperialism for the time.
Yes, the two notions of democracy were arrived at by substantially different routes.
Ancient Greece was a face-to-face society that emphasized the corporate community. Modern democracy arose out of political atomism, or individualism, in the writings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, pacing the development of similar ideas of mechanism in the Renaissance. Galileo's resolutive compositive method was said to have profoundly influenced Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:26 pm
Original Quill wrote:Thorin wrote:Glad you found both articles interesting Quill.
This though was something, I admit to having little knowledge on.
We often think of the ancient Greeks for the inheritance of democracy and yet here. American Federalism was burrowed from the Indigenous Iroquois.
Which makes the early US very detached from European Imperialism for the time.
Yes, the two notions of democracy were arrived at by substantially different routes.
Ancient Greece was a face-to-face society that emphasized the corporate community. Modern democracy arose out of political atomism, or individualism, in the writings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, pacing the development of similar ideas of mechanism in the Renaissance. Galileo's resolutive compositive method was said to have profoundly influenced Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan.
So you agree that Democracy though was invented in Greece, no matter how primitive?.
You would also agree, there has never been genuine or true democracy within human history?
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by Original Quill Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:53 pm
Thorin wrote:Original Quill wrote:
Yes, the two notions of democracy were arrived at by substantially different routes.
Ancient Greece was a face-to-face society that emphasized the corporate community. Modern democracy arose out of political atomism, or individualism, in the writings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, pacing the development of similar ideas of mechanism in the Renaissance. Galileo's resolutive compositive method was said to have profoundly influenced Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan.
So you agree that Democracy though was invented in Greece, no matter how primitive?.
You would also agree, there has never been genuine or true democracy within human history?
I do agree that ancient Athens was one of the best organizations of democracy, then or now. But they would be horrified by how modern democracy has arrived at its point. Whereas the ancient Greeks stressed the corporateness of the community, modern democracy stresses the apartness of it's component parts. Our emphasis of the individual over the collectivity of the population is the polar opposite of what the Greeks had in mind. It is because the Renaissance was about notions of cause and effect and component analysis over wholism.
Terms like democracy, oligarchy, monarchy and aristocracy have never existed in pure form. They are a part of Aristotle's definitional schemata, and remember that Aristotle was taught by Plato. The latter taught that forms exist every bit much as tangible reality.
Even the terms themselves break down into sub-types, such as republicanism versus pure democracy, or monarchy and constitutional monarchy. And, later additions, such as social theory, socialism and communism, confound the problem.
Definitions are useful in describing tendencies, but if you are talking about categories and archetypes...well it's rare if ever. That's why we have so much argument over whether Nazism was LW or RW...they are just archetypes. We are arguing over definitions.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 7:00 pm
But Democracy in its true form still does not exist today Quill, though I do agree with your points.
Interestingly enough, we see the first early forms of equality for women in an oligarchy society. That of the Spartans and Celts.
I mean Spartan women could own land, have voices to speak openly. Its of course not actual equality, but the Celts certainly hold a very strong claim, to having near women equality, centuries ahead of everyone else. Women could even lead and rule in Celtic cultures.
The point is though, we do owe much to the Greeks, in their experimentation's of Government. Whether for right or wrong.
Interestingly enough, we see the first early forms of equality for women in an oligarchy society. That of the Spartans and Celts.
I mean Spartan women could own land, have voices to speak openly. Its of course not actual equality, but the Celts certainly hold a very strong claim, to having near women equality, centuries ahead of everyone else. Women could even lead and rule in Celtic cultures.
The point is though, we do owe much to the Greeks, in their experimentation's of Government. Whether for right or wrong.
Last edited by Thorin on Fri Mar 31, 2017 7:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Fri Mar 31, 2017 7:16 pm
Original Quill wrote:Makes me proud to be a Celt.
Ditto
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by veya_victaous Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:49 am
Democracy is older than Greece
Some Aboriginals had Systems far More Democratic than Ancient Greece 10000 plus years earlier
they never had monarchy. it 's Fair to Suggest many Pre histroic Societies had essentially Democratic Systems
Pure Eurocentric nonsense that 'Majority Rules ' was Invented in Greece
Some Aboriginals had Systems far More Democratic than Ancient Greece 10000 plus years earlier
they never had monarchy. it 's Fair to Suggest many Pre histroic Societies had essentially Democratic Systems
Pure Eurocentric nonsense that 'Majority Rules ' was Invented in Greece
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: America's first nation
by Ben Reilly Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:58 pm
It's always seemed to me that though democracy means rule by the people, society quite separately decides who gets to be a person.
Ben Reilly- King of Texas. Gigantic Killer Robot. Robin Hood of Epping Forest. Fifty Shades of Cray.
- Posts : 30682
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 49
Location : West Essex -
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:00 pm
veya_victaous wrote:Democracy is older than Greece
Some Aboriginals had Systems far More Democratic than Ancient Greece 10000 plus years earlier
they never had monarchy. it 's Fair to Suggest many Pre histroic Societies had essentially Democratic Systems
Pure Eurocentric nonsense that 'Majority Rules ' was Invented in Greece
Gibberish
Put up the evidence
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:02 pm
Ben Reilly wrote:It's always seemed to me that though democracy means rule by the people, society quite separately decides who gets to be a person.
Interesting view point, but is not then anarchy what you advocate?
Until humans learn not to be takers, we need some law and order
I wish for a free world, but humans have not evolved far enough, to stop being selfish
Guest- Guest
Re: America's first nation
by veya_victaous Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:13 am
Thorin wrote:Ben Reilly wrote:It's always seemed to me that though democracy means rule by the people, society quite separately decides who gets to be a person.
Interesting view point, but is not then anarchy what you advocate?
Until humans learn not to be takers, we need some law and order
I wish for a free world, but humans have not evolved far enough, to stop being selfish
And you just said it
Aboriginals where not takers
they had tribal councils
which for many aboriginals nations where ruled by majority vote
They didn't write
so now like the racist Eurocentric you are, you deny the fact that they had democratic values 10,000 plus years before a Greek put it in writing
Cause typically you cant accept any version of history other than the European's one
Majority rules is not a difficult concept, if you don't have monarchies then it is the obvious means of governance.
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: America's first nation
by Guest Sun Apr 02, 2017 3:11 am
veya_victaous wrote:Thorin wrote:
Interesting view point, but is not then anarchy what you advocate?
Until humans learn not to be takers, we need some law and order
I wish for a free world, but humans have not evolved far enough, to stop being selfish
And you just said it
Aboriginals where not takers
they had tribal councils
which for many aboriginals nations where ruled by majority vote
They didn't write
so now like the racist Eurocentric you are, you deny the fact that they had democratic values 10,000 plus years before a Greek put it in writing
Cause typically you cant accept any version of history other than the European's one
Majority rules is not a difficult concept, if you don't have monarchies then it is the obvious means of governance.
So you have just provided me with an example of an oligarchy society
Doh
Guest- Guest
Similar topics» The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly far Right but Brussels and the Remainers just wont talk about it
» Are Americas turning on each other?
» 'Little Ice Age' which froze the River Thames caused by Americas genocide, study finds
» Americas version of our UAF thugs
» Protests show 'two Americas' — those who lost their jobs and those still getting paid
» Are Americas turning on each other?
» 'Little Ice Age' which froze the River Thames caused by Americas genocide, study finds
» Americas version of our UAF thugs
» Protests show 'two Americas' — those who lost their jobs and those still getting paid
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
» Interesting COVID figures
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
» Quill
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
» PHEW.
» And here's some more enrichment...
» John F Kennedy Assassination
» Where is everyone lately...?
» London violence over the weekend...
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...